logo
After successful 1st season, Madison County robotics team needs help to travel for World Championship

After successful 1st season, Madison County robotics team needs help to travel for World Championship

Yahoo07-03-2025

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (WHNT) — A community-based robotics team from Hampton Cove and Owens Cross Roads is looking for help funding their trip to a world championship in Houston, Texas.
A spokesperson for Dread Pirates Robotics said they were inspired to start the team by the 'idea of inclusion.' All team members came from other FIRST Tech Challenge teams but felt they didn't have enough opportunities there to grow and succeed.
National Reading Month: The Bookwyrm in Huntsville
The team describes themselves as a 'motley crew' of nine middle and high school boys and girls.
The spokesperson said their commitment to no one being left out has made a difference. They describe themselves as not just teammates, but friends.
'Most Huntsville City schools in the area offer students the opportunity to participate in robotics, but there are often more students than available roles,' the spokesperson said. 'This can lead to people feeling disengaged or not having the chance to fully contribute. We believe every student who wants to participate should have meaningful opportunities to do so.'
In their first season of competition, they were able to achieve big things.
The newly formed team said they would meet twice a week, beginning in the summer of 2024, to learn the basics of programming and building. They ended the year by winning the FIRST Tech Challenge Alabama State championship held on Feb. 22 at New Century Technology High School in Huntsville, and setting a state record.After winning two state qualifying tournaments, the Pirates had nine consecutive match wins through regulation play and the playoffs. The team had the top three scores of the 2024/2025 season. The spokesperson says they beat several more established, experienced teams, including former champions.
'As a new team, we feel honored,' the spokesperson said. 'At the State Championship, we had one of the simplest robots on the field, but we did this intentionally. We wanted our robot to be simple yet reliable and effective. Winning the State Competition and qualifying for the World Championship showed that you don't have to reinvent the wheel to be competitive, you just need dedication, adaptability, and an awesome group of friends and mentors.'
The Dread Pirates finished the last two competitions with a win-loss record of 19-1. Following the state championship, their season performance ranked them in the top 91% among all FTC teams worldwide, which includes more than 7,000 teams in over 60 countries.
The team credits its coaching from a core group of three volunteer mentors, a simplistic robot design, dedicated parents and their commitment to mastering the art of robotics for helping them accomplish their goals.
As Alabama state champs, the Dread Pirates get an automatic invite to FTC's world championship on April 16-20, where the best robotics teams from around the world compete to be the world's best.
Alabama service member comes home and surprises his kids
The spokesperson said that most FTC teams outside of Alabama have years of experience, including world-class competitors from Romania, Taiwan and Germany.
The entry fee for the world championship the team is trying to attend is $2,500. The estimate to get the Pirates, coaches, their robot and equipment to Houston for five days is around $18,000. While some Pirate families can afford to take an extra expense of that magnitude, others cannot.
The team decided that either everyone goes to Houston, or no one does. The Dread Pirates said despite their best efforts, they cannot afford professional fundraisers.
'If you can contribute $5, $25, or even $1, you'll help this unlikely collection of young engineers step closer to achieving a dream that eight months ago wasn't in the realm of possibility,' the spokesperson said.
The team's GoFundMe can be found by clicking here.
Additionally, the team is developing a process to welcome new members while keeping the team size manageable. Next season, they plan to add one to two new members.
Those interested in applying can reach out to Dread Pirates Robotics by emailing them at dreadpirateroboticsftc@gmail.com or look for an announcement on the team's Instagram (@dreadpiraterobotics_25751_ftc).
Since the team meets in Hampton Cove multiple times a week, they will consider location when selecting new members.
'Our biggest goal is to spread awareness of robotics and FIRST within our community,' the spokesperson said. 'We want to help younger students discover an interest in STEM, especially those who might not have had the chance otherwise. Beyond that, we also want to support other teams in forming and growing. Whether it's mentoring rookie teams, sharing resources, or helping schools start their own programs, we believe that strengthening the robotics community benefits everyone. Inspiring the next generation of engineers is just as important to us as building great robots.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Big Tech's bet on Trump hasn't yielded special favors
Big Tech's bet on Trump hasn't yielded special favors

