logo
Govt halts US arms deals after Trump slams 50% tariffs on exports

Govt halts US arms deals after Trump slams 50% tariffs on exports

Business Standard18 hours ago
New Delhi has put on hold its plans to procure new U.S. weapons and aircraft, according to three Indian officials familiar with the matter, in India's first concrete sign of discontent after tariffs imposed on its exports by President Donald Trump dragged ties to their lowest level in decades.
India had been planning to send Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to Washington in the coming weeks for an announcement on some of the purchases, but that trip has been cancelled, two of the people said.
Trump on Aug. 6 imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods as punishment for Delhi's purchases of Russian oil, which he said meant the country was funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine. That raised the total duty on Indian exports to 50% - among the highest of any U.S. trading partner.
The president has a history of rapidly reversing himself on tariffs and India has said it remains actively engaged in discussions with Washington. One of the people said the defence purchases could go ahead once India had clarity on tariffs and the direction of bilateral ties, but "just not as soon as they were expected to."
Written instructions had not been given to pause the purchases, another official said, indicating that Delhi had the option to quickly reverse course, though there was "no forward movement at least for now."
India's defence ministry and the Pentagon did not respond to Reuters' questions. Delhi, which has forged a close partnership with America in recent years, has said it is being unfairly targeted and that Washington and its European allies continue to trade with Moscow when it is in their interest.
Reuters is reporting for the first time that discussions on India's purchases of Stryker combat vehicles made by General Dynamics Land Systems and Javelin anti-tank missiles developed by Raytheon and Lockheed Martin have been paused due to the tariffs.
Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had in February announced plans to pursue procurement and joint production of those items.
Singh had also been planning to announce the purchase of six Boeing P8I reconnaissance aircraft and support systems for the Indian Navy during his now-cancelled trip, two of the people said. Talks over procuring the aircraft in a proposed $3.6 billion deal were at an advanced stage, according to the officials.
Boeing, Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics referred queries to the Indian and U.S. governments. Raytheon did not return a request for comment.
Russian Relations India's deepening security relationship with the U.S., which is fuelled by their shared strategic rivalry with China, was heralded by many U.S. analysts as one of the key areas of foreign-policy progress in the first Trump administration.
Delhi is the world's second-largest arms importer and Russia has traditionally been its top supplier. India has in recent years however, shifted to importing from Western powers like France, Israel and the U.S., according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute think-tank.
The shift in suppliers was driven partly by constraints on Russia's ability to export arms, which it is utilizing heavily in its invasion of Ukraine. Some Russian weapons have also performed poorly in the battlefield, according to Western analysts.
The broader U.S.-India defence partnership, which includes intelligence sharing and joint military exercises, continues without hiccups, one of the Indian officials said.
India also remains open to scaling back on oil imports from Russia and is open to making deals elsewhere, including the U.S., if it can get similar prices, according to two other Indian sources.
Trump's threats and rising anti-U.S. nationalism in India have "made it politically difficult for Modi to make the shift from Russia to the U.S.," one of the people said. Nonetheless, discounts on the landing cost of Russian oil have shrunk to the lowest since 2022.
India's petroleum ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
While the rupture in U.S.-India ties was abrupt, there have been strains in the relationship. Delhi has repeatedly rebutted Trump's claim that the U.S. brokered a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after four days of fighting between the nuclear-armed neighbours in May. Trump also hosted Pakistan's army chief at the White House in the weeks following the conflict.
In recent months, Moscow has been actively pitching Delhi on buying new defence technologies like its S-500 surface-to-air missile system, according to one of the Indian officials, as well as a Russian source familiar with the talks.
India currently does not see a need for new arms purchases from Moscow, two Indian officials said.
But Delhi is unlikely to wean itself off Russian weapons entirely as the decades-long partnership between the two powers means Indian military systems will continue to require Moscow's support, one of the officials said.
The Russian embassy in Delhi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM Modi Greets Nation On Raksha Bandhan Festival
PM Modi Greets Nation On Raksha Bandhan Festival

