&w=3840&q=100)
Centre plans study to maximise use of Indus waters amid treaty suspension
The Centre is planning a undertake a study to look into ways to maximise the use of the quantum of water from the three rivers that Pakistan had earlier used under the Indus Water Treaty, now that the agreement has been, officials said.
The proposal was made at a high-level meeting on Friday chaired by Home Minister Amit Shah that discussed the future course of action on the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960, which has been kept in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed.
Under the World Bank-brokered treaty, India was granted exclusive rights to the water of the eastern rivers -- the Sutlej, Beas, and Ravi -- amounting to an average annual flow of about 33 million acre-feet (MAF). The water of the western rivers -- the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab -- with an average annual flow of around 135 MAF, were largely allocated to Pakistan.
With the treaty now put in abeyance, the government is looking at ways to utilise the water of the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab.
After Friday's high-level meeting, Jal Shakti Minister C R Paatil asserted that the government is working on a strategy to ensure that not a single drop of water flows into Pakistan.
He said Prime Minister Narendra Modi has issued a slew of directives, and the meeting was held to follow up on them. Shah made several suggestions at the meeting for their effective implementation.
"We will ensure that not a single drop of water flows into Pakistan from India," the Jal Shakti Minister had said after the meeting.
Sources said the government is working on a long-term plan to ensure the effective implementation of its decisions.
According to an official, the ministry has been asked to conduct a study to look at ways to utilise the water from the three western rivers.
Experts have spoken about the lack of infrastructure that may limit India's capability of completely utilising the water it gets from the decision to suspend the treaty.
"The real issue is with the western rivers where infrastructure limitations prevent us from immediately stopping water flows," Himanshu Thakkar of the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP) said.
"We have several projects underway in the Chenab basin that will take five to seven years to complete. Until then, water will continue to flow to Pakistan by gravity. Once these are operational, India will have control mechanisms that currently do not exist," Thakkar had told PTI.
Shripad Dharmadhikary, an environmental activist and the founder of Manthan Adhyayan Kendra, has also cautioned against assuming that India could rapidly divert water flows. "At present, we lack the major infrastructure needed to stop water from flowing into Pakistan," he said.
In response to India's decision on the water sharing agreement, Pakistan's Senate, in a resolution, has said the move amounted to "an act of war".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Tamil Nadu's share higher than Union government's in funding for 6 Central schemes
The Tamil Ndau government's contributes more monetarily compared to the Union government for the implementation of six Central schemes, according to a perusal of documents of the Central and State governments. There are three schemes under the umbrella of the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) — Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS), Indira Gandhi National Widow Pension Scheme (IGNWPS), and the Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme (IGNDPS). The remaining three schemes are the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY)-Rural, Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY), and the Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM). On Thursday, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, in his speech at a government event in Salem, referred to these schemes and said that with the contribution of the Union government, it was not possible to implement them, be it housing or water supply. 'Even in the case of the schemes named after the Prime Minister, the State government, by providing more than 50% [of the scheme cost], has been implementing them,' he observed. Fully funded by the Centre, the NSAP was launched in August 1995. However, the State government has been a pioneer in this area and started implementing an old age pension scheme since January 1962. It extended the scope of the welfare measure to four categories of destitute persons — persons with disabilities, widows, agricultural labourers, and destitute or deserted women following marriage — between 1974 and 1984, all of which were subsumed into the all-India programme after November 2007. In respect of the Old Age and Widow Pension schemes under the NSAP, the Union government's share is ₹200 or ₹300 for those up to 79 years and ₹500 for those aged 80 and above. It is the State government that provides the enhanced top-up — ₹1,000 or ₹900 or ₹ 700, as the case may be — so that the beneficiary eventually gets ₹1,200. As for the beneficiaries under the IGNDPS, they receive ₹1,500, of which ₹300 or ₹500 comes from the Centre, depending on the age group, while the rest is contributed by the State government. In addition, Tamil Nadu funds its own scheme for persons with disabilities, under which beneficiaries are paid ₹1,500. Regarding the PMAY (Rural), the unit cost of a house is shared between Central and State governments in the ratio 60:40 in plain areas. As pointed out by the Chief Minister, the State government's share is perceptibly higher than that of the Centre. In the State, the unit cost of a house under PMAY-R is ₹2,83,900, which is inclusive of the State support cost for reinforced cement concrete (RCC) roofing and the convergence with the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme and the Swachh Bharat Mission (Rural) for the purpose of the construction of toilet. Of this amount, the Union government's share is ₹1,11,100 and the State government's ₹1,72,800. Effectively, the ratio of cost sharing is 39:61. As for PMMSY, which follows different funding patterns, 60% of the cost is to be borne by the Union government and the rest by the State. But, in practice, the Centre's share is 27% and the State's 73%. In the case of the JJM, the cost sharing is to be done equally between the two. But, when it comes to implementation, the State's contribution works out to 55%.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Israel attacks Iran: Who are the top Iranian generals eliminated by Israel
