Fort Worth replaces Austin as 4th-largest Texas city. What is the fastest-growing US city?
It's official: Fort Worth has replaced Austin as the fourth-largest Texas city, hitting the million milestone in 2024.
On Thursday, the U.S. Census Bureau published new population data from July 2024 and revealed changes in both national and state rankings. Fort Worth's rise over Austin was initially suspected in November, when the Texas Demographic Center released its 2023 Population Estimates report.
Fort Worth also became the 11th most populous city in the country, pushing Austin to 13th, below San Jose.
Texas cities dominated the 2024 lists of the fastest-growing cities in the nation, in both percentage and numerical increases. The findings compared the newly-released July 2024 data with July 2023 numbers.
Texas claimed nearly half of the country's 15 fastest-growing cities, with five located in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Four of the five fastest-growing U.S. cities are found in the Lone Star State.
City, state
% increase
2024 total pop.
Princeton, TX
30.6
37,019
Fulshear, TX
26.9
54,629
Leesburg, FL
18.5
37,815
Celina, TX
18.2
51,661
Anna, TX
14.6
31,986
Haines City, FL
12.1
42,073
Foley, AL
12.0
28,043
Fate, TX
11.4
27,467
Rosemount, MN
10.6
30,581
Garner, NC
10.4
39,345
Melissa, TX
10.0
26,194
Sugar Hill, GA
9.5
28,598
Hutto, TX
9.4
42,661
Leland, NC
9.4
34,451
Erie, CO
9.2
38,594
Texas cities also appeared near the top of the Bureau's list for the fastest-growing U.S. cities by population count. Houston's population increase was second only to New York's. Los Angeles came in third, while San Antonio and Fort Worth had the fourth and fifth largest increases, respectively.
City, state
Numeric increase
2024 total pop.
New York, NY
87,184
8,478,072
Houston, TX
43,217
2,390,125
Los Angeles, CA
31,276
3,878,704
San Antonio, TX
23,945
1,526,656
Fort Worth, TX
23,442
1,008,106
Charlotte, NC
23,423
943,476
Chicago, IL
22,164
2,721,308
Phoenix, AZ
16,933
1,673,164
Seattle, WA
16,813
780,995
Jacksonville, FL
16,365
1,009,833
Miami, FL
16,337
487,014
Washington, D.C.
14,926
702,250
San Jose, CA
13,634
997,368
Columbus, OH
12,694
933,263
Las Vegas, Nevada
12,292
678,922
Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Fort Worth and Austin are among the largest 15 U.S. cities in terms of population.
New York, NY: 8,478,072
Los Angeles, CA: 3,878,704
Chicago, IL: 2,721,308
Houston, TX: 2,390,125
Phoenix, AZ: 1,673,164
Philadelphia, PA: 1,573,916
San Antonio, TX: 1,526,656
San Diego, CA: 1,404,452
Dallas, TX: 1,326,087
Jacksonville, FL: 1,009,833
Fort Worth, TX: 1,008,106
San Jose, CA: 997,368
Austin, TX: 993,588
Charlotte, NC: 943,476
Columbus, OH: 933,263
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: These 2 Texas cities are growing faster than any other US city
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Report finds more newcomers moving to Columbus, home prices rising
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – A recent report found more Americans are moving to the heartland states, causing home prices to increase in some of the region's cities, including Columbus. An April analysis by found that the heartland states, which refers to the central portion of the country encompassing the Midwest and parts of the South, are having a post-pandemic revival, thanks to newcomers moving in from the nation's major cities. LinkUs progress: Construction for some bike, pedestrian paths slated to begin next year An estimated 39% of the country's population lived in the heartland region in 2024, a 2.65% jump from 2020. By comparison, the rest of the United States grew by 2.59%, U.S. Census Bureau data shows. This marks the first time since 1959 that the heartland's population gains exceeded the national average. The report specifically found five cities in the heartland states, including Columbus; Grand Rapids, Michigan; Indianapolis; Nashville, Tennessee; and Austin, Texas, are seeing considerable growth. The metros have been drawing in new residents, specifically young professionals looking for 'well-paying' jobs in tech, manufacturing, healthcare and financial services, as well as families looking for affordable housing, the website said. As a result, the median home prices in the heartland hubs have seen increases in home prices from 2019 to 2025, ranging from 17% to 47%, according to the report. The national average in this time frame was 39%. Columbus saw a 'modest' uptick of 26% across the five-year period, with the median home price rising from $285,671 to $360,000. 'While the year-over-year median listing price growth in Columbus, OH in March 2025 was 26%, falling below the national average of 39%, the median list price per square foot — which accounts for changes in home size — was 59% higher than six years ago, compared to 55% nationally,' Senior Economist Jiyai Xu said in a statement. 'This points to stronger-than-average housing demand in the area over the longer term. ' Lawmakers clash over Ohio bill to ban therapy for minors without parent consent Columbus has been getting the most attention from out-of-market home shoppers in Washington, D.C., with residents making up 24.4% of viewers on followed by New Yorkers (10%) and Cleveland locals (7%). The report named Louisville, Kentucky, and Detroit as other heartland 'boomtowns' to watch, with both having views per property exceeding the national average on over the past year. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Forbes
