India-US spat over trade and oil threatens wider fallout
NEW DELHI : US President Donald Trump's tirade against India over trade and Russian oil purchases threatens to undo two decades of diplomatic progress, analysts and officials say, and could derail other areas of cooperation as domestic political pressures drive both sides to harden their stances.
India's opposition parties and the general public have urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to stand up to what they call bullying by Trump, who signed an executive order yesterday, subjecting Indian imports to an additional 25% in duties on top of an existing 25% tariff, due to its big purchases of Russian oil.
While India has emerged in recent years as a key partner for Washington in its strategic rivalry with China, its large US trade surplus and close relations with Russia – which Trump is seeking to pressure into agreeing to a peace agreement with Ukraine – have made it a prime target in the Republican president's global tariff offensive.
'Trump's taunt that India could buy oil from arch enemy Pakistan has also not gone down well in New Delhi,' said two Indian government sources.
India has also rejected repeated claims by Trump that he used trade as a lever to end a recent military conflict between India and Pakistan.
In an unusually sharp statement this week, India accused the US of double standards in singling it out for Russian oil imports while continuing to buy Russian uranium hexafluoride, palladium and fertiliser.
Yesterday, it called the tariffs 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' vowing to 'take all actions necessary to protect its national interests'.
'However, New Delhi knows that any further escalation will hurt it in matters beyond trade,' said the sources.
'Unlike China, India does not have leverage like supplies of rare earths to force Trump's hand to improve the terms of any trade deal,' they said.
In recent years, successive US administrations, including Trump's first, carefully cultivated relations with India with an eye on it as a vital partner in long-term efforts to counter the growing might of China.
However, analysts say Trump's recent moves have plunged the relationship back to possibly its worst phase since the US imposed sanctions on India for nuclear tests in 1998.
'India is now in a trap: because of Trump's pressure, Modi will reduce India's oil purchases from Russia, but he cannot publicly admit to doing so for fear of looking like he's surrendering to Trump's blackmail,' said Ashley Tellis at Washington's Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
'We could be heading into a needless crisis that unravels a quarter century of hard-won gains with India,' Tellis said.
Indian state refiners have in recent days stopped buying Russian oil as discounts narrowed and pressure from Trump rose, Reuters has reported.
New challenges for relations
A more pressing challenge for India, analysts say, is the stark divergence between its priorities and Trump's political base on key issues such as work visas for tech professionals and offshoring of services.
India has long been a major beneficiary of US work visa programmes and the outsourcing of software and business services, a sore point for Americans who have lost jobs to cheaper workers in India.
Relations with India risk becoming a 'football in American domestic politics,' warned Evan Feigenbaum, a former senior state department official under the Republican presidency of George W Bush.
'Issues that directly touch India are among the most partisan and explosive in Washington, including immigration and deportation, H1B visas for tech workers, offshoring and overseas manufacturing by US companies, and technology sharing and co-innovation with foreigners,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post.
Since a 2008 deal to cooperate on civilian nuclear technology, the two countries have deepened intelligence sharing and defence cooperation and expanded interactions with Australia and Japan through the Quad grouping aimed at containing China's dominance in the Indo-Pacific.
However, fractures have appeared, despite Modi's rapport with Trump in his first term and then former president Joe Biden.
Images in February of Indians deported by the US on military planes, their hands and legs shackled, horrified the country just days before Modi went to see Trump seeking to stave off high tariffs.
The relationship was also seriously tested in late 2023 when the US said it had foiled a plot with Indian links to kill a Sikh separatist leader on US soil.
New Delhi has denied any official connection to the plot.
'The Modi regime's credibility in the US has gone down,' said Sukh Deo Muni, a former Indian diplomat and a professor emeritus at New Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University.
'And maybe there are people who think that India or Modi had to be brought back on track, if not taught a lesson.
'And if that trend continues, I'm quite worried that the challenge is quite powerful and strong for India to navigate,' Sukh said.
Strengthening ties with US rivals
One Indian government source said India needs to gradually repair ties with the US while engaging more with other nations that have faced the brunt of Trump tariffs and aid cuts, including the African Union and the BRICS bloc that includes Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa.
India is already making some moves with Russia and China.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to visit New Delhi this year and on Tuesday, Russia said the two countries had discussed further strengthening defence cooperation 'in the form of a particularly privileged strategic partnership'.
India has also boosted engagement with China, a change after years of tensions following a deadly border clash in 2020.
Modi is set to visit China soon for the first time since 2018.
'Russia will attempt to exploit the rift between the US and India by proposing the restoration of the Russia-India-China trilateral and new projects in defence,' said analyst Aleksei Zakharov at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi.