India.com

time5 minutes ago

  • India.com

PM Modi Greets Nation On Raksha Bandhan Festival

Prime Minister Narendra Modi extended his greetings on the occasion of Raksha Bandhan. In his message, he conveyed best wishes to the nation, emphasising the festival's significance in strengthening the bond between siblings."Best wishes on the special occasion of Raksha Bandhan," PM Modi wrote on X. Union Home Minister Amit Shah also extended heartfelt greetings to the nation on the occasion of Raksha Bandhan, a festival celebrating the unbreakable bond of love and trust between siblings. In a post on X, Shah said, "Heartfelt best wishes to all countrymen on the sacred festival of 'Raksha Bandhan,' dedicated to the unbreakable bond of love, trust, and commitment to protection between brothers and sisters. I pray to God that this festival becomes a source of joy and enthusiasm in everyone's life." Similarly, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh wishes on the occasion, emphasising the festival's significance beyond the traditional rakhi thread. He posted on X, "Heartfelt best wishes to all of you on the sacred occasion of Raksha Bandhan. This festival is not only about the purity of the rakhi thread but also a symbol of the commitment to honor, protect, and ensure the happiness and prosperity of our sisters. May this festival, a symbol of the love between brothers and sisters, further strengthen the spirit of protection within us--that is my prayer to God." Raksha Bandhan is a traditional Hindu festival dedicated to the love and bond between brothers and sisters. On this day, sisters tie a Rakhi around their brother's wrists. In return, brothers offer gifts as a symbol of love and care for their sisters. Rakhi symbolises a sense of protection. On Raksha Bandhan, the brothers promise to protect their sisters from harm of any kind. This year, Raksha Bandhan is being celebrated on August 9. Raksha Bandhan is a festival deeply rooted in Indian Culture and has been celebrated for centuries. Incidents of sisters tying a rakhi around their brothers' wrists for protection are mentioned in Hindu religious texts.