New York Post

time7 hours ago

  • New York Post

Big Tech's bet on Trump hasn't yielded special favors

On Inauguration Day 2025, tech titans like Mark Zuckerberg, Tim Cook, and Sundar Pichai secured front-row seats, their $1 million donations and Mar-a-Lago visits seemingly successful in endearing themselves to the President they had for years tried to censor. Yet, months into his second term, the millions they spent on Trump — along with billions pledged by OpenAI, Apple, and Meta for US investment (Zuckerberg even bought a house in D.C. ) — hasn't won them any favors. Big Tech now faces relentless antitrust scrutiny, with a spate of recent reports suggesting their efforts to win over Trump have produced no real benefits. Meta is facing a suit from the FTC over allegations the company's acquisitions have given it monopolistic power. Apple is contending with a suit from the DOJ over concerns it has created a monopoly in the smartphone market. Google is dealing with suits from the DOJ over concerns about monopolies in its ad tech and search businesses. Advertisement 4 Tech billionaires were given prime real estate at the Inauguration — but that hasn't translated to special treatment. Getty Images 'Zuckerberg pumped millions of dollars… and all he got was going to court,' one source with knowledge of Trump's thinking on tech said. 'They got nothing other than Inauguration seats,' the source added, noting that tech leaders opposed Trump's preferred antitrust nominees to FTC and DOJ Antitrust — Andrew Ferguson, Gail Slater, and Mark Meador — yet lost those battles. 'The Facebook lawsuit is still going forward and now there are rumors swirling of a potential lawsuit against Apple.' Advertisement Steve Bannon, who I interviewed earlier this week, told me those coveted inauguration seats were about Trump flexing — not about owing Silicon Valley any favors. 'They were all sitting there thinking they own President Trump … it turned out President Trump started crushing them, whether in federal court or with other anti-trust, anti-trust efforts,' Bannon said. While tech leaders have ramped up their visits to the White House in recent months, the aides who Trump works with day-in and day-out are nudging him to take on Big Tech after what they feel was years of mistreatment. 'He was ready to make peace until we reminded him of the hundreds of millions they spent trying to silence him and run him out of office,' one of Trump's tech advisors told me. Advertisement 4 Mark Zuckerberg went so far as to buy a house in Washington, D.C., to be close to the political action. REUTERS Trump's team, sources told me, are now pushing for aggressive measures, including a potential consent decree as part of an FTC deal that could force Meta to pay restitution to conservative users and businesses harmed by content moderation that was ratcheted up dramatically during covid. While Meta has made recent efforts to hire more right-leaning employees and conservative Joel Kaplan recently got a promotion to head of public policy, it's not enough, some say. 'You're not going to fix this with Bush Republicans,' the MAGA advisor said sharply. Advertisement 4 Tim Cook's efforts to win over Trump haven't won him any favors. Getty Images Mike Davis, a conservative legal strategist, echoed this sentiment, telling me 'Meta spent $400 million chasing Trump out of office and subjected him to four years of unrelenting lawfare. If they want to regain trust, they need permanent solutions—restitution for censorship victims and mass hiring of Trump-aligned officials. It'll take years and concrete steps, not empty promises.' Conservatives aren't just focused on past grievances; they're wary of future threats. 'Meta censored doctors and scientists during COVID, potentially costing lives,' another source told me. 'Now they're trying to steal every copyright for their AI while pretending to make amends … they think they can steal data just like China because they say they want to compete with China.' And in the back of many conservative's minds is the recognition there may be just a small window to make the necessary changes. This story is part of NYNext, an indispensable insider insight into the innovations, moonshots and political chess moves that matter most to NYC's power players (and those who aspire to be). Bannon, whose 'War Room' program shapes the MAGA agenda, remains adamant: 'Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Google—they all need to be broken up. Big Tech is the most dangerous force in the country… we have to go after them,' he said in our interview. 4 Sources said Big Tech's recent efforts to make up with the president don't erase their long history of going after Trump. Getty Images Advertisement 'All the oligarchs are progressive Democrats … they became MAGA at 10 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the 5th of November when President Trump was declared the winner. That's when they all had this Damascene moment,' he added. And Bannon believes the moment the political winds change, they'll go back to the left. And it's not just Trump they have to worry about. Even Trump's likely successor, J.D. Vance, is reportedly more hawkish on antitrust issues. Advertisement Vance has even praised Biden's aggressive FTC Chair Lina Khan who made it her mission to break up big tech. For now, the tech titans' investments and gestures have bought them little more than a front-row view of their own reckoning. Send NYNext a tip: nynextlydia@

