Unfair fight: how lefty nonprofits — and taxpayer money — lifted Mamdani's campaign
Just the opposite is true: The CFB is actually doling out obscene amounts of our money to tilt the scales for left-wing candidates, including Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani.
If November's election is anything like 2021's, taxpayers will shell out more than $100 per vote cast — while the board kneecaps Mamdani's moderate rivals.
Advertisement
The CFB, an independent city agency, was formed in 1988 to give political newbies a fair shot against established pols.
The idea was to match small private contributions dollar-for-dollar with taxpayer funds.
Since then, the match has increased sharply: Now it's a staggering 8-to-1 in the primary, and another 8-to-1 in the general election.
Advertisement
The CFB paid out nearly $63 million in taxpayer money to candidates in last week's primary, and its general-election expenditures will likely double that figure.
It's a gold mine for political operatives, campaign professionals and candidates in the CFB's good graces. As Zohran Mamdani apparently appears to be.
But not everyone is.
Last December, the CFB declared incumbent Mayor Eric Adams ineligible for public financing, alluding to federal allegations that have since been withdrawn.
Advertisement
It was straight-up election meddling — the old 'guilty until proven innocent' trick.
It's not the first time.
In 2013 the CFB denied matching funds to then-Comptroller John Liu in his race for the mayoralty, citing unproven allegations.
That let communist-loving dimwit Bill de Blasio win the primary — a disaster for the city.
Advertisement
This time around, the CFB is turning a blind eye to abuses that violate at least the spirit, and possibly the letter, of the public campaign-finance system.
When Mamdani in May urged his followers to help the floundering campaign of City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, some 370 of them did so, making her eligible for nearly $15,000 in public funding.
That sent taxpayer money to a candidate who didn't have the grassroots support to qualify.
Not a word from the CFB, even after Adams then instructed her supporters to add Mamdani to their ranked-choice ballots.
Wink-wink, a publicly financed quid pro quo.
CFB also chose to ignore Mamdani's biggest in-kind contributor: the Democratic Socialists of America.
On Monday, a DSA Zoom call boasted of its work on Mamdani's behalf: 1.6 million door knocks, 2.3 million phone dials and 30,000 volunteers, who canvassed in at least 60 neighborhoods.
Businesses face severe restrictions on such donations, and candidates have to report every penny of the in-kind resources they receive.
Advertisement
But the DSA poured millions of dollars' worth of expertise and sweat equity into Mamdani's hostile takeover of the Democratic Party — and the CFB was mum.
Mamdani was also backed by a broad network of leftist nonprofits that receive taxpayer funding courtesy of Democratic legislators and supply the expertise, manpower and connections to win political races.
These nonprofits are outstripping the unions in impact and influence.
Advertisement
A close look at Mamdani's fund-raising illustrates how taxpayers are getting fleeced by this nonprofit advocacy-industrial complex.
Mamdani raised $1,708,494 in individual contributions, which the CFB matched 8-to-1, giving him $7,050,417 in taxpayer funds.
That's a whopping $8.75 million, just for the primary race.
But according to CFB filings, 94% of Mamdani's small-dollar haul was 'bundled' by one person, Jerrod MacFarlane.
Advertisement
Bundling is a technical term for gathering donations from multiple givers, and MacFarlane is a professional fund-raiser with Action Lab, a left-of-center group.
The bundling suggests that Mamdani's campaign was less a groundswell of spontaneous support — and more an organized effort by powerful leftist groups with long fund-raising lists at their disposal.
It may not violate the law, but it is contrary to the principle behind the taxpayer-funded matching program.
The CFB did not respond to my questions regarding MacFarlane's bundling — and his name then disappeared from its list of fundraising 'intermediaries.'
Advertisement
Action Lab is headquartered in Brooklyn, thanks to a 'community projects' grant sponsored by Rep. Nydia Velazquez that paid for the building.
There's a pattern here: In a city and state dominated by the left, lawmakers are using taxpayer money to boost the nonprofit radical advocacy-industrial complex, which in turn helps orchestrate their re-election.
The CFB pretends not to see, and lavishly doles out tax dollars to fund the rigged system.
CFB also puts a thumb on the scale through its own aggressive voter 'education and engagement' operation — frequently collaborating with leftist groups like the Legal Defense Fund.
