logo
The school special needs crisis that will impact every one of us

The school special needs crisis that will impact every one of us

Metro5 days ago
When her son was five, Kirsty McNulty knew he wasn't 'the same as the other little boys in his class.'
'He had very obsessive behaviours where he'd become fixated on certain things,' Kirsty, 35, tells Metro.
'At one point, it was Disney villains – he asked me if he could have his hand cut off and replaced with a hook so he would be the same as Captain Hook.'
Diagnosed with autism at a young age, Eli, who is now 14, spent many months out of school in Colne as his mum has battled for him to get appropriate special educational needs and disability (SEND) support.
'Because Eli was judged to be conforming at primary school and meeting his academic targets, we didn't get any help. We coped at home – although barely,' she says.
Kirsty's son, who also has ADHD and mild learning disabilities, managed to mask enough at school to make it through the day, but would have huge meltdowns at home.
'He was so dysregulated that he often became violent,' she remembers. 'I'd have to send my mum a text message simply saying 'SOS' when I couldn't manage him, and she would come around to try and help.'
Kirsty warned teachers and professionals about what was happening at home, even videoing Eli so 'they could see how serious the situation had become,' but to no avail.
'I begged various services for support but was repeatedly told that I wasn't a safeguarding risk so there was no support available. 'I felt awful, like I was failing him, and had to start taking anti-depressants to manage my own mental health,' she admits.
When Eli went to high school, things got worse. 'His friends from primary school began to make new friends, and he started getting involved in more and more risky behaviour to try and fit in with different groups,' Kirsty explains. 'We had visits at home from the police and the fire service, and Eli's mental health got worse and worse.
'School rapidly went from saying he didn't need help to saying they couldn't meet his needs.'
Kirsty believes that if her son had one-to-one support or adaptions while in lessons, Eli would have coped better. Instead, at 11, he was admitted to hospital because of his mental health.
While the family's story may sound shocking, it's a scenario all too familiar for many with SEND children up and down the UK, who say they are being failed by the education system.
'It's really common for parents not to get the right support,' Anna Bird, Chief Executive of the charity Contact and Disabled Children's Partnership's CEO, tells Metro.
One gamechanger is an Education, Health, and Care Plan (EHCP) – a legally binding document which brought into play in 2014, outlining the special education needs of a child. If schools fail to deliver the agreed plans, there are serious consequences.
However, not only are these hard to come by, but there are also fears they may be scrapped in the Government's upcoming Schools White Paper – leading to widespread panic among SEND families.
The alarm comes after the Educating Secretary Bridget Phillipson claimed that the current SEND system, which the government inherited from the Tories, needed a huge overhaul, and she refused to rule out putting an end to EHCPs.
Although Phillipson stated that they would work with parents on a new system, the reality is, the families impacted would rather have something in place, than nothing at all.
'They [families] are worried they are going to lose the small amount of help they get at the moment,' Jane Harris, CEO of Speech and Language UK, tells Metro, adding that even though EHCPs aren't perfect, they're currently the 'only actual way to guarantee support.'
'The reasons they aren't [always] implemented isn't usually because of the legal framework, but because schools don't have enough funding, time, or training and expertise. You can't fix [those problems] by taking away the legal rights they do have.'
In response to the Education Secretary's words, the Disabled Children's Partnership has recently launched an action plan as part of their Fight for Ordinary campaign setting out a blueprint for reforming the SEND system in England.
'The system has to be reformed, and we're pleased to hear the government has committed to do that,' says Anna. 'But they have got to get it right.'
The DCP is calling for the government to address five key areas so that SEND children enjoy the same 'ordinary' things their peers take for granted. Training for school staff, additional specialist support, adequate funding, and systems in place to measure progress are among the recommendations, as is legally guaranteed support for all children who need it, not only those with EHCPs.