Melania Trump Affirms Commitment To Protecting Children Online
Melania Trump Affirms Commitment To Protecting Children Online

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Melania Trump Affirms Commitment To Protecting Children Online

First Lady Melania Trump sent a message to Federal Trade Commission officials on Wednesday, pledging continued support for protecting children from online exploitation as the agency hosted a workshop examining how tech companies harm young users. The message, delivered to participants of the FTC's 'Attention Economy: How Big Tech Firms Exploit Children and Hurt Families' workshop, signals the Trump administration's focus on digital safety for minors. 'I look forward to hearing the outcomes from this workshop so we can continue to shape federal policies that protect children,' Melania said in her written remarks. 'We will work together to develop tools to empower parents and youth, and we will lean on tech executives in the private sector to do their part.' The First Lady thanked FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson for his leadership on the issue. Ferguson, in turn, credited Melania with helping pass recent legislation targeting online abuse. 'I'm also incredibly grateful to the First Lady for her leadership on the 'TAKE IT DOWN Act,'' Ferguson said. 'Getting legislation done in any circumstance is very difficult, and the 'TAKE IT DOWN' Act could not have gotten through Congress without the First Lady's intervention and leadership.' The law, signed by President Donald Trump in May, allows victims to request the swift removal of non-consensual explicit imagery online. That includes content created by artificial intelligence. Melania championed the legislation as part of her BE BEST initiative, which focuses on children's well-being and online protection. The workshop appearance continues that advocacy. In her full message to workshop attendees, Melania acknowledged meeting survivors and families affected by non-consensual intimate imagery. 'Let their courage continue to inspire us to find solutions to protect children and youth from online harm,' she wrote. Still, the First Lady emphasized that passing the TAKE IT DOWN Act marked progress but not completion. The administration plans to develop additional tools for parents while pressing tech executives to increase safeguards.

What to know about the Meta trial as judge weighs decision
What to know about the Meta trial as judge weighs decision

