logo
Target's former diversity chief says calling it DEI is less important than doing the work

Target's former diversity chief says calling it DEI is less important than doing the work

Target's former chief diversity officer is weighing in on the backlash the retailer has faced over its rollback of DEI policies.
Caroline Wanga, who left Target in 2020 and is now CEO of Essence, told NBC's Today show on Friday that Target "didn't walk away from DEI. They trained it."
"If you do this thing right, you create a way that gives goals that can be measured to incent people into the behavior," she said. "Eventually the goal goes away because the behavior is embedded and you pick the next thing."
Target did not immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment.
Wanga's comments come days after CEO Brian Cornell sent an email to employees, according to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, acknowledging that "silence from us has created uncertainty" about where Target stands on inclusivity.
"We are still the Target you know and believe in — a company that welcomes all and aims to bring joy to everyone, every day," Cornell said.
Target has found itself in the cultural crosshairs multiple times in recent years, and has more recently responded to conservative criticism by shrinking initiatives, like its annual LGBTQ Pride collection, or ending others, like its official DEI program.
That response has, in turn, angered some groups who want the retailer to defend a more progressive and inclusive vision of American retail, sparking boycotts and declining foot traffic in recent months.
But Wanga said the fight over DEI as a label is more of a distraction than real substance.
"Do the work, leave the letters," she said.
"The work is still the same, " she added later. "We allow ourselves to be distracted in the things that are easy to argue about, because the work is harder."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump to sign order extending deadline for TikTok ban enforcement, WSJ says
Trump to sign order extending deadline for TikTok ban enforcement, WSJ says

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Trump to sign order extending deadline for TikTok ban enforcement, WSJ says

U.S. President Donald Trump intends to sign an executive order sparing TikTok from a law banning or forcing a sale of the social media platform, again delaying a deadline for enforcement of said law, the Wall Street Journal's Alex Leary reports. 'As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. 'This extension will last 90 days, which the Administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure.' Publicly traded companies in the space include Meta Platforms (META), Pinterest (PINS), Reddit (RDDT) and Snap (SNAP). Confident Investing Starts Here:

Are You One of the Millions of People Afraid of Investing in Cryptocurrency? Here Are 3 Ways to Invest in Crypto That Will Let You Sleep at Night.
Are You One of the Millions of People Afraid of Investing in Cryptocurrency? Here Are 3 Ways to Invest in Crypto That Will Let You Sleep at Night.

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Are You One of the Millions of People Afraid of Investing in Cryptocurrency? Here Are 3 Ways to Invest in Crypto That Will Let You Sleep at Night.

