Debate over having Sikh Regiment in British Army resurfaces, but UK MoD says no such plans
LONDON: The debate over whether there should be a Sikh regiment in the British armed forces has resurfaced but the ministry of defence (MoD) insists there are no such plans.
The debate was triggered after Lord Sahota asked defence minister Lord Coaker in the House of Lords on July 7 whether there was any progress on having a Sikh regiment in the British Army, given the loyalty of Sikh soldiers in both world wars.
Coaker replied, 'Let me consider that request from my noble friend. I am quite happy to meet him to see what more we can do to recognise the contribution of soldiers such as Sikhs.' This led to UK headlines such as 'Minister open to British Army Sikh regiment proposal'.
But MoD sources told TOI: 'Over the years there have been conversations about this, but it would breach Britain's anti-discriminatory laws. There are no current plans for a Sikh regiment as it goes against the Equality Act.
We want to do something to recognise Sikh contributions in some way, but not through a Sikh regiment.'
Lord Sahota, whose grandfathers served in the British Indian army, including the 15th Punjab Regiment, told TOI: 'I don't think it would go against the Equality Act.' He pointed out the British Army has had the Staffordshire regiment and currently has the Brigade of Gurkhas, the Royal Yorkshire Regiment, Royal Welsh and Royal Regiment of Scotland and so on.'It
doesn't mean other faiths like Hindus, Muslim or Christians wouldn't be able to serve in a Sikh regiment.
If you are in the Royal Regiment of Scotland, it doesn't mean you have to be Scottish.'.
'We are struggling to recruit ethnic minorities in this country,' he said, and so having a Sikh Regiment would give Sikhs a 'reason to join.' 'They would wear turbans and have beards and it would reflect Sikh heritage and values,' he said.
'It would foster a better relationship with other countries such as India and South Asia as well,' he added.
There are estimated to be only 200 Sikhs in the British Armed Forces currently.
'People tend to go in the army if their grandfather was in it. Sikhs don't have that role model here,' Sahota said. He said if there was a Punjab or Sikh Regiment they would have that role model. 'There are more than 700k Sikhs in the UK. I am sure quite a few would be prepared to follow in their great grandfather's footsteps. King Charles even told a Sikh soldier he wanted to see more Sikhs in the British Army,' the Labour life peer added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
UK to recognise Palestinian state in September unless Israel acts
Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Tuesday the UK will formally recognise the State of Palestine in September unless Israel takes various "substantive steps", including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza. The potentially landmark move, part of Starmer's plan for a "lasting peace", came after the British leader recalled his cabinet from recess for urgent talks on the worsening situation in the besieged territory. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Management healthcare Data Analytics Cybersecurity Data Science PGDM Digital Marketing Project Management Data Science CXO MBA Healthcare Leadership Operations Management Technology Public Policy Others Finance MCA Degree Design Thinking Artificial Intelligence Product Management others Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta CERT-IIMC APSPM India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 11 Months IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK General Management Programme India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months IIM Kozhikode CERT-IIMK GMPBE India Starts on undefined Get Details Starmer's move, paired with Paris also saying it will recognise a Palestinian state in September, would make the two European allies the first G7 nations to do so. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote In a televised Downing Street address immediately after the cabinet meeting, Starmer said the UK will recognise a Palestinian state if Israel has not taken the steps demanded by the time the UN General Assembly is held in September. It must "end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect" of a two-state solution, he added. Live Events "I've always said we will recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process, at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution," Starmer said. "With that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded, saying: "Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims." "A jihadist state on Israel's border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW. Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen," he posted on the social media platform X. The UK leader also detailed several demands for militant group Hamas, which is holding Israeli hostages seized in its attacks on October 7, 2023. "They must immediately release all of the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza," he said. - 'Hand of history' - Israel's foreign ministry also said it "rejects" the UK move, arguing it "constitutes a reward for Hamas and harms efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza". Starmer spoke to Netanyahu before the announcement, telling him "the situation in Gaza was intolerable," a Downing Street spokeswoman said. "He urged the prime minister to take immediate action to lift all restrictions on aid access," she added in a readout of the call. Starmer also talked to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who "welcomed" the recognition announcement, the spokeswoman noted. The UK move follows French President Emmanuel Macron announcing last week that Paris would recognise a Palestinian state during the UN General Assembly meeting on September 23. Although more than 140 countries already recognise the State of Palestine, none of them carry the weight of Britain and France, who are nuclear-armed allies of Israel with permanent seats on the UN Security Council. On Tuesday, France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot welcomed London joining "the momentum created by France" to "stop the endless cycle of violence". Macron's announcement drew a strong rebuke from both Israel and fellow G7 member the United States. Starmer said Tuesday his government "will make an assessment in September on how far the parties have met" the demands. But he insisted: "No one should have a veto over our decision." Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy, attending a UN conference in New York led by France and Saudi Arabia to promote the two-state solution, echoed the sentiment. Lammy said it was "with the hand of history on our shoulders" that London planned to recognise Palestinian statehood, given Britain's pivotal role in Israel's creation through the 1917 Balfour Declaration. - 'Suffering' - Starmer has been under growing domestic and international pressure to formally recognise a Palestinian state. More than 220 British lawmakers from nine parties including Labour published a letter last Friday urging him to take the step. It was included in Labour's election-winning manifesto last year, as part of "a two-state solution with a safe and secure Israel alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state". But the pressure has risen as the humanitarian situation in Gaza has dramatically worsened. "The Palestinian people have endured terrible suffering," Starmer said in his TV address, adding it "must end". His office said the UK had dropped its first aid, including "lifesaving supplies", by air Tuesday into Gaza, with the help of Jordan. The UK leader thanked its king, Abdullah II, in a call. "However, they agreed that this could not be a substitute for truck deliveries by land, which are the only way to deliver the level of food and other aid urgently needed," Starmer's spokeswoman said.