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

What to know about the Meta trial as judge weighs decision

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Meta have wrapped up a six-week trial over the Facebook and Instagram parent's alleged social networking monopoly, leaving the final decision in the hands of the judge. The trial, which came to a close last week, seeks to determine whether Meta has a monopoly over personal social networking that the company entrenched with its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. Here's what to know about the trial and what comes next: The FTC's trial with Meta represented a full-circle moment for the second Trump administration, after the agency originally brought the case at the tail end of President Trump's first administration. The agency sued Meta, then known as Facebook, in December 2020. The case came as part of a push by the Trump administration to take aim at major tech firms, following the Department of Justice's (DOJ) antitrust lawsuit against Google. Big Tech scrutiny has been an area of rare continuity between both Trump administrations and the Biden administration. Under former President Biden, the DOJ brought a second antitrust case against Google, as well as a lawsuit against Apple. The FTC also sued Amazon. While Trump's firing of two Democratic FTC commissioners has raised questions about his commitment to aggressive antitrust enforcement, the agency notably did not step away from the Meta trial in the face of CEO Mark Zuckerberg's lobbying for a settlement. The Meta CEO reportedly courted Trump and White House officials to settle the case in the weeks leading up to the trial. Zuckerberg, who had a contentious relationship with the president in the wake of Meta's decision to ban Trump from its platforms following the Jan. 6 riots, seemed eager to mend fences after November's election. Like numerous other tech leaders, Zuckerberg traveled to Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., to visit Trump before he took office, contributed $1 million to his inaugural fund and received a front-row seat at his inauguration. However, these efforts don't appear to have paid dividends. The Meta CEO's initial offer of $450 million was brushed aside, with the FTC demanding at least $18 billion and a consent decree, according to The Wall Street Journal. Zuckerberg reportedly upped his offer to $1 billion, but to no avail. The Meta trial began mid-April, and the FTC immediately called Zuckerberg to the stand, where he spent three days facing questions. At the heart of the trial is the FTC's claim that Meta has a monopoly over personal social networking — a market that includes Meta's apps, Snapchat and MeWe and is centered on sharing between family and friends. Meta has pushed back on this market definition, arguing it faces competition from a much broader swath of social media platforms, including TikTok, YouTube, X and iMessage. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg has seemed skeptical of the FTC's proposed market, noted Geoffrey Manne, president and founder of the International Center for Law & Economics. 'The judge has expressed some reservations about the way the FTC is trying to demonstrate its market definition, but obviously the underlying issue is monopoly power,' Manne told The Hill. 'It's a really tough case in this regard because … there seems to be no qualitative evidence that's really going to answer the question,' he added. Boasberg's concerns about the market have been a 'recurring theme' in his comments going back to November, when he refused to dismiss the case, said former FTC Commissioner William Kovacic. 'He nonetheless cautioned that the government had important hurdles to clear, and one of them was the relevant market,' Kovacic said. 'It's always a little bit risky to infer a specific point of view from questions that are posed or comments that are made in the courtroom, but it seems to me that the judge still has doubts about the delineation of the relevant market, and the FTC has to defend its definition or the case founders,' he continued. Because most social media platforms are free, it's not possible to identify Meta's competitors using price data, as antitrust cases often do, Manne noted. Instead, the FTC and Meta have had to rely on other forms of evidence to back up their claims. The government has used advertising load, contending Meta has placed more advertisements on Instagram than it would otherwise, degrading the user experience. Meta, on the other hand, has relied on user data, showing that users move between TikTok and Meta's platforms interchangeably. For instance, the company pointed to data finding that when TikTok briefly went dark in January, it drove users to Facebook and Instagram. 'After six weeks trying their case to undo acquisitions made over a decade ago and show that no deal is ever truly final, the only thing the FTC showed was the dynamic, hyper-competitive nature of the past, present and future of the technology industry,' a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. 'Meta is a proud American success story, and we look forward to continuing to innovate and serve the people and businesses who love our services,' they continued. The FTC has accused Meta of violating antitrust law by attempting to eliminate potential competitors with two key acquisitions — its purchases of Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014. The focus on Meta's acquisitions creates a real risk for the social media giant that a loss could result in a breakup. However, the FTC may also be facing an uphill battle as it tries to prove the Instagram and WhatsApp purchases were anticompetitive, blocking the two once independent companies from developing into Facebook competitors. This results in a 'highly speculative world' that relies heavily on Meta's intent at the time, Manne said. 'You have an entity like Instagram that may or may not have been in any way successful, that may or may not have evolved in a way to actually be a challenge to Facebook, that may or may not have evolved in any way to become bigger than it was when Facebook bought it,' he told The Hill. 'It's never going to be dispositive, and I guess I'm afraid, from the FTC perspective, that they don't have a lot more than that,' he added. The FTC has presented numerous emails and messages from Meta executives, including Zuckerberg, suggesting they had real concerns about Instagram and WhatsApp becoming threats to Facebook prior to the acquisition. 'I thought The FTC did a good job of … reconstructing Facebook's state of mind when the mergers took place, and I think they did a good job of underscoring Meta's anxiety that the transactions were necessary in order to forestall the emergence of competitive rivals,' Kovacic said. 'Yet, even so, it seemed to me that the real core issue in the case is not so much what Meta has perceived at the time, but rather the actual consequence of the mergers as they unfold throughout the decade,' he added. The trial has wrapped, but the two sides have a post-trial briefing schedule that stretches into September, meaning any decision is unlikely before the fall. If the judge rules against Meta, the case would progress to a second phase to determine the proper remedies. Google, which was found last August to have an illegal monopoly over online search, overlapped with Meta at the Washington courthouse in April and May, where it appeared for a three-week remedies hearing. The search giant is seeking to keep its company together as the DOJ pushes for a breakup that would split off its Chrome browser. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store