Alison Hammond's flattering denim dress is the perfect summer outfit - and we've found where to buy it on the high street
Alison Hammond stunned in a flattering denim dress, perfect for the summer, and the outfit is available to snap up on the high street.
The TV star, 50, wore the dark blue dress earlier this month on ITV 's This Morning, which she hosted alongside Dermot O'Leary.
She paired the Denim Button Through Midi Dress from Very with tan sandals and gold jewellery, styling her hair in long curls over her shoulder.
Available to buy for £48, the stylish piece is 95% cotton and features short sleeves, making it perfect for the warmer months.
The shirt collar adds edge to the sleek design while a braided feature along the front creates the appearance of a belt.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
Denim Button Through Midi Dress - Mid Wash
£48.00 Shop
Gold coloured buttons run all the way down the dress and it even has pockets, adding practicality as well as style.
Denim is a simple wardrobe staple and though it is typically styled through jeans, Alison's dress shows how it can stun in other ways too.
The classic piece is available from Very in a range of sizes from 14 to 28.
While the platform heels she styled it with are from ASOS, though are reportedly out of stock.
Other similar outfits are available to buy, including a D enim Graceland Midi Shirt Dress one with longer sleeves from Nobody's Child, priced at £77.
While Next offers a Lipsy Mid Wash Blue Belted Denim Mini Shirt Dress with Waist Seaming Detail for £59.
Last month, the presenter was flooded with compliments from fans who were stunned by her new look after she had taken an extended break from This Morning.
This Morning fans gasped 'she looks amazing!' as Alison Hammond made a 'triumphant return' to the show after an extended break.
Nobody's Child Denim Graceland Midi Shirt Dress £77.00
Shop
Lipsy Mid Wash Blue Belted Denim Mini Shirt Dress £59.00
Shop
H&M Midi denim dress £42.99
Shop
George at ASDA Mid Wash Sleeveless Denim Midi Shirt Dress £22.00
Shop
On April 14, Alison made a comeback and donned a striking new look while she was at it too.
The star styled her hair partly up in a bun and the rest trailed past her shoulders in stunning voluminous curls - marking a change from her usual sleek waves.
She also happened to tower over co-host Dermot and wore animal print heels, paired with a white blouse and burgundy skirt.
'I'm nervous, I feel like I'm out of the flow. It's good to see you Dermot, I'm wearing heels,' Alison commented on her return.
'Rachel who dresses me said put those heels on. I said 'can I have some flat shoes please?' She said no, I'm keeping them.'
Meanwhile Dermot called her comeback a 'triumphant return'.
Fans took to social media to welcome Alison back to the show and many gushed over her new look.
One posted on X: 'Alison looks amazing the hair is everything.'
'Love the hair Alison you look amazing welcome back.'
'Ali-shone!'
'Yay the vibes is back on the show Alison and Dermot.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New mother wins 100-kilometre ultra marathon despite breast feeding her six-month-old daughter three times on the way
A new mother won an 100km ultra marathon despite breast feeding her six-month-old daughter along the way. Stephanie Case, 42, is no stranger to long-distance running but this mammoth undertaking along the 62-mile Ultra-Trail in Snowdonia was a little different to her usual challenges. The human rights lawyer had her new baby Pepper with her and rather than gobbling down some pizza and gulping a Coca-Cola in one of the pit stop stations, Ms Case instead focused her attention and energy on feeding her newborn. And the breaks to breast-feed didn't stop Ms Case from achieving victory and indeed Pepper proved to be her lucky charm. Not only did the new mother cross the finish line, but she did so in her fastest time yet - despite starting 30 minutes behind her competitors. After factoring in her longer breaks, the lawyer crossed the line in a final time of 16 hours, 53 minutes and 22 seconds. After crossing the line, her husband John and Pepper were shocked to find out that she had won a few minutes ahead of the runner-up and Ms Case described the race as 'the best time'. She told The Times: 'I was just so relieved that I didn't know that because it would have put a lot of pressure and stress on my race. And I just had the best time. I had the best time out there, just running completely ignorant of where I was and just going by how my body felt.' She added that she hopes one day she can show Pepper what she was part of and take her through the photos from the monumental day. 'I knew it was past Pepper's bedtime, but it was great. I can't wait until she grows up and I can show her the photos of what we did together'.,' she added. Ms Case's run was a cause for celebration not only for her impressive time but also because it was her first run after struggling with multiple miscarriages and three rounds of IVF before the joyful birth of her daughter. The chief of protection for UNRWA in Jerusalem was forced to scale back her running after a miscarriage three years ago. The Canadian lawyer, who now lives in Chamonix, France, revealed that she discovered she was pregnant after coming second in the over southern Colorado's San Juan Range. Despite her joy, the pregnancy sadly resulted in a miscarriage and Ms Case said that while there was no medical evidence to suggest that running had contributed to it, she decided to stop for a short while. After a second miscarriage Ms Chase discovered she was pregnant for a third time with her daughter Pepper who she welcomed in November. Six weeks after welcoming Pepper, the Canadian re-connected with running and started up again with the help of her midwife and her running coach Megan Roche. Ms Case said: 'Being able to just get back outside and reconnect with that running identity part of me was so important for my physical and mental health in this very vulnerable postpartum period.'
