logo
Buffett to mark 60 years leading Berkshire Hathaway

Buffett to mark 60 years leading Berkshire Hathaway

Perth Now01-05-2025

Berkshire Hathaway has held up well in a rocky year for stocks, and shareholders this weekend will be seeking reassurance from Warren Buffett that they remain in good hands as tariff turmoil disrupts corporate America.
At Saturday's annual meeting in Omaha, Nebraska, the 94-year-old billionaire will mark 60 years in charge of what he built into a $US1.15 trillion conglomerate.
Buffett will spend four-and-a-half hours fielding shareholder questions, which typically focus on Berkshire's operating businesses, markets, the economy, life lessons, and the company's future after the Oracle of Omaha departs.
Berkshire's businesses are disparate, and include Geico insurance, the BNSF railroad, Berkshire Hathaway Energy, Dairy Queen, Fruit of the Loom, and retro brands such as Ginsu knives and the World Book Encyclopedia.
For many, they serve as a proxy for the American economy.
Yet through April 30, Berkshire shares have trounced the Standard & Poor's 500, rising 18 per cent while the index was down five per cent. That gulf, however, is more likely reflective of whipsaw from US President Donald Trump's policies than new attitudes about Berkshire itself.
Some observers view Berkshire's $US334.2 billion year-end cash stake, which at current yields could generate more than $US14 billion of income, as a buffer.
"People have so much conviction in Warren Buffett and his ability to deploy capital well in market downturns," said Brett Gardner, author of Buffett's Early Investments.
"Berkshire also has a lot of stable cash flowing businesses that may not be as impacted as other companies," he added.
The early outperformance fuelled much of Berkshire's stock price gain of more than 6,400,000 per cent since 1965. Over multi year periods, Berkshire now performs more like the S&P, but with better downside protection.
Buffett readily acknowledges the folly of expecting stellar outperformance over the long haul.
"We cannot do as well as we did in the past," Buffett said at Berkshire's 2013 annual shareholder meeting. "It's tougher as we get bigger."
At the 2021 meeting, Buffett said a person who knows nothing about stocks and had no "special feelings" for Berkshire should buy the index.
And in his February 2024 shareholder letter, Buffett said Berkshire "should do a bit better" than average American companies, with materially less risk of losing capital, but that anything beyond "slightly better" was "wishful thinking."
A large driver of Berkshire's profit is insurance, which accounted for 48 per cent of its $US47.4 billion of operating profit last year. Still, earnings in 53 per cent of Berkshire's 189 operating businesses fell last year, and Trump's tariffs could pressure some of the businesses.
Berkshire's value also derives from its huge cache of stocks, including Apple and American Express, though that portfolio suffered during April's market selloff.
Buffett took over Berkshire in a fit of anger in 1965, when management of the then-flailing textile company short-changed him when he offered to sell back his shares.
He later called Berkshire "the dumbest stock I ever bought," saying he missed out on $US200 billion over 45 years by making it his vehicle to invest in insurance instead of starting a new entity.
But by adopting the mantra of the company's late vice chairman, Charlie Munger, to buy wonderful businesses at fair prices, rather than fair businesses at wonderful prices, Buffett made Berkshire what it is today.
Gardner called Berkshire's size its "biggest handicap, being unable to move the needle," but said Buffett's record as perhaps the greatest investor ever outweighed it for many.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big super says ‘big beautiful' Trump bill could cut $3.5b from returns
Big super says ‘big beautiful' Trump bill could cut $3.5b from returns

AU Financial Review

time8 hours ago

  • AU Financial Review

Big super says ‘big beautiful' Trump bill could cut $3.5b from returns

Major superannuation funds could see returns from their American investments fall by nearly $3.5 billion over four years under a punitive tax regime that would target countries that the Trump administration deemed to have discriminated against businesses in the United States. The so-called 'big beautiful bill' now at the centre of recriminations between US President Donald Trump and his one-time confidant Elon Musk contains provisions that would increase taxes on investors including the major retirement savings funds if passed unchanged.

