South African president removes minister criticised by key coalition partner
The removal of Nobuhle Nkabane from her post could help defuse tensions between Ramaphosa's African National Congress (ANC) and the Democratic Alliance (DA), the two biggest parties in the coalition government, ahead of a budget vote this week.
The DA alleges that Nkabane helped engineer the appointment of ANC-connected individuals to the boards of skills development organizations and lied to parliament to cover that up.
Nkabane has denied the allegations against her, according to local television station eNCA. She said in a statement that it had been a privilege to serve in her position.
The DA welcomed Nkabane's dismissal. The party stepped up its criticism of the minister after Ramaphosa fired its deputy trade minister for not receiving presidential permission for an overseas trip, in the latest spat between the two main governing parties.
The DA threatened to vote against the budgets of departments led by ANC ministers it has accused of wrongdoing, including Nkabane, potentially disrupting the national budget.
Lawmakers are due to consider the last major piece of budget legislation, the Appropriation Bill, on Wednesday.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Johannesburg's $1.4 Billion Blowup: Is Africa's Financial Capital on the Brink of Collapse?
South Africa's most important city is now in the hot seat. Johannesburg is under fire after the National Treasury flagged 24.4 billion rand ($1.4 billion) in irregular, unauthorized, and wasteful spending. In a formal letter dated July 30, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana gave Mayor Dada Morero just 14 days to explain how the city plans to fix the messor risk losing critical national funding. That funding accounts for about 15% of Johannesburg's 89 billion rand annual budget, and without it, even the most basic services could be pushed past the breaking point. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with GS. This isn't just another bureaucratic disputeit's a direct threat to investor confidence in the city that houses the continent's largest stock exchange and the headquarters of major corporations like Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA). Internal documents reviewed by Bloomberg revealed Johannesburg is over 221 billion rand behind on much-needed infrastructure upgrades. Roads are crumbling, outages are frequent, and crime remains high. While Mayor Morero recently assembled a "bomb squad" of former officials to improve service delivery, critics argue that past financial mismanagement has already left deep scars. The Democratic Alliance, the main opposition party, called this the gravest financial threat in Johannesburg's democratic history. The stakes go beyond local politics. If Treasury follows through and pulls back funding, it could trigger a broader credibility crisis for South Africa's ruling coalitionjust months before Johannesburg is set to host world leaders at a major global summit. For investors watching from abroad, this situation introduces a new variable into the risk calculus for South African assets. Treasury's letter makes it clear: without urgent action, Johannesburg could become a cautionary tale about fiscal negligence in one of Africa's most promising markets. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations
Lawmakers will use much of September to work on spending bills for the coming budget year, which begins Oct. 1. They likely will need to pass a short-term spending measure to keep the government funded for a few weeks while they work on a longer-term measure that covers the full year. It's not unusual for leaders from both parties to blame the other party for a potential shutdown, but the rhetoric began extra early this year, signaling the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual. Advertisement On Monday, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries sent their Republican counterparts a sharply-worded letter calling for a meeting to discuss 'the government funding deadline and the health care crisis you have visited upon the American people.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up They said it will take bipartisanship to avert a 'painful, unnecessary shutdown.' 'Yet it is clear that the Trump Administration and many in your party are preparing to go it alone and continue to legislate on a solely Republican basis,' said the letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson. Republicans have taken note of the warnings and are portraying the Democrats as itching for a shutdown they hope to blame on the GOP. Advertisement 'It was disturbing to hear the Democrat leader threaten to shut down the government in his July 8 Dear Colleague letter,' Thune said on Saturday. '... I really hope that Democrats will not embrace that position but will continue to work with Republicans to fund the government.' Different approaches from the House and Senate So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills, mostly along party lines. The Senate has passed three on a strongly bipartisan basis. The House is pursuing steep, non-defense spending cuts. The Senate is rejecting many of those cuts. One side will have to give. And any final bill will need some Democratic support to generate the 60 votes necessary to get a spending measure to the finish line. Some Democratic senators are also wanting assurances from Republicans that there won't be more efforts in the coming weeks to claw back or cancel funding already approved by Congress. 'If Republicans want to make a deal, then let's make a deal, but only if Republicans include an agreement they won't take back that deal a few weeks later,' said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., a veteran member of the House Appropriations committee, said the Democratic minority in both chambers has suffered so many legislative losses this year, 'that they are stuck between a rock and their voting base.' Democrats may want to demonstrate more resistance to Trump, but they would rue a shutdown, he warned. 'The reality would be, if the government were shut down, the administration, Donald Trump, would have the ability to decide where to spend and not spend,' Fleischmann said. 'Schumer knows that, Jeffries knows that. We know that. I think it would be much more productive if we start talking about a short-term (continuing resolution.)' Advertisement Republican angry about pace of nominations Republicans are considering changes to Senate rules to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Thune said last week that during the same point in Joe Biden's presidency, 49 of his 121 civilians nominees had been confirmed on an expedited basis through a voice vote or a unanimous consent request. Trump has had none of his civilian nominees confirmed on an expedited basis. Democrats have insisted on roll call votes for all of them, a lengthy process than can take days. 'I think they're desperately in need of change,' Thune said of Senate rules for considering nominees. 'I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that.' Schumer said a rules change would be a 'huge mistake,' especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. The Senate held a rare weekend session as Republicans worked to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Negotiations focused on advancing dozens of additional Trump nominees in exchange for some concessions on releasing some already approved spending. At times, lawmakers spoke of progress on a potential deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' Trump posted on Truth Social. Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report. Advertisement
New York Post
13 minutes ago
- New York Post
Elizabeth Warren joins with Zohran Mamdani, calls him ‘future of the Democratic Party'
It's a steel. Progressive Sen. Elizabeth Warren heaped praise Monday on socialist mayoral contender Zohran Mamdani's 'steely' focus on affordability — casting it as a winning path out of the political wilderness for Democrats. Warren, who appeared alongside Mamdani at the DC37 union building to support his universal childcare proposal, said he kick-started that conversation in the right place. Advertisement 'For me, New York City is the place to start the conversation for Democrats on how affordability is the central issue, the central reason to be a Democrat, and that delivering on it in meaningful, tangible ways that will touch working families is why we're here,' Warren said. Sen. Elizabeth Warren offered praise for NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani on Monday. Matthew McDermott 'That is the Democratic message… Zohran is on the front lines in that fight out there, fighting for families.' Advertisement The Massachusetts senator's blessing came as Mamdani continues to struggle to gain actual endorsements from other high-profile Dems, notably his fellow New Yorkers Chuck Schumer, the Senate's minority leader and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. Both Schumer and Jeffries avoided outright endorsing Mamdani after the Queens state Assemblyman trounced former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in June's Democratic mayoral primary — an upset that prompted a wave of soul-searching among more moderate Dems wary of a socialist being the party's standard-bearer. Warren, who unsuccessfully ran for president in 2020, also recently attacked Cuomo and incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who are both running as independents in November, for allegedly cozying up to billionaires. Mamdani speaks to reporters after Warren calls him 'future' of the Democratic Party. Matthew McDermott Advertisement 'Cuomo and Adams are tripping over themselves to haul in millions of campaign dollars from billionaire donors,' she wrote in Rolling Stone. 'Mamdani has charged ahead with plans to make New York more affordable, and he's showing how to pay for it by taxing the ultra-rich and giant corporations. That may not make him popular with the richest New Yorkers, but he's willing to let Adams and Cuomo suck up to those guys.' This breaking a story. Please check back for updates.
