
'20 years on from 7/7 attacks - British Muslim lives have never been the same'
Today, July 7, 2025, marks 20 years since the tragic London bombings which killed 52 people and injured more than 770 others. The co-ordinated terror attacks took place across four locations and targeted London's transport network during rush hour.
Three of the blasts happened in tubes on the London Underground just before 8:50am BST near Aldgate, Edgware Road, and Russell Square stations, and the fourth bomb exploded at 9:47am BST on a double-decker bus in Tavistock Square.
Mohammad Sidique Khan, 30, Shehzad Tanweer, 22, Germaine Lindsay, 19, and 18-year-old Hasib Hussain, were identified as the suicide bombers.
Sidique, Shehzad, and Hasib were British-born sons of Pakistani parents from the Holbeck and Beeston areas of Leeds, while Germaine, who changed his name to Abdullah Shaheed Jamal, was born in Jamaica and converted to Islam.
Carried out by four men — three of whom were British Muslim — the fallout from the tragedy changed the very fabric of the British Muslim community in the UK. 'The emotional and social toll of 7/7 on Muslim communities was profound and is felt by many to this day,' imam Qari Asim tells the Guardian.
Youth worker Fahad Khan — who was 18 at the time — shares with the BBC: 'It changed the stereotypical narrative of what a terrorist looked like to someone who was British-born, wearing western clothing and with a backpack.'
The 7/7 attacks (as they've come to be known) sent massive shockwaves around the world — felt especially deeply in Leeds, where three of the four suicide bombers had grown up.
Fahad says: 'When I found out they were from Leeds, it was just a huge blow.' Now 38, Fahad feels the perception of young Muslim men — 'someone who looks like him' — has been altered since the heinous attack, as he tells the BBC: 'It changed that narrative to someone who looked like me — and that's a lot to deal with.'
Britain's Muslim community is diverse and predominantly young, with most members under 19, according to the Muslim Council of Britain. Census data from 2021 shows that 3.9 million people in England and Wales — equating to 6.5% of the population — identify as Muslim.
READ MORE: 'I was next to 7/7 bomber and about to ask five-word question before world changed'
Muhbeen Hussain MBE, who was only 11 at the time of the attacks, tells the BBC: 'There was a perception created about British Muslims, and I was growing up in that era. I didn't believe these men represented my religion or identity - it made me want to step up and call it out.'
Speaking to the Guardian, Asim feels things worsened for the Muslim community after the attacks: 'Islamophobia has consistently increased in the last 20 years, and that's not just due to extremism and terrorism but also a multitude of factors.'
After the 7/7 attacks, the government launched a largescale series of counter-terrorism initiatives aimed at preventing future attacks. Tony Blair, the then prime minister, introduced a 12-point plan which intended to offer increased collective security, however it was criticised for its potential negative impact on civil liberties and for over-policing the Muslim community, leading to them feeling alienated.
Prevent, set up in 2006, was another government initiative launched at the time and is one of the four pillars of the UK's counter-terrorism strategy, Contest.
After 7/7, there was a dramatic increase in faith-related hate crimes as well as police stop-and-searches. Dozens of terrorism-related charges were filed each year, with conviction rates rising significantly.
However, Fahad is optimistic — both for the fate of the Muslim community as well as Leeds — as he shares: 'You've had 20 years of more Muslims going to school, university, being more confident and articulate. Leeds is resilient - it doesn't sit under the shadow of 7/7.'
Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Europe's top pickpocket hotspots revealed by ex-detective
An ex-detective has revealed Europe 's top pickpocketing destinations, as Brits gear up for the summer holidays. Appearing on BBC Morning Live on Wednesday (9 July), Rebecca Mason cautioned that whilst theft can happen anywhere, big cities rank the highest. Rome is the most pickpocketed place in Europe, with Mason highlighting the Trevi Fountain as the most common spot. 'People throw a coin in the fountain for good luck but it's not really good luck if you are targeted by a thief', she said. Barcelona, Paris, Amsterdam, Prague, Lisbon also ranked very highly, whilst closer to home, London has been revealed to be the phone theft capital of Europe.