The organisation warns that if these needs aren't met, the economical impact will be felt across the UK – and not just within SEND families, as inadequate early years support already costs England alone over £16 billion annually, according to research from LSE.
'Children who aren't supported during school are less likely to succeed at school. They'll then find it harder to get work. That'll create problems for the economy later down the line,' explains Anna.
As it stands 170,000 children in England are missing at least half of their classes in 2024, while three out of four parents of children with SEND have already been forced to give up work or cut their hours – causing another potential blow to the economy.
'On average, they [families] are losing about £21,000 a year in lost income,' Bird says. 'That's a huge impact and makes a huge difference in how they can look after their children.'
Although Kirsty was eventually successful in getting her ECHP, the financial knock-on the family felt can't be ignored.
With Eli missing several months of school and being four years behind, Kirsty says her son has been 'stripped of his right to an education.'
'The impact has been felt by everyone,' Kirsty says. 'My mental health has taken a huge downturn, and I've lost my career as duty worker with a domestic abuse service.'
Even though Kirsty is desperate to return to work once her son's reduced timetable starts next year, she is fully aware that no employer will allow her the flexibility she needs.
'If the Government is serious about sorting out the SEND system, then they must fund schools to provide our children with the support they need,' she adds. 'Every child has the legal right to an education, and there should be no exceptions to that.'
Tobias Lambe spent most of primary and early high school years masking his struggles at school.
'It was the small things in school that felt overwhelming,' the 21-year-old tells Metro. 'The set up of the room, the bright lights. I never went into the canteen to eat my lunch in high school – it was too loud and smelly. Teachers didn't understand that I took things very literally. I never really had friends because I couldn't understand people – they were often not the nicest.'
It was only when Tobias had a breakdown on a school trip when he was 14, that he eventually got some support and he was eventually diagnosed with autism.
'I was completely overwhelmed and was having auditory hallucinations telling me negative things about myself,' he says. 'It was enough to tip me over the edge. I felt like I didn't belong in this world, no one struggled or thought like me.'
Although his mother's first request for an ECHP assessment was rejected, her second was accepted and the school adjusted Tobias' routines, made teachers aware of his needs and the simple things he struggled with, and was given an autism mentor.
With smaller class sizes, specialist intervention, and a routine that suited him, Tobias thrived. He's now in his third year of medical school and on his way to becoming a doctor within the NHS.
It's no wonder he feels 'scrapping EHCPs is a terrible idea.'
Tobias explains: 'While the government might want to reduce the number because of their cost, they should be working at the underlying problem – children aren't treated as people. They are just numbers in a system.'
To reform the SEND system is clearly going to cost money. In the 2024 autumn budget, Labour announced an increased education spending of £11.2b from 2023/24 by 2025/26, with £1b earmarked for SEND. It's suspected more will be needed to follow recommendations set out by the DCP. More Trending
'We know if you give children help up front, they are far more likely to go into employment. If you try and make short term savings in this area, all you do is massively increase the long-term cost,' Jane Harris points out.
However, if the Government truly listens to families and those working with SEND children, reform could be transformative, believes Anna Bird.
'There are currently around 2 million with special educational needs. If done right, the positive impact of change would mean those children would feel happier at school, achieve their full potential, and contribute to the economy. That's a huge prize,' she says.
'There is every opportunity to get these reforms right, but it does involve us working together.'
MORE: Infant dies in hot car after being left by dad who 'forgot about him'
MORE: Labour's school guidance is Section 28 all over again for LGBTQ+ people
MORE: Never heard of bruxism? You're probably suffering from it
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BBC presenter taken to hospital in ambulance after ‘real wake up call' working at Wimbledon and putting off medical care
BBC presenter taken to hospital in ambulance after ‘real wake up call' working at Wimbledon and putting off medical care

