Why influencers are choosing Seneca UK for their hair restoration treatments
When it comes to hair restoration, there's a reason more and more high-profile names are turning to Seneca Medical Group UK - and particularly its Glasgow clinic - for their treatments.
With over 35 years of experience, a consistent track record of award-winning care, and a medical ethos built around personalised treatment plans delivered exclusively by qualified doctors, Seneca is redefining what patients should expect from a hair transplant clinic.
From influencers and athletes to lifestyle bloggers and gaming entrepreneurs, public figures are opening up about their personal experiences with hair loss and, importantly, the clinics they trust to help them restore confidence.
Among the many clients choosing Seneca UK are John Robertson, founder of TheEverydayMan and ranked #3 in the Top UK Lifestyle Blogs 2025, Zander Murray, a former professional footballer, Archie Watson, a personal trainer and fitness coach and Scott Method, Twitch Partner and founder of gaming collective Method.gg.
Their reasons for choosing Seneca are strikingly similar: trusted expertise, natural results, and discretion - all backed by a globally recognised brand in medical hair restoration.
Seneca Medical Group isn't just another name in the hair transplant industry. It is a pioneer with an unmatched international reputation. With a presence in nine countries including Scotland, Seneca's foundation is built on over three decades of clinical excellence and scientific research in hair loss treatments.
The clinic has been honoured with numerous awards, including distinctions in medical tourism, innovation, and quality of care - and combined with a number of delighted high profile clients, these accolades are a reflection of the exceptionally high standards that underpin every procedure.
What truly sets Seneca apart is its exclusive use of doctors to perform every hair transplant procedure. Unlike some clinics that delegate the work to technicians, Seneca insists on the highest clinical standards, meaning each treatment is delivered by a trained and certified medical professional. This commitment not only ensures better results but gives patients peace of mind knowing their hair, health, and appearance are in expert hands.
In an age of curated images and social media perfection, many influencers are embracing authenticity, sharing their journeys with hair loss - and their decisions to address it.
John Robertson, better known as TheEverydayMan online, documented his hair transplant journey on YouTube, highlighting the professional and supportive environment he experienced at Seneca's UK clinic. In his own words, he praised the personalised approach and noted how Seneca's Glasgow clinic made the process convenient and seamless. "From the consultation to the follow-ups, everything was tailored to me. It's easy to see why Seneca is the go-to clinic for so many people like myself," he said.
Zander Murray, whose football career placed him in the public eye, also spoke candidly about his experience. He chose Seneca not just for its proven results, but for the discreet, medically-led care. His testimonial underscores the importance of trust and professionalism in such a personal procedure. "I wanted the best — and that's exactly what I got with Seneca," he said.
Archie Watson a qualified personal trainer, and Scott Method, an influential figure in gaming and esports, similarly shared their decisions to trust Seneca. For men working in visual and performance-focused industries, a natural-looking hairline and confidence in their appearance are key.
Their stories are available to view on Seneca's official YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/@SenecaHairTransplant-UK and offer honest insights into both the emotional and physical transformations possible with expert care.
No two hair loss journeys are alike and that's something Seneca recognises in every consultation. The clinic provides individualised treatment plans based on thorough diagnosis, taking into account each patient's medical background, lifestyle, and desired results. Every plan is tailored using advanced diagnostic systems and cutting-edge techniques, ensuring the most natural and lasting outcome.
Whether a client is experiencing early signs of thinning or more advanced hair loss, Seneca's comprehensive approach - from diagnosis to post-treatment support - ensures they receive the right treatment, at the right time, in the right hands.
Seneca offers a range of services, including the Direct FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) method, which involves the direct implantation of individual hair follicles with precision and minimal trauma. The technique is minimally invasive, requiring no scalpel or stitches, and significantly reduces downtime.
For Scottish clients, including many influencers living in or travelling to Glasgow, having access to Seneca's world-class services locally is a game-changer. Seneca's Glasgow clinic, located conveniently in the city centre, offers the same high standards found in its European locations, with staff trained to deliver personalised care in a calm, confidential setting.
This is not a one-size-fits-all operation. Seneca's local presence means patients don't need to travel abroad or settle for less-than-ideal solutions. Instead, they get cutting-edge hair restoration right here in Scotland, with all the follow-up care and consultation they need.
For the influencers and professionals who have undergone treatment at Seneca UK, the results speak for themselves - in their photos, videos, and candid reviews. But beyond aesthetics, it's about something deeper: having confidence restored and control regained.
