Opinion: Dealing directly with the unhinged neighbour
Opinion
In the end, the encounter was described as cordial. Tense, yes, but respectful. Some even went so far as to call it productive.
For Canadians, the most meaningful outcome of the first face-to-face meeting between Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump might be that it was largely uneventful — noteworthy for its general absence of blowups, tirades, insults or outright lies from a serially erratic leader who is known for producing all of those things in abundance.
Tuesday's get-together at the White House was described by Trump himself as 'friendly,' and while it did not produce anything in the way of definitive declarations regarding Canada-U.S. relations and the ongoing Trump-initiated tariff dispute that continues to impact both nations' economies, it can fairly be argued it did accomplish a positive reset of the intentions and emotions informing the cross-border alliance.
The Canadian Press
Prime Minister Mark Carney
If it's true — and it most certainly is — the Liberals won the federal election on the strength of their pitch that Carney is the leader best suited to deal with the challenges posed by Trump's scattershot antics, then Tuesday's event would have to be considered a triumph of managed expectations and mostly muted diplomatic restraint.
One can't help wondering what the prime minister was anticipating as he arrived at the White House, and whether his hopes were achieved by the time he exited.
In just a weekend's worth of news cycles leading up to their meeting, Carney would necessarily have watched and taken note as Trump: a) posted on social media (and then denied responsibility for) an AI-generated picture of himself as the next pope, b) mused about reopening the long-shuttered Alcatraz prison to 'house America's most ruthless and violent Offenders,' c) pledged to impose a 100 per cent tariff on movies produced outside the U.S. (a nonsensical notion, given the ethereal logistics and economics of film production) and d) continued his out-loud ruminations about annexing Canada as the 51st U.S. state.
Even with Carney actually en route to their crucial first meeting, the president could not restrain himself from further trolling Canada on his Truth Social platform, posting (inaccurately) that the U.S. 'subsidizes' Canada by US$200 billion annually and that 'We don't need their Cars, we don't need their Energy, we don't need their Lumber, we don't need ANYTHING they have … (and) They, on the other hand, need EVERYTHING from us!'
Armed, as he must have been, with a clear understanding of who and what awaited him in the Oval Office, Carney delivered a virtuoso performance, opening with a deftly measured statement that sounded very much like a compliment — 'Thank you for your hospitality and, above all, your leadership; you're a transformational president…' — but was really nothing more than a recitation of fact that left open to the listener just exactly what Trump is transforming, and (for better or worse) how.
Winnipeg Free Press | Newsletter
Winnipeg Jets Game Days
On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop. Sign up for The Warm-Up
For most of the on-camera portion of their session, Carney remained silent as the president expounded at length on a variety of unrelated topics; when it came time to the PM to address the issue of annexation, however, Carney spoke matter-of-factly in terms Trump could understand:
'As you know, from real estate, there are some places that are never for sale. … Having met with the owners of Canada over the course of the campaign the last several months, it's not for sale, won't be for sale, ever.'
'Never say never,' Trump responded, to which Carney mouthed silently to numerous people in the room, 'Never.'
Message delivered.
