Retirement unease: Is it getting better or worse?
The very mention of half one's last pay prompts a basic question: Are those with no UPS access putting enough away for their silver years? Maybe not. A survey of pension planning by Grant Thornton Bharat (GTB), a professional services firm, has flagged a big gap between the money people expect they'll have to live on as they age and the reality of their financial situation.
Also Read: Pension alert: Even the unified scheme could acquire a sell-by date over time
This is among a significant slice of our workforce. Folks employed by the private sector made up nearly nine-tenths of the survey's sample, with 30% earning above ₹40 lakh annually and the vast bulk taking home more than twice of India's GDP per head. As the GTB study puts it, over 55% of respondents expect monthly pensions exceeding ₹1 lakh, 'but only 11% are confident in their current savings."
The survey was done over August and September 2024. The UPS, which was approved by New Delhi in the midst of that span, may or may not have inflected responses. But the survey also points to low satisfaction with the National Pension System (NPS) that's open to all Indian 18-70-year-olds. Have retiral back-ups like NPS begun to look pale in contrast with the UPS deal? Plausibly.
If this isn't a source of unease, it should be—since so many of us seem to be falling short on stuffing our nest eggs. Either way, the point is not to interpret the worldly context of a survey finding, but to explore viable avenues of relief. According to the GTB report, future needs and means being out of whack 'signals a pressing need for realistic retirement planning and financial education."
Also Read: Unified Pension Scheme: Is good psychology also sound economics?
Indeed. Even in this age of agentic AI bots headed our way to help out, with 'Fire' calculators at the disposal of youth in pursuit of 'financial independence' to 'retire early,' lifelong plans remain sketchy. Clearly, many of us need to get our act together. This is also the market pitch made by various investment vehicles. The 'Mutual fund sahi hai' (it's right) campaign, for example, has played an undeniable role in drawing money into long-held mutual funds.
That equity has been a big draw is no surprise, given the appeal of its returns. Some of our retail rush for shares could be explained by how capitalism has caught on. As Thomas Piketty said, if the rate of return on capital exceeds the rate of economic growth, wealth will enlarge faster than income. To amass the money needed for a cushy life, every salaried person has the risky but rewarding option of buying into the country's capital pie.
Also Read: EPFO reforms: Getting PF dues shouldn't require special services
Of course, advice to invest wisely usually assumes that if one needs a helping hand with old-age security, it's best to look for one at the end of one's arm. In a market economy with a weak welfare net for all but the poor, the onus is on us to take charge of our financial lives.
However, there is a favour that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) can do us that must not escape notice. No multi-decade plan can be firmed up without clarity on the rupee's path of purchasing power into one's old age. But if RBI shows both the will and ability to keep inflation capped at 4% over the long haul, it'll enable truly realistic plans. In assuring us retirement relief, RBI has a major role to play.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘India profiteering from Russian oil, China is different': Top US official ahead of tariff deadline
As Trump's tariff deadline for India nears, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Tuesday that New Delhi was 'profiteering' and 'making billions' from its purchases of Russian oil. As Trump's tariff deadline for India nears, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Tuesday that New Delhi was 'profiteering' and 'making billions' from its purchases of Russian oil. (AFP) In an interview with CNBC, Bessent said India had made huge profits on the sale of Russian oil during the war in Ukraine. "This ... Indian arbitrage - buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product has just sprung during the war - which is unacceptable," he said. The US official further added that India's purchase of Russian oil has been benefiting 'India's richest families.' Speaking to CNBC, Bessent defended US' move to not put tariffs on China for its purchase of Russian oil as Beijing as 'diversified oil imports and so its situation is different.' This is a developing story…
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
GST reform could boost government revenue in long term, says S&P
S&P Global Ratings has seemingly approved of the Indian government's proposed reform of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, dismissing concerns about New Delhi's finances due to lower indirect tax rates. Days after the agency upgraded its rating on India, Yee Farn Phua, director of sovereign and international public finance ratings at S&P, said on Tuesday in a webinar that while the initial reaction to the government's proposal would be that tax rates would come down and hurt revenues, it might not necessarily be the case. 'If you look at the current GST regime, it is quite a complex one – four different rates, which make accounting and implementation sometimes quite difficult. With the proposed two-rate system now being looked at, though the effective rate could be somewhat lower, but actually because of easier implementation and fairer accounting processes, there actually could be a boost to fiscal revenues in the longer term,' Yee Farn Phua said. On August 14, S&P upgraded its rating on India to BBB from BBB-, saying the country is 'among the best performing economies in the world'. A day later, on August 15, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a host of reforms in his Independence Day speech, including one that would see the GST move to a two-slab system of 5 per cent and 18 per cent by the end of 2025. In addition to the two slabs, a special 40 per cent category has been proposed for sin and demerit goods. This higher tax rate is expected to be imposed on only 5-7 items. 