Update after 28 die on ‘Covid cruise'
Nearly 700 passengers contracted Covid-19 on the 13-day Ruby Princess cruise from Sydney on March 8, 2020.
The Federal Court in 2023 found the cruise line, Carnival Australia, was negligent in allowing the ship to set sail following a class-action lawsuit launched by Shine Lawyers.
Justice Angus Stewart also found the cruise line misled passengers by making representations that the cruise was reasonably safe to embark on and the company would take reasonable care for the safety of passengers and increase monitoring, screening and sanitation protocols.
The class action's lead applicant, Susan Karpik, most likely contracted Covid on-board the ship along with her husband, Henry Karpik, Justice Stewart found.
Her husband became so sick from the virus that he was given only a few days to live at one stage, spending nearly two months in hospital during which time he was intubated, ventilated and placed into an induced coma. Mr Karpik survived the ordeal. Susan Karpik was the lead applicant in the class action launched by Shine Lawyers. NewsWire / Dylan Coker Credit: News Corp Australia
Mrs Karpik experienced minor symptoms of the virus; however, she was unable to be with her husband, as she was in isolation and feared he might die.
Justice Stewart found that she'd suffered psychiatric illness as a result but did not uphold her claims that she suffered long Covid.
Mrs Karpik lodged an appeal against her damages; she'd sought more than $360,000 but was only awarded $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses. Mrs Karpik's husband was at one stage given only days to live. NewsWire / Dylan Coker Credit: News Corp Australia
Carnival Australia also lodged a cross-appeal against Justice Stewart's findings.
Justice Sarah Derrington dismissed both appeals in the Federal Court on Tuesday morning.
Her reasons are expected to be published on Tuesday.
More to come …
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
Science fraudster shows independent research watchdog a necessity
Professor Mark Smyth was once considered one of this country's leading cancer researchers. Yet as The Age has reported in the past week, alarming aspects of his work have put into question both his research and the manner in which complaints about his work have been investigated. At core is this: integrity and trust. The Age revealed that while Smyth was working at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, he faced inquiries into falsifying research data. A preliminary investigation found he had a case to answer based on claims of falsified data. That prompted a second probe by the University of Melbourne, which cleared him. Smyth left Peter Mac in 2013 after being hired by leading research institute QIMR Berghofer in Brisbane in 2012. At QIMR, members of his lab team raised concerns about his practices. He was investigated twice, secretly, and no problems were detected. Whistleblowers went looking elsewhere for help. They approached the Office of the Chief Scientist and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), which oversees research integrity. The whistleblowers were referred back to QIMR. Then, finally, four years ago, amid the turmoil of the COVID-19 pandemic, an external independent investigation for the institute found research misconduct by Smyth. He left. This circuitous route of investigation is unacceptable, as is the fact that the report has never been released. The Age 's reports have shown an unhealthy nexus between taxpayer funding for institutions, self-interest and a system ill-equipped to manage complaints. Smyth was protected, it appeared to those complaining, partly because he was a cash cow, having attracted more than $42 million in taxpayer funding for his projects over his career. A staff member at QIMR said of Smyth's work practices: 'Mark was bringing money to the institute, so the institute protected Mark.' Who then protects the integrity of the science?