And, as far as this first meeting is concerned, mission accomplished.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
19 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Ontario leaves out American banks from U.S.-dollar bond issuance in a first since 2011
For the first time in more than a decade, Ontario has issued a U.S.-dollar bond without the assistance of any U.S.-based banks. The province sold US$2-billion worth of 10-year bonds last week with the help of British banking giant Barclays PLC, according to Bloomberg data. Three Canadian banks also helped manage the latest provincial debt issue: BMO Capital Markets, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Bank of Nova Scotia. American banks have participated in every Ontario government U.S.-dollar bond sale since 2011, the data show. As recently as January of this year, the province sold US$3-billion worth of five-year bonds with the help of Bank of America Corp. Ontario Premier Doug Ford had previously committed to banning U.S. companies from government contracts in response to the continental trade war launched earlier this year by U.S. President Donald Trump. However, Ontario finance ministry spokesperson Scott Blodgett said there is currently no prohibition on U.S. banks participating in Ontario bond issues. In fact, Mr. Blodgett said, Bank of America remains a long-standing member of the banking syndicate that regularly assists with the sale of Ontario's domestic market bonds. 'U.S. banks were not 'dropped' from our bond sale,' he said in an e-mailed response to questions. 'Inclusion in any Ontario bond deal is a competitive process with financial partners around the globe vying for international mandates. As bond funds struggle as uncertainty grips the market, here are four for investors to consider 'Several factors, including dealer availability, indicative pricing, consistent quality coverage, and participation on recent transactions is considered. Rotation is also considered with respect to participation on past deals as well as future deals.' Last week's deal generated 'record interest for an Ontario 10-year USD deal,' Mr. Blodgett added. In early March, Mr. Ford pledged to ban U.S. companies from all Ontario procurement contracts until the Trump administration removes tariffs from Canadian goods. The policy has subsequently faced criticism for exempting American companies with at least 250 employees in Canada. For example, Bank of America, which boasts more than 1,000 Canadian employees working out of offices in Toronto, Montreal, Calgary and Vancouver, would qualify for such an exemption. Alberta also avoided using a U.S. bank for a recent bond deal. In March, the province sold €1.25-billion ($1.95-billion) worth of 10-year bonds with the help of Barclays, RBC Capital Markets and TD Securities, according to public data and provincial records. Alberta regularly taps Bank of America for its euro-denominated bond sales, though Marisa Breeze, spokesperson for provincial Finance Minister Nate Horner, said the change was not intentional. Opinion: Here's what really is going on in the bond market - and why I'm still very bullish 'There is no blanket ban on U.S.-based financial institutions,' Ms. Breeze said. 'The province is continuously monitoring and assesses the performance of the service providers employed for its funding activities and adjusts its borrowing syndicate based on that performance.' Meanwhile, at least one other province has continued openly using U.S. banks for its U.S.-dollar bond sales. Bank of America and Citigroup Inc. were both part of the syndicate behind a US$2.5-billion bond issued by British Columbia last week. That syndicate also included BMO Capital Markets, National Bank of Canada and TD Securities. 'The province's inclusion of U.S. banks aligns with market practice among other Canadian issuers,' B.C. finance ministry spokesperson Shantel Esplen said in an e-mail. 'B.C.'s approach is the same as the government of Ontario, who continues to follow a policy which does not rule out inclusion of U.S. banks.' Both the Canada Pension Plan and the federal government have also recently allowed U.S. banks to participate in their debt sales, Ms. Esplen said.
Vancouver Sun
23 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Liberals considering arming the Coast Guard amid significant pivot towards new security mandate
OTTAWA — The Liberal government is mulling arming the Canadian Coast Guard as it launches a significant reform of the civilian maritime agency to give it a bigger role in the country's security apparatus. The move is one of many significant changes that the Liberals are planning for the chronically underfunded Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) that Prime Minister Mark Carney has promised to equip with new gear and a new security mandate. On the same day Carney announced his plan to accelerate defence spending this year, his office told National Post Monday that the CCG — which currently reports to the minister of fisheries — would shift to the minister of national defence's portfolio. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The move away from the fisheries minister makes it both likely easier for the CCG's budget to be included in Canada's defence spending in the eyes of NATO and is part of Carney's desire to pivot the 63-year-old civilian agency towards a more security-oriented role. 'Canadians elected our new Government on a strong mandate for change — to protect our borders and defend our sovereignty with increased focus and investment. To that end, the Prime Minister will soon initiate the process of moving the Canadian Coast Guard to the leadership of the Minister of National Defence,' PMO spokesperson Emily Williams said in a statement. 