The goal isn't maximum turnout, but to turn out specific groups, including former felons, new immigrants and the youth vote.
That is, likely Democratic voters.
CFB even provides provide food, paid transportation and paid childcare — all courtesy of the taxpayers — to engage those targeted audiences.
Sounds almost illegal.
It's past time to eliminate the CFB, let taxpayers off the hook — and ask whether Mamdani actually won the Democratic primary in a fair fight.
Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and co-founder of the Committee to Save Our City.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Bruce Pearl's ‘sweet home Alabama' has a lot to teach Mamdani's bitter NYC
Last week I visited New York City, a place that for generations has represented the magnificence of the American experiment. The economic dynamism of Wall Street, the fine arts of Broadway, and the sports sanctuaries of Madison Square Garden and Yankee Stadium have all made the city exceptional. My early-morning walks downtown along the Hudson River, with the Statue of Liberty in sight, reminded me why America is a beacon of opportunity for people from every corner of the world — including my grandparents, who came to escape religious persecution in Eastern Europe. Advertisement But as I returned home to Auburn, Ala., I learned New York Democrats had chosen Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old Democratic Socialist with a track record of anti-American and antisemitic rhetoric, to be their party's mayoral nominee. He's someone who wants to destroy that opportunity. A quick look at Mamdani's record tells a story of racial divisiveness in the world's melting pot. Advertisement His platform calls for shifting the tax burden to 'whiter' neighborhoods, and he has repeatedly defended using the term 'globalize the intifada.' He has even pledged to arrest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should the Israeli leader speak at the United Nations, or visit the world's largest Jewish community outside of Israel. I fear for the future of our country's great city. If only Mamdani and his ultra-progressive supporters would take a lesson about the very principles they preach — equality, community and opportunity — from my friends here deep in the heart of Dixie. Advertisement I've spent the past two decades living in the American South and barnstorming every major city and college town as a men's basketball coach in the Southeastern Conference. Alabama, like much of the South, has a lot to teach the left. First and foremost, Alabamians are a religious people. Their adherence to the Judeo-Christian tradition fosters caring, committed and prosperous communities. Moreover, ever since I moved to Alabama, I've been welcomed like family. I haven't sensed a whiff of antisemitism, and I've been treated with profound respect by my Evangelical brothers and sisters throughout the state. Advertisement Faith plays a deeply unifying role here. Just this season, my Auburn Tigers basketball team adopted the 'Call God' hand gesture as the signature celebration move for a squad that reached the second Final Four in our school's history. When my players mimic a phone receiver with one hand and hold it up to an ear, they are visibly embracing their faith and the way it strengthens their bonds with each other. We also celebrate, rather than demean, the entrepreneurs driving economic development and financial opportunities. Meritocracy is core to our spirit here. I experience this every day as a coach working tirelessly to put together a winning program. I teach my players that while there are obstacles to their success, there are no roadblocks. And above all else, we love our country. Our patriotism binds us. Advertisement Alabama provides an antidote to the very cultural and social woes that Mamdani and his left-wing compatriots misdiagnose. The left's obsession with racialism and insistence on boxing people by identity creates resentment and mistrust. But my state provides an alternative vision: Cherishing faith and country fosters a healthy pluralism that represents America at her best. Advertisement We can clearly see the crisis of progressive culture on our college campuses, especially the so-called 'elite' ones. Over the past 20 months our country's allegedly finest colleges and universities exploded with anti-Western and antisemitic protests praising Hamas' Islamofascism. Perhaps even worse, administrators at these institutions failed to condemn and curb this appalling behavior. It's no surprise that the base of Mamdani's support — under-40, college-educated (notably, not working-class) voters — is a product of these institutions. Advertisement Once again, Alabama has the fix. At our state institutions, pro-Hamas demonstrations were few and far between; when student activists did organize, they remained civil — and administrators enforced law and order. That's in stark contrast to the 'elite' private institutions that have become hotbeds for progressive ideology, leaving almost no room for dissenting voices. Once they celebrated excellence. Now they're havens for hatred. The Anti-Defamation League's Campus Antisemitism Report Card evaluates colleges and universities on how well they keep students safe and combat discrimination. Advertisement The University of Alabama (my bitter rival) has an 'A' rating, better than any Ivy League institution. Meanwhile, Mamdani's hoity-toity alma mater Bowdoin College — where the candidate founded a chapter of the anti-American Students for Justice in Palestine — gets a 'C'. I know many New Yorkers don't want to live in a nation hindered by racialism and resentment. Many still believe in an America that praises achievement, celebrates excellence and embraces pluralism. For a place where those values still thrive, look to my sweet home Alabama. Bruce Pearl is the head coach of the Auburn Tigers' men's basketball team.
