Top TV anchor says cover-up of Biden's decline ‘worse than Watergate'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE cover-up of Joe Biden's ailing health could be a bigger scandal that Watergate, the author of a bombshell new book on the former president's cognitive decline has claimed.
CNN host Jake Tapper co-wrote Original Sin, an excoriating account of Biden's deterioration - and efforts by those around him to conceal it from the public's view.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
The CNN anchor said the cover-up of Biden's health 'maybe even worse than Watergate in some ways'
3
Former United States President Joe Biden speaks at the Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled (ACRD) conference on April 15, 2025
Credit: Splash
3
The stunning claim came on an interview with Piers Morgan
Biden's physical and mental decline were a constant source of speculation throughout his time as president, which culminated in him dropping out of the 2024 election after a disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump.
But Tapper made a jaw-dropping remark when challenged on his book's conclusion in an interview with Piers Morgan on Monday.
Quoting from the book, Morgan said: "Joe Biden is not Richard Nixon, and the hiding and cover-up of his deterioration is not Watergate."
He added: "I am not entirely sure I agree, Jake, with that conclusion."
But in a stunning moment, the CNN anchor said the cover-up of Biden's health "maybe even worse than Watergate in some ways".
"Because Richard Nixon was in control of his faculties when he was not drinking," he clarified.
He said that while he sees the Biden cover-up as an "entirely separate scandal" from Watergate, he still considers it a "a scandal" nonetheless.
Tapper added the book was not "mean to exonerate" Biden in its conclusion that this scandal was "not Watergate".
"The only reason that we have the Watergate thing in there is because we quote Archibald Cox, who was a Watergate investigator, talking about how powerful the presidency is and how presidents get surrounded by people who have a vested interest in keeping that president propped up," he told Morgan.
"This is an entirely separate scandal," Tapper repeated. "Maybe even worse … maybe even worse."
Joe Biden diagnosed with 'aggressive' form of prostate cancer
It comes following the announcement the Joe Biden has been diagnosed with "aggressive" prostate cancer.
A spokesperson for the former president said: "While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management."
Biden's ailing health was the subject of intense speculation for much of his time in the White House, with many observers questioning if he was fit to serve a second term in office.
While the octogenarian initially announced he would seek re-election, he dropped out of the race after a calamitous debate performance in June 2024.
He was replaced as presumptive Democratic nominee by his Vice President Kamala Harris, who would go on to lose to Trump in November.
Timeline of Biden's failed re-election bid
President Joe Biden endured weeks of calls to step aside before he announced on July 21 that he was dropping out of the 2024 presidential race. Here are key developments leading up to his decision.
June 27: Biden's disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump sparks calls for him to step aside. His voice was raspy and he trailed off several times after having already endured questions about his age and mental capacity following a series of blunders at public events.
July 2: Polls after the debate indicate that Trump is pulling ahead. Texas Representative Lloyd Doggett was the first Democratic congressman to publicly urge Biden to drop his bid for re-election, and big Democratic donors issued the same call a day later.
July 5: Biden does a live TV interview with George Stephanopoulos where he tries to quell fears about his age and debate performance. He called the debate "bad night" and said he was under the weather and "exhausted."
July 10: Vermont Senator Peter Welch becomes the first senator to call for Biden to drop out.
July 11: Biden refers to Ukrainian President Zelensky as President Putin at a NATO event.
July 13: Trump is shot at a campaign rally by a wannabe assassin. His popularity and favorability rating soared after he was seen bloodied on stage but walked off with a fist in the air, telling the crowd to "fight!"
July 17: California Representative Adam Schiff and a series of other Democrats call for Biden to step aside. Even former President Barack Obama tells allies that Biden's path to victory has "greatly diminished." Biden tests positive for Covid-19 hours after saying he would consider ending his bid if he were diagnosed with "some medical issue."
July 19: Biden insists he will continue campaigning in his first statement since Obama's U-turn, despite reports that he would decide to drop out by the weekend.
