Over half of English councils face insolvency under £5bn deficit, MPs warn
In its inquiry into local government finances, the public accounts committee (PAC) told the Treasury and other departments to urgently address the estimated £5bn deficit on high needs spending – mainly on special educational needs – that will hit council balance sheets at the end of the financial year, potentially driving many insolvent.
Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, the PAC's chair, said: 'Our inquiry heard that the government is concerned about local authority finances. But the lack of urgent action to come forward with a plan to address the fast-approaching cliff edge for under-pressure authorities would seem to suggest it is comfortable with the current state of affairs as normalised background noise.
'Alarmingly, scrutiny of council finances can now provoke a sense of deja vu, with the same unfixed issues seen over and over.'
Since 2021 councils have been able to keep high needs deficits off their balance sheets through a 'statutory override' granted by the previous government. But the accounting manoeuvre expires in March 2026, the end of the current financial year.
The inquiry said that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, the Treasury and the Department for Education 'should work together to set out their solution for ensuring local authorities can achieve a sustainable financial position when the statutory override ends in March 2026. The solution must include how cumulative deficits will be treated.'
Louise Gittins, chair of the Local Government Association, which represents councils, said: 'We expect the government to provide urgent clarity on how it plans to address high needs deficits, which are projected to rise to £5bn next year, as part of its forthcoming special educational needs and disabilities reforms.
'Over half of councils have warned us they will become insolvent next year when the statutory override flexibility ends and we continue to urge the government to write off these deficits.'
The committee also accused the government of creating 'significant uncertainty' over a string of promised reforms and reorganisations, including for funding, special needs provision and social care.
Clifton-Brown said: 'Aspirations for wide-ranging reforms seem to be unengaged with a reality in which local authorities do not have good and strong capacity to fundamentally change the way they work.'
But Jim McMahon, minister of state for local government, said: 'These claims are not supported by the evidence. From a standing start we have set out a clear plan to fix the foundations of local government and have wasted no time in taking action as part of our plan for change.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
'We've taken action to restore the audit system to a functioning state, recast our approach to council best value and we are laying legislation to bring in a new local audit office.
'The spending review provided over £5bn of new grant funding for local services, and that's on top of the £69bn we have already injected this year to boost council finances.'
Last week the Guardian reported that council leaders in England say the multibillion pound high needs deficits have become a 'burning platform' that will push scores of councils into bankruptcy within months.
Ministers aim to publish a schools white paper in the autumn, including reforms to education, health and care plans, known as EHCPs. The plans give children and young people up to the age of 25 the legal right to support from local authorities' high needs budgets, for conditions such as autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and speech, language and communication needs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Applied Nutrition founder reveals why he teamed up with Coleen Rooney
Tom Ryder is aghast. I've just told the founder of sports supplements group Applied Nutrition about recently running a 10km in my fastest time for years without drinking any water during the race or taking any special products beforehand. He asks what kept me going. 'Jelly Babies,' I confess. He hands me a tube of endurance tablets packed with performance-enhancing electrolytes that help maintain hydration. 'Here, you'll go even faster if you have these,' he says in a distinct Scouse accent. Ryder is convinced that he has caught the wave of a health and wellbeing revolution. A report by retail research group Kantar found that sales of sports nutrition products surged by 45 per cent in the first five months of this year compared with the same period in 2024. They were the 'biggest winners' as customers shaped their diets around lifestyle choices 'with health, wellbeing and exercise apparently top of many people's minds', Kantar said. Ryder, 41, has also gained from the boom. He netted £67 million when shares in Applied Nutrition were listed on the London stock market last year. The share price has fallen back since then, but the company is still worth £330 million, valuing Ryder's remaining 34 per cent stake at £110 million. A trading update is due this week. His is a classic rags-to-riches story of a working-class lad from Liverpool who built a multi-million pound business from scratch. Raised by his grandparents on a Kirkby council estate following his father's death, Ryder opened his first store, Body Fuel, when he was 18, selling muscle-bulking protein powder, creatine and other supplements while working as a scaffolder for the local council. After six years juggling two jobs, Ryder created Applied Nutrition in 2014 and began working from a small factory in nearby Knowsley. The business has since mushroomed to become one of Europe's fastest growing brands. Ryder hasn't let success go to his head. The first time he felt financial freedom was when retailer JD Sports bought a significant stake in the business in 2021. He celebrated by buying a lawnmower. Ryder is a firm believer in personal discipline. 