Rupee hits over two-month low, hurt by geopolitical worries, Trump tariff remark
MUMBAI, June 17 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee hit its weakest level in more than two months on Tuesday, hurt by worries over geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and U.S. President Donald Trump's remark that pharmaceutical tariffs were coming very soon.
The rupee declined to 86.28 against the U.S. dollar near the end of the trading session, its weakest level since April 9, before closing at 86.24, down 0.2% on the day.
Speaking to reporters on Air Force One on the way back from attending a meeting of G7 leaders, Trump said that pharmaceutical tariffs were coming very soon.
The rupee extended its losses after the statement, traders said. Indian drugmakers earn a significant share of their revenue from the United States.
India's pharma exports to the U.S. stood at $8.73 billion in fiscal year 2024, accounting for about one-third of the industry's overall exports, as per data from government-backed trade body Pharmaceuticals Export Promotion Council of India.
Asian currencies were down between 0.1% and 0.5% while the dollar index was steady at 98.1.
Brent crude oil futures rose more than 1% to $74.30 per barrel with analysts saying that uncertainty over the Iran-Israel conflict would keep prices elevated.
Dollar demand from state-run banks also weighed on the rupee, a trader at a private bank said. "A close over 86.10 indicates that a bullish bias may start to build on USD/INR in the near-term," the trader said.
India's benchmark equity index, the Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab, fell about 0.3%, in line with losses in most regional peers.
While the focus will remain on geopolitical developments in the Middle East, traders are also awaiting the Federal Reserve's policy decision on Wednesday.
With the central bank widely expected to keep policy rates unchanged, its projections for policy rates and commentary from Chair Jerome Powell will be in the spotlight.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Will the US-UK trade deal make Starmer popular again?
To general surprise, at least as to the location and the timing, the British prime minister and the American president have confirmed that the US-UK economic prosperity deal (EPD) has indeed been signed and will now be in force. It is the first, and only, trade deal of any kind to have been signed by the Trump administration since 'Liberation Day' on 2 April. It was a notable moment, but for Keir Starmer, one question will be how far it will go in helping his government recover from its rapid fall from grace since the general election... What's with the optics? Obviously, someone – possibly in the British embassy in Washington – came up with the idea of the president and his counterpart springing the announcement on the world's media when they were least expecting it, for maximum impact. So instead of the usual photo-op in the Oval Office, with Trump signing the executive order and then posing with it for the cameras, it was displayed in the open air at an impromptu press conference. The pages fell out of the presidential folder, to be retrieved by Starmer, but that just seemed to add to the easy informality of the occasion. The prime minister was allowed to address the president as 'Donald', and Trump said nice things about him. The British are to be shielded from further tariffs because, as Trump put it, 'I like them', and he thinks Starmer's team are 'great people'. What's missing? Steel, most urgently. The Americans insist that steel 'made in Britain' should be virgin and not dependent on raw materials from, let us say, China or the EU. For the steel works at Port Talbot that implies trouble, because the capacity to make such steel has been lost with the closure of the last blast furnace, now replaced with electric arc technology. So the ruinous 25 per cent tariff on UK steel exports to the US will stay, after all, and will rise to a prohibitive 50 per cent on 9 July. Politically, if Starmer can get the right conditions over the line by then and the threat of such tariffs subsides, it will mean a great deal to the voters in south Wales, who are being enthusiastically, if cynically, courted by Reform UK ahead of next year's Welsh parliament elections. Scunthorpe, too, should benefit from the deal, with a comparable electoral dividend. Any other winners? The car industry, especially Jaguar Land Rover, BMW and Aston Martin in the Midlands, plus Bentley in Crewe, Rolls-Royce in Sussex, and similar centres for export production. Aerospace actually escapes US tariffs completely, which is excellent news for manufacturing centres in Derby, the northwest, north Wales and Bristol. With the orders going in for new rails, girders, and the defence industry, the government can make some claim to be rebuilding the industrial base – although high energy prices remain an obstacle to competitiveness. The government, particularly Ed Miliband, has probably yet to win the argument that renewables are a cheaper and reliable alternative to fossil fuels. Even the farmers, badly disadvantaged in the Australian and New Zealand trade deals, have some protections against low-cost US imports. The economy as a whole? Broadly, on US trade, things are worse than they were under Joe Biden, but better than they would be without a deal. It's only fair to add that if