US beef might be on the table, but we don't have to eat it
US beef might be on the table, but we don't have to eat it

Sydney Morning Herald

time10 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

US beef might be on the table, but we don't have to eat it

If the government deals with Donald Trump's tariffs by opening our nation to beef imports, Australians' response should be quite simple – don't buy American beef (' Albanese to put beef on the table in Trump trade talks ', June 6). Australians must make a point of checking where products come from and make the decision to buy Australian. In our capitalist system, the consumer is boss. If the issue of beef imports really is a biosecurity threat, as our farmers suggest, it is also our civic duty to avoid it. I do not buy the 'grown in USA' grapes that have recently replaced the Australian ones in my local fruit barn. I also don't trust home brand products from the big two supermarkets as many of them are imported. The added bonus of telling Trump where to put his tariffs is that we support Australian jobs and reduce our carbon footprint. Lesley Maguire, Marsfield Sure, we have a beef with Trump over tariffs and presidential demands, but our biosecurity protocols are sacrosanct. Importing beef from the US may be Russian roulette for our farmers. Our agricultural industries would be devastated should they be afflicted with the diversity of pests and pathogens assailing the natural environment. One of our greatest exports is the international reputation of our quarantine and biosecurity sentinels. Steve Dillon, Thirroul On Britain's exemption from US steel tariffs, Sussan Ley said: 'We stand ready to work with the Albanese government to ensure Australia can achieve the same outcome. The Coalition wants the government to succeed because that is in the national interest.' With two sentences, the Liberal leader has hopefully begun a period of bipartisanship and a return to true Liberal principles. I congratulate her and hope she can succeed in her rebirthing of a centrist Liberal Party. Rowan Godwin, Rozelle If the US Department of Agriculture's food safety and inspection service was affected by the DOGE cuts, the prime minister should be very careful in reviewing the ban on beef from the US, or any other food products for that matter. There's too much at stake. Judith Campbell, Drummoyne The government is willing to negotiate with Trump on beef but not on pork. Clearly, surrendering their pork barrels is a bridge too far. Richard Grant, St Leonards At long last, the federal government has come to understand and appreciate the value of Australia's primary export products. For far too long, our city-centric governments have failed to value or understand that the nation's wealth has always been based on our primary exports, be it minerals, livestock, wool, grains, wine or seafood. Cost of living was a big issue at the last election, the rising price of eggs a case in point. Some time soon, urban communities will finally learn to appreciate what people living in rural and regional areas have contributed to the nation's living standards, as prices increase and shortages of supply become evident. The nation's wealth is spent but not created in our cities. Bruce Clydsdale, Bathurst Bros become foes In Trump's fickle world, one thing was always certain: his chumminess with Elon Musk would end in a mudslinging fight (' Bromance is over: Musk accuses Trump of being in the Epstein files, June 6). So many times we have watched the humiliating drubbings dished out by Trump on those he deems disloyal or with whom he disagrees. This time, however, he may have met his match. Musk's bombshell post to the world that 'Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the reason they have not been made public', may prove to be Musk's leverage in the relationship. As he cynically posted: 'Have a nice day DJT.' Mary Carde, Parrearra (Qld) Trump Derangement Syndrome. Well, there it is, from his own pen, what we've been seeing for years but didn't know what to call it – and now he's named it for us. Shrinks will be studying Trump for a long time to come, but in the meantime, can we give him the honour he richly deserves – the front cover of Mad Magazine. Patrick McGrath, Potts Point Trump, the fabulist in chief versus Musk, a certifiable megalomaniac. 'Rumble in the Jungle' on steroids. Best show in town. Maureen Moss, Beecroft Peace Prize at stake The US veto of the latest UN Security Council ceasefire resolution simply reminds us that the power to bring the Gaza conflict to an end lies in the hands of one person, the president of the United States (' US vetoes Security Council call for a ceasefire', June 6). The UN itself is powerless, as Israel's ambassador Danny Danon made defiantly clear, saying that 'no resolution, no vote, no moral failure, will stand in our way'. If Donald Trump has set his sights on the Nobel Peace Prize, as often claimed, he should sign one of his famous executive orders to immediately top supplying Israel's war machine. Tom Knowles, Parkville (Vic) Stick with Israel Josh Szeps advises Jews to abandon Israel because supporting it at present conflicts with Jewish values (' It's time for Jews to abandon Israel ', June 6). But abandonment itself is an abdication of essential and core Jewish values of, among others, Chesed and Emunah, which mean loving kindness, steadfast loyalty and faith. To suggest that Israel should be abandoned because of the way its current government is prosecuting the tragic war in Gaza could not be more un-Jewish. Raymond Schwartz, Bellevue Hill Josh Szeps writes a