Council Submission Raises Concerns Over Losses In Water Quality
A Waikato Regional Council submission has raised concerns of potential losses in water quality in the region.
The council's submission is in response to proposed wastewater environmental performance standards stemming from the Local Government (Water Services) Bill.
Taumata Arowai is consulting on the initial wastewater standards which regional councils will be required to implement through resource consent conditions, without making them stricter or more lenient, councillors heard at the April meeting of the Strategy and Policy Committee.
The council's submission advised that while the proposed standards are expected to enhance environmental outcomes and improve efficiencies, they conflict with current council initiatives to improve water quality.
Committee chair Warren Maher said the council has been systematically strengthening the limits of resource consents over time to improve water quality across the region in collaboration with territorial authorities.
'Many of the existing municipal wastewater discharges have one or multiple contaminant standards in their existing consents or current applications which are stricter than what the proposed standards would require.
'Implementing these standards as they are would significantly undermine the substantial efforts and investments made by territorial authorities, which have been actively supported by our council, in upgrading wastewater treatment plant discharges,' said Cr Maher.
'If the government decides to progress the standards, then they should at least enable the council to maintain current discharge quality levels. If not, then water quality across the region could deteriorate and the percentage of waterways experiencing significant adverse effects may worsen.'
Councillors also expressed their concerns regarding the proposal to grant new resource consents a 35-year timeframe.
'As a regulator, the council must be able to carry out a case-by-case assessment that considers localised effects and specific merits of an application to determine the appropriate duration of a resource consent,' said Cr Maher.
'Applying a blanket 35-year approach will not adequately account for future changes in environmental conditions, community needs and technology advancements.'
The proposed wastewater environmental performance standards are expected to be set by late 2025 following enactment of the Local Government (Water Services) Bill.
The report on the council's submission along with a recording of the Strategy and Policy Committee meeting can be viewed at waikatoregion.govt.nz/council-meetings/policy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
16 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Scraping the bottom of the barrel
Just when you think things can't get any worse, they often do. That is precisely what we have seen politically this week when it comes to the behaviour of our politicians. As if Leader of the House Chris Bishop's ill-conceived and poorly controlled ramblings at the Aotearoa Music Awards about a Stan Walker performance featuring Toitū Te Tiriti banners and people waving tino rangatiratanga flags weren't enough, the country had to endure even ghastlier behaviour in Parliament on Thursday. The debate about whether to endorse the recommendation to suspend three Te Pāti Māori MPs really showed New Zealanders the worst of Parliament. Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, and Rawiri Waititi have now been barred from the House for seven days, 21 days and 21 days respectively for performing a haka in Parliament during debate last November about the waste of time, energy and money that was the Act party's contentious Treaty Principles Bill. Their intimidatory behaviour towards Act MPs then was at the core of the complaints considered by the Privileges Committee. Despite efforts by Opposition parties to reduce the length of the recommended suspensions, the government on Thursday ratified the committee's recommendations for punishments which, in the case of Ms Ngarewa-Packer and Mr Waititi, are the most severe ever handed down to MPs. While there can be little doubt that the behaviour of the three MPs last November was threatening and failed to meet the standards of Parliament, the severity seems unnecessarily vindictive. Interestingly, an RNZ poll of just over 1000 people, with a margin of error of 3.1 %, now shows that most respondents – 37% – think the punishment is 'about right" while 36.2% consider it too harsh. It is 'too lenient" in the minds of 17.2% of those surveyed. Of Labour Party supporters, 8% believe it should have been tougher, as do 3.8% of Green Party followers and, surprisingly, 9% of Te Pāti Māori supporters. The poll shows 54.2% of respondents either support the penalties or think they were too weak, a reflection of the government's view. While the impromptu haka by the three was seen by some as unacceptable and a breach of parliamentary protocol, it was Ms Ngarewa-Packer's foolish mimicry of shooting Act MPs which was the worst and most intimidatory action that day. The second she put her two fingers together, made the pretend gun and pointed it at Act leader David Seymour and colleagues marked the start of this whole sorry saga – though of course it can also be argued the real start came with the introduction of Mr Seymour's divisive Bill, allowed to happen by a prime minister too focused on stitching up a coalition deal with him at the top. The inciting incidents, the response and the reactions this week leave a stain on the reputation of Parliament. Some of the grandiloquence in the House on Thursday was vituperative and unwarranted. NZ First leader Winston Peters went way too far when he likened Mr Waititi's moko to scribbles, though he did apologise after the Speaker's intervention. Mr Waititi also stepped over the line by bringing a noose into the