News.com.au
13 hours ago
- News.com.au
Woman loses bid to challenge damages awarded after husband nearly died following ‘Covid cruise'
A woman whose husband nearly died following a major Covid outbreak on a cruise that led to 28 deaths has lost her challenge to the damages she was awarded. Nearly 700 passengers contracted Covid-19 on the 13-day Ruby Princess cruise from Sydney on March 8, 2020. The Federal Court in 2023 found the cruise line, Carnival Australia, was negligent in allowing the ship to set sail following a class-action lawsuit launched by Shine Lawyers. Justice Angus Stewart also found the cruise line misled passengers by making representations that the cruise was reasonably safe to embark on and the company would take reasonable care for the safety of passengers and increase monitoring, screening and sanitation protocols. The class action's lead applicant, Susan Karpik, most likely contracted Covid on-board the ship along with her husband, Henry Karpik, Justice Stewart found. Her husband became so sick from the virus that he was given only a few days to live at one stage, spending nearly two months in hospital during which time he was intubated, ventilated and placed into an induced coma. Mr Karpik survived the ordeal. Mrs Karpik experienced minor symptoms of the virus; however, she was unable to be with her husband, as she was in isolation and feared he might die. Justice Stewart found that she'd suffered psychiatric illness as a result but did not uphold her claims that she suffered long Covid. Mrs Karpik lodged an appeal against her personal injury, disappointment and distress damages; she'd sought more than $300,000 but was only awarded about $4000 as a refund for her ticket. Carnival Australia also lodged a cross-appeal against Justice Stewart's findings of negligence and misleading representations. Justice Sarah Derrington dismissed both appeals in the Federal Court on Tuesday morning, ordering each party to pay for each other's costs. 'Each of the appeal and the cross-appeal have failed in their entirety,' Justice Derrington said. She upheld the findings of Justice Stewart that Carnival Australia breached consumer guarantees and its duty of care to passengers by not cancelling the cruise, nor warning Mrs Karpik of the heightened risk of the virus on the cruise. Justice Derrington also found the primary judge was correct in concluding Mrs Karpik's damages didn't exceed the cost of the ticket refund she was given, and she wasn't entitled to personal injury damages, as it fell below the severity required. Justice Derrington described how Mr Karpik was 'gravely ill and nearly died' in her reasons for judgment, with Mrs Karpik unable to be by her husband's side, as she was told he only had about a 10 per cent shot at survival while she was still self-isolating. Mr Karpik's condition improved over the following days and he survived despite a 'long and difficult recovery'. Shine Lawyers joint head of class action Vicky Antzoulatos said she was pleased with the Federal Court's upholding of negligence findings in a statement outside of court. 'The Full Court has upheld the comprehensive findings of Justice Stewart, the trial judge, that Carnival Cruises was negligent and breached the Australian Consumer Law in its conduct of the voyage of the Ruby Princess in March 2020,' Ms Antzoulatos said. 'The Full Court has also upheld the trial findings in relation to Mrs Karpik's damages. 'The case is now in its fifth year, and sadly, several of the passengers on this ill-fated cruise have now passed away.' Ms Antzoulatos said passengers can have their claims assessed. 'We hope this result will lead to a meaningful resolution of their claims so that they can finally put this sorry episode of their lives behind them,' she said.
Perth Now
14 hours ago
- Perth Now
Update after 28 die on ‘Covid cruise'
A woman whose husband was told he had just days to live following a major Covid outbreak on a cruise that led to 28 deaths has lost her challenge to the damages she was awarded. Nearly 700 passengers contracted Covid-19 on the 13-day Ruby Princess cruise from Sydney on March 8, 2020. The Federal Court in 2023 found the cruise line, Carnival Australia, was negligent in allowing the ship to set sail following a class-action lawsuit launched by Shine Lawyers. Justice Angus Stewart also found the cruise line misled passengers by making representations that the cruise was reasonably safe to embark on and the company would take reasonable care for the safety of passengers and increase monitoring, screening and sanitation protocols. The class action's lead applicant, Susan Karpik, most likely contracted Covid on-board the ship along with her husband, Henry Karpik, Justice Stewart found. Her husband became so sick from the virus that he was given only a few days to live at one stage, spending nearly two months in hospital during which time he was intubated, ventilated and placed into an induced coma. Mr Karpik survived the ordeal. Susan Karpik was the lead applicant in the class action launched by Shine Lawyers. NewsWire / Dylan Coker Credit: News Corp Australia Mrs Karpik experienced minor symptoms of the virus; however, she was unable to be with her husband, as she was in isolation and feared he might die. Justice Stewart found that she'd suffered psychiatric illness as a result but did not uphold her claims that she suffered long Covid. Mrs Karpik lodged an appeal against her damages; she'd sought more than $360,000 but was only awarded $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses. Mrs Karpik's husband was at one stage given only days to live. NewsWire / Dylan Coker Credit: News Corp Australia Carnival Australia also lodged a cross-appeal against Justice Stewart's findings. Justice Sarah Derrington dismissed both appeals in the Federal Court on Tuesday morning. Her reasons are expected to be published on Tuesday. More to come …