With over 35 years of experience, award-winning service, qualified professionals performing every procedure and a tailored approach for every client, Seneca UK continues to be a leader in medical hair restoration and the clear choice for influencers who demand nothing less than the best.
To explore real patient stories and learn more about treatment options at Seneca UK's Glasgow clinic, visit:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why influencers are choosing Seneca UK for their hair restoration treatments
When it comes to hair restoration, there's a reason more and more high-profile names are turning to Seneca Medical Group UK - and particularly its Glasgow clinic - for their treatments. With over 35 years of experience, a consistent track record of award-winning care, and a medical ethos built around personalised treatment plans delivered exclusively by qualified doctors, Seneca is redefining what patients should expect from a hair transplant clinic. From influencers and athletes to lifestyle bloggers and gaming entrepreneurs, public figures are opening up about their personal experiences with hair loss and, importantly, the clinics they trust to help them restore confidence. Among the many clients choosing Seneca UK are John Robertson, founder of TheEverydayMan and ranked #3 in the Top UK Lifestyle Blogs 2025, Zander Murray, a former professional footballer, Archie Watson, a personal trainer and fitness coach and Scott Method, Twitch Partner and founder of gaming collective Their reasons for choosing Seneca are strikingly similar: trusted expertise, natural results, and discretion - all backed by a globally recognised brand in medical hair restoration. Seneca Medical Group isn't just another name in the hair transplant industry. It is a pioneer with an unmatched international reputation. With a presence in nine countries including Scotland, Seneca's foundation is built on over three decades of clinical excellence and scientific research in hair loss treatments. The clinic has been honoured with numerous awards, including distinctions in medical tourism, innovation, and quality of care - and combined with a number of delighted high profile clients, these accolades are a reflection of the exceptionally high standards that underpin every procedure. What truly sets Seneca apart is its exclusive use of doctors to perform every hair transplant procedure. Unlike some clinics that delegate the work to technicians, Seneca insists on the highest clinical standards, meaning each treatment is delivered by a trained and certified medical professional. This commitment not only ensures better results but gives patients peace of mind knowing their hair, health, and appearance are in expert hands. In an age of curated images and social media perfection, many influencers are embracing authenticity, sharing their journeys with hair loss - and their decisions to address it. John Robertson, better known as TheEverydayMan online, documented his hair transplant journey on YouTube, highlighting the professional and supportive environment he experienced at Seneca's UK clinic. In his own words, he praised the personalised approach and noted how Seneca's Glasgow clinic made the process convenient and seamless. "From the consultation to the follow-ups, everything was tailored to me. It's easy to see why Seneca is the go-to clinic for so many people like myself," he said. Zander Murray, whose football career placed him in the public eye, also spoke candidly about his experience. He chose Seneca not just for its proven results, but for the discreet, medically-led care. His testimonial underscores the importance of trust and professionalism in such a personal procedure. "I wanted the best — and that's exactly what I got with Seneca," he said. Archie Watson a qualified personal trainer, and Scott Method, an influential figure in gaming and esports, similarly shared their decisions to trust Seneca. For men working in visual and performance-focused industries, a natural-looking hairline and confidence in their appearance are key. Their stories are available to view on Seneca's official YouTube channel at and offer honest insights into both the emotional and physical transformations possible with expert care. No two hair loss journeys are alike and that's something Seneca recognises in every consultation. The clinic provides individualised treatment plans based on thorough diagnosis, taking into account each patient's medical background, lifestyle, and desired results. Every plan is tailored using advanced diagnostic systems and cutting-edge techniques, ensuring the most natural and lasting outcome. Whether a client is experiencing early signs of thinning or more advanced hair loss, Seneca's comprehensive approach - from diagnosis to post-treatment support - ensures they receive the right treatment, at the right time, in the right hands. Seneca offers a range of services, including the Direct FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) method, which involves the direct implantation of individual hair follicles with precision and minimal trauma. The technique is minimally invasive, requiring no scalpel or stitches, and significantly reduces downtime. For Scottish clients, including many influencers living in or travelling to Glasgow, having access to Seneca's world-class services locally is a game-changer. Seneca's Glasgow clinic, located conveniently in the city centre, offers the same high standards found in its European locations, with staff trained to deliver personalised care in a calm, confidential setting. This is not a one-size-fits-all operation. Seneca's local presence means patients don't need to travel abroad or settle for less-than-ideal solutions. Instead, they get cutting-edge hair restoration right here in Scotland, with all the follow-up care and consultation they need. For the influencers and professionals who have undergone treatment at Seneca UK, the results speak for themselves - in their photos, videos, and candid reviews. But beyond aesthetics, it's about something deeper: having confidence restored and control regained. With over 35 years of experience, award-winning service, qualified professionals performing every procedure and a tailored approach for every client, Seneca UK continues to be a leader in medical hair restoration and the clear choice for influencers who demand nothing less than the best. To explore real patient stories and learn more about treatment options at Seneca UK's Glasgow clinic, visit:
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
Howard Levitt: Think the issue of workplace vaccine mandates is long-settled? Not quite, say courts
Some employers (and employees) might believe that firing workers for non-compliance with vaccine mandates is settled law. After all, vaccines were the best response to a public health emergency and all levels of government both imposed and supported them. So, when an employee refuses to get vaccinated, one would think the employer has a pretty clear case for discharge. Now that the acute phase of COVID-19 has essentially ended, this topic may seem of little relevance. But the wheels of justice spin slowly and many cases are still winding their way through the courts. Although the arbitration cases have been mixed, the courts have primarily found that employers had the right to impose vaccine mandates, with the leading case being my own in Seneca College. (Seneca won both initially and on appeal.) As one court noted in a case involving the TTC, 'If even one TTC rider or worker dies or is seriously harmed after catching Covid-19 from an unvaccinated TTC employee, it will be one too many. That is harm that is truly irreparable.' In the unionized context, employers could suspend or layoff workers pending either the employee being vaccinated or the policy changing. Employers of non-union employees, however, felt that they did not have that recourse because both layoffs and suspensions are generally constructive dismissals. There were always exceptions for employees with medical or religious exemptions, if an accommodation could be found without risking the health of others. And, of course, if an employee refused to provide proof of their vaccination status, the employer could treat them as being unvaccinated and terminate their employment. Unvaccinated employees invariably argued that they should be permitted to work from home as, without contact with customers or coworkers, their vaccination status would be irrelevant. But now that employers have begun work recalls, such employees should not have special status and be permitted to work from home on the basis of being unvaccinated while vaccinated employees are forced to return to the office. But what if an employer has no real interest in enforcing a vaccine mandate for a particular employee? That issue recently arose in a case involving 37-year-old Jocelyn Paul, who had been employed for 10 years as a senior account manager with Sensient Colors Canada Ltd. Her performance appraisal for the first year of the pandemic was highly positive, noting that she was able to 'close a tremendous gap in revenue' despite the challenges of Covid-19. By the fall of 2021, Sensient introduced a vaccine mandate. Paul did not claim a medical or religious exemption. She simply refused to disclose whether she was vaccinated. She was the only employee who refused to comply and was fired with just cause alleged. The court found that 'in certain cases, a refusal to vaccinate may sufficiently undermine an employee's ability to carry out their duties so as to justify dismissal for cause. However, this will not be true in every case.' It said there must be a sufficient connection between a worker's responsibilities and the vaccination requirement to justify imposing 'the ultimate penalty' of termination. Ontario Superior Court Justice Chris De Sa looked at the relevant factors in Paul's case: Ninety per cent of her work time since the pandemic started was from home. During the pandemic, her performance exceeded the job requirements. None of her 10 top clients required her to be vaccinated to do an on-site visit. Prior to her termination and during the pandemic, she continued to do on-site visits with clients in Ontario with no problems. She had no United States-based clients. Even though her job required that she attend certain meetings in the U.S., the employer could have arranged much of the training in other ways. She complied with all other safety requirements, such as masking. What did the court find Sentient should have done? 'A more proportionate response here may have been to review and revise Ms. Paul's customer portfolio to the extent required, temporarily suspend her from customer-facing sales or even possibly put her on a leave of absence.' In short, the court found that Sensient should have accommodated Paul's refusal by changing her job, thereby advantaging her over others who were vaccinated and creating some inconvenience or inefficiency for the employer. Howard Levitt: The key factors determining severance in wrongful dismissal cases Howard Levitt: Why Ottawa should stop interfering and let Canada Post and the union duke it out The suggestion that she could potentially be suspended for months or placed on unpaid leave is also interesting, since that would generally be treated as a constructive dismissal. This case is symptomatic of the court's increasingly employee-friendly approach, particularly in Ontario. And, to the point, if an employer is going to succeed in enforcing a vaccine mandate in court, they will need to — if this case is any predictor — show some genuine prejudice. One size, judicially speaking, does not fit all. Howard Levitt is senior partner of Levitt LLP, employment and labour lawyers with offices in Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia. He practices employment law in eight provinces and is the author of six books, including the Law of Dismissal in Canada. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