'The change will permit the Coast Guard to fulfill better both its civilian and security responsibilities.' The statement did not say when the changeover would happen, with Williams promising that 'more details will come in due course.' A senior Liberal source also told National Post that the government is considering arming the CCG, though they stressed that no decision has been made yet as officials continue to chart the reform. Arming the CCG, which would be a massive — and costly — change for the special agency that has always been an unarmed civilian organization. 'We're not there yet,' the official said of the decision. The source was granted anonymity to discuss internal government deliberations. The Coast Guard has struggled for years with its mandate, pulled between its various responsibilities such as research, search and rescue, icebreaking, marine protection and coastal surveillance, but without any law enforcement powers. Due to its icebreaking capabilities, it also has unique expertise on the Canadian Arctic within the government. In the recent election campaign, the Liberals promised to give the CCG a new mandate 'to conduct maritime surveillance operations' along with the required equipment. Last week, the Liberals tabled a border security bill that proposes to give the CCG a new security mandate, the power to conduct 'security patrols' and the ability to share information with the military and intelligence agencies. In an interview, former CCG Commissioner Jody Thomas said the agency is long overdue for significant reform and that she'd been 'nagging' the government to move the agency to the defence or public safety portfolio for years. 'It is a major change, and I think it's an important change. I think that this is just another signal that Canada is changing its perspective on our own sovereignty,' said Thomas, who was also headed the Department of National Defence and was National Security Advisor to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Regarding armaments, she said that icebreakers currently under construction have been fitted for, but not with, weapons, meaning that arming them would be a relatively straightforward task. The real challenge of arming the Coast Guard, she warned, is training. 'It's a very expensive decision, not for the weaponry, but for the training and the constant preparation and exercising that's required,' she said. 'The Navy is always in training… for what's coming. The Coast Guard is out there working. So, it's a very different fleet and with very different purposes.' There are also talks within government of switching the Coast Guard from a special operating agency, which is still part of its host department, into a departmental agency with its own governing legislation that reports to the Minister of National Defense. I think that this is just another signal that Canada is changing its perspective on our own sovereignty In an interview in late May, Thomas argued that that needs to happen. 'It does need to be a legislative agency, the special operating agency status right now, that's a very flimsy sort of architecture and legal basis for an agency' with a security focus, Thomas said. A chronic challenge for the Coast Guard has been the deteriorating condition of its fleet while it operates on a 'shoestring' budget, according to Thomas. As of November, the CCG had 18 icebreakers , making it the second-largest icebreaking fleet in the world. Its fleet registry shows it has just over 120 ships on duty, the majority of which are small rescue vessels. But the aging fleet is also deteriorating rapidly, with ships spending more time in repairs and less time in the water. 'The CCG's aging vessels are becoming more costly to maintain and are more frequently taken out of operation for unscheduled repairs, placing further strain on the remaining fleet,' the agency said in its 2024-2025 department plans report . 'The need to replace the vessels has never been more important.' In March, the federal government contracted two new polar icebreakers which are expected to be delivered between 2030 and 2032. But Thomas said the coast guard has much bigger needs. 'We're one of the few countries that uses the same fleet for northern and southern ice breaking. We ice break year-round, essentially,' she said. 'So, you have to look at the wear and tear on the ship and the things you want them to do, and the places you want them to be, and they're going to have to plan the fleet accordingly.' National Post cnardi@ Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Edmonton Journal
26 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
Liberals considering arming the Coast Guard amid significant pivot towards new security mandate
Article content On the same day Carney announced his plan to accelerate defence spending this year, his office told National Post Monday that the CCG — which currently reports to the minister of fisheries — would shift to the minister of national defence's portfolio. The move away from the fisheries minister makes it both likely easier for the CCG's budget to be included in Canada's defence spending in the eyes of NATO and is part of Carney's desire to pivot the 63-year-old civilian agency towards a more security-oriented role. 'Canadians elected our new Government on a strong mandate for change — to protect our borders and defend our sovereignty with increased focus and investment. To that end, the Prime Minister will soon initiate the process of moving the Canadian Coast Guard to the leadership of the Minister of National Defence,' PMO spokesperson Emily Williams said in a statement.