Rhyl Journal
3 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government urges Fujitsu to pay compensation to victims of Post Office scandal
The call came as critics pointed out the Japanese tech giant had 'paid not one penny' for the 'havoc and misery that it helped to cause'. They also argued the under-fire company 'should be nowhere near' new Government contracts as it emerged it continued to secure lucrative multimillion-pound deals with Whitehall, bankrolled by the taxpayer. The company has already acknowledged it has a 'moral obligation' to contribute to compensation, pending the outcome of the public inquiry led by Sir Wyn Williams. The firm has come under renewed pressure after the publication of the first part of Sir Wyn's final report. It found around 1,000 people were wrongly prosecuted and convicted after Fujitsu's defective Horizon accounting system made it appear as though money was missing at their Post Office branches. Some victims were sent to prison or financially ruined, others were shunned by their communities, and some took their own lives. The long-running battle for justice accelerated dramatically after ITV broadcast the drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office, which highlighted the scandal. Sir Wyn said around 10,000 people are eligible to submit compensation claims following what has been dubbed as the worst miscarriage of justice in British legal history. Labour former MP Kevan Jones, who now sits in the upper chamber as Lord Beamish, has been a long-standing champion for the subpostmasters. He said: 'To date, the Government and taxpayers have paid over a billion pounds, quite rightly, to those victims. 'Fujitsu have not paid one penny piece. They may have a moral obligation, but moral obligations do not pay compensation.' He added: 'So when will the Government get on and force Fujitsu to act on its moral obligations, put its hands in its pockets and at least pay some interim payments? Responding, Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent said: 'With regards to the payments by Fujitsu, we urge them to make interim payments, but there are ongoing conversations with Fujitsu, including regular meetings with the Crown representative, the Cabinet Office and DBT (the Department for Business and Trade) and we will continue to have such meetings.' Conservative peer Lord Arbuthnot, who played a pivotal role in exposing the scandal, said: 'Fujitsu has paid not one penny towards the victims of the havoc and misery that it helped to cause. 'Is the Government – is the country – over a barrel to Fujitsu? If not, why is Fujitsu still winning government work? If we are, what are the Government doing about it?' Lady Anderson said: 'They have accepted that they have a moral obligation to give funds, but he will be even more aware than I am that we are yet to see a penny. 'Fujitsu have agreed that they will have to make a financial contribution, but I am urged not to give a running commentary, although we will welcome any interim payment in due course.' In addition to extensions available under Fujitsu's existing contracts, a further 12 new deals had been struck with the company over the last year. The Government has said the majority are for services already provided by Fujitsu and were put in place to ensure continuity of services. Liberal Democrat Lord Clement-Jones raised concerns over HM Revenue & Customs continuing to award contacts to Fujitsu. He said: 'In the light of the Horizon report, which condemns Fujitsu's conduct as a key contributor to the suffering of thousands of innocent people, isn't it already very clear that Fujitsu should be nowhere near any new contract?' Lady Anderson said: 'Some of this is about continuity of service, to make sure that we are still able to have business supply secured.' Given the 'human tragedies' caused by the wrongful convictions of subpostmasters, Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick pressed the minister over due diligence measures 'to ensure that contractors with a history of significant failures or legal issues can demonstrate that they have addressed these concerns before being awarded new contracts'. Lady Anderson said new procurement legislation provided buyers with more scope to exclude suppliers who had performed poorly on previous contracts. She added: 'Due diligence on such failures is also more straightforward as the act now provides for the sharing of information on poorly performing suppliers.' A Fujitsu spokesperson said: 'We remain committed to providing our full cooperation to the inquiry as Sir Wyn prepares his final report and we are engaged with Government regarding Fujitsu's contribution to compensation.' They added: 'We continue to work with the UK Government to ensure we adhere to the voluntary restrictions we put in place regarding bidding for new contracts while the Post Office inquiry is ongoing.'