Beyond Tariffs, How Modi Got Trumped
Beyond Tariffs, How Modi Got Trumped

The Wire

time5 minutes ago

  • The Wire

Beyond Tariffs, How Modi Got Trumped

Trump likes blandishments, but even chuffed bullies often double-down on those who do not push back. Donald Trump, the President of the United States of America, has earned himself the moniker of being the WMD (weapon of mass destruction, for the uninitiated) of the global order, as we once knew it. Frequently ridiculed and correctly lampooned for his mercurial mood swings ( which decides geopolitical conditions) and several sexual harassment cases, including those of his allegedly 'Epstein past', Trump poses as a mind-numbing conundrum to the world, for two reasons. Firstly, his capricious predilections, bordering on pure insanity, has led to extreme unpredictability. From the stock markets to trade negotiations to military alliances, uncertainty is a dreaded word. It makes policy-making redundant; everything becomes reductionist, everything is a short-term transactional deal until the weekend golfer from Mar-a-Lago golf club next gets a migraine or watches a Fox News program that triggers him. The second factor exacerbates the problem caused by the first; the American president is the most powerful man in the world. The world's largest economy, which also commands the global currency, and its insuperable military prowess, makes the man in the White House the Zubin Mehta of the philharmonic orchestra. Trump had already experienced the heady near-monarchical status of a unipolar US in his first term. This second time, when he has won against all odds, he is hell-bent to leverage the formidable power of the Oval Office, an unfinished task as it were. 'MAGA' – or 'Make America Great Again' – is nothing but a movement to resuscitate the smoldering remains of the great American Empire facing an inevitable decline that began probably around the Bill Clinton-George Bush Jr presidencies. India, unfortunately, forgot to read the tea leaves. The foreign policy miscalculations by the Modi government have put it in an unenviable quandary, and almost friendless. Given America's duplicitous track-record abroad (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and several Latin American countries) and the Trump administration's open admission that it encouraged a multipolar world, India needed to be more circumspect and less effusive when handling Uncle Sam. For heaven's sake, USA has even considered jettisoning NATO, the most durable and strategically significant military alliance post-world war two! However, New Delhi chose to put all its eggs in the Washington basket. A bulwark against China, a pawn in the American chessboard, delighted the mandarins in South Block. Despite the historic civil nuclear deal that was collaboratively conceptualised and curated between late Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and former US President Geroge Bush Jr, which removed our pariah status in the storied nuclear club, India maintained its non-aligned status when it came to the Big Boys club, deftly handling its old but diminished ally Russia and strengthening relationship with its mighty adversary China. There were no tilts. Global summits began to talk about the great Asian resurgence in the Chindia story. The Russian remained a steadfast support. Barack Obama's respect for Singh is legendary. So what has changed so dramatically that it prompted Trump acolyte Republican Senator Lindsey Graham to say 'We are going to tear the hell out of you and ruin your economy'? Why would the Americans call India's buying of cheap Russian oil, 'blood money', akin to funding Vladimir Putin's bloody war in Ukraine? From bromance to bete noire, how did the much pumped-up bonhomie – A b Ki Baar Trump Sarkar and Howdy Modi – between the two heads of state suddenly turn so bitter? The answer lies not so much in the 50% tariff (Trump has threatened more sanctions), which is an irrational arm-twisting by the Trump administration, but in India surrendering its nuanced, liberal pro-human rights embedded in international relations, ostensibly for strategic self-interest. That is the crux of the matter. Ignore the clever wordplay that foreign policy wonks habitually do to obfuscate positions, but how did India come to not back UNGA resolutions on condemning Russian invasion and human rights violations in Ukraine several times over? Just because of cheap Russian oil? Gaza is the apotheosis of perverse hubris and shocking apathy; India actually did not even support UNGA resolutions calling for ceasefire and humanitarian assistance for the slaughtered, suffering and starving Palestinians. India became the social media misinformation/disinformation capital of the world; its pro-Isreal propaganda flooding toxic platforms. The world saw India in a new avatar: ambivalent on human rights, opportunistic on commercial deal-making, egregiously sympathetic to Israeli genocide and blithely nonchalant about conducting offshore assassinations of suspected terrorists. To justify everything, 'strategic autonomy' became the convenient pretext in a country that had turned ultra-nationalistic in its public discourse. But the truth is, not even Shashi Tharoor's extraordinary eloquence can camouflage the blatant fault lines, the demonstrable chicanery in India's foreign policy. India stands isolated in its own immediate neighborhood. Under Modi, India has abandoned any pretensions of leading the global South, clearly preferring cheap Russian oil and Israel's Pegasus spyware, surveillance systems and defense hardware instead. Modi has reduced foreign policy, a complex statecraft into a domestic theatrical pantomime. Everything is about a megalomaniacal cult. Thus, cornered by a recalcitrant Trump and bullied by all his lackeys too, a feckless Modi wished to score brownie points. 'Won't compromise on our interests, ready to pay heavy personal price': as usual, it was back to playing the victimhood card. Americans are the smartest businesspeople. Trump likes blandishments, but even chuffed bullies often double-down on those who do not push back. They saw that Modi was nebbish; all he needed was video content to burnish his popularity on the electronic screens in India. That Trump is perfunctorily hammering India, whose trade surplus is just about 5% of US total trade deficit, tells you how he has been conditioned to seeing a complaisant India play footsie with him. India's giant crush on both Trump and Israel has also been because of their shining Islamophobia. It has helped the local narrative that the BJP thrives on. Unfortunately for Modi, foreign policy is conducted in an open unfiltered theater. It is almost impossible to manipulate headlines using cheerleader promos consistently. Truth often leaks out. There is also the 'Adani factor', a negotiating instrument in the hands of the art of deal maker Trump. Remember, Trump had asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for dirt on Hunter Biden in return for military aid? You should know what you are asking for. Sanjay Jha is an author and former national spokesperson for the Congress. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

