logo
Lawmakers debate measure requiring state employees to return to in-office working

Lawmakers debate measure requiring state employees to return to in-office working

USA Today11-02-2025
Lawmakers debate measure requiring state employees to return to in-office working
MADISON - Republican lawmakers want state employees who have worked remotely since the coronavirus pandemic to return to taxpayer-funded offices full-time following an audit that showed the vast majority of workstations in more than a dozen state agencies were not being used.
The Republican-controlled Senate Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs held a public hearing Tuesday on a bill that would require all state employees to work full-time in state office starting July 1, unless there is a telework agreement in place or their job was a telework position before the pandemic.
The committee may vote remotely on whether to advance the bill on Thursday due to anticipated inclement weather, a move Democratic committee member Sen. Chris Larson of Milwaukee implied was ironic.
The bill was introduced by Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, and Sen. Corey Tomczyk, R-Mosinee, who said getting such employees back to work is necessary to fill offices that taxpayers pay for, check in on employee efficiency and to build relationships between team members once again.
But Democratic Gov. Tony Evers has already said he will veto such proposals.
In December, Evers said he would not sign the upcoming state budget if Republicans include a requirement mandating state employees working remotely return to the office.
"I think it's important for us to say, 'We want to get the best people working for the state of Wisconsin possible,' and sometimes that will mean that they will work from home, part-time, full-time," Evers said in an interview on WISN-TV's "Upfront" Sunday morning. "We can work that out. It's working fine."
Work-from-home agreements were implemented to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 back in 2020, but that's no longer a risk, Nedweski said during Tuesday's testimony.
"Simply asking employees to return to the work routine they enjoyed prior to the pandemic is not only fair, it is representative of what the public is demanding," she said. "And that is accountability."
Tomczyk said he drew upon his experience in managing people to write the bill and knowing that people can't just work on their own all the time.
"Everyone needs accountability in some way. It's what motivates us, it's how we prove our work. We are all accountable to the taxpayer," he said. "This bill is about good management and development of human beings in a work setting. Nothing, and I mean nothing, can replace the face-to-face experience when coaching or developing or creating something with humans."
Democrats on the committee questioned why employees should be back in the office five days a week and raised concerns about the recruitment and retention of employees in Madison and across the state who choose to work for state agencies because of the flexibility.
"I think one of the things that we learned was remote work can work," Larson said.
Last year, an analysis released by the nonpartisan Legislative Audit Bureau found most state agencies and University of Wisconsin institutions allowed employees to work from home up to five days a week and one-third or less of workstations in state offices were being used during auditors' visits.
Based on six visits to 15 agencies and University of Wisconsin System offices between July and August 2023, the highest percentage of workstations being used was 34.5% at the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance. The audit was released in December 2023.
The lowest percentage was at the state Department of Public Instruction, where just 5.3% of workstations were used.
Most agency officials told auditors telework increased the efficiency of their operations, but many had not assessed the effects of remote work in writing.
Auditors wrote in the December report on their findings that the "precise extent to which employees worked in the office was not known."
Through a review of the state and UW's human resources systems, auditors found that 3,439 agency employees used their key cards at four buildings on an average of 1.3 days per week and 186 UW System Administration employees used their key cards at two buildings an average of 1.5 days week.
The key card data indicate some employees may not have worked in the office as frequently as expected, based on their agreements.
Assembly Speaker Robin Vos in November suggested he wants to have state employees working in the office "at least three to four days a week."
During the hearing, lawmakers also discussed the idea of potentially auditing the levels of productivity of workers while working remotely vs in the office.
"I'm not against the idea of saying we should do an analysis to see what's working and what's not working," Larson said. He added he has concerns about abruptly uprooting employees and putting them back in the office again.
"I don't know, tackling one problem can often create more problems," he said.
The Wisconsin proposal is similar to an order by President Donald Trump in January, requiring all federal employees to return to in-person work on a full-time basis.
Nedweski said that the bill wasn't based on that "federal trend," which was issued after the Wisconsin audit, and was in fact one of the reasons that she decided to run for office.
"It is about being responsive and accountable to the taxpayer and using that dollar to its maximum efficiency," she said.
Laura Schulte and Molly Beck can be reached at leschulte@jrn.com and molly.beck@jrn.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration deepens crackdown on solar and wind tax credits
Trump administration deepens crackdown on solar and wind tax credits

