logo
No freedom to eat meat on Independence Day? Ajit Pawar joins Maha Vikas Aghadi in slamming ban

No freedom to eat meat on Independence Day? Ajit Pawar joins Maha Vikas Aghadi in slamming ban

Deccan Heralda day ago
Mumbai: A huge political row has erupted in Maharashtra after several civic bodies asked slaughterhouses and meat shops to remain shut this Independence Day - a development that left the ruling Maha Yuti divided even as the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi slammed the BJP for interfering with food choices of people. In Maharashtra, such orders have come from some corporations including Kalyan-Dombivli, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Malegaon and Nagpur.The MVA comprising Congress, Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena (UBT) and Sharad Pawar-headed NCP (SP) slammed the government. On the other hand, Deputy Chief Minister and NCP President Ajit Pawar raised objections..BBMP bans meat sale for Krishna Janmashtami in Bengaluru on August 16.'One would have understood the ban if it were on Ashadhi Ekadashi, Maha Shivratri or Mahavir Jayanti. But when there is no such occasion, why should meat shops be forced to remain closed?…today it is 78 years that we have got Independence…some people are vegetarian and some are non-vegetarian…for years and ages people eat particular type of food,' said Pawar, the state Finance and Planning Minister. 'Now you will ban it during Independence Day, Republic Day, Maharashtra Day…this is difficult,' he said, adding how certain communities in the Konkan belt are known to prepare delicacies comprising vegetables mixed with dry fish.Shiv Sena (UBT) Legislature Party leader MLA Aaditya Thackeray said: 'What we eat on Independence Day is our choice….the municipal commissioners has no right to interfere, and that diktat won't be followed! Instead of imposing vegetarianism on the citizens, focus on improving the terrible roads and broken civic services. Citizens will eat whatever they want to- vegetarian/ non vegetarian.'.Ayodhya civic body bans sale of meat, liquor on entire Ram Path.Congress Legislature Party leader Vijay Wadettiwar said that it is a ploy to divert attention of the people from real problems with government engaging in 'menu management.''On Independence Day, by imposing restrictions on people's freedom to eat, it is only to divert the public's attention from the main issues. Roads are in disrepair, traffic congestion, pollution is increasing… but what is the municipal corporation worried about? What should people eat on August 15? …this is now going too far,' he said. NCP (SP) leader Dr Jitendra Awhad alleged that the government was 'fueling a vegetarian–non-vegetarian divide' after having 'exhausted other social controversies'. 'Such a directive could not have been issued without state-level approval,' he said. .'We will never align': Sharad Pawar says no to alliance with nephew Ajit Pawar.Samajwadi Party's state unit President and MLA Abu Asim Azmi said: 'On Independence Day, the government is imposing restrictions on what people can eat. How many people's livelihoods will be halted for a day — doesn't the government know that farmers are struggling? We strongly condemn this.''What's the connection between eating meat and celebrating Independence Day? 99% of Telangana's people eat meat. These meat bans violate people's right to liberty, privacy, livelihood, culture, nutrition and religion,' asked AIMIM chief and Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi. Decision is old: BJP.Citizens' group urges govt to relax Oct 2 meat ban .The BJP, however, slammed the MVA saying that the decision of meat ban on Independence Day dates back to the late eighties. 'There is no disagreement that the government should not decide what to eat and what not to eat. The BJP's stance is that everyone should respect the sentiments of the diverse communities in our country, which is united in its diversity. Will Aditya Thackeray and Jitendra Awhad, who are criticizing the Mahayuti government over the closure of slaughterhouses on August 15, protest against Sharad Pawar for the same slaughterhouse closure on August 15? Will they oppose it? Will they question him? This is the real question,' asked BJP spokesperson Keshav Upadhye. 'The decision to close slaughterhouses on August 15 was not taken by the Maha Yuti government but was made on May 12, 1988, when Shankarrao Chavan was the Chief Minister and the Congress was in power. Subsequently, within a month, when Sharad Pawar became the Chief Minister, this decision to close slaughterhouses on August 15 was first implemented. Not only that, even two or three years ago, when both of them were ministers in the MVA government, slaughterhouses were closed on August 15, and at that time, neither of them uttered a single word against it,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Narayan Chandra Maiti: I went underground to evade arrest, hid in jute fields
Narayan Chandra Maiti: I went underground to evade arrest, hid in jute fields

Hindustan Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Narayan Chandra Maiti: I went underground to evade arrest, hid in jute fields

Today, the nation marks its Independence Day. But 101-year-old Narayan Chandra Maiti, a resident of Chakdurgadas, a remote village in West Bengal's East Midnapore district, is still fighting a legal battle in the Calcutta high court to get a pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme.'I had to go underground to evade arrest. I used to hide in jute fields. But one day when I was hiding in an abandoned village house, a villager recognised me and informed the police. I was arrested. Later I got bail,' he participated in the Quit India Movement of 1942 under the leadership of Sushil Kumar Dhara, freedom fighter who was later elected as an MLA in the West Bengal assembly and a Lok Sabha MP. A certificate given to Maiti by Dhara in 1981, states that between 1942 and 1944, Maiti was a worker of the government styled Tamralipta Jatiya Sarkar and a soldier of its militia.'Several decades have passed since we gained independence. But there are many freedom fighters who are yet to get their due respect. There are many like me who are still fighting to get a freedom fighters' pension,' said Maiti. Narayan Chandra Maiti: I went underground to evade arrest, used to hide in jute fields

