logo
To Make ‘Toots,' My Sensitive Film About Aging, I Needed the Perfect Fart Noise

To Make ‘Toots,' My Sensitive Film About Aging, I Needed the Perfect Fart Noise

Yahoo27-07-2025
Chris Evans is a Shreveport, Louisiana-based filmmaker whose latest film, "toots." is on a festival run that has recently included Indy Shorts. In the piece below, he discusses the importance of sound.
The amazing Phoebe Waller-Bridge once gave me some advice (via an Instagram reel, but still): 'Disarm an audience with comedy and then punch them in the gut with drama when they least expect it.' I applied it to my short film, 'Toots.,' the story of a devoted son grappling with the responsibilities of caring for his aging mother with Parkinson's.
Where's the comedy, you ask? It lies in an extended flatulence scene that sets up a heartbreaking finish. Risky: Because the success or failure of the scene depends, in part, on the sound of the flatulence.
Related Headlines
Lisa Dahl: Blessed by Grace Recounts a Mother's Journey From Tragedy to Nourishing Others
Sean Connery as 007: 12 Behind the Scenes Images of Bond at His Best
11 Shameless 2000s Comedies That Just Don't Care If You're Offended
Folks loved the script, but you can't hear a script. I had a strong sonic concept of how it should play out, but I didn't know exactly how to compose it in the sound design, or communicate it to the production team.
Also Read: 11 Films of the 1940s That Are Still a Pleasure to Watch
The fart sounds you find in sound packets on the internet just don't cut the mustard. I had a small budget of $1,500 for sound design — which we went over — and a strong sense of what the laughing/tooting scene should sound like.
'Toots' Director Chris Evans on the Quest for the Perfect Flatulence
Our lead actress, Pam Dougherty, was on board to play the aging mother. In Pam's 'fart scene,' her character would have a laughing fit, which would stimulate a symphony of toots meant to harmonize with her laughter, as if her diaphragm was pushing out both ends. When Pam and I talked this scene over, prior to filming, she said, 'I can laugh on cue no problem. But I'm not sure I can fart on cue.' I assured her no practical flatulence was required.
First, we had to film the scene. I needed reactions from the son, played brilliantly by Logan Sledge, as well as rhythmic laughter from the mom. We wanted clean audio of her laughs without the toots, so we could add them in later. In early takes, I threw out 'brrnnhh' noises, but it just didn't work. Pam looked at me one time and said, 'What does that mean?' She wasn't used to her director speaking in onomatopoeia.
The next problem I didn't foresee was that the sound designer needed a long time to get things perfect. I had to get placeholder audio in for the editors, and needed an edit so the composer could get to work. None of them would have the final sound design while they worked. People were really frightened. The early placeholder farting was truly cringe. At one point an editor took out the farting sounds and replaced them with music, so the viewer would see the scene and hear the laughing, but not the toots.
For a moment I thought she was onto something — maybe we wouldn't be able to pull this off. The composer, Lucas Lechowski, was touched by the story, but understandably nervous about the heavy-handed farting that was in the edit he was working with. Lucas tried ever so subtly to ask me to dial it back. I reassured him that his instincts were in line with mine, and that I was still working on the sound design.
Enter the real hero of this story, sound designer Gregory C. Vilfranc. Gregory and I had a long talk before we agreed to work together on this, and thankfully, he also was touched by the story. We talked about ways that the farting cadence could mimic the laughing cadence.
'Is that even possible?' I asked. He answered with some very long and technical jargon that sounded like a 'yes.'
We went back and forth trying to find just the right balance. Each time we would dial the farts back, or cut a couple out, or replace the position of where they landed. Everything had to sound real, not cartoony. It had to satisfy the moment in the story that symbolized a return to fonder days between the mother and the son.
The fart scene also had to set up a final scene in which the son finds the mother after she has peacefully expired in her sleep. Oof, heavy. If we didn't get it right, this film was going to be an embarrassment. I found myself giving Gregory notes like, 'They need to sound more demure' or, 'They need to sound like they are slipping out instead of being pushed out' or 'They need to sound more airy.'
The real magic came in this back and forth communication. I really feel like we could've kept fine-tuning forever, but at some point you have to call it finished. For me, that point was when the 'laughing scene' elicited more of a smile than a full belly laugh. Just enough humor was perfect. Too much humor would be detrimental. A little bit of feeling sorry for the mother was perfect. Feeling grossed out would be detrimental.
The real key was when the death scene felt truly heartbreaking. It's a magical thing how edits to a prior scene can completely change the feeling of the ensuing scene, especially when you're not changing the ensuing scene at all. Through strong conviction and excessive communication, the right balance of sweetness and silliness was found, and a touching story of caring for each other was preserved.
Main image: Pam Dougherty and Logan Sledge in "Toots." Courtesy of Chris Evans
Related Headlines
Lisa Dahl: Blessed by Grace Recounts a Mother's Journey From Tragedy to Nourishing Others
Sean Connery as 007: 12 Behind the Scenes Images of Bond at His Best
11 Shameless 2000s Comedies That Just Don't Care If You're Offended
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Freakier Friday Hits Cinemas, 11 Sequels That Were Better Than The Original Film
As Freakier Friday Hits Cinemas, 11 Sequels That Were Better Than The Original Film