25 minutes ago
Republican megabill will mean higher health costs for many Americans
The tax and spending legislation the House voted to send to President Donald Trump's desk on Thursday, enacting much of his domestic agenda, cuts federal health spending by about $1 trillion over a decade in ways that will jeopardize the physical and financial health of tens of millions of Americans. The bill, passed in both the House and the Senate without a single Democratic vote, is expected to reverse many of the health coverage gains of the Biden and Obama administrations. Their policies made it easier for millions of people to access health care and reduced the U.S. uninsured rate to record lows, though Republicans say the trade-off was far higher costs borne by taxpayers and increased fraud. Under the legislation Trump's expected to sign on Friday, Independence Day, reductions in federal support for Medicaid and Affordable Care Act marketplaces will cause nearly 12 million more people to be without insurance by 2034, the Congressional Budget Office estimates. That in turn is expected to undermine the finances of hospitals, nursing homes, and community health centers — which will have to absorb more of the cost of treating uninsured people. Some may reduce services and employees or close altogether. Here are five ways the GOP's plans may affect health care access. Need Medicaid? Then get a job The deepest cuts to health care spending come from a proposed Medicaid work requirement, which is expected to end coverage for millions of enrollees who do not meet new employment or reporting standards. In 40 states and Washington, D.C., all of which have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, some Medicaid enrollees will have to regularly file paperwork proving that they are working, volunteering, or attending school at least 80 hours a month, or that they qualify for an exemption, such as caring for a young child. The new requirement will start as early as January 2027. The bill's requirement doesn't apply to people in the 10 largely GOP-led states that have not expanded Medicaid to nondisabled adults. Health researchers say the policy will have little impact on employment. Most working-age Medicaid enrollees who don't receive disability benefits already work or are looking for work, or are unable to do so because they have a disability, attend school, or care for a family member, according to KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News. State experiments with work requirements have been plagued with administrative issues, such as eligible enrollees losing coverage over paperwork problems, and budget overruns. Georgia's work requirement, which officially launched in July 2023, has cost more than $90 million, with only $26 million of that spent on health benefits, according to the Georgia Budget & Policy Institute, a nonpartisan research organization. "The hidden costs are astronomical," said Chima Ndumele, a professor at the Yale School of Public Health. Belt-tightening that targets states could translate into fewer health services, medical professionals and even hospitals, especially in rural communities. The GOP's plan curtails a practice, known as provider taxes, that nearly every state has used for decades to increase Medicaid payments to hospitals, nursing homes, and other providers and private managed-care companies. States often use the federal money generated through taxes to pay the institutions more than Medicaid would otherwise pay. Medicaid generally pays lower fees for care than Medicare, the program for people over 65 and some with disabilities, and private insurance. But thanks to provider taxes, some hospitals are paid more under Medicaid than Medicare, according to the Commonwealth Fund, a health research nonprofit. Hospitals and nursing homes say they use these extra Medicaid dollars to expand or add new services and improve care for all patients. Rural hospitals typically operate on thin profit margins and rely on payments from Medicaid taxes to sustain them. Researchers from the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research who examined the original House version of the bill concluded it would push more than 300 rural hospitals — many of them in Kentucky, Louisiana, California, and Oklahoma — toward service reductions or closure. Republicans in the Senate tacked a $50 billion fund onto the legislation to cushion the blow to rural hospitals. The money will be distributed starting in 2027 and continuing for five years. Harder to get and keep ACA coverage For those with Obamacare plans, the new legislation will make it harder to enroll and to retain their coverage. Affordable Care Act marketplace policyholders will be required to update their income, immigration status and other information each year, rather than be allowed to automatically reenroll — something more than 10 million people did this year. They'll also have less time to enroll; the bill shortens the annual open enrollment period by about a month. People applying for coverage outside that period — for instance because they lose a job or other insurance or need to add a newborn or spouse to an existing policy — will have to wait for all their documents to be processed before