'It's still very early days to see the actual fiscal impact, but we don't think that the government would reform this system to the point that it would hit fiscal revenues for them. After all, in the past five to six years, GST reform has proven (to be) a driver of and a very important and major component of the government's fiscal revenues. So, we think that story will continue to play out… Overall, we don't think it would be a major drag on fiscal revenue,' Yee Farn Phua said, adding that S&P is 'monitoring' this new development. S&P's assessment is broadly in line with that of other economists, who see higher consumption from lower indirect tax rates aiding the government's tax collections in the long term, although the short run could see a fiscal hit. According to Morgan Stanley economists Upasana Chachra and Bani Gambhir, while the fiscal balances of the central and state governments will likely come under pressure due to revenue losses, it could be 'partly offset by higher GDP growth improving direct and indirect tax collection'. 'All else being equal, a loss in GST revenues could put upward pressure on the consolidated fiscal balance, but we believe that as growth picks up, the net effect will potentially be limited. Further, specifically for 2025-26, the impact on central government deficit should be less than 0.1 per cent of GDP, assuming no offsetting impact,' Chachra and Gambhir wrote in a note on August 17. State governments, however, are wary, with The Indian Express reporting this week that multiple states have expressed concerns over substantial losses in their share of GST revenues due to lower indirect tax rates. Annually, top officials from state governments said, the revenue loss could be Rs 7,000-9,000 crore for most major states. Over the years, GST rates have gradually come down due to tweaks made by the GST Council. As per an RBI study from September 2019, the weighted average effective GST rate had decreased from 14.4 per cent at the time of the new indirect regime's launch in mid-2017 to 11.6 per cent by mid-2019, with higher buoyancy 'achieved by widening the tax base and removing distortions'. According to S&P's forecasts, made prior to the GST reforms announced by Modi, the combined fiscal deficit of the central and state governments is seen at 7.3 per cent of GDP in 2025-26, which it expects to decline to 6.6 per cent by 2028-29. In terms of debt, S&P expects India's net central plus state debt to decline to 78 per cent of GDP by 2028-29 from 83 per cent in 2024-25, bringing it closer to pre-pandemic levels. The Centre has targeted a reduction in its debt-to-GDP ratio to 49-51 per cent by 2030-31 from 57.1 per cent in 2024-25. States do not have a debt target. Rating agencies view government debt on a consolidated basis – Centre plus states. At the webinar on Tuesday, when asked if the rating upgrade was 'too little, too late' considering India's performance, Yee Farn Phua laughed, saying he had seen Indian media headlines which said 'S&P upgrades India after 18 years'. 'My response to that is that we generally take a long-term view to these sorts of things. If you look at India's performance as an economy over the past 10-20 years, there have been up-cycles and down-cycles. Economic growth has sort of chugged along, but fiscal numbers have spiked up and down.'
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Buying cheap, reselling it': US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's sharp dig at India's Russian oil trade
In his sharpest remarks yet on India's energy trade, the US Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, has alleged that New Delhi is engaging in 'arbitrage' — purchasing heavily discounted Russian crude and reselling it at higher margins on the global market. The accusation, if sustained, could place renewed pressure on India's carefully balanced foreign policy, which has so far allowed it to maintain close ties with both Moscow and Washington despite the ongoing war in Ukraine. Bessent told CNBC in an interview that India had made huge profits on the sale of Russian oil during the war in Ukraine. "This ... Indian arbitrage - buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product has just sprung during the war - which is unacceptable," he said. In the latest remarks, the US Treasury Secretary has alleged that India is engaging in what she termed 'arbitrage' — buying deeply discounted Russian crude oil and reselling it for profit in international markets. The statement, which comes amid intensifying Western efforts to curtail Moscow's wartime revenues, underscores growing unease in Washington over New Delhi's energy policy. Since the start of the war in Ukraine, India has emerged as one of the largest buyers of Russian crude, capitalising on price discounts offered by Moscow to secure alternative markets. New Delhi has consistently defended its purchases, stressing that they are driven by energy security and affordability concerns for its 1.4 billion citizens. Officials have also highlighted that India refines much of this crude domestically, thereby meeting both local demand and global supply needs. Bessent said he expects a substantial increase in tariff revenues from the $300 billion he forecast earlier this year, and said the money would be used to start paying down the sizeable U.S. federal debt. Bessent, speaking in an interview on CNBC, declined to give a specific new revenue forecast, but said he and President Donald Trump were "laser-focused" on paying down the debt. "I've been saying that tariff revenue could be $300 billion this year. I'm going to have to revise that up substantially," he said. Analysts suggest that while the accusation is unlikely to rupture ties, it adds a layer of tension at a delicate moment. New Delhi continues to seek deeper defence and technology cooperation with Washington, even as it maintains a longstanding partnership with Moscow in energy and military supplies. A prolonged standoff over crude oil could complicate India's diplomatic balancing act, especially with the United States heading into a crucial election year. For Washington, targeting India's energy dealings is part of a broader push to tighten enforcement of sanctions against Russia. For New Delhi, the question remains one of sovereignty and pragmatism: should a country facing soaring energy needs be compelled to bear the costs of a war it did not start?