Investing in cryptocurrency is not for the faint of heart. There are a handful of approaches you can use to make it less scary. All-in on crypto is not the way to go. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Cryptocurrencies' price charts look like a cardiogram after a triple espresso. Bitcoin is up more than 1,060% in the last five years, but it has experienced multiple drawdowns in excess of 80% in its lifetime so far. It's little wonder that 63% of U.S. adults say they have little to no confidence in crypto's safety or reliability as an investment, per a survey by Pew Research. However, a 2025 Motley Fool research report found that 1 in 5 of the American adults it surveyed held cryptocurrencies, and 42% of those surveyed claimed they would buy crypto in the next year. The good news is that you do not need steel nerves or uncanny luck to invest in cryptocurrency. Three straightforward habits can turn cryptocurrency investments from sleep thieves to profitable (if exciting) investments. Here's what to do. Volatility in cryptocurrencies is the dragon most investors fear, yet there's a relatively easy move that can turn it from a terror-inducing roller-coaster ride with your portfolio in the balance into a neutral fact of life that you can work around like it's the weather. Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) means buying a fixed dollar amount on a set schedule. When prices fall, you pick up more units; when they soar, you grab fewer. Using a DCA strategy can meaningfully reduce your maximum drawdowns compared with lump-sum buys. It also might reduce your returns a little bit under certain circumstances, but don't fret about that at all. It's a lot better than accidentally buying a coin at the very top of its price range, only to see your investment immediately go deeply underwater for months or longer. It takes the pressure off because it automates your decision-making, taking emotion out of the loop and preventing anxiety in the process. A weekly auto-purchase through a brokerage or an exchange-traded fund (ETF) converts the uncertainty into disciplined accumulation without mental gymnastics. Tie the buy to your payday and let the software do the heavy lifting. After you automate when and how much to invest, the next step is to tighten up the assets you're investing in. There are many terrible investments in cryptocurrency. They will lose all of the money you invest -- in many cases, literally 100% of it. There is no need to go out on a limb and invest in small altcoins or meme coins in hopes of generating 10 times or 100 times your money. Those are traps that can literally destroy your portfolio's value. Ethereum, XRP, and Solana join Bitcoin in commanding roughly 75% of the entire crypto market cap, with Bitcoin alone hovering near 61%. Their liquidity is deeper, trading spreads are tighter, and there is real institutional research to scrutinize, which is far better terrain for long-term investors than thinly traded meme tokens. These majors also map more cleanly onto concepts that stock pickers already understand, like network fees (akin to revenue), developer activity (research and development), and hash rate or validator count (production capacity). That makes them a lot easier to evaluate. In contrast, smaller coins often live or die by social media hype and opaque tokenomics, leaving investors guessing about their intrinsic value -- and often guessing extremely incorrectly. Sticking to leaders dramatically reduces both rug-pull risk and the headache of moving obscure tokens between wallets. It will very likely power better returns with fewer frightening pullbacks, too. Even crypto believers with patience and careful investing habits need guardrails. The easiest way to tame your crypto fears is to keep your dabbling limited to a small proportion of your portfolio's overall value. That way, if you suffer unexpectedly high losses, it won't be that meaningful in the long term. You could perhaps start at 1%, all in Bitcoin, and grow it via dollar-cost averaging. After a year and at least one gut-check dip, reassess your nerves. If your stomach and thesis both hold, maybe nudge toward an allocation of 3% to 5%, spread across the big four. If you're still feeling confident a year later, you could cap your exposure near 10%; beyond that threshold, crypto's volatility hijacks portfolio risk, turning a satellite position into the portfolio's emotional center of gravity, which isn't desirable. As you accept crypto risk, you might also want to Other things in your portfolio should stay boring the more risk you accept via a crypto allocation. That ballast turns crypto's wild moves into asymmetric upside rather than an existential threat. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $375,244!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $37,668!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $660,821!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Alex Carchidi has positions in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Are You One of the Millions of People Afraid of Investing in Cryptocurrency? Here Are 3 Ways to Invest in Crypto That Will Let You Sleep at Night. was originally published by The Motley Fool

G7 leaders fail to reach ambitious joint agreements on key issues after Trump's exit
G7 leaders fail to reach ambitious joint agreements on key issues after Trump's exit

Chicago Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

G7 leaders fail to reach ambitious joint agreements on key issues after Trump's exit

