Pedro Pascal Receives Goodnight Prank Call From Chris Evans & Dakota Johnson
Chris Evans and Dakota Johnson surprised Pedro Pascal with a viral prank call after he missed the New York premiere of their film Materialists. The moment, shared by A24, quickly gained attention for its unscripted charm and playful tone.
Here's what happened during the call, how Pascal responded, and what it revealed about their off-screen bond.
Chris Evans and Dakota Johnson FaceTimed Pedro Pascal as part of a viral 'goodnight' prank, joining a trend where celebrities call their friends to say goodnight without context. The call was shared on A24's Instagram as part of promotions for Materialists, the romantic dramedy starring all three actors.
The prank occurred because Pascal could not attend the film's New York premiere on June 7, 2025. During the call, Pascal answered with, 'What do you want?' Evans replied, 'You,' while Johnson added, 'We're just calling to say goodnight.' Pascal responded, 'Goodni— I'm supposed to go to bed at 6 p.m.?' Johnson affirmed, 'Yeah. Night night.' Evans closed with, 'Sleep tight buddy. Sweet dreams.'
Evans then asked, 'Do you wish you were here? On a scale of one to 10' to which Pascal replied, 'With the two of you? I'd do anything to be with you two.' Johnson followed up by asking, 'Do you love me or Chris more?' Pascal said, 'It's so hard. It's impossible. It's actually impossible [to answer].' Evans then whispered, 'I know the truth.'
The interaction took place in front of a cardboard cutout of Pascal at the Materialists premiere, where Johnson and Evans were present. The film, directed by Past Lives filmmaker Celine Song, stars Johnson as Lucy, a matchmaker caught between her ex-boyfriend John (Evans) and a new partner Harry (Pascal).
Johnson called the story 'a story of bravery, really, and fear.' She described Evans and Pascal as 'sensitive and open' co-stars. She added, 'It was interesting because it was two different worlds working, Pedro's world and Chris' world.'
The 'goodnight' prank trend began on TikTok and has featured celebrities like Robert De Niro and Martin Scorsese.
Originally reported by Vritti Johar on ComingSoon.net.
The post Pedro Pascal Receives Goodnight Prank Call From Chris Evans & Dakota Johnson appeared first on Mandatory.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
22 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Doja Cat Addresses An Uncomfortable Fan Interaction
Doja Cat is in the middle of viral internet madness again, but this one hits differently — because why are we still invalidating people's experiences in 2025? Doja had a fan interaction that she later responded to X users about —and what followed was an onslaught of backlash toward her that, quite frankly, was entirely unwarranted. The person in the video with Doja is Pablo Tomayo, an influencer with over 400k followers on TikTok. Pablo designs custom jewelry and has even interacted with Paris Hilton, Rihanna, and Saweetie, who received his products. So, let's establish that Pablo's been doing this for a hot minute. In the video, it appears that Pablo is standing next to Doja outside of an event and gives her the actual shirt off his back, which is part of his collab with Melimayystudios. Pablo and Doja share a hug and a friendly kiss before ending the video by jumping up and down in celebration. Based on the reactions, the internet loved how Doja interacted with Pablo. Appearances are not always what they seem on the surface. Based on a series of X posts a week later, the reality is that Doja didn't quite enjoy the interaction. Doja posted a now-deleted X post, saying, "bottom line is i'll smile at you but it doesn't mean I fuck w you and don't touch me and man handle me when you don't even fuckin know me. iykyk. i honestly think I need to stand up for myself in the moment sometimes. and he didn't even know my fuckin name to be touching me and kissing me on my face like that is crazy." An X user responded that they thought she was feeling the interaction, and when they asked for context, Doja said, "i was very drunk idk what to tell you." She added in a now-deleted X post she "threw that musty ass shirt away," referring to the shirt he gave her off his back. When someone responded that they thought she said he "smelt good," Doja explained why she didn't enjoy the interaction. "He did but i don't like how comfortable he was touching me and kissing me without asking permission," she wrote. When word got around to Pablo that Doja talked about the situation on X, he responded with a TikTok video. "I just want to clear this up because it hurts because I loved her. I watched her at Coachella. I never claimed to be the biggest fan, but I stan her and I think her work is amazing." "I would've never wanted to make her uncomfortable. I would've never filmed if she didn't say yes. That video that we filmed was after everything," he continued. "I understand that she has to set her boundaries. She's a celebrity. I'm not. I will never understand that, so I value that... I appreciate and I get that." "I apologize if I did anything wrong at all," he said. "I know I didn't know her first. I never claimed to be the biggest