Trump call to oust Intel CEO Tan could sidetrack chipmaker's turnaround
Trump call to oust Intel CEO Tan could sidetrack chipmaker's turnaround

Indian Express

time5 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump call to oust Intel CEO Tan could sidetrack chipmaker's turnaround

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan is already facing an uphill battle in turning around the ailing chipmaker. Now, U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that Tan resign over his ties to Chinese firms will only distract him from that task, two investors and a former senior employee said. Trump said on Thursday that Tan was 'highly conflicted' due to his Chinese connections. Reuters reported exclusively in April that Tan had invested in hundreds of Chinese firms, some of which were linked to the Chinese military. Tan may now have to mount an effort to reassure Trump that he remains the right person to revive the storied American chipmaker, pulling his focus away from the cost cuts he's trying to implement. 'It is distracting,' said Ryuta Makino, analyst at Intel investor Gabelli Funds, which, according to LSEG data, owns more than 200,000 shares in Intel. 'I think Trump will make goals for Intel to spend more, and I don't think Intel has the capabilities to spend more, like what Apple and Nvidia are doing.' AI chip market leader Nvidia and iPhone-maker Apple have committed hundreds of billions of dollars to expand domestic manufacturing, which, according to Trump, will bring jobs back home. Until recently, Intel had emerged as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the 2022 CHIPS Act, as former CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out plans to build advanced chipmaking factories. Tan, however, has significantly pared back such ambitions, as the company's goal of rivaling Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC's contract manufacturing chops have fallen short. Tan said last month that he would slow construction work on new factories in Ohio and planned to build factories only when he saw demand for Intel's chips, a move that is likely to further strain relations with Trump. The company, its board and Tan were making significant investments aligned with Trump's America First agenda, Intel said in a statement on Thursday, without any mention of Trump's demand. The statement was 'bland', said David Wagner, a portfolio manager at Intel shareholder Aptus Capital Advisors, which owns Intel stock through index funds. 'Either defend your leader, which will be the beginning of a difficult road ahead, or consider making a change,' Wagner said. Having this play out over a few months is not something that Intel can afford, he said. Tan himself released a statement late on Thursday. 'The United States has been my home for more than 40 years. I love this country and am profoundly grateful for the opportunities it has given me. I also love this company,' he said, adding that the board was 'fully supportive of the work we are doing to transform our company.' 'BUILT ON TRUST' Tan, a chip industry veteran, took the helm at Intel about six months ago, after the board ousted previous boss Pat Gelsinger over years of missteps and burgeoning losses. The company's shares are largely flat this year after losing nearly two-thirds of their value last year. Tan was the CEO of chip-design software maker Cadence Design from 2008 through December 2021. Cadence last month agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to resolve charges for selling its products to a Chinese military university believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts, Reuters reported. The sales to Chinese entities occurred under his leadership. Reuters reported on Wednesday that U.S. Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair with questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and the criminal case involving Cadence. 'There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about my past roles,' Tan said in his statement on Thursday. 'I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards. My reputation has been built on trust,' he said. It is not illegal for U.S. citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies unless those companies have been added to the U.S. Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List, which explicitly bans such investments. Reuters in April had found no evidence that Tan at the time was invested directly in any company on that list. But Trump's remarks have now forced the limelight on an issue that could erode investor confidence. 'If you add in another layer of government scrutiny, and everybody looking into how the company is doing whatever it's doing … that just makes it harder,' said a former senior executive at Intel, who was familiar with the company's strategy under Gelsinger. The source, who declined to be named, was let go as part of Gelsinger's workforce reduction drive last year. Tan's strategy is to 'get rid of all of the non-productive parts of the company and really focus on a key few products,' the person said. 'If (Tan) leaves, it's going to just prolong whatever Intel has to do and needs to do really quickly.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store