The Sun

time14 minutes ago

  • The Sun

BBC presenter taken to hospital in ambulance after ‘real wake up call' working at Wimbledon and putting off medical care

BBC presenter Qasa Alom has opened up on his recent health battle after being taken to hospital in an ambulance in the middle of Wimbledon. The journalist took to Instagram to lift the lid on a difficult few weeks for him following an admission to hospital in the middle of the SW19 tournament. 5 5 5 5 He did not provide details on what exactly the issue was, but said it had escalated after he had put off going to see a medical professional. Qasa said: "I can't say the last few weeks have been easy… "Ever since the middle of Wimbledon I've been battling my body with a health issue. "I put off getting proper medical care because I just did not want to miss The Championships (error). Eventually it became too much & escalated. "Thankfully the NHS have been brilliant in giving me the care I needed." He described the incident as a "real wake up call" and warned his followers to not put off seeking help if needed as it "will completely knock you for six". Qasa added: "Respect your body and its limitations. We only have one. "Grateful to my family for helping me through a difficult period & now the road to recovery." Qasa shared pictures of his time at the hospital and during his journey to hospital on his post. Originally from Birmingham, Qasa joined the BBC in 2010 working for local radio before going on to win a Frank Gillard Award for his coverage for Radio 4 about Stoke-on-Trent's illegal sex trade. He made his BBC1 debut in 2016 before directing a film for the broadcaster in 2017. Qasa was named Radio Presenter of the Year in 2020 in the Asian Media Awards for his work on BBC Asian Network. He covered The Boat Race and 2022 Commonwealth Games in his hometown of Birmingham before taking on the role as BBC's flagship daily tennis highlights presenter for Wimbledon in 2023.

More states ban certain people from buying junk food... is YOURS one of them?
More states ban certain people from buying junk food... is YOURS one of them?

Daily Mail​

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

More states ban certain people from buying junk food... is YOURS one of them?

Soda and candy have now been made off-limits to certain Americans in six more states as officials continue to clamp down on what people can buy with food stamps. Low-income residents in West Virginia, Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas will be barred from buying the goods under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). These restrictions are further built on top of a movement started earlier this year. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins has previously banned the foods from SNAP recipients in Nebraska, Iowa, Indiana, Arkansas, Idaho, and Utah. The controversial move is aimed at improving the health of the millions of Americans in those states who rely on food stamps. While the plans would ban sugary and high-calorie sweets, they would also exclude purchases of diet sodas and fruit juice with less than 50 percent natural juice, as these are high in sugar and artificial sweeteners. Restricting junk food from the $100billion-a-year federal SNAP program has been a key goal for health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr and his 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda. The first-of-its-kind ban will become effective for all the participating states starting January 1, 2026 and last for at least two years. Other Republican-led states are set to roll out similar measures. Serving nearly 42million Americans, SNAP helps low-income families purchase fruits, vegetables, meat, poultry, fish, dairy products, breads and cereals, snacks and plants that can produce foods. It is run by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and administered through individual states. In general, benefits are available to people with an income at or below about $33,500 a year for a three-person household. Over the past two decades, lawmakers in several states have proposed halting SNAP payments for soda, chips, ice cream and 'luxury meats' like steak, as well as bottled water and decorated birthday cakes. However, despite multiple proposals being submitted, no other presidential administration, including President Donald Trump's first, has approved them in the past. Secretary Rollins said: 'It is incredible to see so many states take action at this critical moment in our nation's history and do something to begin to address chronic health problems. 'President Trump has changed the status quo, and the entire cabinet is taking action to Make America Healthy Again. 'At USDA, we play a key role in supporting Americans who fall on hard times, and that commitment does not change. Rather, these state waivers promote healthier options for families in need.' According to the USDA website, food stamps users spend over $600million a year on sweetened beverages including soft drinks and energy drinks. A 2024 scientific review published in the journal Public Health by British researchers found that energy drinks can raise the risk of physical and mental health problems among children. For example, kids who consume the beverages, which can contain more caffeine than a cup of coffee, are more likely to be overweight and develop heart problems. They also face a higher chance of getting mental health problems, such as anxiety, depression and suicide attempts. The ban comes as RFK Jr has continued to push for restricting junk food from SNAP since his nomination as Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary. The leader of the Make America Healthy Again movement has repeatedly called soda 'poison' and claimed it can cause damage to human health. Kennedy has also previously suggested Americans who eat donuts, guzzle sodas or smoke should not be provided with free healthcare. 'If you're smoking three packs of cigarettes a day, should you expect society to pay when you get sick?' he told CBS. The nation's top health official noted it is the American people's choice to 'eat donuts all day' and he would not to take it away. However, he went on to say junk food lovers cannot expect 'society to care for them' since there is possibility for them to get 'very sick.' His claims have long put him at odds with President Trump as the latter is known to enjoy multiple sodas per day, albeit the sugar-free versions. Shortly after being sworn-in for the second time, President Trump also re-installed a bright red button on his desk in the Oval Office to notify an aide that the commander-in-chief wants a fresh Diet Coke. The 79-year-old reportedly drinks multiple cans of Diet Coke a day and is known to indulge in an occasional burger and fries for his meals. Trump yet to make a comment on the newly announced wave of bans. Prior to these waivers, SNAP recipients could buy anything except alcohol, tobacco, hot and prepared foods, and personal care products. Antihunger groups oppose SNAP food restrictions, saying that research shows that program participants are no more likely than other low-income Americans to buy sugary drinks or snack foods. And they say that limiting food choices undermines the autonomy of people who receive a benefit of about $187 per month — or about $6.20 per day. 'They just seem to be targeting a specific population without having data that says that they are the issue or that this is going to improve,' said Gina Plata-Nino, a deputy director at the Food Research and Action Center, a nonprofit advocacy group. Trade groups representing beverage and candy makers criticized the effort, saying that they narrowly target SNAP participants. Representatives for the soda industry accused state and federal officials of 'choosing to be the food police rather than take truly meaningful steps to lift people off SNAP with good-paying jobs.' Chris Gindlesperger, a spokesman for the National Confectioners Association, called the approach 'misguided.' 'SNAP participants and non-SNAP participants alike understand that chocolate and candy are treats – not meal replacements,' Gindlesperger said.