House. It was a bit rich for Mr Peters to tell RNZ it was a sad day in Parliament when he played a significant role in making it that. Parliament is no place for shrinking violets. We have seen that time and time again. It has had more than its share of biffo and nastiness over the years, which never led to suspensions anywhere near the length of those rubberstamped this week. Let us hope we don't see the like of this miserable drama again. Saw that coming It was always going to be a case of 'this town ain't big enough for the both of us". The implosion in recent days of United States President Donald Trump's simpering friendship with Elon Musk, the world's richest man, has been both highly predictable and highly amusing. Mr Musk has become increasingly caustic and is now calling for Mr Trump to be impeached. In turn, the president wants all Mr Musk's government contracts to be cancelled. When two such massive egos meet, there can only be one winner. Who that will ultimately be remains to be seen. In the meantime, let's be honest, the feud provides some much-needed light relief.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Wellington mayoral hopeful Ray Chung promises to slash council jobs
Photo: Supplied / Facebook Wellington mayoral hopeful Ray Chung wants to eliminate rates increases altogether by cutting costs - starting with council employees, despite an admission he does not know what "a lot of these people do". Chung, councillor for Wharangi/Onslow-Western Ward after topping the ballot in the 2022 local elections, is running for mayor on the 'Independent Together' (IT) ticket. The frontrunner is likely former Labour leader Andrew Little, who has the backing of the city's outgoing Green-affiliated mayor, Tory Whanau. Chung insists the city should steer clear of party politicians. "I've never belonged to any political party, so I don't have any affiliation with any of the parties. I just think that we should be looking at things that make financial sense, make things that work for everyone." IT's five key policies include having no party politics in local government. "The media are very fond of saying that we're 'right' when we first announced IT. Even some of my colleagues came out and said that, 'Oh, we are a right-wing party,' but we aren't, and I don't even know what any of the people, any of the candidates that we actually have, I don't even know what their political affiliations are." The party's headline policy was zero rates increases for three years - not zero after inflation, but zero at all - and after that only increase rate to match inflation. That was despite the city's potential billion-dollar problems with its water infrastructure and projected double-digit increases for years to come . Asked on Morning Report on Friday if zero rates increases would mean cuts, Chung replied "absolutely". But when it came to what exactly would get the chop, he said "a good close look" at things that "aren't our core business" would be needed. "The thing is, when cutting, when looking at cutting rates, the rate cuts have to come from [operating expenses]. They don't come from [capital expenditure] - a little bit comes from [capital expenditure], but very little… "Anything that we need to borrow money for to actually build or to do, then that comes out of [capital expenditure]. So that doesn't affect your rates, except for the interest on the money that you're borrowing. "So where the big cuts are coming is out of operating expenses. So we've got to take those out because they have a direct effect on rates. So these are the things that we're focusing on to try and get out." Pressed further, he ruled out cuts to "core council activities" including "parks, swimming pools, libraries, community facilities". But said the size of the council's payroll was a problem. "Our staff numbers have just gone up exponentially and really, I have no idea what a lot of these people do." According to Wellington City Council's latest annual report , the headcount has actually been relatively flat over the last few years - 1970 in 2022, 2065 in 2023 and actually dropping to 1939 in 2024. Each year, between a quarter and a third of employees were casual or part-time. In 2017, the council had 1762 employees, percent3D&keywords=2017&type=all&utm_source= its archives showed . Other pillars of IT's policy platform included scrapping "wasteful projects", reinstating "lost" carparks and increasing surveillance in the CBD to prevent anti-social behaviour. At his own campaign launch, Little called Chung's campaign pitch of no rates increases not credible . "I don't think that's at all credible, and I know look, I'm the first to say rate rises of 30 percent over two years is not acceptable. That's not credible either, and so the council has to be doing what it can to manage those rates rises." Voting in this year's local elections begins in September. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Desley Simpson endorses Wayne Brown for Auckland Mayor
Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown and Deputy Mayor Desley Simpson. Photo: RNZ / Jessica Hopkins Auckland's deputy mayor has officially endorsed Wayne Brown in his re-election bid, after months of speculation she would run against him. In a joint press conference a short time ago Desley Simpson said she endorsed Brown's campaign for a second term as mayor. Desley Simpson said she had ruled out running for mayor in the October local body elections a long time ago. But in April Simpson told RNZ she was still undecided on running for mayor, after she confirmed earlier this year she was mulling it over. The changes Brown had made for Auckland had been significant for the city and praised his vision for the city, she said. Both denied they had ever shared harsh words with each other but agreed there has been disagreements. Brown said if re-elected this would be his last term.