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
BGT's Amanda Holden looks incredible in plunging white gown after hitting back at complaints
BRITAIN'S Got Talent's Amanda Holden looked incredible in a racy white gown for tonight's final after hitting back at complaints. Judge Amanda, 54, was a vision in the custom Saint. Hendrix number, which included a plunging turtle neck and midriff structures matching her headpiece. 3 3 3 The actress flashed a beaming smile while making her grand entrance alongside Simon Cowell, Bruno Tonioli and Alesha Dixon - and a pair of stunning dancers. She wore her blonde locks in a sleek bun and accentuated her natural beauty with a full face of make-up. It was just hours ago that Amanda clapped back at Ofcom complaints over her daring BGT wardrobe - insisting she "really loves" her sexy attire. The presenter spoke out ahead of the reality TV show's live final this weekend. In the past she's sparked outraged over her flashing the flesh. This has included a plunging wet-look dress as well as garments with plunging necklines for the family-friendly tea-time series. Now she has insisted: "What you see on TV, I really love. "I'm always asked about the Ofcom complaints, but every outfit on the show is checked before I leave my dressing room, so I'm never worried." She added to Closer Magazine: "I think people should have fun with fashion!" It remains to be seen what she will wear during the show final this weekend. SPEAK OUT The mum of two previously insisted BGT is "the perfect opportunity to take risks". She previously told The Sun her outfits are so famously controversial they're now monitored before she steps on-stage. "There's now a whole body of people that knock on my door and come and stare at my chest before we go on air," she explained. There's a t*t committee. There are so many brilliant people, they come down, knock on the door and there's the lady who's the producer who said, 'Mandy, it looks great'." Meanwhile, cheeky Amanda recently revealed her plan to sex up her outfits for her new TV show away from BGT. She confessed to The Sun she might sex up her overalls for any future series of Amanda & Alan's Spanish Job. She said: 'It's a joy to wear something so different, and nice to be able to breathe out, with no side boob. "Though next year I might have some side boob. 'For now, I always go pretty classy and standard. I've got my name on the back, but I didn't even do that in Spanish — I've got Handy Mandy. I should have put Handios Mandios.'
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rebekah Vardy finally agrees to pay Coleen Rooney huge seven-figure sum after losing Wagatha Christie courtroom showdown
Rebekah Vardy will pay Coleen Rooney a huge seven-figure sum after she lost their epic Wagatha Christie courtroom showdown. The WAG, 42, agreed to pay £1,190,000 of Mrs Rooney's legal bill, plus was ordered to pay a further £212,266 in assessment courts, after sensationally losing their high-profile libel case. This takes the total Mrs Vardy must pay to at least £1,402,266.20. Mrs Rooney ran up a legal bill of more than £1.8 million while successfully defending herself against Mrs Vardy's High Court claim in 2022. After losing their High Court showdown, Mrs Vardy was ordered to pay 90 percent of Mrs Rooney's legal costs. In written submissions to a specialist costs court hearing on Tuesday, Mrs Vardy's barrister, Juliet Wells, said Mrs Rooney's total legal bill of £1,833,906.89 'has now been settled at £1,190,000, being [approximately] £1,125,000 plus interest of [approximately] £65,000'. The court heard that while Mrs Rooney was also asking for a further £315,000 in 'assessment costs', Costs Judge Mark Whalan ordered Mrs Vardy to pay £212,266.20 of Mrs Rooney's assessment costs, inclusive of VAT but before interest, on top of the £1.19 million settlement. Mrs Rooney must also pay Mrs Vardy a total of £135,097.50 in costs under the terms of court orders from 2024, which will be set off against what Mrs Vardy must pay. While Mrs Wells previously called for the 'grossly disproportionate' assessment costs to be capped at 'no more than £100,000', Judge Whalan said the amount awarded was 'reasonable and proportionate'. He added that while there had been 'extraordinary expenditure of costs' on both sides, he was 'generally happy' the outcome was 'commercially satisfactory conclusion' for the pair. 