30-05-2025
- Yahoo
Temitope Oriola: Fighting violent online network preying on kids requires all-of-society approach
The RCMP announced on Thursday the terrorism-related arrest of a 15-year old Alberta boy. He is being charged under Section 810.011 of the Criminal Code — Fear of terrorism offence. This section of the Criminal Code states that 'A person who fears on reasonable grounds that another person may commit a terrorism offence may, with the attorney general's consent, lay an information before a provincial court judge.' This suggests that the RCMP had reason to believe the boy might carry out an act of terrorism. The boy allegedly belongs to '764', a loose, nodal, rhizomatic, supranational network of online violent entities. The RCMP news release describes 764 network as 'a transnational online ecosystem of violent online predators who routinely lure youth, particularly those in vulnerable sectors, and encourage them to commit sexual acts, self-harm, and the torture of animals. Elements of The Com/764 network are known to have extreme ideological views and are victimizing children through desensitizing and radicalizing them to violence.' This is indeed a national security concern and global problem. In March 2025, the FBI issued a warning regarding 'a sharp increase in the activity of 764 and other violent online networks which operate within the United States and around the globe.' The statement notes that the networks 'methodically target and exploit minors and other vulnerable individuals.' Crimes like rape, murder, child pornography, sextortion, kidnapping, et cetera, have been linked to the network around the world. There have been arrests, charges and/or convictions of its members in Brazil, the U.K., Spain, U.S., Romania, Sweden, and Australia, among others. 764 is believed to have been founded by a Texas teenager, Bradley Cadenhead, in 2021. It has multiple sub-entities. One of the more telling is 'No Lives Matter.' The nihilism — ostensible meaninglessness of life — presupposed by the network is evident in the name. The network encourages members to engage in and livestream self-harm and suicide. This is a quintessentially vile 21st century network. Its activities have been catalyzed by the relative anonymity and instantaneity of the Internet and social media platforms. While we are right to focus on the Facebooks of this world, others like Discord, Twitch and Telegram are being deployed by 764. In September 2022, while appearing before the Standing Committee on Human Rights for the Senate, I stated the need to focus on all forms of terrorism. Jihadi terrorism had been the epicentre of national security concerns with relatively scant attention to 'homegrown' terrorism. That gave an inadvertent latitude to the incel network, for example, to carry out attacks they had been discussing online for weeks without seemingly being interrogated. It contributed to tragedies such as the van attack by Alek Minassian in Toronto in 2018. Words have meanings. It appears we are entering a new era of co-locating and cross-fertilizing people's online and offline words and actions. We learned the hard way. The arrest of the 15-year-old may be viewed as a lesson from the Incel rebellion. The RCMP deserves commendation for moving swiftly before any apparent damage could be done. Dealing with transnational actors like the 764 network requires an all-of-society approach. The significance of the role of social media companies cannot be overstated: what content they allow on their platforms, minimum requirements of registration (if any), and surveillance of suspicious words and images. It is also crucial to strengthen legislation regulating social media organizations. Nonetheless, there is no substitute to parental responsibility. Parents must be vigilant about the online activities of their children. It may be cool at first that a child almost always remains in their room but being camped in the basement for days and weeks on end meeting with online friends should elicit parental curiosity. Social engagement of young people is important. Such online groups prey on social isolation, alienation and boredom of young people. We need to provide opportunities for sports, volunteering and other avenues to bond with non-criminal peers. Such activities may also contribute to building the confidence of our young people. Mental health support is fundamental given the self-harm and suicidal ideation that are integral to the imprimatur of 764. I strongly recommend the RCMP resource page on what signs parents can observe to prevent entanglement of children in violent online networks. Temitope Oriola is professor of criminology and recipient of the J. Gordin Kaplan Award, the University of Alberta's most prestigious honour for research excellence. 'X': @topeoriola We invite you to write letters to the editor. A maximum of 150 words is preferred. Letters must carry a first and last name, or two initials and a last name, and include an address and daytime telephone number. All letters are subject to editing. We don't publish letters addressed to others or sent to other publications. Email: letters@ Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the news you need to know — add and to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here. You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. Support us by subscribing today: The Edmonton Journal |The Edmonton Sun.
