Rahul Gandhi should unite secular forces instead of creating divisions: John Brittas
Brittas was reacting to the Congress leader's remarks in Kerala, where he equated the Communist Party of India (Marxist) with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).
The CPI(M) Rajya Sabha leader however added that it would not impact the opposition's unity in the upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament.
Gandhi, speaking in Kerala's Kottayam on Friday, said that he fights the RSS and the CPI(M) ideologically, but his biggest complaint about them was their lack of feelings for the people.
Asked his view on Gandhi's remark, Brittas said, "It's ridiculous, preposterous."
"Whenever he goes to Kerala, there is a penchant for him to speak such rubbish things. And I think the Kerala Congress Party is responsible for that. He chose Kerala as the battleground to take on RSS. Whereas, it was actually a fight between the Left and the Congress there," Brittas told PTI.
"I would earnestly wish that leaders like Rahul Gandhi, who is opposition leader, his sole purpose should be to unite the secular forces, instead of creating confusion, division amongst the rank and file of the secular parties. He doesn't need to give lessons to CPI(M) on how to take on RSS," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Arvind Sanger warns US tariffs on India could exceed 20% without a strong deal
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads "There's a lot of negotiating through the press going on, and there's a clear recognition within the Trump administration that implementing tariffs like the 100%+ ones announced back in April only result in U.S. retailers running out of inventory and store shelves going empty," says Arvind Sanger Well, so far it seems like 15% is where the EU and Japan have landed. But they've agreed to cough up—or at least President Trump claims they've agreed to cough up—a fairly significant amount of investment into the U.S. I'm not sure what kind of deal India is aiming for. A month or month-and-a-half ago, I thought India would be at the front of the line. Now, unfortunately, it seems like India is at the back of the line. And frankly, the deals are going Trump's way. He didn't have to give anything to the EU in exchange for what he got. I don't think he gave up much to Japan either. So, the problem is that the later you come to the table, the less leverage you that sense, I'm not sure how it will pan out. But it's certainly going to be north of 15%, and whether it's 20% or higher will depend on how good a deal India can negotiate. Clearly, President Trump is negotiating with these public claims. They're not likely to reflect the final settlement, but we also don't know where it will ultimately land. What does seem clear is that it's unlikely to settle at the low levels we were hoping for just a few weeks a lot of negotiating through the press going on, and there's a clear recognition within the Trump administration that implementing tariffs like the 100%+ ones announced back in April only result in U.S. retailers running out of inventory and store shelves going empty. That's not something the U.S. government wants. China recognizes that some of these threats are hollow because both countries are heavily reliant on each my assumption is that there will be a lot of brinkmanship, but negotiations will continue. Tariffs are already at, I believe, 60%, which is not low. I'm not sure where things will eventually land, but my concern is that none of these outcomes are guaranteed. There's a lot of uncertainty, and yet the market is priced for perfection. That's the problem—global markets, especially the U.S. market, are assuming that everything will resolve perfectly. Yes, there have been a few good deals, but a lot still needs to remember, the sanctions are not directly on Russia. They're secondary sanctions on those buying Russian oil—primarily aimed at China and India, two of the largest buyers. Congress had proposed a bill imposing 500% secondary sanctions on Russian oil buyers, while President Trump has mentioned 100% sanctions. So that's the one hand, they're trying to negotiate deals with China and India; on the other, they're threatening them over Russian oil purchases. I remain skeptical. President Trump has talked tough on Iran and Venezuela in the past, but his actions have ultimately been restrained—to avoid oil price spikes—because he wants the Fed to cut rates. So I don't believe these threats will be acted upon, but over the past couple of days, he has been speaking quite seriously about them. We're keeping a close watch, though we remain skeptical. Still, the market is clearly pricing in the risk. If Trump follows through on his threats, it could cause major disruption in oil markets—Russia is, after all, the second-largest exporter after Saudi an interesting one. The employment data might surprise on the downside. As for inflation, I'm not expecting any big shocks, but the worst-case scenario would be high inflation coupled with weak jobs data. That would trap the Fed—what do they prioritize then? Especially as these tariffs begin to bite. Remember, we're in a 10% tariff regime until August 1st, after which new tariffs kick in. So, in terms of inflation and growth slowdown, the Fed can't declare victory too early. They'll need to watch the data from August and September to assess the full impact of the tariffs before making Chairman Powell says it's still too early to make a call—even with some encouraging signs—he'll likely avoid taking a strong stance in either direction. But the market, which is increasingly counting on a September rate cut, might get nervous. There's a lot of good news already priced in, but plenty of uncertainty lies ahead.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Trump's Theatre Of Lies: India's Opposition Falls For Master Manipulator's Claims