North Wales Chronicle
3 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Government urges Fujitsu to pay compensation to victims of Post Office scandal
The call came as critics pointed out the Japanese tech giant had 'paid not one penny' for the 'havoc and misery that it helped to cause'. They also argued the under-fire company 'should be nowhere near' new Government contracts as it emerged it continued to secure lucrative multimillion-pound deals with Whitehall, bankrolled by the taxpayer. The company has already acknowledged it has a 'moral obligation' to contribute to compensation, pending the outcome of the public inquiry led by Sir Wyn Williams. The firm has come under renewed pressure after the publication of the first part of Sir Wyn's final report. It found around 1,000 people were wrongly prosecuted and convicted after Fujitsu's defective Horizon accounting system made it appear as though money was missing at their Post Office branches. Some victims were sent to prison or financially ruined, others were shunned by their communities, and some took their own lives. The long-running battle for justice accelerated dramatically after ITV broadcast the drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office, which highlighted the scandal. Sir Wyn said around 10,000 people are eligible to submit compensation claims following what has been dubbed as the worst miscarriage of justice in British legal history. Labour former MP Kevan Jones, who now sits in the upper chamber as Lord Beamish, has been a long-standing champion for the subpostmasters. He said: 'To date, the Government and taxpayers have paid over a billion pounds, quite rightly, to those victims. 'Fujitsu have not paid one penny piece. They may have a moral obligation, but moral obligations do not pay compensation.' He added: 'So when will the Government get on and force Fujitsu to act on its moral obligations, put its hands in its pockets and at least pay some interim payments? Responding, Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent said: 'With regards to the payments by Fujitsu, we urge them to make interim payments, but there are ongoing conversations with Fujitsu, including regular meetings with the Crown representative, the Cabinet Office and DBT (the Department for Business and Trade) and we will continue to have such meetings.' Conservative peer Lord Arbuthnot, who played a pivotal role in exposing the scandal, said: 'Fujitsu has paid not one penny towards the victims of the havoc and misery that it helped to cause. 'Is the Government – is the country – over a barrel to Fujitsu? If not, why is Fujitsu still winning government work? If we are, what are the Government doing about it?' Lady Anderson said: 'They have accepted that they have a moral obligation to give funds, but he will be even more aware than I am that we are yet to see a penny. 'Fujitsu have agreed that they will have to make a financial contribution, but I am urged not to give a running commentary, although we will welcome any interim payment in due course.' In addition to extensions available under Fujitsu's existing contracts, a further 12 new deals had been struck with the company over the last year. The Government has said the majority are for services already provided by Fujitsu and were put in place to ensure continuity of services. Liberal Democrat Lord Clement-Jones raised concerns over HM Revenue & Customs continuing to award contacts to Fujitsu. He said: 'In the light of the Horizon report, which condemns Fujitsu's conduct as a key contributor to the suffering of thousands of innocent people, isn't it already very clear that Fujitsu should be nowhere near any new contract?' Lady Anderson said: 'Some of this is about continuity of service, to make sure that we are still able to have business supply secured.' Given the 'human tragedies' caused by the wrongful convictions of subpostmasters, Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick pressed the minister over due diligence measures 'to ensure that contractors with a history of significant failures or legal issues can demonstrate that they have addressed these concerns before being awarded new contracts'. Lady Anderson said new procurement legislation provided buyers with more scope to exclude suppliers who had performed poorly on previous contracts. She added: 'Due diligence on such failures is also more straightforward as the act now provides for the sharing of information on poorly performing suppliers.' A Fujitsu spokesperson said: 'We remain committed to providing our full cooperation to the inquiry as Sir Wyn prepares his final report and we are engaged with Government regarding Fujitsu's contribution to compensation.' They added: 'We continue to work with the UK Government to ensure we adhere to the voluntary restrictions we put in place regarding bidding for new contracts while the Post Office inquiry is ongoing.'