'I learnt from an early age that if you want something you have to make some sacrifices,' he says. One of those was not spending enough time with his eldest daughters when they were young and he was busy growing the business. He's now making up for lost time and admits to becoming 'a dance dad', taking them to numerous festivals and competitions in the North-West. The entrepreneur is happy to have bucked the trend of home-grown companies that have shunned the London stock market. Becoming a public company has been 'absolutely amazing, a dream come true', he says, adding: 'It's given us a lot of credibility.' He also seems relaxed about having a higher public profile, saying: 'I don't mind being in the limelight. This company is my life. It doesn't feel like work.' But he admits he 'completely underestimated' the extra red tape and reporting rules that came with being a quoted company. A 'great' team and board, chaired by AJ Bell investment platform founder Andy Bell, helped 'take that burden away from me'. Applied Nutrition started out selling protein shakes to muscle-bound body-builders in sweaty gyms, but it has evolved into 'a brand for everybody' that appeals to a wider range of consumers, Ryder says. So how does Applied Nutrition fit in to the weight-loss craze fuelled by drugs such as Ozempic? Ryder thinks it's going to amplify demand for supplements. Anyone on a weight-loss drug 'is more likely to make health-conscious choices' around protein, vitamins and hydration as 'they are not only losing fat, they are losing muscle, which is not great', he explains, adding: 'They can't eat, they've got no appetite so the alternative is supplements.' One of the 'mega-trends' he's tapping into is the move from women simply wanting to be skinny to women who want to be healthy, fit and strong. It's an audience Ryder is eager to reach. 'Wagatha Christie' celebrity Colleen Rooney has been hired as a brand ambassador to fuel demand for protein supplements among these health-conscious women. 'She has moved the dial and been a game-changer for us,' says Ryder. 'Her audience is exactly the female audience we are trying to appeal to.' Hiring the fellow Liverpudlian, who is also an investor in Applied Nutrition, seems to have paid off. 'Two years ago we were still very male-dominated,' Ryder says. But since then the number of female customers has shot up from 20 to more than 40 per cent, he reveals. To keep costs down Applied Nutrition mainly sells through distributors in local markets – exporting boxes of supplements from the Liverpool warehouse overseas to places such as the Gulf – but its products can also be found in major supermarkets and online. Targeting new audiences via social media channels comes with extra marketing costs. But having raised almost £160 million in the flotation, Ryder now has the financial firepower to continue expanding at home and abroad, especially in the US, where the company has an office in Dallas, Texas. The record price of whey – a vital ingredient in protein shakes – is 'a headwind', Ryder admits, but he has been able to pass on these cost increases to customers in the form of higher prices. That helps protect profit margins, which at 29 per cent are among the highest in the health and beauty sector – bigger even than those of French giant L'Oreal and only surpassed by Estee Lauder, according to stockbroker Panmure Liberum. This is remarkable given that Applied Nutrition is a traditional bricks-and-mortar wholesale business, operating from a single warehouse site on the outskirts of Liverpool. Ryder won't be drawn on the Government's raid on employers' National Insurance Contributions, which has hit many companies, especially growing ones like his, which now employs 200 staff. 'What can you do?' he asks. 'We don't get caught up in what goes on from a political standpoint. We just get on with what we've got to do.' So do the supplements he sells really work? Can they actually improve performance? Well, correlation does not equal causation, but after swallowing some of Ryder's endurance tablets a few days after the interview, I ran an even faster 10k time. Ryder will feel vindicated.
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is Zelensky about to walk into another White House ambush after Trump's Putin meeting?
The free world's most celebrated president is showing some mettle in agreeing to a meeting with the leader of the free world. When Volodymyr Zelensky walks into the Oval Office on Monday, he knows he's risking another ambush. The Ukrainian president is prepared to gamble that he'll get another White House schoolyard bullying session, because there's a slim chance that Donald Trump may finally have tired of being played by the Kremlin. It is now conceivable, just, that Trump is prepared to consider security guarantees for Ukraine that reflect Nato's Article 5, which could mean that if Ukraine signed up to a peace deal then its long-term future sovereignty and security would be protected, by force of arms, by allies including the US. Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, spoke with Trump and went public with the idea (that had been hers in the first place) suggesting that the US president had bought into the concept. "The crucial point remains security guarantees to prevent new Russian invasions, and this is the aspect where the most interesting developments were recorded in Anchorage," Meloni said. Meloni said Trump had highlighted an earlier Italian proposal for security guarantees for Ukraine "inspired by Nato's Article 5'. "The starting point of the proposal is the definition of a collective security clause that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the USA, ready to take action in case it is attacked again," said Meloni. After his Friday summit with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Trump said that the two presidents were close to an agreement. He didn't mention 'peace' or a 'ceasefire' and admitted that there's no deal until there is a full deal. Sources have since confirmed to The Independent that Putin demanded that Ukraine give Luhansk and Donetsk provinces to Russia in return for a 'freeze' on the front lines elsewhere. Zelensky, they said, would seek 'clarity' on the proposal - which could only be agreed after a referendum in Ukraine. 'We had an extremely productive meeting and many points were agreed to. There are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there,' Trump said. That 'one' significant sticking point with Russia might well be that Ukraine and Europe have persuaded Trump that there can be no enduring peace for Ukraine if a ceasefire, or peace deal, is just a pause in fighting while the Kremlin prepares for a renewed conflict. Putin's demand that Ukraine cede two provinces in return for a pause in the killing are certain to be rejected by Europe and Ukraine as they make no commitment to ending Putin's long-term desire to take the rest of the counrty. So far this year Trump has echoed and accepted almost all of Russia's conditions for peace. He has endorsed Putin's demand that Ukraine can never join Nato. He has accepted that Moscow should keep the Ukrainian lands it has already captured. He has blamed the west for provoking the war with Russia in the first place and has even questioned the legitimacy of the Zelensky presidency itself. Diplomatic sources very close to the European and Ukrainian talks, which followed the Trump-Putin meeting, said that while there was relief that Trump now understood the need for Ukrainian security guarantees. But details of how it would work – and what concessions Ukraine would be asked to make, are critical. 