
Food for Thought: How What We Eat Is Reshaping the Mental Health Conversation
Not just the food itself but the way we approach it. How we eat. What it means to us. And what it might be doing to our minds.
A new study is helping bring this conversation into focus. The GAIA Study: Connecting the Dots Between Burnout and Nutrition, conducted by the JIVINITI Research Program at the Virsa Foundation, surveyed more than 14,600 Americans. The goal was to explore how different eating habits affect stress, emotional resilience, and even recovery from illness.
The takeaway? People following a whole-food, plant-based (WFPB) or vegan diet were more likely to report stable moods and lower stress than those sticking with the Standard American Diet — known, somewhat ironically, as 'SAD.'
'Our daily food choices can have a major impact on how we feel,' says Nivi Jaswal-Wirtjes, President of the Virsa Foundation and head of the JIVINITI Research Program. 'More than half of WFPB eaters in our study reported no stress at all. That's not just interesting, it's important.'
If you're thinking this all sounds like wellness fluff, there's actual science to back it up, starting with your gut.
The gastrointestinal tract plays a far bigger role in mental health than most people realize. At the center of it all is the gut microbiome: trillions of bacteria that regulate everything from digestion to inflammation to the production of neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine. In fact, nearly 90% of the body's serotonin is made in the gut, not the brain.
'Your gut health is one of the most important predictors of your mental health,' says Dr. Shireen Kassam, founder of Plant-Based Health Professionals UK. 'And your diet is what drives your gut health.'
Fiber-rich, plant-based diets support a diverse and balanced microbiome. Processed foods, on the other hand, especially those high in sugar, artificial additives, and saturated fats, can throw the system into disarray. When the microbiome is out of balance, so is your mood.
The idea that food influences mood isn't new, but it's been getting more attention.
We already know that a nutrient-dense diet (think whole grains, leafy greens, beans, nuts, and lean proteins) can lower the risk of heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, and other chronic conditions. However, recent research shows it may also help reduce the risk of depression and anxiety. The American Heart Association even highlights diet quality as an important factor in mental health.
It's not just about cutting out the 'bad' stuff like added sugars and saturated fats. It's about consistently adding in the foods that help stabilize blood sugar, reduce inflammation, and keep our gut (and brain) in check.
According to the GAIA Study, people eating a mostly processed diet were far more likely to report feeling emotionally drained. About a third of them struggled with basic tasks or said they felt overwhelmed most days.
Meanwhile, those who prioritized whole, unprocessed foods were more likely to describe better focus, steadier moods, and even a sense of calm. 'Food can either feed burnout or help protect you from it,' says Jaswal-Wirtjes. 'That distinction really matters, especially now.'
Samantha Derrick, MPH and co-founder of the Plant Futures Initiative, sees the shift in real-time. 'We're seeing food less as just fuel or a way to lose weight,' she says. 'It's now becoming a key part of how we support our emotional and mental health.'
For a lot of people, food is more than calories and nutrients. It's memory, tradition, and identity. During the early days of the pandemic, when routines fell apart and uncertainty took over, many found solace in cooking. It wasn't just about health, it was about control, creativity, and comfort. 'For many people, cooking became a way to feel grounded again,' says Jaswal-Wirtjes. 'It wasn't just self-care; it was connection.'
That emotional link to food matters. When fast, ultra-processed options replace homemade meals and cultural dishes, something gets lost. It's not just a nutritional issue, it's about the loss of rituals, stories, and shared experiences.
That's one reason food access programs, like produce prescriptions and community meal subsidies, are gaining attention. They do more than just provide nutrients. They restore a sense of dignity, agency, and emotional balance.
Let's be real: Not everyone has access to therapy. Not everyone feels comfortable with medication. Food, in many ways, is the most immediate, universal tool we have.
Medically tailored meals (MTMs) are an example of what's possible when food becomes part of the solution. Created with input from dietitians and doctors, MTMs are designed to support people with chronic conditions like diabetes, heart disease, and even cancer. These meals are not just healthy; they're personalized, culturally sensitive, and often delivered directly to the home.
The Food is Medicine Coalition is one group pushing for this model. Their goal? To make nutrition a foundational part of healthcare, not just an afterthought.
'We've developed standards to ensure people get real help through food,' the coalition notes. 'It's about health equity, prevention, and treating people with dignity.'
No fancy detox. No dramatic overhaul. Just a few simple steps that support your body and your brain:
In a culture that has been known to celebrate speed, hustle, and convenience, taking time to nourish yourself can feel radical. But it's also necessary. And sometimes, the first step toward feeling better isn't a diagnosis or a prescription; it could be what's on your plate.
