Swinney says sorry to Gypsy Travellers for ‘trauma' of the ‘tinker experiment'
John Swinney made clear that the treatment of members of this community in previous years had been 'unacceptable'.
His comments came as a new report, published by the Scottish Government, stated that 'the context within which the TE (tinker experiment) occurred is best understood as cultural genocide'.
Between 1940 and 1980, the so-called experiment – supported by councils and the UK government – attempted to strip away the nomadic lifestyle of Gypsy Travellers, providing rudimentary and often cramped huts for people to live in.
When families became too big to be housed in the huts, children would sometimes be taken away.
The Scottish Government has been carrying out research into the impact of what happened – with report, by the Third Generation Project at St Andrews University, revealing 'discriminatory' policies had been carried out in 27 of Scotland's current 32 local authorities.
The Church of Scotland also issued 'a heartfelt and genuine apology for these historic wrongs'.
Mr Swinney, in a statement to Holyrood, said he hoped his apology could be the 'beginning of a new conversation' with efforts to improve the lives of Gypsy Traveller community in Scotland.
The First Minister told MSPs 'without ambiguity' that 'what happened to Gypsy Traveller communities in Scotland was unacceptable'.
He added: 'It is clear to the Government that stark prejudice and lack of cultural awareness led to a series of unfair and unjust policies.
'These policies resulted in children being removed from families, and families were forced to live in substandard accommodation and degrading conditions.
'The trauma that this has caused to individuals, families and groups, including those who regard themselves as 'victims of tinker experiments', is significant and lasting'.
With Gypsy Travellers in Holyrood's public gallery, Mr Swinney continued: 'As First Minister of Scotland, I want to say this directly to Gypsy Traveller communities: the 'tinker experiments' should not have happened.
'These policies were wrong. And we recognise how much it is still hurting so many.
'And more than anything else I want to say this – on behalf of Scotland, we are sorry.'
Mr Swinney added that although Scotland had 'come a long way since the 'Tinker experiments', there was 'still much to do' in tackling the prejudice the community continued to face.
And while Holyrood ministers published a new Gypsy Traveller action plan last year, the First Minister said the experiences shared as part of the government's work 'underline the urgent need for systemic change, greater accountability, and a shift in attitudes at every level'.
He declared: 'We must do better.'
Stressing the need for 'meaningful action' he highlighted the importance of 'challenging stereotypes, confronting everyday discrimination, and committing to long-term efforts that promote understanding, respect, and equity for Gypsy Travellers'.
He stated: 'Our hope is that we now have a foundation for continuing to build trust and fostering renewed relationships with all those who have been impacted by historical policies.'
His comments came as the report described the tinker experiments as being the 'recurring societal and institutional dehumanisation of Gypsy Travellers in Scotland'.
This was 'often carried out under the stereotype of Gypsy Travellers as a people that collectively practised a backwards or undeveloped way of life', it added.
The research highlighted the role of the UK national government 'and specifically the Scottish Office as a primary actor in the construction and enforcement of such policies'.
But it said that others – including local councils, churches and charities – were involved in 'constructing the environment' that allowed this to happen.
Gypsy Travellers in Scotland were housed in accommodation including Nissen-type huts, repurposed military buildings and disused properties, the report added – with these 'known by government agents to be substandard' with such properties 'frequently without' electricity and running water.
The report also highlighted the 'forced transfer of children', with some youngsters being removed from their families and placed in temporary care, while others were permanently taken away, being adopted either in the UK or overseas.
Afterwards, the Reverend Tommy MacNeil, convener of the Faith Action Programme Leadership Team of the Church of Scotland and Dr Mike Cantlay, convener of its Social Care Council said: 'On behalf of the Church of Scotland, we offer a heartfelt and genuine apology for these historic wrongs, highlighted in the report and carried out in the name of the Church.'
They added: 'We wish to say we stand in solidarity with those who suffered, and deeply regret the harm that came to them as a result of actions by the Church in the past.'