'The question is – how can, or will, this work?' one senior source said. If, on arrival in the Oval Office, Trump tells him to accept that he must give away Ukraine's east, including Crimea, forever abandon fantasies of joining the EU and Nato and hold elections while his country is occupied (all Russian demands) – then any 'security guarantees' will be meaningless. They will have been part of a Russian effort to see Zelensky enfiladed in the White House, as he was in February. Europe's leaders know this. They have moved fast to wrap Zelensky in diplomatic armour. "We are clear that Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. We welcome President Trump's statement that the US is prepared to give security guarantees. The Coalition of the Willing is ready to play an active role. No limitations should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its cooperation with third countries. Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to EU and NATO,' they said. The leaders – Sir Keir Starmer, France's Emmanuel Macron, Italy's Giorgia Meloni, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Finnish president Alexander Stubb, Polish prime minister Donald Tusk, European Council President Antonio Costa and EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen – are warning Trump that, whatever Putin may have told him, he risks a permanent breach with Europe if he stays in the Kremlin's camp. Zelensky has reiterated these principles and that there can be no talks about Ukraine, without Ukraine. Trump has said he understands this. But his instincts remain with Putin. Worse still is that while the US president is narcissistic and peevish, which makes him easily manipulated by Putin. But he deeply, personally, resents Zelensky. Both are former television stars. But Ukraine's president is perceived as the embodiment of his nation's heroism. Trump is seen as a dangerous joke on the international stage. When they meet again in the White House on Monday it's unlikely trump will contain his righteous jealousy.
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Chancellor is forced to correct string of gaffes
Rachel Reeves has been forced to correct the official record after she got her facts about a flagship pension reform wrong, underestimated the unemployment rate and confused the name of a Northern town earmarked for a major tram network extension. The Chancellor, who has previously had to amend her profile on social networking site LinkedIn after overstating her qualifications as an economist, made the string of errors at a recent grilling by peers over her handling of the public finances. It prompted shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith to accuse her of a 'shocking grasp of detail'. And it came as Reeves prepares to unleash another volley of tax rises later this year that experts say will further strangle anaemic growth. In one exchange with former Chancellor Lord Lamont, Reeves twice claimed the £425 billion Local Government Pension Scheme was managed by '96 administering authorities' which she wants to cut to 'eight pools'. 'We are going to consolidate local government pensions, because we want them to work better for savers and taxpayers,' she added, flanked by two senior Treasury officials. But the LGPS is managed by 86 local authorities, not 96, while the number of pools is being cut from eight to six under controversial new laws that will force two of them covering the Tory shires of southern England to find new homes by March. After being contacted by The Mail on Sunday, Treasury officials corrected Hansard, Parliament's written record of debates. They were also forced to clarify to the House of Lords Economic Affairs committee that when Reeves told peers the unemployment rate was 'just over 4 per cent', the latest figure from the Office for National Statistics was closer to 5 per cent – at 4.7 per cent. Griffith told The Mail on Sunday: 'When she's writing such big cheques with taxpayers' money, it's no time to be loose with your numbers.' The Chancellor's geography also escaped her at the hearing, which took place three weeks after her tearful appearance before MPs during Prime Minister's questions. Reeves, who represents a constituency in Leeds, told peers that the Greater Manchester tram network was being extended to 'Bury and somewhere else'. In fact Bury already has a tram stop. The planned extension will go to Stockport, more than 20 miles away. Bury station is being upgraded but the work was 'not an extension to the metro line', Treasury officials admitted. The latest revelations about Reeves's lack of attention to detail come as she prepares to fill a hole of up to £50 billion in the public finances in her Autumn Budget. She has ruled out tax rises on 'working people' – namely income tax, VAT and employee National Insurance – but left the door open to raids on inheritance tax, pensions, gambling companies and banks. Reeves could also extend the freeze on income tax thresholds to help balance the books. The pause is due to end in 2028, from which point the thresholds are set to rise with inflation. But keeping the freeze for another two years would generate more cash for the Treasury, as rising wages and pensions pull more people into higher tax bands. Extending the stealth tax, known as 'fiscal drag', could raise £8 billion, claims the Resolution Foundation think-tank. Experts say she boxed herself in by also pledging to stick to her fiscal rules, which include only borrowing to invest by the end of this Parliament. Key to how much money she needs to find is how the official forecaster judges likely productivity growth – the rate of hourly output per worker. Reeves will have to find even more money if the Office for Budget Responsibility cuts its forecast for productivity growth, which it has consistently overestimated. Productivity growth stalled in the second quarter, heaping pressure on the OBR to act. A downgrade would have 'very significant fiscal implications that far exceed the policy U-turns on welfare spending,' said Simon French at stockbroker Panmure Liberum.