The tragedy lies not in Trump's predictable dishonesty—that is simply his established modus operandi—but in India's Opposition choosing to legitimise these fabrications It is part of Donald Trump's personality to make seemingly insane remarks that defy logic and truth. Trump is no stranger to lies and outright falsities—he has spread these on umpteen occasions throughout his public life. The Washington Post documented over 10,000 false or misleading statements during his previous presidency. What is truly surprising, however, is India's opposition, led by Rahul Gandhi, taking all of Donald Trump's claims at face value. Trump has claimed 29 times now that he stopped the India-Pakistan flare-up using trade as a leverage. India has categorically denied any such mediation from the US. Yet, the Congress ecosystem has decided to go by the words of a 'gora' president instead of their own prime minister and government. The pattern of Trump's dishonesty is well-documented. From inflating statistics on immigration and crime to exaggerating crowd sizes and misrepresenting trade policies, Trump's relationship with truth has always been transactional. His approach to foreign policy follows the same playbook—make outrageous claims, dominate the news cycle and use the resulting chaos as leverage for his broader objectives. The Defence Sales Gambit As far as Trump is concerned, his rants pertaining to India are driven by a clear desire to coerce New Delhi into buying high-end American weaponry. The timing of his claims coincides perfectly with ongoing discussions about India's fifth-generation fighter jet requirements. While Russia has offered its Su-57 stealth fighter for local production in India, the United States has been pushing its F-35 as an alternative. However, for India, the economic equation matters as much as the strategic one. After all, the F35 are dramatically more expensive than the Su-57 and operate best only under a NATO-grade system of systems. By amplifying drama around India-Pakistan tensions and claiming credit for de-escalation, Trump is signaling that India's decision to buy Russian systems over pricier American platforms will be met with tangible consequences. This coercive approach is reinforced by Senator Lindsey Graham's stark warnings that continued defence or energy deals with Russia could trigger severe economic repercussions for India. Graham has threatened 100 per cent tariffs on oil imports from Russia and proposed legislation enabling up to 500 per cent tariffs on countries helping Russia, directly targeting India's significant energy imports from Moscow. Negotiating Through Exaggeration This theatre of lies is also part of Trump's broader negotiating tactic, especially as trade talks between both countries are ongoing. Trump's negotiation style relies heavily on 'truthful hyperbole"—a strategy he outlined in 'The Art of the Deal'. His approach follows a predictable pattern: start with extreme positions, create disruption and chaos, normalise the absurd through repetition, and then pull negotiations toward his anchor point. Trump's repeated claims about mediating the India-Pakistan conflict serve multiple purposes in this framework. First, they establish him as an indispensable broker, positioning America as the ultimate arbiter of 'South Asian" security. Second, they create artificial leverage in trade negotiations by suggesting that India's security depends on American goodwill. The Trump administration has formally told a US federal court that trade access was used as an incentive to 'avert a full-scale war" between India and Pakistan, demonstrating how these claims are being institutionalised to justify broader trade policies. The strategy is part of Trump's overarching belief that 'leverage is everything". By threatening withdrawal from trade agreements, imposing unilateral import restrictions and creating artificial crises, Trump seeks to reshape global trade dynamics in America's favour. Trump's false claims about India-Pakistan mediation also serve his domestic political needs. After all, he promised to end the wars between Russia and Ukraine, and Israel and Hamas, as soon as he took office for his second term. Yet, he has spectacularly failed to deliver on these grandiose promises. More than 100 days into his presidency, both conflicts have not only continued but escalated. Israel launched a new war against Iran in June 2025, while Russia has stepped up its assault on Ukraine. The Gaza ceasefire that Trump claimed credit for collapsed within weeks. In this context, his fabricated claims about mediating India-Pakistan tensions serve as a substitute success story. By repeatedly asserting that he prevented a nuclear conflict in the Indian Subcontinent, Trump attempts to maintain his image as a global peacemaker despite his stark failures elsewhere. The claims allow him to project strength and dealmaking prowess to his domestic audience. India's Categorical Rejection India's response to Trump's claims has been unequivocal and consistent. Prime Minister Narendra Modi personally told Trump in a phone conversation that 'India has never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never do so in the future". On the floor of the Lok Sabha, PM Modi debunked Trump's claims of mediating a ceasefire, saying no world leader asked India to stop. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has repeatedly clarified that no trade discussions occurred during the May conflict and that the ceasefire was achieved through direct military-to-military communication between India and Pakistan. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri emphasised that 'there was no conversation between PM Modi and Trump between April 22 and June 17", directly contradicting Trump's timeline of events. Despite this clear position, the Congress party has chosen to give credence to Trump's fabrications rather than their own government's statements. This suggests a troubling willingness to accept foreign assertions over domestic clarifications, particularly when those assertions come from a leader with a well-documented history of dishonesty. It also represents a fundamental misunderstanding of Trump's modus operandi. His claims are not factual statements to be verified but strategic tools designed to create pressure and extract concessions. By treating Trump's lies as credible enough to warrant investigation, the Opposition is helping legitimise his tactics and providing him with the domestic Indian controversy he needs to maintain pressure on the Modi government. The Congress' stance becomes even more problematic when viewed against Trump's broader pattern of coercion. His administration's threats of economic consequences for countries maintaining ties with Russia are clearly designed to pressure India into aligning more closely with American strategic interests. By amplifying Trump's claims through parliamentary debates and public statements, the Opposition risks playing into a narrative that portrays India as dependent on American mediation for regional stability. top videos View all Trump's theatre of lies regarding India-Pakistan mediation reveals the intersection of his domestic political needs, strategic arms sales objectives, and signature negotiating tactics. His repeated false claims serve multiple purposes: maintaining his peacemaker image despite foreign policy failures, pressuring India toward American defence purchases, and creating artificial leverage in trade negotiations. The tragedy lies not in Trump's predictable dishonesty—that is simply his established modus operandi—but in India's Opposition choosing to legitimise these fabrications through their misplaced outrage. In doing so, they risk undermining India's sovereignty and playing directly into the hands of a master manipulator who views truth as just another negotiating chip. About the Author Sanbeer Singh Ranhotra Sanbeer Singh Ranhotra is a producer and video journalist at Network18. He is enthusiastic about and writes on both national affairs as well as geopolitics. tags : Congresss donald trump Rahul Gandhi Straight Talk United states view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 30, 2025, 12:34 IST News opinion Straight Talk | Trump's Theatre Of Lies: India's Opposition Falls For Master Manipulator's Claims Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Govt Slams Rahul Gandhi's 'Trump Liar' Dare As Immature, Reaffirms Strong US Ties: Sources
Last Updated: Emphasising the depth of the bilateral relationship, sources cited US support to India during the Doklam crisis as a key example of the trust between the two nations Senior government sources have hit back at Congress MP and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi for demanding that Prime Minister Narendra Modi publicly call US President Donald Trump a 'liar" in Parliament over his past ceasefire claims between India and Pakistan. 'It's adolescent on the part of Rahul to say the PM should call Trump a liar on the floor of the House," a top government source said, adding that PM Modi had already clarified the matter by stating that 'no world leader asked India to stop the war." Sources also underlined that External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar had previously informed Parliament that Trump and Modi never spoke regarding any such ceasefire, dismissing the claim altogether. They further pointed out that India and the US share a long-standing strategic partnership that goes beyond just trade negotiations. 'The Congress has been in power before, it should know how governments function," one official added, urging restraint in matters of foreign policy discourse. Emphasising the depth of the bilateral relationship, sources cited US support to India during the Doklam crisis as a key example of the trust between the two nations, noting that reducing ties to a single statement undermines broader diplomatic realities. Rahul Gandhi had earlier, during the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor, accused the PM of lacking the courage to rebut Trump's repeated ceasefire claims and questioned India's foreign policy handling of the Pahalgam terror attack. He also criticised the government's terminology of a 'new normal" in counter-terror strategy, and cited Pakistan Army Chief Gen Asim Munir's visit to the US as evidence of diplomatic failure. The Congress has been trying to corner Prime Minister Modi by citing Donald Trump's repeated claims, made 30 times, that he had brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan using trade as leverage. The Prime Minister set the record straight on Tuesday. 'On May 9, US Vice-President JD Vance tried to speak to me 3-4 times for over an hour, but I was in a meeting. When I called him back, he said Pakistan will do a very big attack. I replied to him—if Pakistan has this intention, toh usse bahut mehnga padega (it will cost them dearly). I told Vance that we will do a bigger attack than Pakistan…that hum goli ka jawab gole se denge (we will respond to bullets with shells)," the Prime Minister told the Lok Sabha. Earlier, Foreign Minister S Jaishankar had informed Parliament that President Trump and Prime Minister Modi never spoke during Operation Sindoor, and highlighted how the Prime Minister remained firm during his call with JD Vance. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
