Burnley MP Oliver Ryan's suspension over WhatsApp messages lifted
The messages, sent to the WhatsApp group named Trigger Me Timbers, were reported to show Ryan mocking a Labour MP for his sexuality, and denigrating the vice-chairman of the local Labour Party.He has been approached for comment.The BBC understands the party complaints process remains ongoing in relation to Andrew Gwynne, the MP for Gorton and Denton.He was suspended from the party and sacked as health minister in February after sending offensive messages in the group.
'Swift action'
Labour suspended 11 councillors in Greater Manchester for their roles in the group, which was set up to co-ordinate Labour's campaigning in the local area.Two Tameside councillors, George Newton and Jack Naylor, have now been expelled from the party, as well as former Stockport councillor Andrew Verdeille, the BBC understands.Tameside councillors Alison Gwynne and Claire Reid were handed six-month suspensions from the party, while Tameside councillors George Jones, Vincent Ricci, and Brenda Warrington were handed a formal warning.No further action was taken against Tameside Councillor Denise Ward.Two Stockport councillors, David Sedgwick and Holly McCormack resigned during the investigation, as did Tameside councillor Charlotte Martin. A Labour spokesman said that the party "took swift action as soon as we became aware of the activity in this WhatsApp Group"."These matters have been investigated thoroughly, in line with the Labour Party's rules and procedures."We cannot comment further on any ongoing investigations."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
JK Rowling compares Nicola Sturgeon to Donald Trump in scathing book review
JK Rowling has compared Nicola Sturgeon to US President Donald Trump and the Twilight character Bella Swan in a scathing review of the former first minister's memoir. The Harry Potter author accused Ms Sturgeon of being 'flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts' on issues relating to trans and women's rights. The writer is a long-time critic of the former SNP leader and her views on gender self-ID. In her near-3000-word review, published on her own website, she accuses Ms Sturgeon, who passed gender reform legislation at Holyrood, of holding 'luxury beliefs' that have caused 'real, lasting harm' to women. Rowling published her review on X alongside what appears to be an AI-generated image of Ms Sturgeon in the woods in front of a wolf and a vampire. She said of the politician's memoir, Frankly: 'She remains stubbornly wedded to her belief that it is possible to let some men into women's spaces on the men's say so, without letting any man who fancies it come inside. 'She denies there are any risks to a policy of gender self-identification. 'She can't imagine any male predator capitalising on such policies, in spite of the fact that it has, demonstrably, happened many times. 'She is flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and facts.' Rowling, who lives in Edinburgh, said the Glasgow Southside MSP had not been 'remotely humbled' by the Supreme Court ruling that sex in the UK Equality Act referred to biological sex. The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Act, which was passed by MSPs, was ultimately scrapped by Westminster, with the then Tory government saying it contravened equalities law. In her book, Ms Sturgeon said she had never received as much abuse than when Rowling posted a picture of herself on social media with a T-shirt saying 'Nicola Sturgeon, destroyer of women's rights'. The former first minister said the post made her feel 'more at risk of possible physical harm'. Rowling defended the decision, writing in her review her intention was to encourage journalists to question Ms Sturgeon on the impacts her gender reforms may have. She compares the MSP to Twilight character Bella Swan, saying both were 'monomaniacs', with Mr Sturgeon being 'consumed' by independence. She says of them: 'Both shy, insecure teenagers have dates with destiny. 'Nicola Sturgeon will one day become first minister of Scotland. Bella Swan will join the ranks of the undead.' The author said Sturgeon made significant omissions in her memoir, including WhatsApp messages from the Covid pandemic, education standards and the row over delayed and over-budget ferries. 'Perhaps the most disgraceful omission — and I'll admit to a personal interest here, because I'm married to a doctor who used to run a methadone clinic, so saw the national scandal up close — is the fact that Scotland continues to lead the whole of Europe in drug deaths,' she said. Ms Sturgeon has said she stands by the principle of gender self-ID but has expressed regret at not pausing her gender reforms in order to find common ground with opponents. Speaking at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on Thursday, Ms Sturgeon said the debate was 'toxic on both sides'. She accepted that 'in all of the tone and tenor of this I am not saying I was blameless at all', saying she 'desperately' wished she had been able to 'find a more collegiate way forward' on the controversial issue. Ms Sturgeon has been approached for comment.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Locks need urgent repair amid threat to future of Cambridge punting
Two locks in Cambridge deemed at imminent danger of collapse and posing a threat to the future of punting in the city urgently need to be repaired, Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said. The flat-bottomed boats, propelled along the river by someone pushing a long pole against the river bed, have been enjoyed by visitors to the prestigious university city for more than a century. But the possible collapse of a lock island could take out a sluice, lowering the river water level to a 'muddy trickle' and putting an end to punting, it is feared. David Goode, chair of the Conservators of the River Cam – which manages a stretch of the river, said a structural engineer surveyed two locks as 'in imminent danger of collapse' in May last year. Both Jesus Green Lock near central Cambridge and Bait's Bite Lock, further north on the river, remain closed to navigation as they are 'unsafe'. He said work to replace the two locks could cost around £25 million, and the conservators do not have the money to do it. Sir Ed, speaking after he tried his hand at punting on Friday, said: 'I think these locks urgently need to be repaired and potentially rebuilt. 'It's essential for people using the river but the river itself. 'Without that water control, the river would go to a trickle. 'Punting might just go away. 'All the jobs, all the revenue, all the tourism that brings to this great city. 'So this is actually quite an urgent investment and I hope Cambridge City Council can work with the Government or with other agencies to get that investment.' Rod Ingersent, managing director of Scudamores – a Cambridge punting company, said: 'It's almost certainly been a problem building over many decades and it's to do with very old structures which are expensive to maintain.' He said that 'something of this scale gets beyond' what the conservators 'can be reasonably expected to do as it requires so much investment and so much expertise in the maintenance of old structures'. 