powerful but problematic article. When he calls for Jews to abandon Israel, I presume he means diaspora Jews – that is, Jews living outside of Israel. But what about the seven million Jews living in Israel? Are we to eschew our friends, family and religious kinsmen, tarring them all with the same brush as their government? Do I know how to fix the abhorrent situation in Gaza? No. But I do know that no solution will come from turning away. It is now, more than ever, that we need to turn towards each other and find the strength to get through this latest threat to Jewish survival. Yehuda Bassin, North Bondi Josh Szeps brutally tears the scab off what the state of Israel is doing to the Palestinian people. Is there any legitimate reason why there is space in the world for a Jewish state but not for a Palestinian state? Richard Sergi, Summer Hill Smokes and ire First Chris Minns wants to increase the threat tobacco poses to public health by reducing prices, and now the police minister wants to give a boost to organised crime by excluding the police force from acting against the tobacco black market (' Police 'can't regulate' tobacconists ' June 6). Just whose interests is the government of NSW protecting? It certainly doesn't appear to be ours. John Croker, Woonona 30-year itch The opposition is attacking the government's proposal to adjust the taxation on higher superannuation balances (' Coalition shuts down deal on super tax ', June 5). A mainstay of its argument is the government's failure to index the proposed cut-in point of $3 million. The opposition says inflation will pull in ever more super-holders so that young workers in 30 years' time will have to pay this tax as soon as they start earning. Really? Even if wages do balloon like that, does anyone know of a taxation measure still in force from 30 years ago without change or adjustment? Perhaps the Coalition expects to remain in opposition for the next 30 years, with no opportunity to introduce any changes themselves. E. Mark Latham, Croydon Park Multi-party preferred The path to desperately needed taxation reform must involve bipartisan agreements with the conservatives (' Deal or no deal: Chalmer's mistake ', June 6). The Liberals may be weak, almost irrelevant at present, but they'll not always be so. The best way to achieve this is with the support of the conservatives, Greens and independents. Obviously, some concessions will be necessary by Jim Chalmers, but increased taxation is essential and must be set in stone. Geoff Harding, Chatswood Libs doomed by inability to learn It's hard to believe that the Liberals could sink much lower after their 'near-death' electoral defeat, but they continue to surprise (' Elder statesman has taken his party backwards ', June 6). A divorce with their whacky National partners, followed only days later by a reconciliation (of sorts); old stale, pale males (Abbott and Stockdale) sniping, undermining, and publicly putting the little ladies back in their places; and even a shadow cabinet position given to someone (Kapterian), before the vote count was completed, who didn't end up winning a seat in parliament. With their inability to learn from their past defeats, it seems that the Liberals will always be the party of greater ridicule and incompetence. Alan Marel, North Curl Curl Aside from the misogyny, may I suggest that the most prominent characteristic of a certain Mr Stockdale is his eyebrowage. Photos of him sitting beneath a portrait of Bob Menzies, also magnificently eyebrow endowed, make me wonder whether the only way for women to get ahead in the Liberal Party is to put those tweezers away. Kate Coates, Wangi Wangi It's bleeding obvious that the federal intervention into the NSW Liberal Party has always been a move to consolidate the influence of the conservative faction in NSW. Ironically, the intervention team is dominated by two right-wing fossils from Victoria, a state where the Liberal Party has long been on life support. If the present intervention team prevails, the Liberals will remain increasingly irrelevant, and Australia will be the worse for it. Bruce Spence, Balmain Anyone who follows the intrigues of Victorian state politics would know that former Labor premier Dan Andrews was able to win three elections, arguably owing to the disarray of the Liberal opposition. To send two relics from that disorder of the Victorian age (sorry, Victorian state) is quite insulting. I wonder if Alan Stockdale and former NSW Liberal leader Peter Collins caught up for a bevvy or two. Peter King, Windsor Downs Women's issue Hysteria is an old word that relates to the uterus – a 'woman thing'. I'm guessing that Mark Speakman, though the product of a uterus, has not, and probably will not, understand that his use of the word 'hysterical' has just lost him a swag of women's votes. Mine especially (' Catley slams Speakman after he calls her 'hysterical', ' June 6). Kathryn Coates, Wangi Wangi Pyrrhic victory Those who celebrated North Sydney Council's failure to implement a rate rise as a win for the community should now see the reality of this Pyrrhic victory (' Inside the fight to save famous oval that's slowly falling apart ', June 6). A much-loved iconic oval is in disrepair, council buildings leak when it rains, community services will need to be curtailed and there may have to be a fire sale of income-generating assets. All of this when current residential rates are lower than those of neighbouring councils and the ill-conceived pool continues to drain council finances at an alarming rate. Catherine Turner, Cremorne Left in limbo Workers' rights are under