"Unlawful" Great Highway park faces legal challenge
Weeks before the Upper Great Highway is set to open as a park, opponents of the contentious measure authorizing the roadway closure are fighting back with a legal challenge.
Driving the news: Earlier this week, Proposition K opponents filed a lawsuit against San Francisco questioning the legality of the measure and how it was placed on the ballot.
Why it matters: The lawsuit is the latest escalation in the fight over the planned park set to open next month. It has split voters on the city's east and west sides over " the war on cars" and sparked a recall campaign against District 4 Supervisor Joel Engardio who led the effort to put it on the ballot.
Catch up quick: Proposition K asked voters whether to permanently ban cars along a 2-mile stretch of the highway and turn it into an oceanfront park.
While the measure passed with 54% approval, voters in the Sunset and Richmond districts largely opposed the plan due to concerns over traffic and longer commutes, in sharp contrast to the approval it gained from voters in the city's eastern districts.
Between the lines: The plaintiffs in the case, including Matthew Boschetto, a former Board Supervisor candidate and leader of the " No on K" campaign, contend that voters do not have the right to approve the street closure and that the park proposal should be subject to the state's environmental review law.
The suit claims the defendants — Engardio, Supervisors Myrna Melgar, Rafael Mandelman, Matt Dorsey and former Supervisor Dean Preston — "ignored the state's plenary authority over traffic control and roads and unlawfully placed a measure before San Francisco voters," according to the lawsuit.
What they're saying: Boschetto argued that the ballot measure should be voided and that the park conversion should go through the legislative process with community input rather than being decided upon by voters.
"I don't have a complete prohibition to any park being there, but if we're going to do this, there's a right way to do it and it's been done the completely wrong way," he told Axios Wednesday.
The other side: Lucas Lux, president of Friends of Ocean Beach Park, said he doesn't believe the "lawsuit has any merit" and feels confident that it will be dismissed.
"If you buy their argument, you can't have JFK promenade anymore. You can't have the car-free road through McLaren park. You can't have this new Ocean Beach park. The consequences are so broad and sweeping and out-of-step with the intent of the state legislation," Lux said, adding that such projects have already been granted exemptions from environmental reviews.
"We want everyone's voices to be at the table, but the way to solve problems is not through lawsuits, it's through working together," he added.
What's next: The plaintiffs are seeking a court injunction to block this Friday's scheduled closure to vehicles and the park's opening on April 12.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
Pressure mounts but Hogsett says he won't resign
Mayor Joe Hogsett says he won't resign, despite increasing calls for him to do so. Why it matters: Some local leaders say mounting criticism of his handling of sexual harassment allegations made by former campaign and city staffers against former chief of staff Thomas Cook — plus new questions about Hogsett's own behavior — are impacting the mayor's ability to do his job. What he's saying:"We still have so much important work to do to ensure the confidentiality and the safety of every employee," Hogsett told Axios on Tuesday afternoon. "My focus and that of my administration for the remainder of this term will also be on the promises that we made to the residents of the city of Indianapolis to create economic and social vitality and growth for the people of Indianapolis." Driving the news: Local faith and philanthropy leaders asked that Hogsett not attend a press conference Tuesday for a new initiative to address chronic homelessness. In a statement, the mayor's office told reporters the event was postponed "in light of recent events, in order to keep the focus on supporting our unhoused neighbors." The day before, one of Cook's accusers, Lauren Roberts, was forcibly removed from a City-County Council meeting by sheriff's deputies for not following a two-minute rule for public comment. What they're saying: David Greene Sr., pastor at Purpose of Life Ministries and a member of the Mayor's Leadership Council on Homelessness, told Axios that Hogsett was asked not to attend. "We're not trying to politicize our homeless brothers and sisters," Greene said. "This initiative is really about trying to house the unhoused. "I understand why he'd want a group of people standing around him with high integrity and ethics," Greene added. "We didn't want to be used that way." Greene, who also serves as president of the Concerned Clergy of Indianapolis, described himself as a Democrat who voted for Hogsett in the past. He said if the mayor indeed sent inappropriate texts, then "morally, ethically … he needs to resign." "He's not going to fix a culture he himself created." Zoom in: Three City-County Councilors — Jesse Brown, Andy Nielsen and Josh Bain — have now called for Hogsett's resignation. A fourth, Crista Carlino, said she is "deeply considering it" after the IndyStar published late-night text messages about poetry and boyfriends Hogsett sent to Roberts and Caroline Ellert, the other woman who has publicly accused Cook of harassment. These exchanges with Hogsett were shared during the City-County Council's investigation into Hogsett's handling of accusations against Cook, but were left out of the final report. Council President Vop Osili does not think Hogsett needs to resign, but called the messages "odd." The latest: Bain said Tuesday that calling for resignation is not something he does lightly. "But the weight of these failures — ethical, personal and professional — demands accountability," he wrote in a statement. "Immediate change in leadership would be right for Indianapolis." The other side: Hogsett told Axios that he did develop a "casual, conversational" style of communicating with those he worked closely with, but did not mean to make anyone uncomfortable. "In retrospect, I now can see how my words could have been taken out of context," he said. "I think that one of the lessons that I've learned in this process is that it is easy to fall prey to a more casual conversation style with those you work closely with." Hogsett said he did not ask for anything to be omitted from the report and he's committed to providing a safe, harassment-free work environment. What's next: The City-County Council's administration and finance committee will hold a public comment session next week for Roberts, Ellert and others to share their experience.
Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. Army can't "continue to buy VCRs" amid global security shift
The U.S. Army Transformation Initiative trotted out by service leaders last month is just the tip of the iceberg. There will be additional pivots, debates, cuts and media appearances. Why it matters: "The risk is in not changing," Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George told Axios during an interview in his Pentagon office. "We've got to get better by 2026," he said, shrugging off longer-term ambitions like the Army of 2030 or 2040. "I think we have to be improving on a day-by-day, week-by-week basis." State of play: The changes introduced May 1 — combining Army Futures and Training and Doctrine commands, shifting to mobile brigade combat teams, axing AH-64D Apaches and M10 Bookers and more — are colloquially known as "1.0." There's "going to be 2.0 and 3.0," George said, "and that's how we need to look at it." He did not say what each iteration might comprise or target. Officials have claimed ATI will save some $48 billion over the next five years. Context: The goal is to produce a force that can shoot and kill more accurately from farther away while also being harder to detect, especially on the electromagnetic spectrum. "World events will tell you that we need to make adjustments," George said. (We spoke just days after Ukraine's surprise Spiderweb drone assault.) "We don't want to continue to buy VCRs just because that's what people are producing." Between the lines: Expect the fruits of canceled programs to be applied elsewhere.
Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
Michigan's bottle return rates plummet
More Michiganders are skipping the hassle of collecting their 10-cent bottle and can deposits — and the state is making millions in the process. The big picture: Only 70% of deposits were redeemed last year, the state's lowest rate going back to 1990, state data shows. Since the pandemic, Michigan's bottle and can return rates have fallen drastically from the 96% annual average from 1990-2019. Many factors are to blame, including: People are less incentivized by the 10-cent return, particularly if they have curbside recycling at home. Bottle return rooms at grocery stores can be unclean, with a foul odor. Retailers reject containers from brands they don't sell. Follow the money: As Michigan's deposit redemption rate has fallen, the state has made more money. More than $116 million went unclaimed last year, leaving $87.6 million to the state, its largest cut on record, Bridge Michigan reports. Under the law, the first $1 million in unclaimed deposits goes to a state police fund for enforcement. Of the remainder, 75% goes into a state environmental fund and 25% goes back to the retailers who collect empties. What they're saying: The data shows Michigan's bottle and can return system isn't working, even as the state's recycling rate reached a new high in April for the fourth straight year, says Drew Beardslee, vice president of government affairs for the Michigan Retailers Association. "There's this reverse incentive where the state benefits when the system doesn't work, because the amount that goes back to the state is at an all-time high," Beardslee tells Axios. Catch up quick: Voters approved Michigan's bottle law in 1976 to discourage littering and keep the state's roads, parks and waterways clean. Michigan's treasury department is in charge of collecting and distributing unredeemed deposits. State of play: Reforming the law is difficult. Because voters originally approved it through an initiative petition, any change would need to be voter-approved or gain the support of three-quarters of the Legislature, per Bridge. Environmental groups have proposed expanding the law to include water, juice and sports drink bottles. Allowing empties to be returned at stores even if they don't sell that brand, known as universal redemption, also has been discussed. Retailers, however, oppose the law's expansion because it would increase costs. 💭 Joe's thought bubble: After countless rejected craft beer bottles, I decided years ago that my time is more valuable than returning my empties. I just recycle them.