July 21: Just before 2 pm, Biden announces he is stepping aside in the 2024 election and endorses Vice President Kamala Harris.
But the debate was far from the only sign of Biden's deterioration.
Biden once failed to recognise George Clooney at a fundraiser when the A-lister was stood right in front of him, according to insiders.
"It was like watching someone who was not alive," a Hollywood source said in the book.
"It was startling. And we all looked at each other. It was so awful."
Another leaked audio clip appears to show Biden struggling to recall when his son Beau had died.
Speaking to Morgan, Tapper addressed criticisms that many in the US media had failed to sufficiently cover reports of Biden's ailing health.
"I feel like I owe the American people an acknowledgement that I wish I had covered the story better," he said.
Tapper told CNN earlier this month: "I think some of the criticism is fair, to be honest.
"Of me, certainly. I'm not going to speak for anybody else, but knowing then what I know now, I look back at my coverage during the Biden years — and I did cover some of these issues, but not enough.
"I look back on it with humility."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump slaps Biden over Iran and denies U.S. nuclear deal would allow country to enrich uranium
President Donald Trump blamed former President Joe Biden for the U.S.'s current Iran woes - and denied that the new Iran nuclear deal would allow for uranium enrichment. On Monday, Axios reported that the 'secret' nuclear deal proposed Saturday by the United States would allow Iran to enrich low levels of uranium for a period of time that was yet to be determined. The White House didn't immediately contest those details, which run counter to public statements from White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 'The AUTOPEN should have stopped Iran a long time ago from "enriching,"' Trump chimed in Monday evening. 'Under our potential Agreement - WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' The president has nicknamed 82-year-old Biden 'autopen,' using it as a way to disparage the Democrat for allegedly being asleep at the wheel - and allowing aides to sign documents for him. Not much progress was made with Iran during Biden's four years in office, after Trump pulled out of the Obama-era nuclear deal in 2018. The Biden administration initially tried to revive the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the Obama deal, but it was later declared 'dead.' In the meantime there were warnings about Iranian assassination plots against Trump and other key Trump 1.0 administration figures over the U.S.'s 2020 targeted strike in Iraq that killed Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani. Now the U.S. is once engaged in Iran nuclear talks, this time with Witkoff at the helm. Axios reported that the proposal Witkoff submitted on Saturday included 'preliminary ideas' that would be discussed in the next round of talks. Under the proposal, Iran would be barred from building new enrichment facilities and would have to 'dismantle critical infrastructure for conversion and processing of uranium.' It also stated that Iran would have to halt new research and development of centrifuges. At the same time, it would allow for some domestic enrichment, though not beyond those necessary for civilian purposes. Upon signing the agreement, Iran would have to temporarily reduce its enrichment concentration to 3 percent, sources told Axios. Iran's underground nuclear facilities would have to become 'non-operational' for a period of time that was agreed to by the parties. The country's above-ground facilities would be limited to to the level needed to make nuclear reactor fuel using International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines. Sanctions relief would follow if Iran 'demonstrates real commitment' to the satifaction of the U.S. and the IAEA. And overall the nuclear deal would focus on creating a regional enrichment consortium. Those terms would make it easier for the U.S. to strike a deal. But they would likely irritate Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has called on the U.S. to only strike a deal with Iran under the strictest terms. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Axios in a statement. 'Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it,' she said. 'Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' When asked for comment on the Axios story, a White House official told the Daily Mail that the deal was 'tough' and it would prevent Iran from getting the bomb. 'President Trump is speaking the cold, hard truth,' the official said via email. 'The terms we gave Iran were very tough and would make it impossible for them to ever obtain a nuclear bomb.'