KANANASKIS, Alberta — Six of the Group of Seven leaders discussed Russia's war in Ukraine and the Israel-Iran conflict but failed to reach major agreements on those and many other top issues — wrapping up a summit that was forced to try and show how the wealthy nations' club might still shape global policy despite the early departure of U.S. President Donald Trump. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and his counterparts from the U.K., France, Germany, Italy and Japan were joined during Tuesday's final sessions by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and NATO chief Mark Rutte. 'We need support from allies and I'm here,' Zelenskyy said, before adding, 'We are ready for the peace negotiations, unconditional ceasefire. I think it's very important. But for this, we need pressure.' The remaining leaders agreed to jointly attempt to combat what they called non-market policies that could jeopardize global access to critical minerals. They also pledged to limit the downsides of artificial intelligence on jobs and the environment, while still embracing the potential of the 'technological revolution.' There was consensus on other issues, but though the summit was meant to showcase unity on top global concerns, no joint statement on the conflict in Ukraine was released. Zelenskyy had been set to meet with Trump while world leaders were gathering in the Canadian Rocky Mountain resort of Kananaskis, but that was scrapped. The U.S. also previously signed an agreement granting American access to Ukraine's vast mineral resources. A senior Canadian official said the U.S. opposed a joint statement on Ukraine amid its efforts to promote negotiations with Russia. The official said it only became clear during the summit's first day on Monday that there wouldn't be a joint statement — though other attendees suggested no consensus agreement was seriously on the table. The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to not being authorized to discuss summit deliberations. In Trump's absence, the remaining six leaders held an extensive session on Ukraine. Lacking unanimity, individual leaders also met with Zelenskyy to reassure him of their support. The summit also was largely overshadowed by a showdown over Iran's nuclear program that could escalate. Israel launched an aerial bombardment campaign against Iran, and Iran has hit back with missiles and drones. French President Emmanuel Macron warned against the U.S. and other powers pushing for regime change in Iran, suggesting it could destabilize the greater Middle East. 'I believe the greatest mistake today would be to pursue regime change in Iran through military means, as that would lead to chaos,' Macron said. Before leaving, Trump joined the other leaders in issuing a statement saying Iran 'can never have a nuclear weapon' and calling for a 'de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.' Getting unanimity — even on a short and broadly worded statement — was a modest measure of success. Macron said Carney fulfilled his mission as G7 host by preserving the unity of the multilateral organization. 'We shouldn't ask the Canadian presidency to resolve every issue on earth today. That would be unfair,' said Macron, who will host the G7 next year. Carney said in his final remarks Tuesday evening that Trump's early exit was about the 'extraordinary' situation in the Middle East, not anything that occurred during the summit. 'There was no problem,' Canada's prime minister said. 'Mr. Trump felt it was better to be in Washington, and I can understand that.' Carney said Canada would impose new economic sanctions against Russia and was releasing its own statement offering 'unwavering support for a secure and sovereign Ukraine.' Asked if the U.S. pushed to soften any possible joint statement from the gathered leaders on Ukraine, Carney said he consulted with Trump while preparing the language his own country used. Still, Trump's departure only served to heighten the drama of a world on the verge of several firestorms — and of a summit deprived early of its most-watched world leader. ` 'We did everything I had to do at the G7,' Trump said while flying back to Washington. But things were getting awkward even before he left. After the famous photo from the G7 in 2018 featured Trump and then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel displaying less-than-friendly body language, this year's edition included a dramatic eye-roll by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni as French President Emmanuel Macron whispered something in her ear during a Monday roundtable. That, and concerns about the Russia-Ukraine war, little progress on the conflict in Gaza and now the situation in Iran have made things all the more tense — especially after Trump imposed severe tariffs on multiple nations that risk a global economic slowdown. Members of Trump's trade team remained in Canada to continue discussing tariffs, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who sat at the table as world leaders met with Zelenskyy. Trump's stance on Ukraine also put him fundamentally at odds with the other G7 leaders, who are clear that Russia is the aggressor in the war. The U.S. declined to join new sanctions against Russia, with Trump saying, 'When I sanction a country, that costs the U.S. a lot of money, a tremendous amount of money.' Trump also said at the summit that there would have been no war in Ukraine if G7 members hadn't expelled Putin from the organization in 2014 for annexing Crimea. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the G7 now looks 'very pale and quite useless' compared to 'for example, such formats as the G20.' Additionally, the U.S. president has placed greater priority on addressing his grievances with other nations' trade policies than on collaboration with G7 allies. He has imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum, as well as 25% tariffs on autos. Trump is also charging a 10% tax on imports from most countries, though he could raise rates on July 9, after the 90-day negotiating period set by him would expire. One bright spot for Trump during the summit came when he and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer signed a trade framework that was previously announced in May. Trump said British trade was 'very well protected' because 'I like them, that's why. That's their ultimate protection.' But, while announcing that agreement, Trump brandished pages spelling out the deal and dropped them. Starmer stooped to pick them up, later explaining that he was compelled to ditch diplomatic decorum because anyone else trying to help risked spooking the president's security team. 'There were quite strict rules about who can get close to the president,' Starmer said, adding that he was 'just deeply conscious that in a situation like that it would not have been good for anybody else to have stepped forward.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store