Janaki Vs State of Kerala: Censor board makes U-turn on cuts, allows name with twist
The affidavit further stated that if this scene is approved, similar scenes of a similar nature will continue to be repeated in films.The Kerala High Court, overseen by Justice Nagaresh, has requested the filmmakers to present their views on these suggestions in a subsequent hearing, scheduled for later today. This development indicates a shift in the board's initial decision, offering a more feasible path for the film's release.Justice N Nagaresh adjourned the hearing to 1:45 pm, allowing the petitioners' counsel to seek instructions from the film's producers on the proposed revisions.The court had earlier watched the film on Saturday, July 5.The initial resistance against the film stemmed largely from the Mumbai division of the CBFC, which found the use of 'Janaki' problematic. However, the Kerala division had already passed the film without objections, highlighting regional disparities in the certification process. This case underscores the complexities and challenges filmmakers face with regional differences in censorship standards across India.The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future films dealing with similar themes and titles, as the film industry continues to navigate the intricate landscape of content regulation.'Janaki vs State of Kerala' features Gopi and Anupama Parameswaran in lead roles. It was originally set for release on 20 June, but the conflict has led to significant delays. The film's creators earlier expressed frustration, describing the CBFC's demands as "arbitrary" and "unwarranted."- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Assam Police books journalist Abhisar Sharma days after summoning Siddharth Varadarajan and Karan Thapar
The Assam Police on Thursday registered an FIR against Delhi-based journalist Abhisar Sharma under multiple sections of the BNS, including section 152, which deals with acts 'endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India', a senior police officer said. This comes days after two other senior Delhi-based journalists, The Wire's Siddharth Varadarajan and Karan Thapar, received summons from the Assam Police in connection with an FIR registered at the Crime Branch police station in Guwahati under Section 152, along with other sections of the BNS pertaining to promoting enmity between different groups; publishing false or misleading information jeopardising the sovereignty unity and integrity or security of India; statements conducing to public mischief; and criminal conspiracy. The FIR against Sharma has also been registered at the Guwahati Crime Branch police station and is based on a complaint filed by a Guwahati resident, Alok Baruah, against a video Sharma had uploaded on his YouTube channel on August 8. In the video, Sharma refers to recent remarks by Gauhati High Court judge Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi, questioning why 3,000 bighas of land in the tribal Dima Hasao district were allotted to a private company to set up a cement factory, and accuses Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma of 'spreading poison' and raising communal issues as a 'distraction'. Along with section 152, the FIR has also been registered under sections pertaining to promoting enmity between different groups and to imputations and assertions prejudicial to national integrity. In the complaint attached to the FIR, the complainant alleges that the video 'contained statements ridiculing and denigrating the duly elected Governments of Assam and the Union of India, stating that the Government survives only on Hindu-Muslim polarisation, thereby provoking communal sentiments, accusing the Chief Minister of communal politics and promoting enmity between different groups on the ground of religion, prejudicial to maintenance of harmony, mocking ridiculing the principle of Ram Rajya, etc.' 'That the article published/circulated by the accused, Mr Abhisar Sharma, is not mere criticism but amounts to an attempt to excite disaffection, provoke public disorder, and endanger the unity and integrity of India by portraying the state as corrupt, communal and illegitimate, thereby commited the offence punishable under section 152 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita,' the complaint said. When contacted by The Indian Express, Sharma said he had just received the FIR and that he would respond after seeking legal opinion.
NDTV
15 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Will Watch, Then Pass Order': High Court On Yogi Adityanath-Inspired Film
Mumbai: The upcoming film 'Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi' will be seen by the Bombay High Court, and will thereafter decide on Monday on the reasons or objections raised for the rejection of the film communicated by the CBFC to the Petitioner. The movie, inspired by the book 'The Monk Who Became Chief Minister' by Shantanu Gupta, is based on the life of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. The bench while hearing Ravi Kadam, senior advocate, Satatya Anand and Nikhil Aradhe, Advocates for the Petitioner (Smart Cinematics) opined that although an alternate remedy (appeal) under Section 5-C of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, is available, however, it is not an absolute bar on the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The bench observed that the CBFC has shown and has taken a rigid approach to reject the certification application filed by the Petitioner for certification of its film. The bench opined that the film will have to be viewed in order to understand the context of the objections and ultimately agreed to watch the movie. The bench also opined that the movie has to be viewed in its entirety as per the guidelines. The court has reserved Monday for the hearing on the decision on the objections given by the Revising Committee based on which the certification to the film of the Petitioner was refused. Earlier, the Bombay High Court directed the CBFC to decide the film's release date. The court allowed the Petitioner's prayer for screening of the film to complete the screening process as per the Cinematograph Act and Rules framed thereunder and also directed to convey its decision as per the Rules to the Petitioner by Wednesday, August 6, 2025. Samrat Cinematics, the production house behind 'Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi', said, 'Today's outcome reaffirms our faith in the judiciary. This film is the sincere creative effort of over 300 industry professionals, and we remain hopeful that it will be allowed to reach the audience it was made for". The court also observed that seeing the conduct of CBFC and the erroneous approach adopted earlier without following the due process of law, the court has kept the petition pending for CBFC's compliance. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Guidelines out for Vinayagar fest
Chennai: Greater Chennai Police held a meeting on Thursday with 150 representatives from Hindu organizations and political groups to lay down guidelines for Vinayagar Chathurthi celebrations on Aug 27. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Police instructed organizers to obtain permission from landowners, and local bodies before installing idols. They must also secure no objection certificates (NOCs) from fire department and TNPDCL. Applications have to be submitted at local police stations along with an undertaking to comply with rules. Authorities set a height limit of 10 feet for idols and barred their placement near places of worship, hospitals or schools. Slogans that could incite communal disharmony are prohibited. For immersions, idols can be taken only along approved routes. Use of crackers at pandals, processions, or immersion points is banned. TNN