'I do mean it when I say that I hope that this is the end of a long and unhappy road,' he added. Rebekah, 42, was ordered to pay 90 percent of Coleen's (pictured) legal bills after she sensationally lost the libel case which accused her of leaking stories about Wayne Rooney 's wife to the press Mrs Vardy's lawyer previously argued Mrs Rooney's team had used a 'kitchen sink' approach when calculating the total and included 'over £120,000 of costs to which Mrs Rooney has no entitlement'. It was also claimed the bill included costs for one of the WAG's team to stay at Nobu - a five star luxury hotel - and 'substantial dinner and drinks charges as well as mini bar charges'. The lawyer said Coleen's £1,833,906.89 legal bill was over three times her 'agreed costs budget of £540,779.07'. But Coleen's lawyer, Robin Dunne, had argued it was 'frankly outrageous' to accuse them of dishonesty. Mrs Vardy unsuccessfully sued the I'm A Celeb star in the High Court in 2022 after she was publicly accused of leaking stories about her to the press. The catalyst for the famous Wagatha Christie case was a dramatic open letter written by Mrs Rooney and posted on social media in October 2019 in which she revealed she had turned detective to figure out who had been leaking the stories to the press. Mrs Rooney publicly claimed Mrs Vardy's account was the source behind three newspaper stories featuring fake details she had posted on her private Instagram profile - her travelling to Mexico for a 'gender selection' procedure, her planning to return to TV and the basement flooding at her home. Penning that she had a 'suspicion' of who it could be, Mrs Rooney told her millions of followers that 'to try and prove this' she 'came up with an idea'. 'I blocked everyone from viewing my Instagram stories except ONE account,' she wrote. The post that started it all: Mrs Rooney accused Mrs Vardy's social media account of leaking stories For the next five months, she uploaded 'a series of false stories' to see if 'they made their way' into the press. 'And you know what, they did!' she penned 'The story about gender selection in Mexico, the story about returning to TV and then the latest story about the basement flooding in my new house.' She continued to build suspense, writing: 'It's been tough keeping it to myself and not making any comment at all, especially when the stories have been leaked, however I had to. Now I know for certain which account/individual it's come from. 'I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person had viewed them.' And then, she delivered her final iconic line: 'It's.......... Rebekah Vardy's account.' What followed was a tearful appearance from Rebekah on ITV's Loose Women in February 2020 in which claimed the stress over the dispute had caused her to have anxiety attacks so severe she 'ended up in hospital three times'. The emotional display was met by Coleen with a statement to say she did not want to 'engage in further public debate' on the matter. Four months later, in June 2020, Rebekah began legal proceedings against Coleen for libel with her lawyers alleging she had 'suffered extreme distress, hurt, anxiety and embarrassment as a result of the publication of the post and the events which followed'. At the first preliminary hearing in London's High Court in November the same year, Mr Justice Warby ruled that Coleen's famous letter 'clearly identified' Rebekah as being 'guilty of the serious and consistent breach of trust'. He concluded the 'natural and ordinary' meaning of the posts was that Rebekah had 'regularly and frequently abused her status as a trusted follower of Mrs Rooney's personal Instagram account' by secretly informing the press of Coleen's 'private posts and stories'. When the case returned to the courts in February 2022, a series of explosive messages between Rebekah and her agent Caroline Watt were revealed with Coleen's lawyers alleging they were about her. Rebekah denied that one message calling someone a 'nasty b****' was in reference to Coleen. When asked by defence lawyers to present Ms Watt's phone so they could further investigate the WhatsApp messages, they were told it had fallen into the North Sea when Ms Watt was on a boat during a holiday. Coleen was denied permission to bring a High Court claim against Ms Watt for misuse of private information to be heard alongside the libel battle as it was brought too late. Ms Watt was then dubbed not fit to give oral evidence, revoked permission for her witness statement to be used and withdrew her waiver which would have allowed journalists to say whether she was a source of the leaked stories. Coleen's barrister then told the High Court Rebekah 'appears to accept' her agent was the source of the leaked stories and argued her new statement suggested this but Rebekah claimed she 'did not authorise or condone her'. In May 2022, the women finally came face-to-face in court to give evidence as the Wagatha Christie trial began in the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Coleen secured her victory the next month when Mrs Justice Steyn delivered her verdict, dismissing the claim made by Rebekah and finding Coleen had proved the meaning of her famous accusatory letter was 'substantially true'. Whilst Coleen said she was 'pleased' the judge had ruled in her favour, Rebekah declared she was 'extremely sad and disappointed' at the decision. MailOnline has reached out to representatives for Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney for comment.