the UK were still in the EU then a trade deal would not yet have occurred, although the EU's collective bargaining strength may in time prove to be a strategic advantage in securing better terms. In terms of growth, the net effects will be small, given that the 10 per cent US 'baseline' tariff implemented by the Trump administration remains on all other UK goods. But, again, the situation is undoubtedly better than it would otherwise have been. For a government and a nation desperate for growth, this partial relaxation of US taxes, the Indian free trade deal, and, most of all, the EU 'reset', should boost overall growth by a modest but useful amount. The EPD also has the promise of more cooperation on everything from financial services to AI. What could go wrong? The NHS uses its huge purchasing power to drive a hard bargain with US pharma giants, and these companies, along with the president, resent the way in which so much of the production of final products, and of the compounds used to manufacture them, has been outsourced by the US. There are vague but ominous-sounding words in the EPD about this: 'The United States and the United Kingdom intend to promptly negotiate significantly preferential treatment outcomes on pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients. The United Kingdom confirms that it will endeavour to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the United Kingdom.' The treatment of US pharma giants has long been a complaint of Trump's. A net gain in the domestic political balance of trade? Yes. Starmer has done well on the international stage, and all these deals show that his government can actually get things done. It adds some lustre to Starmer's dullish image, and also adds to his 'prime ministerial' air, which contrasts with that of the more inexperienced Badenoch and the 'unserious' Nigel Farage. Starmer could plausibly claim to be the kind of steady, dependable leader needed to steer the country through stormy times, even if he sometimes needs to adjust course. The local economic boost in areas most affected will help, as well as the contribution to growth at the national level. But, as ever, a demanding electorate will want to feel the tangible benefit of growing real wages, stabilised taxes, and improving public services before Labour can dream of catching up with Reform UK. Deals such as this, alongside some dramatic U-turns on the winter fuel payment and the grooming gangs, give the government hope that it's at least possible to win some voters back.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump ‘could keep tariffs on UK steel unless US secures guarantees'
Donald Trump is threatening to keep tariffs on some or all of its steel imports from the UK unless it gives specific guarantees over the Indian-owned steelmaking plant at Port Talbot in south Wales, sources have told the Guardian. An agreement to reduce tariffs on UK car exports to the US and scrap them for the aerospace sector was signed off by the US president and Keir Starmer on Monday, on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada. However, it did not include the removal of tariffs on steel imports from the UK. Officials are still negotiating over the fine points of a deal to cover the steel and aluminium industry, amid US concerns about the fact that Tata Steel imports raw materials from abroad. Starmer told reporters in Banff, Canada: 'There's further work to do in relation to steel, but we're getting on and doing that work.' Trump and Starmer announced the main terms of the trade agreement in May, with the UK prime minister calling it a 'fantastic, historic day'. According to that deal, tariffs on up to 100,000 British cars are due to be reduced to 10% from 27.5%. As it stands, UK steelmakers still face 25% tariffs, although this is lower than the global tariff of 50% imposed by the Trump administration on other nations. The UK business department said the two leaders had pledged to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed' in May. The deal was heralded by Downing Street as a triumph for Starmer's brand of gentle diplomacy, in which he wooed the president with the promise of a state visit while shying away from any direct criticism on topics such as trade. The May trade announcement itself was followed by weeks of further talks as the two sides continued to negotiate over the small print. Monday's announcement by the two leaders means the tariff reductions will kick in for aerospace and automobiles over the coming weeks, with Starmer saying they would begin 'very soon'. However, the Trump administration is understood to be seeking further guarantees on British steel exports, given Tata Steel has closed its blast furnaces at Port Talbot last year and therefore now imports raw materials from abroad until the planned opening of a new, much cleaner electric arc furnace in 2027. According to US import rules, steel must be 'melted and poured' in a country to qualify as having originated in that country. The company says these supplies come from Tata's other sites, mainly those in the Netherlands and India. US trade officials are considering granting Tata an exemption, sources say, but are asking for guarantees about when it will switch on its new electric arc furnaces, and therefore stop importing raw materials from abroad. They also want to know where those supplies are coming from and how Tata is able to track their movements throughout the supply chain. The British government is hoping that the fact that Tata does not import any of the raw steel from China will persuade the Trump administration to include all British exports in the deal. Starmer is sending his business adviser Varun Chandra to lead a delegation to Washington next week, and officials say they are confident of striking a final deal next month. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The Chinese ownership of British Steel, which has a separate plant at Scunthorpe, is understood not to be an issue since the government took over its management. Alasdair McDiarmid, the assistant general secretary of the steel industry union Community, said on Tuesday: 'It is now absolutely vital that a deal for steel is secured as soon as possible. Our steel producers and their US customers need an end to the current state of uncertainty to allow normal business to resume. 'Crucially, we must see a full exemption for all UK steel exports to the US – without that guarantee, some of our leading steel businesses could be left behind, with a threat to jobs and livelihoods.' A government source said: 'Thanks to our agreement with the US, the UK is the only country in the world to be exempt from the 50% tariff on steel and aluminium that other countries now face. 'Yesterday the US president confirmed his intention to work with the UK to remove the 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium, helping us to ensure they can be implemented as soon as possible and in the best interests of the UK industry.' Additional reporting by Peter Walker in Banff
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump on ‘good form', Starmer says after US president's trade deal gaffe
Donald Trump was on 'good form' at the G7 summit, Sir Keir Starmer has insisted after a gaffe-filled media appearance led to questions about the US president's health. The Prime Minister also said he rushed to pick up signed documents which Mr Trump dropped on the floor to prevent a security scare following the completion of the British-American trade deal. The two leaders had posed for pictures with the official paperwork after finalising the transatlantic agreement at the G7 summit on Monday, when the president accidentally let a sheaf of files fall to the ground. He also mistakenly referred to the pact as 'a trade agreement with the European Union'. Sir Keir said he bent to pick up the paperwork because there are 'quite strict rules about who can get close to the president'. Asked whether people should be concerned about the US leader's health, the Prime Minister told reporters at the G7 conference in Canada: 'No. I mean, look, there weren't many choices with the documents and picking it up, because one, as you probably know there were quite strict rules about who can get close to the president. 'I was just deeply conscious that in a situation like it would not have been good for anybody else to have stepped forwards – not that any of you rushed to! 'There's a very tightly guarded security zone around the president, as you would expect.' He added: 'But no, he was in good form yesterday, and I mean we had, I don't know how many sessions yesterday together at the G7 and then into the evening session as well. 'And I'm just really pleased that we signed the executive order and for JLR's 44,000 people, that is a huge relief in terms of the protection of their jobs and their livelihoods, and that's really important to me.' Mr Trump, who turned 79 on Saturday, abruptly left the summit of leaders from the world's major economies amid escalating conflict in the Middle East on Monday. Hours before his departure, he and Sir Keir rubber-stamped a long-coveted deal that will slash tariffs for British carmakers and the aerospace sector, but leaves the future of import taxes on UK steel hanging in the balance. The agreement will grant the auto industry a reprieve by the end of June as levies drop from 25% to 10%, while the aerospace sector will face no tariffs. Tariffs for the steel industry, which is of key economic importance to the UK, will stand at 25% for now rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. This is less than the US global rate of 50% for steel and aluminium. The two leaders pledged to 'make progress towards 0% tariffs on core steel products as agreed'. The Prime Minister said the move marked a 'very important day' for both sides while the US president praised Sir Keir as a 'friend' who had done a 'great job' securing the deal that eluded leaders before him. 'We're very long-time partners and allies and friends, and we've become friends in a short period of time,' Mr Trump said. 'He's slightly more liberal than I am to put it mildly.' 'We make it work,' Sir Keir joked. Asked on Tuesday why he thought the US president liked him despite their differing political backgrounds, the Prime Minister said: 'That's really for him to answer rather than me, but we do have a good relationship. 'I think that is in the national interest, frankly. There's long been a close relationship between the US and the UK. 'As I've said many times, on defence and security and intelligence sharing in particular, we are closer than any two countries, and I'm very pleased that I've got a good relationship with him – notwithstanding, as both he and I acknowledge, that our political backgrounds are different.'