'But the effect would be catastrophic for punting, certainly for the colleges above the lock, the old buildings would be in trouble, and there's some amazing listed buildings along the college backs, they'd be under risk from the foundations being affected,' he said. 'Then below the lock the rowing with the city and the college clubs, that would be disrupted.' He said the problem was of 'such a scale, the level of funding, it needs to go up some stages'. 'It might… need to go up to Defra, up to central government possibly,' Mr Ingersent said. 'I think it's not reasonable to expect the Cam conservancy to do it from their own resources, they're quite a small body and their main task is looking after navigation rather than I suppose being maintainers of old structures which they've inherited.' He said water has been 'scouring away at the foundations' of the lock island, and if there were another high water event it 'could be very challenging and something could start to give way with maybe quite catastrophic results'. Mr Goode said the river level is 'artificially held high' to allow navigation, and if the lock island collapsed it could take out a sluice causing the water level to drop. 'The lock irons are directly connected to the sluices so if the lock island collapses it's going to take out the Environment Agency sluice with it, I imagine, and that would be the issue with water level,' said Mr Goode. 'Because then the water level would not be maintained at its current depth which it is on the Backs, which is the section of the river where the punting takes place.' He said that 'every 20 years or so' the conservators ask the Environment Agency to drop the river level so 'we can clear the crap out of the river'. 'Bikes, shopping trolleys, all the things students and townspeople throw in on a drunken night out,' said Mr Goode. 'When we do that we let the water out so we simulate what would happen if the sluice or the weir failed. 'All that's left is a muddy trickle. 'You would not be able to support punting at all. 'You could walk across it (the river) from one side to the other. 'So that would be the end of punting if that were to happen.' He said that £1.6 million 'stabilisation work', described as a 'temporary fix that will enable us to re-open the lock safely', would start at Bait's Bite lock from August 25. Mr Goode said that fix could last five to 10 years. He said they have 'sold the family silver', including some cottages and the former conservator's house which they owned, to afford the work to Bait's Bite Lock – but do not have funds for more work.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly
A jury's decision to clear a suspended Labour councillor of encouraging violent disorder after he called for far-right activists' throats to be cut cannot be compared to the case of Lucy Connolly, lawyers have claimed. Ricky Jones, 58, faced trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court after he described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' in a speech at an anti-racism rally last year, in the wake of the Southport murders. The now-suspended councillor, surrounded by cheering supporters in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 2024, was filmed stating: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' Jurors deliberated for just over half-an-hour and found him not guilty on Friday. This caused Conservative and Reform politicians to brand the decision 'two-tier justice' – with shadow home secretary Chris Philp comparing the case to that of Mrs Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months after she posted a tweet calling for 'mass deportation' of asylum seekers and to 'set fire to all the f****** hotels' on the day of the Southport attacks. Former home secretary and Tory leadership candidate Sir James Cleverly also called the jury's decision to clear Ricky Jones 'perverse' in an X post, adding: 'Perverse decisions like this are adding to the anger that people feel and amplifying the belief that there isn't a dispassionate criminal justice system.' Lawyers have said the cases should not be conflated as Connolly and Jones faced allegations of a different nature – and Jones faced trial where Connolly, having pleaded guilty, did not. Peter Stringfellow, a solicitor at Brett Wilson, told the PA news agency, said: 'Both (Jones and Connolly) said pretty unpleasant things. 'However, I'm afraid the conflation of the two after that is a problem. It comes from people who've got some sort of political agenda, in my view. 'They were facing completely different allegations and a massive part of those different allegations is the racial element. 'If you look at the Connolly case … her intention is of a racial nature.' Connolly pleaded guilty last year to a charge of inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X. On July 29 last year, she posted: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' 'She directs everybody to the fact that this was a racial comment,' Mr Stringfellow said. 'She pleads guilty to that intention … she accepted that she had intended to stir racial hatred. 'The Jones case is different because one, he's facing a completely different allegation: he's facing encouraging violent disorder. 'And the difference with him is he's saying: 'That's not what I was intended to do'.' Mr Stringfellow added that, in the case of Connolly, racially aggravated discourse on social media did translate into real-life violence across the country – whereas Mr Jones' comments at a rally did not cause a violent disorder. 'What she (Connolly) did, what followed her comments about threatening to burn people in hotels, is that that's precisely what then happened – and people were attempting to burn people in hotels.' Ernest Aduwa, partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, said comparisons between Jones' and Connolly's cases were 'misplaced'. 'We need to be honest about what is going on here. The verdict in the Ricky Jones case was not political, it was legal,' he said. 'A jury listened to the evidence, tested it and decided unanimously he was not guilty. 'That is not bias or 'two-tier justice' – it is the justice system doing what it is supposed to do: separating facts from noise. 'Comparisons with the Lucy Connolly case are misplaced. 'Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty. There was no trial, no cross-examination, no jury. She admitted the specific offence: stirring up racial hatred online. 'Ricky Jones faced a different charge … with a high burden of proof. 'The jury decided the Crown had not met it. 'That does not mean the protest was not passionate or loud – it means there was not enough evidence to prove intent to incite violence. That distinction matters. 'I understand why emotions run high. But flattening two different situations into one misleading narrative does no favours to justice. 'The fact that a black man at a protest can receive a fair trial and be acquitted should be seen not as an injustice, but as proof the system can still get it right.' He added: 'The law is not perfect, but it must rest on evidence – not opinion, pressure, or politics.'