4 days ago
- Forbes
U.S. Exports to China Lost To 7-Year Trump-Biden Tariffs: $160 Billion
Dan Duffy steps off his tractor earlier this year while planting soybeans on land he farms with his ... More brother near Dwight, Ill. Duffy, like many farmers, is concerned about the long-term impact tariffs may have on soybean exports to China as it looks to other countries like Brazil and Argentina, the world's largest and third-largest producers of soybeans, for a less expensive alternative. U.S. exports of soybeans are one of the "bottom 10" of U.S. exports that have not rebounded from their totals prior to the trade war's onset in 2018. More than 40 percent of the grain produced in Illinois is sold for export. The state exported about $2.4 billion worth of soybeans last year, $805 million to China. (Photo by) Seven years of tariffs on Chinese imports have led to retaliation and diminished U.S. exports to China that are conservatively worth $160 billion and as much as $201 billion, based on my analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data. The analysis reveals the commodities that have failed to rebound and might be helpful to better understand how the world's second-largest economy and the United States' third-largest trade partner would respond to an escalated trade war. From 2018, when President Trump first imposed tariffs on China, through 2024, when former President Joe Biden left office, largely having left those tariffs in place, U.S. exports to China increased 10.42%. In the same time period, U.S. exports to the world increased 33.44%. If U.S. exports to China had kept pace with the 33.44% overall average, that would have resulted in an additional $159.92 billion in exports to China. U.S. exports to China grew more rapidly than the average with the world in two seven-year periods ... More prior to the seven-year trade war with China. There's good reason to believe they would have done so – or better. In the seven-year period prior to the trade war, 2010-2017, the growth in U.S. exports to China was virtually double that of the United States with the world, 41.44% growth compared to the U.S. average with the world of 21.02%. Had U.S. exports to China kept to that pace, the additional exports would have totaled $201.50 billion. I looked at the U.S. exports that fell the most and increased the most during the seven years the tariffs have been in place for clues on what to expect should the United States and China continue to escalate the trade war rather than de-escalate it or simply leave it in place. I looked at tonnage also, though those figures do not affect the trade deficit, on which the Trump administration remains sharply focused, and not only on the one with China. Before I get to those U.S. exports, it is worth noting that U.S. imports from China 'lost' to the trade war fell far more than exports in the last seven years, as much as $772.90 billion. Because of that, some might describe the decline in U.S. exports to China during the trade war, by using a term often used in wartime: 'collateral damage.' Some others would suggest that the decline is not as steep as it might appear, that the Chinese are manipulating 'country of origin' labeling. That's a supposition supported, if not proven, by increases in U.S. imports from Vietnam, Taiwan, Japan and other countries corresponding to declines in specific commodities from China. But because of that steep decline in U.S. imports, at least according to official U.S. government data, China dropped from being the United States' top trade partner to No. 3 behind Mexico and Canada; dropped to second behind Mexico for U.S. imports, which it had previously dominated; and saw the U.S. deficit with China fall from about five times greater than with any other nation to just about 50% greater than that with Mexico. No doubt, China has felt the impact. Despite this, U.S. trade continued to grow, even as trade with China fell, toping a record $5.33 trillion in 2024. U.S. imports continued to rise, even as those with China faltered, topping $3.27 trillion. And the U.S. deficit with the world continued to swell, increasing six of the last eight years, topping $1.20 trillion in 2024. While it is hard to have certainty on U.S. imports from China, it is not difficult to have certainty on U.S. exports to China. U.S. soybean exports to China – which buys a majority of these U.S. exports and was an early and highly visible symbol of the trade war that began in 2018 – were down $1.12 billion in the first quarter of this year from the first quarter of 2017, before the trade war began. That 33.97% decline is more than twice the decline in overall U.S. soybean exports, 16.93%. Passenger vehicle exports to China are down 76.54% when compared to the same