Politico

timea few seconds ago

  • Politico

Trump administration deepens crackdown on solar and wind tax credits

The GOP law terminated existing investment and production tax credits for solar and wind projects that start producing electricity after 2027, but provided more time for projects that begin construction within a year. Trump then directed Treasury to 'strictly enforce' the end of the credits for wind and solar facilities, including by issuing new guidance concerning when a project is deemed to have begun construction. Traditionally, that longstanding metric has allowed projects to qualify by taking steps such as incurring 5 percent of a project's total cost or beginning physical construction activities. Tax lawyers and clean energy developers have warned the guidance could mark an unprecedented and legally dubious attempt to rewrite congressional intent, and could be challenged in court. Grassley has also said he would object to consideration of the Treasury nominees until he can be 'certain that such rules and regulations adhere to the law and congressional intent.' But the guidance will have immediate impact for hundreds of planned solar and wind projects across the country. Adrian Deveny, founder and president of policy advisory firm Climate Vision, said the new guidance will 'pull the rug out from under the entire pipeline of wind and solar projects that are in development.' Deveny, who helped craft the clean energy credits as a former policy director for Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer, said Trump is 'determined to jack up American energy bills.' Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, in a statement called it a 'blatant rejection' of what Congress passed in the tax law. In the weeks following Trump's directive, the administration has undertaken a host of actions across agencies to further imperil wind and solar development, including major actions at the Interior Department that have received pushback from some Senate Republicans. The new Treasury guidance — which is not open to public comment — will apply to projects after Sept. 2.

Mamdani recalls Obama call about 'darkness' in politics after NYC primary victory
Mamdani recalls Obama call about 'darkness' in politics after NYC primary victory

Fox News

time8 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Mamdani recalls Obama call about 'darkness' in politics after NYC primary victory

Zohran Mamdani confirmed to reporters that he spoke to former President Barack Obama on the phone soon after declaring victory in New York City's Democratic primary in June. "It was a call that I was honored to receive," Mamdani said during an anti-Trump event in the Bronx on Thursday. The 33-year-old mayoral hopeful told reporters that after winning the primary, he discussed with Obama "the importance of hope in our politics and the ways in which we govern to deliver on that." Mamdani said they focused on the campaign he ran, calling it an "honor to receive that time" with the former president. "We spoke about the importance in a moment such as this, where politics is often characterized by a language of darkness, the necessity of hope in how we speak and how we orient ourselves to the world," Mamdani said. The democratic socialist said he is "lucky" to have an example in the former president of how to rise above the barrage of criticism that has been thrown his way on the campaign trail. During an anti-Trump stop on Staten Island on Wednesday, Mamdani was told to "go back to where you came from" and called a "commie" by some protesters outside his event. "I know that those New Yorkers are representative just of themselves. And yet, sadly, that is what politics has become for far too many," Mamdani said. Mamdani answered a follow-up question about his discussion with Obama during the final stop on his anti-Trump tour across New York City in Queens on Friday. The Democratic nominee said Obama's "stature speaks for itself." "It was an honor to have that conversation, and that presents for us an opportunity to continue to build on both the way in which we practice our politics, but also, as the borough president said, it is one thing to inspire hope. Our responsibility now is also to deliver on and take justice seriously," Mamdani said. And as he spoke to reporters in his home borough, Mamdani began looking to the future, reflecting on the reality that he could very likely become the mayor of New York City. "The first 100 days, the first year, the first term of what it means to be the mayor of the city, such that the New Yorkers who got to vote for the very first time, more than 30,000 we registered in the last ten days, but they continue to vote because they continue to see themselves in their democracy," Mamdani said. The details of Obama's call to Mamdani were first reported by The New York Times on Wednesday. According to the reporting, Obama congratulated Mamdani, offered him advice about governing, and the two discussed the importance of hope during a dark time politically, citing people with knowledge of the conversation. The report also details how Obama's former aides, including the "Obama Bros" of "Pod Save America," Jon Favreau and Dan Pfieffer, have been in communication with Mamdani's Democratic strategist, Morris Katz. Obama has built a reputation since leaving office in 2016 for his strategic participation in politics. The news about his call to Mamdani broke as ABC News reported this week that Obama praised a group of Texas Democrats for fleeing the state to avoid voting for an ever-controversial Trump-backed redistricting bill, calling it "inspiring."

Trump's motivation for accusing Adam Schiff of fraud is clear. But the legal case is not
Trump's motivation for accusing Adam Schiff of fraud is clear. But the legal case is not

San Francisco Chronicle​

time30 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump's motivation for accusing Adam Schiff of fraud is clear. But the legal case is not