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
Homeland Security stonewalling info on non-citizen DNA collection operation, lawsuit alleges
The Trump administration has been turning to DNA technology to help find and arrest immigrants, including children, but immigration advocates say it has been slow to spell out how it's using and overseeing the genetic information. Three groups sued the Department of Homeland Security on Monday after trying to get records about the data collection program since last summer, during the Biden administration. The plaintiffs are the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology, part of the Georgetown University Law School that focuses on privacy and surveillance law and policy; the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights and Americans for Immigrant Justice, both immigrant rights groups. The groups describe in their lawsuit their back-and-forth with DHS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection since they originally requested information about their DNA collection from noncitizens on Aug. 1, 2024. Since 2020, DHS has expanded its DNA collection program and increased DNA contributions to the FBI's database, CODIS, by 5,000%, becoming the largest contributor, according to the Georgetown center. The DNA database of the FBI can be accessed by police across the country for criminal investigations, the plaintiff groups said in a statement. Stevie Glaberson, director of research and advocacy at the Georgetown center, said in a statement that DHS is expanding its database by "collecting DNA from people accused of no crime and while operating with none of the constraints that are supposed to be in place before the government compels someone to give over their most sensitive personal information." He said Americans deserve more visibility on the program and said DHS's lack of transparency is unacceptable. NBC News has contacted DHS for comment. Daniel Melo, senior staff attorney with Amica's Immigration Impact Lab, told NBC News that previous administrations have also collected DNA. A 2005 law mandated federal agencies collect DNA from people in custody, including noncitizens. Prior to 2020, the Justice Department had told DHS that its immigration enforcement and border agents did not have to routinely collect DNA from every noncitizen it detained, Melo said. The Biden administration adopted rules requiring full compliance with the 2005 law, but whistleblowers and a government watchdog complained compliance was uneven. The "Securing Our Borders" executive order signed by President Donald Trump requires the attorney general and the DHS to fulfill requirements on DNA collection from noncitizens mandated in the 2005 law. 'Sweeps in information about everyone' Privacy and civil rights groups have long had issues with the government's DNA collection program. Melo said the public should be concerned whether people are being advised of their rights and how the information is being collected and used. "This information could tentatively be used in all sorts of ways to map full communities, to basically build a more intricate web of surveillance around noncitizen communities," Melo said. He said if DHS can continue to collect the DNA of noncitizens, essentially "experimenting" on them, "then they are able to refine these technologies and deploy them in new and interesting and probably really dangerous and scary ways on the rest of us." Emily Tucker, the Georgetown center's executive director, said in a statement that "it is a mistake to think of DHS' DNA collection program as 'immigration enforcement.'" "Trump is using immigration powers to justify the activities of his militarized federal police force because there is so little institutional or judicial oversight or accountability for executive enforcement actions that invoke 'immigration authority," she said in a statement. "This program is one part of a massive surveillance dragnet that sweeps in information about everyone. They will use it for deportation, but they will also use it to intimidate, silence, and target anyone they perceive as the enemy.'
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Ex-Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich threatened with legal action over £2.3bn proceeds from sale of club
Abramovich was forced to sell in 2022 due to his links with Putin SALE ROW Ex-Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich threatened with legal action over £2.3bn proceeds from sale of club Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) FORMER Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich is being threatened with legal action over the £2.3billion proceeds from his sale of the club. The cash was supposed to go on humanitarian projects in Ukraine. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up But British government officials and Abramovich have failed to reach an agreement. The money has been sitting in a bank account since the 58-year-old was forced to sell in 2022 due to his links with tyrant Vladimir Putin. The Government has lost patience after three years of talks with the Russian oligarch failed to resolve the situation. In a joint statement, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: 'The Government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine, following Russia's illegal full-scale invasion. 'We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far. 'While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required, to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible.' Pressure was growing on the Government for some time to take a harder line on Abramovich. Charities like Save The Children and senior political figures like Lord Foulkes, a former chairman of Scottish club Hearts, urged first the previous Conservative administration and then the current Labour Government to find a way to end the deadlock. 1 Roman Abramovich is being threatened with legal action over the £2.3billion proceeds from his sale of Chelsea Credit: AP UK government could approve the sale of Chelsea but Abramovich can't personally profit, says MP Chris Philp Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.