Click here for more information on the Virsa Foundation
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
This Lifestyle Change May Delay Dementia And Heart Disease As You Age
While many of us might think of longevity when we imagine happy ageing, the American Heart Association explained that our 'healthspan' might be just as important. This, Dr Corey Rovzarn from the Stanford Prevention Research Centre said, 'means living better, not just longer.' It refers to the number of years someone lives without a disease that negatively affects their quality of life. In 2023, Age UK found that almost 74% of those aged 65-74 and 86% of people aged over 85 lived with at least one long-term health condition. But a paper published in Nature Ageing might have found a lifestyle factor that could delay the onset of common chronic illnesses, including neurodegenerative and cardiovascular issues (like heart disease and dementia). Diet may be key to delaying chronic illness in older age Researchers at the Ageing Research Centre at the Karolinska Institutet, Sweden, followed 2,400+ Swedish people over 15 years. They had a mean age of just over 71 at the start of the study. After looking at the health status and lifestyle habits of the participants, the scientists found a link between sticking to healthier diets (like the MIND, AHEI and AMED diets, all of which prioritise fruits, whole grains, fish, nuts, seeds, and veggies) and a delayed onset of chronic illnesses, like dementia and heart disease. This effect seemed stronger in women and those over 78. The researchers speculated that this could be because people who have healthier diets may face less constant, low-grade inflammation, which has 'been linked to cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric disease'. Diet did not seem to have an effect on musculoskeletal illnesses, like arthritis. What should I eat to delay chronic illnesses as I age? Writing for The Conversation, three of the study's authors said: 'The message is clear: eat plenty of vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts and whole grains. 'Choose healthy fats like rapeseed oil and fish. Limit red and processed meats, sugary drinks and solid fats.' But the researchers stressed that diet is only one factor – socialising, staying active, and access to healthcare all matter too. Related... This Is The Age When Ageing 'Accelerates', According To New Research It's Called A 'Fart Walk', And It May Be The Secret To Healthy Ageing, Doctor Says Science Says You Can Prevent Brain Ageing With 4 Simple Steps
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iowa attorney general signs letter calling on DEA to ban ‘designer Xanax'
Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird. (Photo by Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner) Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird is calling on the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in a joint letter to take emergency action to schedule a drug that has been linked to deaths in the state and across the country. Bromazolam is described in the letter penned by Sunday and 20 other state attorneys general as a 'designer Xanax.' The prosecutors say the drug is increasingly contributing to overdose deaths and posing a growing threat to public health. It is also highly potent and unpredictable, Pennsylvania Attorney General Dave Sunday's office wrote, especially when mixed with opioids. Narcan, which is used to reverse an overdose, is ineffective against the drug in such emergencies. Bromazolam is unscheduled under the federal Controlled Substances Act. 'Despite its clear dangers, bromazolam remains unscheduled at the federal level, creating significant challenges for law enforcement and public health officials trying to respond to this emerging crisis,' the attorneys generals wrote. 'Without scheduling, this drug continues to evade traditional regulatory and prosecutorial tools, hindering interdiction efforts and enabling continued distribution through illicit channels.' 'Taking emergency action to schedule bromazolam will help law enforcement remove it from circulation, give prosecutors the tools to hold traffickers accountable, and send a clear signal that this dangerous substance has no place on our streets,' the attorneys general wrote. 'Bromazolam, or 'Designer Xanax' is a lethal, counterfeit drug with no medical use that is highly addictive and killing Americans,' Bird said in a statement. 'It is already an illegal drug in Iowa, and I strongly urge the DEA to take swift and definite action at the federal level to give law enforcement the tools they need to stop this crisis, save lives, and hold traffickers accountable.' This story was originally published by Pennsylvania Capital-Star, which is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Pennsylvania Capital-Star maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Tim Lambert for questions: info@ Solve the daily Crossword

The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Pediatric group bucks RFK Jr. on kids' COVID shots
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommended Tuesday that children between 6 months and 23 months old receive the vaccine to protect them against serious illness caused by the virus. Kids under the age of 2 are especially vulnerable to severe COVID-19, the group said, and should be prioritized for vaccination unless they have an allergy to the jab or its ingredients. In May, Kennedy announced that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would no longer recommend routine COVID-19 shots for healthy children due to a lack of clinical data justifying the need for annual vaccinations against the virus. But the CDC did not follow Kennedy's guidance to the letter, instead recommending that parents take part in a 'shared decision making' process with health care providers to determine if their child needs the shot. The AAP and HHS have been at odds for months, and tensions reached a head when Kennedy dismissed all the members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replaced them with his own handpicked representatives, including some outright vaccine skeptics. Since it was founded in 1930, the AAP has published evidence-based vaccine guidance to support pediatricians. But it has not traditionally differed substantially from federal recommendations. The move to publish COVID recommendations that break from HHS reflects a new effort by medical societies and expert advocacy groups to bypass Kennedy and what they say are his efforts to upend the nation's vaccine system. With vaccine skeptics in charge of U.S. health care, these groups say they want to give Americans — especially parents — as much information as possible to protect children from disease. At the same time AAP's recommendations were released, a group of epidemiologists and infectious diseases experts called the Vaccine Integrity Project held essentially their own version of an ACIP meeting to review evidence on the safety and efficacy for flu, COVID and RSV shots. Members of the initiative said ACIP usually reviews guidelines for respiratory virus vaccines during the summer, but has not appeared to have done it this year. In its absence, the initiative was stepping in. The panel concluded there was no change in safety signals or sudden drop in efficacy on any of the vaccines reviewed. 'There is no scientific evidence to support the changes HHS made to COVID recommendations for pregnant women or for children most at risk for high-risk transmission of severe disease,' said Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, who is leading the initiative.