three months of 2017, which equates to $1.80 billion. U.S. passenger vehicles to the world are actually up 7.37%, or $948.80 million this year. Like passenger vehicles and soybeans, the other eight exports that fell the most from the first quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of this year – a 'bottom 10' rather than a 'top 10,' if you will– all underperformed the U.S. average. Oil shipments to China are down 25.61% while U.S. exports have increased 518.64%. China is, of course, buying oil from Russia, allowing it to continue to invade Ukraine, which the United States is spending billions to defend, along with European nations. Those who recycle or consider themselves to be at least environmentally conscious might recall that during the early days of the trade war, China quit accepting scrap metal and paper. You can see that in the data. The export value of aluminum waste and scrap exported to China is down 85.93% from 2017 while U.S. exports have increased 29.61%. Paper and paperboard scrap exports are down 99.56% to China, 30.51% to the rest of the world. Scrap iron and steel exports have fallen 99.41% while exports to the world are up 28.53%. There are, of course, winners, commodities that have increased since the first quarter of 2017, which has allowed U.S. exports overall to increase 8.18%. (The increase occurred during the Biden Administration, which was equally strident in policy just less voval; the first quarter total for 2025, with Trump back in office, is the lowest figure since 2020.) Civilian aircraft and parts increased 97.88% in that time, far more than the 27.57% U.S. average with the world in that time frame. That's an increase of $2.4 billion in the first quarter, compared to the first quarter of 2017. Much of that appears to be parts rather than flight-ready jets, although the Census data is not clear. As was the case in the aviation category, China outperformed the U.S. average with six others in the top 10 as well, making it possible for overall exports to rise despite the performance of the laggards. Three are in the healthcare field: the category of vaccines, plasma and other blood fractions; medicines in individual doses, which includes a number of cardiac, diabetic and anti-depressant medications and is one of the largest such categories; and medical instruments, which can range from syringes to expensive and large imaging machines. The first, the vaccine category, is up 537.14%, compared to a U.S. increase with the world of 180.54%. The second, medicines, is up 128.01% compared to 72.72% for the United States as a whole. Finally, medical instruments rose slightly more than the national average, 36.80% to 36.65%. All of the above can be loosely construed to contain advanced technology. With the computer chip category, there would be no doubt. Those U.S. exports toChina have increased 143.02% compared to the U.S. average of 47.06%. The category that includes LNG and a broad plastics category both increased, 147.91% and 95.13%, respectively, but the U.S. averages increased more, 271.18% and 110.19%, respectively. Lastly, at first glance, the Chinese seem not to have a beef with U.S. beef, which is delivered frozen, given the distance traveled. That category has increased 1.9 million percent while the U.S. average with the world is an 88.14% increase. What accounts for the massive percentage gain? The total in the first quarter of 2017 was a paltry $15,232. Bottom line: The trade war with China, now in its eighth year and swerving back and forth between escalation and de-escalation, hit Chinese imports hard but did not lower the U.S. trade deficit and harmed U.S. exports – providing something of a road map going forward.
Associated Press
4 days ago
- Associated Press
Competition Bureau publishes competitor property controls guidance
GATINEAU, QC, June 4, 2025 /CNW/ - The Competition Bureau has published updated guidance on competitor property controls following a public consultation. The guidance provides Canadians transparency on the Bureau's enforcement approach to competitor property controls under the Competition Act. The Bureau will continue to revise its approach as it gains more experience, as circumstances change, or as the law continues to evolve. Competitor property controls are restrictions that limit how a property can be used by others. They can raise serious competition concerns, for example, by making it difficult for businesses to open new stores, or by limiting the products that can be sold in a store. The Bureau encourages Canadian businesses to review the guidance and ensure that their existing or planned property controls comply with the law. Quick facts Related products Associated links General information: Request for information | Complaint form Stay connected: X (Twitter) | Facebook | LinkedIn | YouTube | RSS Feed | Email Distribution List The Competition Bureau is an independent law enforcement agency that protects and promotes competition for the benefit of Canadian consumers and businesses. Competition drives lower prices and innovation while fueling economic growth. SOURCE Competition Bureau