'India will undoubtedly be mindful of structural factors such as sanctions against Russia and will seek to find a compromise with the Trump administration,' Zakharov said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
4 minutes ago
- The Star
Mexico, under pressure from Trump, transfers 26 more cartel members to US
Members of Mexico's federal forces escort a prisoner wanted in the U.S. for ties to drug-trafficking groups at the Altiplano high-security prison, before transferring them to Toluca International Airport, amid pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump to dismantle drug cartels, in Almoloya de Juarez, Mexico, August 12, 2025. Gabinete de Seguridad de Mexico/Handout via REUTERS MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Mexico sent more than two dozen suspected cartel members to the U.S. on Tuesday, amid rising pressure from President Donald Trump on Mexico to dismantle the country's powerful drug organizations. Authorities shipped 26 prisoners wanted in the U.S. for ties to drug-trafficking groups, Mexico's attorney general's office and security ministry said in a joint statement. Mexico said the U.S. Department of Justice had requested their extradition and that it would not seek the death penalty for the accused cartel members. The transfer is the second of its kind this year. In February, Mexican authorities sent 29 alleged cartel leaders to the U.S., sparking a debate about the political and legal grounds for such a move. That Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum permitted yet another large-scale extradition of Mexican nationals underscores the balancing act she faces as she seeks to appease Trump while also avoiding unilateral U.S. military action in Mexico. In a statement, the U.S. Embassy said among those extradited were key figures in the Jalisco New Generation Cartel and the Sinaloa Cartel, which are Mexico's two dominant organized crime groups. 'This transfer is yet another example of what is possible when two governments unite against violence and impunity," U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Ronald Johnson said in a statement. "These fugitives will now face justice in American courts, and the citizens of both our nations will be safer.' Trump has tied tariffs on Mexico to the deadly fentanyl trade, claiming the country hasn't tackled drug cartels aggressively enough. Last week, he directed the Pentagon to prepare operations against Mexican drug gangs that have been designated global terrorist organizations. Sheinbaum has said the U.S. and Mexico are nearing a security agreement to expand cooperation in the fight against cartels. But she has flatly rejected suggestions by the Trump administration that it could carry out unilateral military operations in Mexico. (Additional reporting by Mrinmay Dey in Bengaluru; Editing by Chris Reese, Cassandra Garrison and Lincoln Feast.)
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Petroleum Development Act can't supersede relevant Sarawak laws, says senator
Senator Ahmad Ibrahim disputed law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said's statement that Petronas's rights on O&G resources in Sarawak remain protected under the PDA. (Petronas pic) PETALING JAYA : The Petroleum Development Act (PDA) 1974 cannot supersede the relevant laws in Sarawak, especially the Oil Mining Ordinance (OMO) 1958, a senator said in disputing a statement by a federal minister. Ahmad Ibrahim said Sarawak had been producing oil and gas since the discovery of oil in Miri in 1910, some 53 years before Malaysia was formed, the Sarawak Public Communications Unit reported. Ahmad said Sarawak had developed the industry under the state's own laws way before the PDA was enacted. Apart from the PDA, he said, the other relevant laws were the Distribution of Gas Ordinance (DGO) 2016, the Sarawak Land Code, and the State Sales Tax regime. He said Section 73 of the Malaysia Act 1963 preserved all state laws in force before Malaysia was formed, which included the OMO. Moreover, the ordinance, following its amendment in 2018, granted the state full authority over petroleum licensing onshore and on its continental shelf. 'The PDA (only) applies fully in states that do not have their own petroleum laws like the OMO, and therefore, in those states, Petronas is the sole aggregator of oil and gas,' he was quoted as saying. On Tuesday, law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said said the national oil company's rights on oil and gas resources in Sarawak remained protected under the PDA. In a written parliamentary reply, Azalina said the PDA would remain in force, in accordance with existing legal provisions. 'Petronas is vested with the ownership of petroleum, and the rights, powers, freedoms, and exclusive privileges to explore, exploit, obtain, and acquire petroleum, whether onshore or offshore Malaysia, as provided for under the Act,' she was quoted as saying. Ahmad said that under the DGO, Sarawak has exclusive authority to license and regulate domestic gas distribution, with state-owned Petroleum Sarawak Bhd (Petros) having been formally recognised by the federal government as the sole gas aggregator for Sarawak's domestic market, excluding liquefied natural gas. As for the State Sales Tax, he said, a 2020 High Court ruling upheld Sarawak's right to impose such a tax on petroleum products, noting that Petronas withdrew its appeal and settled the dues. On Feb 5, Azalina said Sarawak had accepted that the PDA, not the state ordinances, dictated the operation of Malaysia's petroleum sector. She said Sarawak's concession was among key matters agreed upon by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Sarawak premier Abang Johari Openg during a meeting on Jan 7. On Feb 7, Anwar said the federal and Sarawak governments had agreed to Petronas and its subsidiaries retaining all existing contractual obligations, domestic and international. However, to fulfil Sarawak's aspirations in the oil and gas sector, it was agreed that the DGO will come into force on March 1, he said. 'The DGO will be read together with the PDA, and therefore Petros will act as Sarawak's aggregator,' he had said. Anwar said this after Abang Johari reiterated the state's contention that it had regulatory authority over oil and gas activities within its territory.
Free Malaysia Today
5 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
New monitoring mechanisms for EAIC as part of rebranding
The EAIC said its new logo symbolises its sharpness and vigilance in monitoring misconduct. PETALING JAYA : The Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission (EAIC) today said it is introducing new mechanisms to monitor the progress of its probes and enhancing its standard operating procedures (SOPs) for investigations as part of the organisation's rebranding. In a statement, the EAIC said it had conducted studies on the effectiveness of enforcement agencies under its purview and participated in field operations and consultations with stakeholders to better understand the issues faced by the agencies in question. It said the rebranding marked the continuation of reforms which started last year, including the establishment of a special task force to investigate high-profile and public interest cases. Such cases include the illegal disposal of electronic waste (e-waste), abuse of power in the issuance of medical visas, and a study to identify preventive measures for deaths in custody. The EAIC also introduced a new logo, featuring elements of a tiger's eye and claw, meant to symbolise sharpness and vigilance in monitoring misconduct. 'This rebranding aims to clearly communicate the commission's mission to move forward as a leader in improving integrity, transparency, and public trust among enforcement agencies,' it said. The EAIC is a federal statutory body under the Prime Minister's Department, established in 2011 to monitor, investigate, and report on misconduct by personnel from enforcement agencies. It also handles public complaints about misconduct in enforcement agencies such as the police, immigration department, and road transport department.