Popular artificial sweetener may negatively affect cancer immunotherapy
Popular artificial sweetener may negatively affect cancer immunotherapy

Medical News Today

time3 hours ago

  • Medical News Today

Popular artificial sweetener may negatively affect cancer immunotherapy

Non-sugar, or artificial, sweeteners are widely used to reduce the energy in sweetened foods and drinks, particularly those marketed as diet, or low or no concerns about their possible health effects include links to gastrointestinal problems, metabolic effects, and even increased cancer a study has found that one of the most widely used artificial sweeteners, sucralose, could adversely affect cancer researchers suggest that by changing the gut microbiome, sucralose decreases the effectiveness of immunotherapy for several cancers. Health concerns regarding sucralose have mainly centered around its potential to cause systemic inflammation, metabolic diseases, disruptions in gut microbiota, liver damage, and toxic effects at the cellular a study suggests that people whose diet includes large amounts of sucralose, e.g., from diet drinks, respond less well to cancer immunotherapy than those who consume less or none of the research, which is published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association of Cancer Research, found that sucralose changed the gut microbiota so bacteria degraded an amino acid, arginine, that immune cells need to be able to destroy cancer are experts worried about sucralose?Sucralose is one of six non-sugar sweeteners approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as additives in the food and drinks industry — the others are aspartame, advantame, neotame, saccharin, and acesulfame potassium (Ace-K).It is made by replacing 3 hydroxyl (oxygen and hydrogen) groups in sucrose (table sugar) molecules with chloride resulting sucralose is up to 650 times sweeter than sucrose and, because people cannot digest it, contains no accessible energy. Therefore, it is widely used to sweeten foods and drinks, as well as being sold as an alternative to sugar for those trying to decrease their energy intake. However, there are concerns, both about its health effects and its efficacy for helping weight loss. In 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) advised that non-sugar sweeteners should not be used for weight control, saying that: 'Replacing free sugars with NSS [non-sugar sweeteners] does not help with weight control in the long term. […] NSS are not essential dietary factors and have no nutritional value. People should reduce the sweetness of the diet altogether, starting early in life, to improve their health.'Investigating the sucralose-cancer linkDiwakar Davar, MD, associate professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh and a medical oncologist and hematologist at UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, senior author of the study, told Medical News Today:'We think this finding is highly significant as it could have immediate positive impacts on cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. The fact that we not only identified sucralose as a potential problem for those receiving immunotherapy, but that we also found a way to fix this problem through arginine supplementation is exciting and something that could be put into clinical practice easily.'According to Jack Jacoub, MD, a board certified medical oncologist and medical director of MemorialCare Cancer Institute at Orange Coast and Saddleback Medical Centers in Orange County, CA, who was not involved in this research, the findings were significant.'Frankly, this is a superb piece of scientific work,' Jacoub told MNT. 