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

As Freakier Friday Hits Cinemas, 11 Sequels That Were Better Than The Original Film

A version of this article was previously published in 2020. The old saying goes that a sequel is never as good as the original, and over the years, plenty of films have proved this to be the case. Fortunately for the team behind Freakier Friday, the long-awaited sequel to 2003′s iconic body-swap comedy, critics seem pretty impressed with the follow-up, with many hailing it as a worthy successor to Freaky Friday. But what about those rare sequels that somehow manage to better the movie that came before it? Here are 11 of the most celebrated follow-ups in modern movie history... Addams Family Values We don't use terms like 'perfection' lightly, but if there were ever a perfect family comedy then Addams Family Values might well be it. The fact it's actually a sequel to a less-revered live-action version of the classic cartoon is even more impressive. Obviously all of the cast members playing the creepy, kooky, mysterious, spooky and, indeed, altogether ooky family shine as brightly as their dark surroundings will allow (special shout-out to Anjelica Huston serving true macabre glamour as Morticia). But Addams Family Values really belongs to new addition Joan Cusack, who stars as Uncle Fester's love interest Debbie. Toy Story 3 Who'd have guessed that an animated buddy comedy about a toy cowboy and a plastic astronaut would have sparked one of the most lucrative film sagas of recent times? And while Toy Story 2 – released four years after the original – kicked things up several notches, it was the third instalment in the series that people really went wild for. Toy Story 3 served up adorable new characters, scooped an impressive Best Picture nomination at the Oscars and, crucially, delivered not one but two ugly-cry moments. Paddington 2 Even though the original Paddington film was well-received when it first hit cinemas in 2014 – featuring a CGI version of the classic character interacting with live-action actors – few could predict just how beloved its sequel would go on to become. Not only was it nominated for Outstanding British Film at the Baftas, it's also one of the few movies with a perfect score on review site Rotten Tomatoes. With 238 positive reviews, it's also the highest-rated film on the entire website. Take that, Citizen Kane. The Dark Knight Like many, we were sold on The Dark Knight from the moment we saw its infamous viral marketing campaign (back in the day when viral marketing campaigns were actually still new and exciting). We could probably talk all day about how this film is a level up on Batman Begins, from Christopher Nolan's direction, to the incredible costumes and special effects. But let's be honest, this film is all about Heath Ledger, who earned a posthumous Academy Award for his unforgettable portrayal of the Joker. Aliens Although the original Alien divided critics upon its original release in 1979, the film quickly garnered a loyal following, and by the mid-1980s, was revered among fans of sci-fi. Putting out a sequel was therefore always going to be a bit of a risk, but fortunately 1986′s Aliens more than lived up to its predecessor. It earned Sigourney Weaver a game-changing Oscar nomination as the star of a sci-fi film. It has also been named the Best Sequel Of All Time by Empire magazine. Mad Max: Fury Road Listen, we get it, Fury Road was billed as a 'revisiting' of the original Mad Max trilogy, rather than a straight-up sequel or a traditional reboot. Still, the film was so well-received – check that 97% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes if you don't believe us, not to mention its six Oscar wins – we felt we couldn't leave it off this list. Plus, who would pass up the opportunity to see Charlize Theron in all her buzzed glory again? Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back Star Wars has so many different instalments, and a fan community that stretches far and wide, that it would be literally impossible to decide which of the numerous sequels is the superior one. So while we'd struggle to pinpoint which of film is the best, we've gone with The Empire Strikes Back for the simple reason it contains arguably the most iconic moment in Star Wars history, when Darth Vader's true identity is revealed. Terminator 2: Judgement Day He said 'I'll be back', and apparently he meant it, although it did take seven years. Terminator 2: Judgement Day was hailed as even better than the original film by many critics, who were wowed by the advanced special effects (which went on to win one of the film's four Academy Awards). The success of Terminator 2 led to a number of additional spin-offs and sequels, although none of these have quite been able to match the original two films. Avengers: Endgame Essentially the sequel to around 100 other films from the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Avengers: Endgame was much-awaited when it hit cinemas in 2019, wrapping up stories that began in the Iron Man, Thor and Captain America film series. Fortunately, the majority of cinema-goers felt the ambitious project was worth the wait, with Avengers: Endgame landing rave reviews and becoming the highest-grossing film of all time (that's second-highest, when adjusted for inflation). The Godfather Part II The first sequel to ever win Best Picture at the Academy Awards (the only other being Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King), Godfather II is so revered it was added to the U.S. National Film Registry of the Library of Congress due to its cultural significance, alongside the original Godfather film. The same can not be said for the follow-up, Godfather III. Skyfall Although Casino Royale and Quantum Of Solace proved popular, many 007 fans still breathed a sigh of relief when Skyfall was released, as they felt it was more in keeping with the James Bond franchise than Daniel Craig's first two outings. Skyfall won largely positive reviews from critics, many of whom praised the decision to give more material for Dame Judi Dench to work with, and became the highest-grossing film in the UK ever at that time. Follow-up Spectre was similarly well-received, with the Daniel's fifth and final Bond film, No Time To Die, set to hit cinemas... soon. Let's just say soon. MORE FILM: Sally Hawkins Opens Up About The Real Reason She Quit The Paddington Franchise This Trailer For Netflix's Gripping New Mystery Is Jam-Packed With UK National Treasures Emerald Fennell's Wuthering Heights Just Had Its First Test Screening, And It Sounds Absolutely Wild