constant pressure, every hour of every day. The ABC keeping staff members on revolving fixed-term contracts is just another example (' Play School staffer sues ABC ', June 6). Such staff members are not chess pieces to be moved around at the whim of management. Flexibility to quickly and easily sack staff is not conducive to loyalty or good mental health. It also erodes the ability of staff to plan their lives. It is not a moral way to improve any organisation's bottom line. Greg Baker, Fitzroy Falls A fair race The final election result for the federal seat of Bradfield has been called, with independent Nicolette Boele declared the winner by a margin of just 26 votes over the Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian (' Teal candidate Nicolette Boele wins final Bradfield recount ', June 5). The Australian Electoral Commission should be applauded for the thorough way in which the full recount was conducted over the past week and a half. The genuine commitment to democracy was evident at every stage and the staff were consistently polite and obliging. My respect for our democratic processes was constantly reinforced as I watched the process unfold. Each vote was treated with the respect it deserved and the intention of the voter was paramount. I feel nothing but gratitude for our amazing AEC and our democratic processes. Robyn Thomas, Wahroonga Waste costs schools I have been following reports in the Herald of the ICAC hearings into allegations about improper spending at the public schools building unit (' Unravelling top schools unit's network of consultants ', June 6). As a lifelong advocate for public schooling (I attended public schools, my children and grandchildren attended public schools and I taught in public schools), I am alarmed at the reported amounts of money that were spent on consultants and the awarding of contracts to friends. Public schools are crying out for money for building maintenance, extra resources, specialist staff, heating and cooling for classrooms, and proper classrooms for additional enrolments. Now we are learning where the money was being spent. Shame on those responsible, shame, shame, shame. Helen Russell, Leichhardt Rare birds It seems calling someone a 'bird brain' is no longer an insult (' Smart cockies crack the water fountain test ', June 6). Mexican sparrows have even found a way to make tobacco into a health aid – they put cigarette butts in their nests to repel parasites. Paul Doyle, Glenbrook It's good to know my visiting cockatoos might come in handy when I have a jar I can't open. Lisa Clarke, Watsons Bay Hard to swallow Jeremy Brender (Letters, June 6), why would anybody consider paying an exorbitant price for an egg and lettuce sandwich at Sydney airport when they could buy a $10.30 meat pie instead? Robert Peters, Maitland Name brand Maiden name? A woman's 'maiden' name is really her father's name. Patriarchy still rules (Letters, June 6). Betsy Brennan, Wahroonga Ruff and ready While I'm in full agreement with correspondent Alison Stewart's views on misogyny in the Liberal Party (Letters, June 6), I must, in defence of old dogs, take issue with her last sentence. You can, actually, teach them new tricks. It just takes a little longer. Jo Bond, South Melbourne (Vic) Postscript Who can trust a politician? We all know the answer to that one, yet Australians trusted Anthony Albanese enough to vote for him in record numbers only a month ago. Buyer's remorse seems to be creeping up fast, as it does in politics, not least among readers who had hoped for a meaningful shift away from fossil fuels. Labor's approval of Woodside's North West Shelf gas project until 2070 was viewed by many, including Herald columnist Ross Gittins, as an inexcusable breach of trust. 'Why, Albo, why? Make it make sense,' pleaded reader Ross Hudson. In bringing Labor back for a second term, Australians had also hoped for tax reform, but the prime minister's unwillingness to slap mining companies with a resources rent tax further undermined public faith. 'Albanese has lost his spine,' lamented Peter Nash. 'Labor has been intimidated by mining companies and by business opposition to changing negative gearing and capital gains tax.' People with fat super balances are also having trust issues after Labor announced its plan to raise earnings tax on accounts above $3 million. The government's extravagant tobacco tax seems to have backfired too, leading to a proliferation of illegal imported cigarettes and vapes. 'Labor's disastrous tobacco taxes are a timely warning about their proposed super taxes,' wrote William Lloyd. Albanese's rejection of American demands for Australia to jack up defence spending didn't inspire confidence among defence hawks. David Sinclair didn't mince words. On the matter of public security 'our PM either has his head stuck firmly in the sand, or in another part of his anatomy entirely.' The defection of Greens senator Dorinda Cox to Labor this week only created more suspicion. 'Albanese's welcoming of that political turncoat adds insult to injury,' said James Fliece. A cynical Sue Dyer added: 'The prime minister and Cox should come clean about when she applied and how this was facilitated and approved.' Labor wasn't alone in the firing line. Liberal elder Alan Stockdale's 'light-hearted' remarks about 'assertive women' – in an address to the NSW Liberal Women's Council no less – drew howls of derision. Alison Stewart had some advice for Liberal women: 'You can't teach old dogs new tricks. Look elsewhere for representation.' That's always an option Alison, but the question is, who do you trust?