In this operation, three top Iranian leaders were killed. The three were Hossein Salami , head of Iran's Revolutionary Guards; Mohammad Bagheri , Chief of Staff of Iran's armed forces; and Ali Shamkhani , former national security chief and senior advisor. The three musketeers Major General Hossein Salami born in 1960, was the leader of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and later in 2019 he became the head of the IRGC. He reported directly to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The IRGC is Iran's most powerful military group. Salami led the IRGC when Iran fired hundreds of drones and missiles at Israel in April and October 2023, as per reports. In Jan 2024, Iranian media showed Salami at an underground missile site linked to those attacks. At that base, he walked over U.S. and Israel flags and viewed 'new special missiles.' He was also the head when the IRGC accidentally shot down a Ukrainian passenger plane in 2020. That crash killed all 176 people on board. CNN analyst Beth Sanner said killing Salami is like killing the U.S. Chairman of Joint Chiefs, a very big deal. Since 2016, Major General Mohammad Bagheri has been the Chief of Staff of Iran's Armed Forces. His office, the General Staff, runs and coordinates all military activities. In 2019, the U.S. punished him with sanctions for supporting terrorism and hurting the rights of Iranian people, as stated by CNN report. In April, Bagheri had a meeting in Tehran with Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman. In that meeting, the Saudi prince warned Bagheri to accept Trump's nuclear deal offer to avoid war with Israel, according to the report by Reuters. Live Events Ali Shamkhani was a trusted advisor to Khamenei, who is Iran's Supreme Leader. He helped Iran and Saudi Arabia become friends again after years of problems. His death was confirmed by Iran's IRINN TV network after Israel's strike. Shamkhani was Iran's top national security chief from 2013 to mid-2023. Before that, he worked in the IRGC and Iran's defense ministry, according to the report by CNN. He was well-known internationally, especially in U.S. and European foreign policy circles. In 2023, he led China-brokered talks with Saudi Arabia which ended years of hostility. But he was suddenly replaced later that year. Analysts say Shamkhani was very ambitious, he even ran for President in 2001. Some experts believed Khamenei thought he was getting too powerful, as per reports. Still, he stayed close to the Supreme Leader and gave advice during Trump-era nuclear talks. In April before U.S. talks, he warned that Iran might expel UN nuclear inspectors if threatened. FAQs Q1. Who did Israel kill in the Iran strike? Israel killed Hossein Salami, Mohammad Bagheri, and Ali Shamkhani. Q2. Why is this attack important? These leaders helped run Iran's army and nuclear plans, so their deaths could weaken Iran's response.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Meghalaya to strengthen resident safety law in wake of Sohra honeymoon murder
Shillong, In the wake of the sensational honeymoon murder in Sohra, the Meghalaya government on Friday decided to strengthen an existing legislation aimed at ensuring the safety of state residents and curbing the entry of criminal elements posing as tourists. The move comes weeks after the gruesome murder of Indore-based businessman Raja Raghuvanshi, who was killed during a honeymoon trip to Sohra, in a plot orchestrated by his wife and her lover. "The cabinet today decided to revisit the Meghalaya Resident Safety and Security Act , 2016, an existing state legislation, to add more teeth to this Act to minimise the possibility of criminal elements entering Meghalaya in the guise of tourists," Cabinet spokesperson Paul Lyngdoh said after the cabinet meeting here. "The government will soon come up with a formal proposal to further strengthen the MRSSA," he said. The 2016 Act was originally introduced to enhance the security of Meghalaya residents through the vetting of tenants and tourists. It allows for identity verification through a tourism-specific app and has provisions similar to those under the Inner Line Permit system, which the state has long been seeking from the Centre. According to Lyngdoh, the Assembly had adopted a resolution demanding implementation of the Inner Line Permit in Meghalaya. "The matter is pending before the Union Ministry of Home Affairs. There were several queries from the Ministry which the state government had addressed," he said, adding that the Union Ministry had expressed concern since Meghalaya is a transit state to other parts of the North East. The Cabinet minister also informed that the MRSSA is already a very effective legislation, which will need a little bit of "upscale" as of now. The urgency to revisit the Act was triggered by the case involving Sonam, the wife of murdered businessman Raja. She had allegedly conspired to kill her husband along with her lover and his friends, and entered Meghalaya under the guise of a tourist. According to Lyngdoh, the Cabinet placed on record its gratitude to the entire police department for cracking this case in record time and arresting all the accused, saving the state from a "bad name".