fan ever. I just respect her a lot for her work." Here's the thing. We must learn to be accountable for doing things we didn't intend to do. I don't believe any party in this situation is a villain, but I think it's fair for Doja to admit that she might not have enjoyed the interaction despite what we see in the video. It's also fair for Pablo to be disheartened by the new development. Perhaps going on X wasn't the best solution, hence why the messages were deleted, but the response to her feelings was disgusting. Here's the one that Doja specially responded to: Are we okay? What distorted timeline of parasocial stan culture do we exist in that we're suddenly accepting "she kissed back" and "I thought you were feeling it" as invitations to invade someone's personal space? It's honestly hard to tell whether or not the reactions are just a product of the vitriolic stan culture or if this is genuinely how we respond to a person's experience. Perhaps I'm in my feelings because I just spent weeks reading people find ways to speak negatively about Megan Thee Stallion, Halle Bailey, Skai Jackson, Cassie, Blake Lively, and other celebrities receiving backlash for choosing to speak up. These are all different scenarios of varying degrees, and I'm not even trying to consider they're in the same ballpark. But the response and how we speak about the woman in the scenario is oddly familiar, so I'm standing on business and saying the misogyny (and misogynoir) has to end. A person speaking their truth isn't an invitation for you to double down on your keyboard bigotry. I hope Doja and Pablo can make amends, but in the meantime, the bashing of women online needs to be checked at the door. And I'm so serious.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bonnaroo 2025 cancelled after just one night due to severe storms days after co-founder's death
The remainder of music festival Bonnaroo has been cancelled due to weather just days after the death of one of its co-founders. Set to run through Sunday at Bonnaroo Farm in Manchester, Tennessee, the music festival was cancelled Friday evening after hours of delays and even an evacuation notice. 'Today, the National Weather Service provided us with an updated forecast with significant and steady precipitation that will produce deteriorating camping and egress conditions in the coming days,' Bonnaroo shared via Instagram. 'We are beyond gutted, but we must make the safest decision and cancel the remainder of Bonnaroo.' The festival promised at least partial refunds for all ticket holders, many of whom paid hundreds of dollars to attend. Luke Combs was the only of the four headliners to deliver a performance. He took the stage Thursday night and performed alongside fellow country star Miranda Lambert onstage, as well as Marcus King and Jon Bellion. The other headliners, Tyler, the Creator, Olivia Rodrigo and Hozier, have all had their sets cancelled. Additional performers slated to take the stage included Vampire Weekend, GloRilla, Tyla, Avril Lavigne, Queens of the Stone Age, John Summit, Dom Dolla, and Glass Animals. 'We have put our hearts and souls into making this weekend the most special one of the year, and cannot express how crushed we are to have made this decision,' Bonnaroo's statement concluded. 'Thank you in advance for your patience, your positivity and your unfailing Bonnaroovian spirit.' Many fans were disappointed by the cancellation, with some noting it wasn't the first time in recent years attendees found themselves in this situation. 'Wondering what this means for the future of bonnaroo honestly. 3 cancellations in 5 years isn't looking good for us,' one fan wrote on Instagram. 'First and last bonnaroo. Absolute s*** show, not to mention not a speck of rain was seen after they cancelled,' another shared, while someone else agreed: 'Literally spent THOUSANDS of dollars flying from Hawaii……. first roo and most likely my last.' The fan-favorite festival's last minute cancellation came days after the death of one of its co-founders. Jonathan Mayers, who helped create a number of major American festivals, died earlier this week at 51. No cause of death has yet been announced. In a statement to Billboard, Red Light Management founder Coran Capshaw said: 'This is incredibly tough news for so many of us. Jon was the creative force behind so much of what people experience at Bonnaroo, Outside Lands, and many other events over the years. We're all really going to miss him.' Mayers co-founded promotions company Superfly with partners Rick Farman, Richard Goodstone and Kerry Black in 1996. They hosted their first concert during Mardi Gras. The four worked together to launch Bonnaroo in 2002 after securing the festival site on farmland in Manchester, an hour outside of Nashville. They worked closely with Capshaw's Red Light Management and other industry figures to book headliners, including the Grateful Dead's Phil Lesh and Bob Weir. In 2008, Mayers partnered with Another Planet Entertainment to create the Outside Lands festival in San Francisco's Golden Gate Park. Mayers left Superfly acrimoniously in 2021, and the following year sued his former partners Farman, Goodstone and Black, accusing them of civil misrepresentation, breach of contract and fraud. Mayers alleged that they had misrepresented the value of his shares in the promotions company. The lawsuit was dismissed in 2023. Superfly said in a statement to Billboard: 'We are heartbroken with the passing of Jonathan. He was a cherished part of Superfly's story, woven into it's history and legacy. In addition to the role he's played in bringing joy to millions, we will miss his razor sharp wit, infectious smile and contagious laugh. No one could light up a room like Jon.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