Australia in driver's seat but US trade deal some time away, says CBA
Australia in driver's seat but US trade deal some time away, says CBA

West Australian

time13 hours ago

  • West Australian

Australia in driver's seat but US trade deal some time away, says CBA

The chief economist at the nation's biggest bank has warned an Australian trade deal with the US could be some time away given the complexity involved and America's push for increased market access. Commonwealth Bank's Luke Yeaman also said there was a risk that if Donald Trump does not strike deals with key trading partners before the July 9 deadline — when the pause on the US President's reciprocal tariffs is due to resume — he may 'lose patience and reinstate unilateral tariffs . . . sparking another round of volatility in global markets'. It comes as the Australian sharemarket swung on Friday following turmoil in the US, following an ugly exchange between Mr Trump and Elon Musk that wiped more than $US150 billion ($231b) off the value of Tesla. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also signalled he was prepared to make concessions allowing American beef into the country as deliberations ramp up. Mr Yeaman said Australia remained in a 'relatively strong negotiating position' as the country's tariffs are equal to Mr Trump's global minimum level of 10 per cent. He said the recent move to double steel and aluminium taxes to 50 per cent would be a concern, but the Federal Government won't feel pressured to conclude an agreement quickly. 'Using the UK deal as a template, an Australian trade deal could still be some time away,' Mr Yeaman said. 'There are obvious areas for co-operation (critical minerals), but addressing key US asks around market access for US beef exports, the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, regulation of US tech companies and defence spending won't be easy.' Last month, the UK became the first country to agree to a trade deal with the US since Mr Trump imposed the sweeping tariffs in April. Prime Minister Keir Starmer this week said Britain was hoping to ink a pact with the US in the next two weeks to avoid the new tariffs on steel. Mr Yeaman said those talks — alongside America's negotiations with China and the European Union — provided important insights into the Trump administration's thinking. He said last month's US-China trade war pause showed both countries have an economic 'pain threshold' they are unwilling to cross — albeit a high one. 'This takes some severe downside scenarios off the table, but tensions will remain high and further bouts of escalation are likely,' Mr Yeaman said. 'Whenever two superpowers 'play chicken' there is always a risk of a head on crash. With US-China tariffs escalating to over 125 per cent, it appeared that could be the outcome (and a severe global recession). 'Both countries have now shown that they do not want to go down that road — the economic costs are simply too high.' But despite the de-escalation, Mr Yeaman remained doubtful a comprehensive US-China trade agreement would be settled by August 14. AMP deputy chief economist Diana Mousina said financial markets appeared to remain confident Mr Trump would pull back from the brink. 'US sharemarkets have had a massive rally in recent weeks, and are up by 19 per cent since the post-Liberation day lows,' she said. 'It is hard to see this positive momentum continuing when Trump's tariffs are still up in the air.' There were plenty of risks weighing on shares including the trade battles, American debt and tensions in Iran, Ms Mousina said. The Aussie dollar could remain weak in the near-term, she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store