Iqbal Singh went to jail when children his age learnt the alphabet
Iqbal Singh went to jail when children his age learnt the alphabet

Hindustan Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Iqbal Singh went to jail when children his age learnt the alphabet

At an age when most children are busy learning the alphabet and numbers, Iqbal Singh was learning the harsh realities of colonial oppression — inside a prison cell. Iqbal Singh went to jail when children his age learnt the alphabet Now 89, the freedom fighter from Ferozepur district, who has lived in Ludhiana for 45 years, recalled how he was just 7 or 8 when he joined a protest against British rule. 'They arrested me along with other protestors and sent us to Lahore Central Jail. My age didn't matter to them; the British officers thrashed me mercilessly,' he said. After coming to Ludhiana, he started dairy farming. His son Gursewak Singh is continuing the business. He takes pride in India's development but he has one regret. 'The state government used to invite us to attend Independence Day and Republic Day celebrations every year,' he said. 'Now, very few of us freedom fighters are alive. Yet many of our demands, like proper housing and free medical facilities, remain unmet.'

HT Archive: Building an equitable for our tribals
HT Archive: Building an equitable for our tribals

Hindustan Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

HT Archive: Building an equitable for our tribals

When Independence came, the leaders should have given it some consideration that the British were here to exploit India, and not to make it a flourishing economy. The leaders should have started everything from scratch, like strict enforcement of land reforms, land distribution to the landless, preservation and enlargement of forest areas, setting up of schools, laying roadways, ensuring drinking water and Irrigation facilities. electricity, housing, etc. These should have reached the people living below the poverty line all over India, and this should have been achieved by 50 years. But, regrettably, only 10% may have been achieved. Jawaharlal Nehru addresses the nation from Red Fort on Independence Day (HT Photo) We can well surmise that the tribals have borne the brunt of this laid-back attitude. In making big projects, the Government of India is always taking away tribal land. The evicted tribals are increasing in number, becoming rootless and swelling the number of migrant workers. They have been chiefly left at the mercy of contractors entrusted with the construction of such big projects such as the Narmada dam or the Heavy Engineering Corporation (HEC) at Ranchi. The DVC dams in West Bengal and Bihar saw thousands and thousands of Santhals evicted. We find that to meet the ever-growing need for land of non-resident Indians or residential non-Indians, agricultural land is being taken away. As a result, both tribal and non-tribal peasants have suffered. In the Sunderbans, hundreds of acres of tribal land have been converted into fisheries for prawn cultivation. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, after the tribal revolt in the Chhotanagpur plateau, countless Santhals, Oraons, Mundas, Bedias and other tribals became landless. They were recruited by middlemen for cleaning the jungle and preparing large tracts for tea gardens as well as cropland. That is how these tribals came to West Bengal. On making an objective survey of Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and other places, we find that the story remains the same. Even before Independence, tribal and non-tribal peasants in Kakdwip in West Bengal and Telangana in Andhra Pradesh were deprived of land. By 1955, the Zamindari Abolition Act came into force. But the zamindars had pre-empted this move by 1952-53. So, they felled forests, kept benami land and evicted tribals who had lived there for hundreds of years. In most cases, they held the ownership rayati patta. In the tea gardens in the 19th century, tribals were given large areas of land, but no patta. As the returns from the gardens increased, the tribals were evicted. The 1946 Tebhaga movement in Jalpaiguri was a result of the grievances of the landless tribals, and 12 of them became martyrs while fighting for their cause. The Naxalite movement originated from the land-grievance of the tribals. There are legal provisions to preserve tribal land. But neither the tribals nor the government can do anything as land revenue officers are generally corrupt. For a tribal to approach them and get redress is almost impossible. To make matters worse, no land reform has been attempted in the rest of the country. Even in a state like Kerala, the assembly passed a bill the other day which said outsiders could acquire any tribal land anywhere. The worst sufferers among them are the so-called criminal tribals. In 1871, the British notified many forest tribes as criminal ones along with some Scheduled Caste groups. In 1952, the Government of India declared them as denotified tribes, meaning they would no longer be treated as criminals. But for years the neighbouring people and the police have grown into believing that such tribes comprised born criminals. We have Lodhas in Midnapore district and the Kheria-Shabars in Purulia in this category. On December 20, 1996, five Lodhas rescued a forest beat officer from some miscreants who had attacked him when the officer caught them red-handed felling trees. The Lodhas not only saved him, but also took him to hospital, risking their own lives. Four days later the forest officer lodged an FIR with the local police naming the culprits and speaking eloquently of the Lodhas. But the district police submitted a charge sheet in which the five Lodhas were named as the accused. The Lodhas have fled their homes in terror. That there exists a bias against these people cannot be denied. Another example highlighting the same situation involves Lalit Shabar, a Kheria boy, who was sent to work in a neighbouring village. There he was bound to a tree and his right hand chopped off by none other than the local panchayat pradhan. The Lodhas and Kherias bear the stigma of being branded criminals to this day as the people and the police refuse to change their attitude. But there has emerged a silver lining. Women's organisations are coming up. Women have become conscious of the discrimination against them and are protesting. In Nellore district in Andhra Pradesh, women rose in protest against country liquor and forced the government to ban it, though the move has not been totally successful. The point to remember is that the protesting women belonged to the poorer strata of society. Women are also increasingly joining the decision-making process at the grassroot level. Edited except of an article written by author and activist Mahasweta Devi that appeared on August 15, 1997.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store