Their statement acknowleged that the Church of Scotland 'tolerated discrimination and the use of derogatory language by its employees and members'
The men stressed: 'We regret and are very sorry for the trauma that was inflicted on Gypsy Traveller communities, families and individuals by our Church.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Starmer hails ‘breakthrough' on security guarantees after crunch White House Ukraine talks
Sir Keir Starmer has hailed a "breakthrough" in efforts to end Vladimir Putin 's invasion of Ukraine as Donald Trump said he would broker a meeting between the Ukrainian and Russian presidents. The PM joined Voldymyr Zelensky, French president Emmanuel Macron and Nato secretary general Mark Rutte for crunch talks in the White House on Monday. And, following the meeting, Sir Keir said the UK and US would begin work on the specifics of security guarantees with the US as soon as Tuesday. "The two outcomes were a real significant breakthrough when it comes to security guarantees, because we're now going to be working with the US on those security guarantees," he told the BBC. "We've tasked our teams, some of them are even arriving tomorrow, to start the detailed work on that." Mr Trump said he had spoken directly with Vladimir Putin to begin planning a meeting between the Russian leader and Mr Zelensky, which will then be followed by a three-way meeting involving himself. The US president said Moscow will "accept" multinational efforts to guarantee Ukraine's security. Mr Zelensky, meanwhile, said he was "ready" for bilateral and trilateral meetings. But he told reporters following the White House meeting that if Russia does "not demonstrate a will to meet, then we will ask the United States to act accordingly". Nato secretary general Mark Rutte said the US and Europe would "do more" on tariffs and sanctions against Russia if the country "is not playing ball" on direct talks with Ukraine, in comments to Fox News. Sir Keir described the talks as "good and constructive" and said there was a "real sense of unity" between the European leaders, Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky. He said Mr Trump's plans to arrange the bilateral and trilateral meetings showed a recognition that Ukraine must be involved in talks. "That is a recognition of the principle that on some of these issues, whether it's territory or the exchange of prisoners, or the very serious issue of the return of children, that is something where Ukraine must be at the table." Mr Trump called the talks "very good". "During the meeting we discussed security guarantees for Ukraine, which guarantees would be provided by the various European countries, with a co-ordination with the United States of America," he posted on his Truth Social platform. "Everyone is happy about the possibility of PEACE for Russia/Ukraine. "At the conclusion of the meetings, I called president Putin and began arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between president Putin and president Zelensky. "After the meeting takes place, we will have a trilat which would be the two presidents plus myself." The US president met with Mr Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday, where he declared there was "no deal until there's a deal" to end more than three years of fighting in eastern Europe. "The Alaska summit reinforced my belief that while difficult, peace is within reach and I believe, in a very significant step, president Putin agreed that Russia would accept security guarantees for Ukraine," he said on Monday. "And this is one of the key points that we need to consider." He later said: "We also need to discuss the possible exchanges of territory taken into consideration the current line of contact." Future three-way talks "have a good chance" of stopping the conflict, the US president said. But he appeared to share conflicting views on whether a ceasefire was necessary to stop the war. "I don't think you need a ceasefire," he originally said, before later explaining that, "all of us would obviously prefer an immediate ceasefire while we work on a lasting peace". Mr Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, had suggested over the weekend that measures similar to Nato's article five mutual defence provision - that an attack on one member is an attack on the entire bloc - could be offered by the US without Kyiv joining the alliance. Sir Keir welcomed plans for "Article Five-style guarantees" during Monday's talks and said that they would fit with the work of his "coalition of the willing" group of countries. He said to Mr Trump: "With you coming alongside, the US alongside, what we've already developed, I think we could take a really important step forward today - a historic step, actually, could come out of this meeting in terms of security for Ukraine and security in Europe." Sir Keir also described potential future trilateral talks as a "sensible next step". The prime minister had disrupted his holiday plans over the weekend to join calls, including with Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky, before he headed to Washington. Mr Zelensky, whom Mr Trump greeted at the door of the West Wing with a handshake earlier in the evening, wore a black shirt with buttons and a black blazer to the meeting at the White House. His attire had appeared to become a point of irritation for Mr Trump during a previous meeting in February. Early in the meeting, the Ukrainian described the talks as "really good", saying they had been "the best" so far. Mr Zelensky said: "We are very happy with the president that all the leaders are here and security in Ukraine depends on the United States and on you and on those leaders who are with us in our hearts."
The Sun
2 minutes ago
- The Sun
Plans to lift two-child benefit cap will land UK's biggest jobless families with £20K a year costing taxpayer £3.5B
PLANS to lift the two-child benefit cap could give Britain's largest families around £20,000 a year. Around 70,000 families would receive more than £18,000 a year in child benefits if ministers move to lift the controversial limit. 3 3 Some of the largest families in the UK would find themselves more than £20,000 better off compared to the current system, however this could come at a hefty cost to the taxpayer. The two-child benefit cap - introduced by the Conservatives in 2017 - means parents cannot claim Universal Credit payments (worth about £300 a month) for more than two of their kids. However, ministers have floated the idea of scrapping the cap - which would cost £3.5 billion. Pressure has been growing on Keir Starmer to change the policy, with his backbenchers believing the cap is deeply unfair to children growing up in poverty. However, the Conservatives argue it would be unfair to hand packages to families on benefits that are worth more than the minimum wage when other taxpayers cannot afford to have more children. Former prime minister Gordon Brown has pleaded the government to increase gambling levies in order to fund the scrapping of the cap. If lifted, around half a million children could be taken out of poverty. Nigel Farage has said Reform UK would also lift the cap to encourage families to have more children, leaving the Tories somewhat isolated in their position. At present, the two-child benefit cap prevents families from claiming the £292.81-a-month child element of Universal Credit for third or subsequent children born after April 6, 2017. Around 71,000 families with five or more children on Universal Credit would stand to gain significantly from the abolished cap, official figures show. Changes to UC & PIP payments in full as Labour reveals bruising welfare bill concessions in bid to quell rebellion Each one of these would become eligible for at least £18,122.88 every year. This includes 14,899 families with six children, 4,812 with seven children, 1,822 with eight children and 668 with nine children, according to data released in answer to a parliamentary question. On top of these, there are 424 families with ten or more children who, without the cap, could gain child Universal Credit payments worth more than £35,000 a year, in addition to other benefits. Exactly how much each family stands to gain depends on when their children were born. Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Helen Whately said: "Without a cap, Labour will end up giving households thousands of pounds in extra benefits — a top-up worth more than a year's full-time pay on the minimum wage. "Not only is this unaffordable, it's also unfair. If you're in work you don't get extra pay for another child, so it doesn't make sense for parents on benefits to get more." She added: "Working people shouldn't see their taxes go up to fund uncapped payouts to others who've opted out of work but opted in to multiple children." The prime minister has faced backlash from his backbench in recent months, including pressure which led to a u-turn on planned tightening for Personal Independence Payments (PIP) claims. Whately said: "Starmer's Britain is living beyond its means. He needs to stand firm against the pressure from his backbenchers and make the firm but fair choices to get welfare costs under control." TWO-CHILD BENEFIT CAP IS 'BIGGEST DRIVER OF RISING CHILD POVERTY' However, Chief Executive of the Child Poverty Action Group Alison Garnham said that "evidence shows the two-child limit does not affect parents' decision about family size". She highlighted that just two per cent of families on benefits had five or more children, arguing it was "poor policy" to focus on extreme cases. Garnham added: "Clearly for these households, money does not drive decisions about family size since the vast majority are only receiving UC support for two children" Around 4.5 million children currently live in relative poverty, with Garnham saying the two-child limit was the "biggest driver of rising child poverty". 100,000 more children entered relative poverty last year, and Garnham argues that "scrapping it is the most cost-effective way to reverse the increase". She said: "Giving all children the best start in life will be impossible unless the government abolishes the policy in its autumn child poverty strategy." A government spokesman said: "Every child — no matter their background — deserves the best start in life. "That's why our child poverty taskforce will publish an ambitious strategy to tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty, and in the meantime we are investing £500 million in children's development and ensuring the poorest children don't go hungry in the holidays through a new £1 billion crisis support package."
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government must stop children using VPNs to dodge age checks on porn sites, commissioner demands
England's children's commissioner has demanded that the government stop children from using virtual private networks (VPNs) to get around age verification on porn sites. Calling for change, Dame Rachel de Souza warned it is "absolutely a loophole that needs closing" as she released a new report, which found the proportion of children saying they have seen pornography online has risen in the past two years, with most likely to have stumbled upon it accidentally. VPNs are tools that connect internet users to websites via remote servers, enabling them to hide their real IP address and location, which includes allowing them to look as if they are online but in another country. This means the Online Safety Act, which now forces platforms to check users' ages if attempting to access some adult content, can be dodged. After sites such as PornHub, Reddit and X introduced age verifcation requirements last month, VPNs became the most downloaded apps, according to the BBC. A government spokesperson told the broadcaster that there are no plans to ban VPNs as they are legal tools for adults. Dame Rachel told Newsnight: "Of course, we need age verification on VPNs – it's absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that's one of my major recommendations." She called on ministers to look at requiring VPNs 'to implement highly effective age assurances to stop underage users from accessing pornography'. More than half (58 per cent) of respondents to the commissioner's survey said that, as children, they had seen pornography involving strangulation, while 44 per cent reported seeing a depiction of rape – specifically someone who was asleep. Made up of responses from 1,020 people aged between 16 and 21 years old, the report also found that while children were on average aged 13 when they first saw pornography, more than a quarter (27 per cent) said they were 11, and some reported being aged 'six or younger'. The research suggested four in 10 respondents felt girls can be 'persuaded' to have sex even if they say no at first, and that young people who had watched pornography were more likely to think this way. The report, a follow-on from research by the Children's Commissioner's office in 2023, found a higher proportion (70 per cent) of people saying they had seen online pornography before turning 18, up from 64 per cent of respondents two years ago. Boys (73 per cent) were more likely than girls (65 per cent) to report seeing online pornography. A majority (59 per cent) of children and young people said they had seen pornography online by accident – a rise from 38 per cent in 2023. Dame Rachel said her research is evidence that harmful content is being presented to children through dangerous algorithms, rather than them seeking it out. She described the content young people are seeing as 'violent, extreme and degrading' and often illegal, and said her office's findings must be seen as a 'snapshot of what rock bottom looks like'. Dame Rachel said: 'This report must act as a line in the sand. The findings set out the extent to which the technology industry will need to change for their platforms to ever keep children safe. 'Take, for example, the vast number of children seeing pornography by accident. This tells us how much of the problem is about the design of platforms, algorithms and recommendation systems that put harmful content in front of children who never sought it out.' The research was done in May, ahead of new online safety measures coming into effect last month, including age checks to prevent children accessing pornography and other harmful content. A Department of Science, Innovation and Technology spokesperson told the BBC that "children have been left to grow up in a lawless online world for too long" and "the Online Safety Act is changing that'. However, responding to Dame Rachel's remarks on VPNs, they added that there are no plans to ban them, "but if platforms deliberately push workarounds like VPNs to children, they face tough enforcement and heavy fines'.