Sen. Adam Schiff has been on President Donald Trump's hit list for many years — an outspoken critic with a role in both of Trump's impeachments — so it came as no surprise when the president announced a criminal investigation into Schiff's financial transactions. What is far less clear is whether the California Democrat stepped over any legal lines when he bought two homes, on opposite coasts, and listed both of them for a number of years as his 'principal residence,' with potential benefits in mortgage rates and taxes. In 2003, three years after his election to the House of Representatives, Schiff and his wife, Eve, purchased a home in a Maryland suburb for themselves and their two young children. Six years later, the couple bought a condominium in Schiff's House district in Burbank. It was not until 2020 that he reclassified the Maryland home as a 'secondary' residence. Home owners can claim a tax deduction on mortgage payments for their primary residence, and Schiff says he took a deduction only on the condominium, saving $70 per year. They may also qualify for lower mortgage payments, and Schiff's office — while insisting that he has never misled his lenders — has not responded to questions on whether he sought reduced payments on either residence. The transactions came to Trump's attention last month. 'I have always suspected Shifty Adam Schiff was a scam artist,' Trump said in a July 15 post on his Truth Social network. Now, he said, federal financial investigators have found that 'Schiff has engaged in a sustained pattern of possible mortgage fraud,' and Ed Martin — designated 'special attorney' by Trump's Justice Department after he failed to win Senate confirmation as a U.S. attorney — will look into possible criminal charges. Schiff, unsurprisingly, called it a baseless smear, 'Donald Trump's latest attempt at political retaliation against his perceived enemies.' And Schiff, who served 24 years in the House before his Senate election last November, has been on Trump's enemies list at least since 2019, when he played a lead role in the congressional investigation that led to Trump's first impeachment. That followed disclosures that Trump had withheld congressionally approved military aid from Ukraine to pressure the nation's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, to announce an investigation of Democratic candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter. In 2021, Schiff also took part in the investigation that resulted in Trump's impeachment by the House for helping to incite the attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob trying to overturn the 2020 election results. The Senate acquitted Trump in both cases, as Democrats lacked the two-thirds majority needed to remove him from office. Meanwhile, Schiff's supporters note that Trump has been silent about revelations last month that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican and strong supporter of the president, and his now-estranged wife had declared three separate homes in Texas as their primary residences at the same time, which reportedly made it possible for them to reduce their loan payments by hundreds of thousands of dollars. Schiff insists he has done nothing wrong. He says he notified his lenders and mortgage companies that he and his wife listed both their homes as 'principal residences' because they lived in both places and did not use them as vacation homes or rental property. And he says he acted 'in consultation' with House legal staff. 'Big surprise — members of Congress, almost all of them, own more than one home or rent more than one home because we're required to be on both coasts,' Schiff said in a video posted online. Federal mortgage fraud is the crime of deliberately making false statements to mislead a lender or mortgage company into approving a loan or granting other financial benefits that otherwise would have been denied. It requires proof that the person knowingly provided misinformation about an important issue in order to deceive the lender into approving a loan or providing financial benefits. The crime is a felony punishable by up to 30 years in prison. So did Schiff knowingly deceive his lenders? That might depend on whom you ask. The evidence Trump has relayed to prosecutor Ken Martin contains 'very serious allegations if true, and they could potentially constitute some level of fraud,' William Jacobson, a Cornell law professor and conservative commentator, told Fox News. 'If an average citizen misrepresented mortgage documents … to get a favorable rate, I think such person would be prosecuted.' Jacobson also criticized Schiff and other Democrats for 'cheerleading' Trump's prosecution and conviction on 34 felony charges. Trump was found guilty by a New York jury in May 2024 of concealing $130,000 in payments to former porn actress Stormy Daniels to keep her from disclosing their sexual relationship before the 2016 election. A sentencing judge imposed no criminal penalties this January, as Trump was about to return to office. Schiff's actions drew a similar assessment from William Pulte, a former businessman appointed by Trump in January to direct the Federal Housing Finance Agency. In a 'criminal referral' to Justice Department officials in May, Pulte, citing media reports, said Schiff 'has, in multiple instances, falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms.' A different assessment came from Lawrence Jacobson, a veteran real estate lawyer in Beverly Hills who has served as an expert witness in trials on property issues. 'He has done nothing wrong,' Jacobson — no relation to the Cornell professor — told the Chronicle. 'He made full disclosure to the lenders and did it only after advice of counsel. The only crime he committed was doing his job.' Candace Turitto, a professor of political science at the University of Maryland, said that 'technically, there's absolutely nothing wrong' with Schiff's transactions, based on the evidence so far. But she said the mortgage laws, allowing borrowers to claim benefits on only one home at a time, raise difficult legal and political issues for members of Congress from faraway states. 'It might make one ponder, where exactly is the line for a primary residence?' Turitto said. 'How much time of a year should I spend sleeping under a certain roof for it to count as primary? Must I travel across the country to go 'home' after work, while my MD or VA colleague has a 30-minute drive home?' And it also affects congressional dialogue, she said. Before the time of regular air travel, Turitto said, 'members of Congress would spend weekends and the like in DC. … They would socialize, break bread, talk shop in after-hours environments,' forming 'more cooperative relationships across party lines.' These days, she observed, 'there's much less of this.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store