The Hindu
33 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. House panel rejects immunity request by Epstein associate Maxwell
A Republican-led congressional committee rejected on Tuesday (July 29, 2025) a request by a longtime associate of the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for immunity from future prosecution as a condition for testifying to the panel in the midst of a political storm surrounding President Donald Trump Ghislaine Maxwell , who was convicted in New York in 2021 of helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls and is serving a 20-year sentence in Florida, has been subpoenaed to testify privately to the House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee. The committee has aimed to conduct a deposition of Maxwell, a British socialite who was the wealthy financier's longtime girlfriend, on August 11 at the prison where she is being held in Tallahassee. 'Ms. Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity,' Maxwell's lawyer David Markus told Representative James Comer, who chairs the House committee, in a letter. In an emailed statement, a committee spokesperson said: 'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony.' Markus also had laid down additional conditions for a deposition, including conducting it somewhere other than the prison and being provided with the committee's questions in advance. Maxwell, Markus added, would testify to the committee in a public setting if she were to be granted clemency. Maxwell is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn her conviction. Trump has said he was not considering a presidential pardon for Maxwell. Questions over Trump's past relationship with Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking minors, and his administration's handling of records related to the case have dogged the president for weeks, including during a weekend visit to Scotland. Trump knew Epstein socially in the 1990s and early 2000s. Trump has said that he cut off ties with Epstein years before Epstein's death. Democrats in Congress and some of Trump's core supporters have demanded the release of documents involving Epstein and Maxwell. Epstein served a 13-month jail sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a Florida state felony prostitution charge. Democrats on Tuesday sought more information about the matter. Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse wrote to the Justice Department, asking for a copy of the transcript of a recent conversation a department official had with Maxwell. In addition, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer called on the FBI to conduct a 'counterintelligence threat assessment' to determine the risk to U.S. national security if a foreign entity were to gain access to the Epstein files. 'Could our adversaries use that information to blackmail someone like the president or other senior leaders in government?' Schumer asked.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
33 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump warns Russia of tariffs in 10 days unless Ukraine ceasefire is reached
Trump has issued a fresh warning to Russia, saying the US will impose sanctions and tariffs within 10 days unless Moscow takes steps to end the war in Ukraine. read more US President Donald Trump has warned that the US will begin imposing sanctions and tariffs on Russia within 10 days unless Moscow shows signs of ending its war in Ukraine. Speaking aboard Air Force One, Trump said he has yet to hear back from the Kremlin and saw no reason to delay. 'There's no reason to wait. If you know what the answer is going to be, why wait? And it would be sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs,' he told reporters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The president had earlier given Russia a 50-day deadline, but said on Monday he was cutting it short due to the lack of progress. 'I'm going to make a new deadline of about… 10 or 12 days from today,' he said during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'We just don't see any progress being made.' Trump also said he doesn't plan to speak with President Vladimir Putin again, adding that punitive economic measures will serve as the US response if Russia doesn't act. He dismissed fears of oil market disruptions, saying increased domestic production would cushion any fallout. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy welcomed Trump's remarks, calling them 'particularly significant.' In a post on X, he wrote: 'A clear stance and expressed determination by @POTUS – right on time, when a lot can change through strength for real peace… I thank President Trump for his focus on saving lives and stopping this horrible war.' Kyiv had suggested a possible meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin before the end of August, but the Kremlin rejected the idea, saying any such summit must come only after concrete peace terms are in place. Russia's foreign ministry has said that if the West truly wanted peace, it would stop arming Ukraine. Trump, meanwhile, pointed to his past role in de-escalating conflicts between India and Pakistan, and Rwanda and Congo, saying his push for peace continues—though progress in Gaza remains elusive. Some global leaders have even floated his name for the Nobel Peace Prize. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