'The authors were able to study preclinical models (mice) and draw conclusions related to the effect of high sucralose intake on T-cell function tumor response to immunotherapy.''They then took this understanding and later tested it in prospective enrolled patients with lung cancer and melanoma. They showed that patients consuming sucralose greater than 0.16 mg/kg/d [milligram per kilogram per day] had inferior response to immunotherapy,' he explained.'Recognizing the significance of arginine on T cell functions they then went back to the mouse model and proved giving it restored T cell function and benefit to immunotherapy in mice. In my opinion, this is high quality evidence suggesting this absolutely needs more exploration,' added decreased immune responseIn their study, the researchers included 132 patients who had undergone immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy for advanced/metastatic melanoma or advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They also included 25 patients who had high-risk resectable melanoma. All participants had completed a Diet History Questionnaire III (DHQ III), had received at least 3 months of treatment, had at least one post-treatment imaging study evaluable for response and had been followed up for at least 6 months from the start of the diet questionnaire, researchers calculated each patient's non-nutritive sugar (NNS) intake (mg/day) and divided it by their weight in kg to get a weight-normalized average daily intake of mg/kg/ with melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer who consumed high levels of sucralose (more than 0.16mg/kg/day) had a worse response to immunotherapy, and poorer survival rates, than those with diets low in the artificial whether people undergoing cancer immunotherapy should try to avoid sucralose in their diets, lead author Abby Overacre, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Immunology at the University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, told MNT:'We are working on future prospective clinical trials to ask these sorts of questions for patients undergoing immunotherapy. Based on what we know so far, we would recommend that patients minimize intake of non-nutritive sweeteners, particularly sucralose.'Jacoub agreed with this assessment, saying that: 'This is enough information for me to recommend this to my patients. Frankly, we are talking about cancer and giving up diet soda, etc. is not difficult and directly goes to the question patients and their family commonly ask every day when I see them which is 'What can I do to help treat my cancer?'.'It is important to note that the research is still in the early stages, and this may not apply to all cancer microbiota changes reduced T-cell activityThe researchers then carried out tests in two mouse models of cancer to determine how high sucralose consumption reduced the immunotherapy found that mice fed sucralose were resistant to immunotherapy, had significantly increased tumor growth, less CD8+ T cell infiltration, and were more likely to T-cells are immune cells that produce the most powerful anti-cancer response, so their reduced function meant the immunotherapy was less effective. In the sucralose-fed mice, the researchers discovered changes in the gut microbiota, with greater numbers of gram positive bacteria that degraded arginine, an amino acid that is essential for T-cell production.'Gram positive bacteria have been associated with poorer immunotherapy efficacy in previous studies. However, we are very focused and interested in the function of these bacteria in hopes to better understand how they may directly contribute to cancer growth and immunotherapy response.'— Abby Overacre, PhDArginine supplements may counteract sucralose's effectsWhen researchers fed arginine or citrulline (which is metabolized in the body to arginine) to the mice, immunotherapy became effective again. They suggest that arginine or citrulline supplements could be given to people undergoing cancer immunotherapy to counteract the effect of sucralose in their diet. But could people undergoing cancer immunotherapy get enough arginine from their diet?'While there are certainly foods that are higher in arginine, especially in diets associated with better immunotherapy responses (nuts/seeds, poultry, lentils, fruits), a supplement may help those who struggle to achieve a high amount or arginine from diet alone,' Overacre told addition to continuing their research into sucralose and immunotherapy, the researchers hope to investigate whether other non-nutritive sweeteners have similar effects.'We hope that this study can help patients currently receiving immunotherapy. Importantly, this gives patients something they can do themselves or alongside their physicians to potentially improve their overall care.'— Abby Overacre, PhD

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store