People Don't Realize Meta's AI App Is Publicly Blasting Their Humiliating Secrets to the World
At this point, we're probably all familiar with the trope of the dirty old uncle who doesn't realize that simping for thirst traps on social shows up on his public feed. Now, in a hilarious 2025 riffs on the phenomenon, users of Meta's AI app are inadvertently posting the most private queries imaginable to what they don't realize is showing up for anyone to see. Released in late April, Meta's "AI assistant" app — really just a flashy chatbot meant to harvest your data — has quickly become a go-to virtual helper for many around the world. Just a month after its release, Meta bragged that its app had surpassed over 1 billion users. There's just one tiny problem: everything you ask Meta's AI is liable to wind up in a public feed for the whole world to laugh at. From when you first log in, the app is eager to get you rolling. The first thing a new user sees is a sparse screen populated with suggested prompts, ranging from "let's get to know each other" and "describe me in three emojis." If an unsuspecting user — say, a granddad not well-versed in tech — decides to start here, they might accidentally stumble into a little "share" icon in the top corner that uploads their query into the app's "discover feed." Given the virtual assistant's life-like voice and instance-based chat sessions, one would be forgiven for thinking that one-on-ones with Meta AI would remain private, no matter what random buttons you click. Meta even addresses this on its website: "as always, you're in control: nothing is shared to your feed unless you choose to post it." Nothing could be further from the truth. A quick survey of the app's discover feed reveals a mountain of exchanges that people are almost certainly not intending to share publicly. Tucked among the now-to-be-expected generative AI slop — stuff like "teen girl walks her raptor on a leash casually," or "Wonder Woman driving a 1965 green mustang fastback" — are scores of chatbot queries with some astonishingly personal information. "How do i [sic] improve my bowel movements," one user asked, for instance. The chatbot responds with some general tips, then explicitly asks for personal details: "what's your current diet and lifestyle like? Any specific issues you're experiencing with bowel movements?" "I have high calestrerol and often strugfle with stool movement is it ralated?" asks the user, with typographical errors throughout. Horrifyingly, if you logged into Meta AI with an existing Facebook or Instagram account, whatever name you have visible on there — your real one, for most users — is visible under your public queries. The unfortunate user struggling with bowel movements, for example, has a profile containing other private questions, like "whats the easiest way to get rid of crabs?" followed up with "is their a reason i keep getten [sic] em?" Like the discover feed, the privacy violations are endless. Other examples we found include teachers generating test questions, users asking for situationship advice, more queries on sexual hygiene, detailed discussions about medical history, and assistance generating a "heartfelt" letter to a judge ahead of a criminal sentencing. Astonishingly, the app also records and uploads voice queries, no matter the length. We found one recording that went on for over an hour, where the conversation drifted from Candace Owens' take on Black Lives Matter to whether or not anyone was actively "trying to kill George Soros" to asking for detailed directions based on the user's current location. Another spent several minutes detailing their tax woes. "What do I do if I made about two hundred thousand last year and I forgot to file taxes," they asked. "If you owe taxes, the IRS will likely send you a notice with the amount due," the chatbot suggests. "Well I'll just wait till [sic] they call me I guess," the user sighs. Other conversations drifted into topics better left for the incognito tab. On one hand, the whole thing reveals the staggering amount of faith people already have in these brand new products — and the extent to which they've quickly become a crutch for many. One user, for example, asked it "what to say to congratulate my niece who graduates from UCLA." At the same time, it also underscores the mammoth responsibility Meta has as the provider of a de facto public service — and the horrifying lack of accountability the company has consistently shown throughout its lifespan. More on Meta: Mark Zuckerberg Is Reportedly Absolutely Furious at His Own Failure