The foremost expert on happiness thinks your ambition is making you miserable
The foremost expert on happiness thinks your ambition is making you miserable

Fast Company

time20 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

The foremost expert on happiness thinks your ambition is making you miserable

Arthur Brooks is the poster child for an interesting and accomplished life. He has made it a practice to upend his career every decade. He played the French horn for the Barcelona orchestra, is friends with the Dalai Lama, and is the author of 14 books (including one coauthored with Oprah Winfrey). He's also a happiness evangelist and a professor at Harvard Kennedy School and Harvard Business School, where he teaches a popular course on leadership and happiness. In addition, he's a columnist for The Atlantic, where he writes weekly about the tools for building a happier life. Yet even he struggles with his own happiness, which is why he studies it. Now he's gathered his most popular essays into a new book, The Happiness Files: Insights on Work and Life (Harvard Business Review Press), which goes on sale August 12. I connected with Brooks on August 4 for an in-depth conversation, in which you'll learn: Why worrying about whether you feel happy is the wrong way to assess whether you are happy How you can stop doing the things you hate Why ambition often works as a counterpoint to happiness The following transcript has been edited for length and clarity. advertisement The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.

Have You Seen ‘Weapons'? We Talk About What It Might Mean
Have You Seen ‘Weapons'? We Talk About What It Might Mean

New York Times

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Have You Seen ‘Weapons'? We Talk About What It Might Mean

This entire article is a spoiler of 'Weapons.' 'Weapons,' the new horror movie from the writer-director Zach Cregger, is chockablock with talismans, assassins, spells and speed racing humans-turned-hell hounds. What does it all mean? A quick recap: 'Weapons' examines what happens in an American town after all but one child in a grade school class disappears overnight, leaving behind the kids' bewildered teacher, Justine, (Julia Garner), the surviving student, Alex (Cary Christopher), and the despairing parents of the missing, including Archer (Josh Brolin). Amid the chaos enters Gladys (Amy Madigan), a witch with a nefarious plan. Discussing Cregger in her review of 'Weapons,' Manohla Dargis wrote, 'He has a talent for both creating and maintaining an ominous mood, deploying a classic approach to freaking out audiences by suggesting the very worst (things seem bad!) and delaying the reveal (they are!)' Cregger declined an interview request to talk about spoilers from his film, so let's take a swing at theorizing what might have inspired him. Time Crawl Cregger patiently paces his scares and revelations, as he did in 'Barbarian (2022),' which built dread by plucking nerve after nerve before its harrowing what's-in-the-basement reveal. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store