receiving government subsidies to help pay their monthly premiums. Currently, they get up to 90 days of premium help during the application process, which can take weeks. Republican lawmakers and some conservative policy think tanks, including the Paragon Health Institute, said the changes are needed to reduce fraudulent enrollments, while opponents say they represent Trump's best effort to undo Obamacare. The legislation also does not call for an extension of more generous premium subsidies put in place during the covid pandemic. If Congress doesn't act, those enhanced subsidies will expire at year's end, resulting in premiums rising by an average of 75% next year, according to KFF. On Medicaid? Pay more to see doctors Many Medicaid enrollees can expect to pay more out-of-pocket for appointments. Trump's legislation requires states that have expanded Medicaid to charge enrollees up to $35 for some services if their incomes are between the federal poverty level (this year, $15,650 for an individual) and 138% of that amount ($21,597). Medicaid enrollees often don't pay anything when seeking medical services because studies have shown charging even small copayments prompts low-income people to forgo needed care. In recent years, some states have added charges under $10 for certain services. The policy won't apply to people seeking primary care, mental health care or substance abuse treatment. The bill allows states to enact even higher cost sharing for enrollees who seek emergency room care for nonemergencies. But if Medicaid patients fail to pay, hospitals and other providers could be left to foot the bill. Cuts for lawfully present immigrants The GOP plan could cause at least hundreds of thousands of immigrants who are lawfully present — including asylum-seekers, victims of trafficking and refugees — to lose their ACA marketplace coverage by cutting off the subsidies that make premiums affordable. The restriction won't apply to green-card holders. Because the immigrants who will lose subsidies under the legislation tend to be younger than the overall U.S. population, their exit would leave an older, sicker, and costlier population of marketplace enrollees, further pushing up marketplace premiums, according to marketplace directors in California, Maryland, and Massachusetts and health analysts. Taking health care access away from immigrants living in the country legally "will do irreparable harm to individuals we have promised to protect and impose unnecessary costs on local systems already under strain," John Slocum, executive director of Refugee Council USA, an advocacy group, said in a statement. The bill reflects the Trump administration's restrictive approach to immigration. But because it ran afoul of Senate rules, the legislation doesn't include a proposal that would have reduced federal Medicaid payments to states such as California that use their own money to cover immigrants without legal status.
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP megabill extends and expands compensation for nuclear weapons radiation victims
The Republican megabill passed by Congress on Thursday contains an extension and expansion of a program to compensate Americans who developed cancer from radiation exposure linked to the U.S. nuclear weapons program. The megabill revives a compensation program for victims who were exposed to this radiation and which lapsed last year. It also expands it to new areas in states including Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Idaho and Missouri and ups compensation to $100,000 from either $50,000 or $75,000, depending on the disease. Mary Dickson, an activist who grew up in Salt Lake City and believes her thyroid cancer came from living downwind of nuclear weapons testing in Nevada, told The Hill she expects to be eligible for compensation for the first time. The government detonated 928 test bombs from 1951 to 1992 at the Nevada site. 'The winds blew the fallout across the country. Utah was blanketed. So we were exposed repeatedly to fallout,' Dickson said. She said she was 'crying' when the legislation passed the House, calling it 'an acknowledgement that our government did this to us.' At the same time, Dickson said, 'it's not going to bring back all the loved ones who have died' including her sister, who died of lupus, an autoimmune disease. The inclusion marks a victory for lawmakers including Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) who has pushed for the program's expansion. 'To all the radiation survivors and nuclear veterans across the country: WE DID IT,' Hawley said in a post on X. Hawley was one of the bill's key Senate holdouts, at first saying its cuts to Medicaid went too far while its cuts to renewable energy subsidies did not go far enough. The radiation program he fought for, known as the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, had widespread Democratic support but was more controversial among Republicans, some of whom expressed concerns about the program's cost. Kyle Ann Sebastian, a spokesperson for the Union of Concerned Scientists, said that the expansion was 'an incredibly important step' but was a compromise that left out parts of the country including Guam, Montana and Colorado.
