Trump tariffs force Greek olive oil producers to seek new markets
Within weeks, his family-run company had found a new buyer in Brazil, where Portuguese olive oil typically dominates. His first shipment of 15,000 bottles is expected to arrive in the port of Itapoa in two weeks.
When Reuters visited his farm on Friday, Papadopoulos was close to sealing a separate deal with a new customer in Australia.
"I think we learned a lesson from Trump not to rely with all our strength on one market... and to always have alternatives," Papadopoulos said in his olive oil mill and bottling plant, surrounded by thousands of bottles and huge tanks filled with the golden liquid.
Trump announced a 30% tariff on European products that has sent shivers through industries from wine and peaches to cars. Papadopoulos' decision shows just how wide the fallout could be as producers grow weary even of the threats of tariffs.
Greece, the fifth-largest exporter of olive oil to the United States, ships about 8,000-10,000 tonnes there annually. Three of the other top producers - Spain, Italy and Portugal - are in Europe and face the same conundrum.
The industry is huge for Greece, whose rolling hills are filled with groves of ancient, crooked olive trees.
The Papadopoulos family company exported 350 tonnes of extra virgin olive oil in 2024 to the U.S., about one-third of its total exports, and 100 tonnes so far this year. He estimates that if Trump's tariff materialises sales to the U.S. will fall by about 40% this year.
"While we had built all our infrastructure based on a large scale on the American market, suddenly we see it disappearing," Papadopoulos said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
27 minutes ago
- Finextra
Europe must provide more support for stablecoins or face subservience to the US dollar
Jürgen Schaaf, an economist and advisor to the European Central Bank's Market Infrastructure and Payments division, says more support should be provided for properly regulated euro-denominated stablecoins to ward off the threat posed by US dollar-backed tokens. 0 US dollar-based stablecoins currently account for some 99% of total stablecoin market capitalisation. In contrast, euro-denominated stablecoins remain marginal - with market capitalisation of less than €350 million. Their appeal lies in functioning as a blockchain-based money equivalent which is liquid, globally transferable, and perceived as a stable and solid store of value. Given their growing scale and complexity, stablecoins also present knotty challenges for financial stability, monetary sovereignty, the smooth functioning of payment systems and international policy coordination Stablecoins still remain dwarfed by 'conventional' financial assets. However, they are starting to come out of their niche and become more entangled with traditional financial institutions, creating potential threats to financial stability. Says Schaaf: "A disorderly collapse could reverberate across the financial system, and the risk of contagion is a growing concern for central banks." In its Annual Economic Report 2025, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) issued a stark warning about stablecoins. Its concerns include the potential for stablecoins to undermine monetary sovereignty, transparency issues and the risk of capital flight from emerging economies. The BIS pointed out that many stablecoins have seen substantial deviations from par, highlighting the 'fragility of their peg'. The emergence of interest-bearing stablecoins also throws up more challenges, in that, if more business started using them, they could divert deposits from traditional banks, which could jeopardise financial intermediation and hamper credit availability. This would be a bigger issue in Europe, where banks play a central role in the financial system and deposits are their main source of refinancing. Should US dollar stablecoins become widely used in the euro area - whether for payments, savings or settlement - the ECB's control over monetary conditions could be weakened, warns Schaaf. "This encroachment, though gradual, could echo patterns observed in dollarised economies, especially if users seek perceived safety or yield advantages that are not available in euro-denominated instruments," he says. "Such dynamics would be difficult to reverse given the network character of stablecoins and the economies of scale in this context. The larger their footprint, the harder these would be to unwind. If the use of US dollar-denominated stablecoins continues to increase through traditional channels, they may compete directly with euro-based instruments in cross-border transactions. In tokenised settlement, where a reliable digital cash equivalent is key, US dollar stablecoins may cement their early dominance unless credible euro alternatives materialise." The US Administration has made it clear - through executive orders, congressional testimony and social media - that its support for stablecoins goes beyond just encouraging technological innovation. The goal is twofold: to protect the US dollar's global dominance by expanding its use on digital platforms worldwide; and to reduce borrowing costs by increasing demand for US Treasuries through stablecoin reserve holdings. If Europe is to come unscathed thropugh the maelstrom, policy makers must adapt their thinking and embrace the coming disruption, says Schaaf. "While the neutrality of public institutions is often preferred, a strategic blind spot in this space could prove costly," he says. "Euro-based stablecoins, if designed to high standards and effective risk mitigation, could serve legitimate market needs. They could also reinforce the international role of the euro." He contends that Europe's stable institutional framework and rules-based approach provide a solid foundation for mitigating the risks posed. "If the Eurosystem and the European Union can build on this advantage - through robust regulation, infrastructure investment and digital currency innovation - the euro could emerge from this period of change as a stronger currency.," he concludes"In a world of shifting sands, the euro has the potential to be the bedrock on which others can build."
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Former Pizza Express boss in talks with Wildwood restaurant owner
The restaurant firm behind the Wildwood chain has said it is in talks with restaurant tycoon David Page over a deal which could see him join the company and secure new investment. Shares in the company have dropped to a record low in recent weeks in the face of tumbling revenues as it seeks to turn around its fortunes. On Monday, it confirmed it has held talks with David Page, the former boss of Pizza Express and Franco Manca owner The Fulham Shore over a move which would see him appointed to the group's board. Tasty, which also owns the Dim T brand, said it is also in talks with Fulham Shore finance director Nicholas Wong as part of the proposed deal. The group is also 'evaluating funding options' as a result, which could include raising cash through an equity placing. It comes after Sky News reported that Mr Page is seeking to secure close to £10 million in new funding from institutional investors. The report indicated that a deal could see Mr Page installed as executive chairman of Tasty and rename the business as Bow Street Group on the London Stock Exchange. Tasty, which runs 36 restaurants, saw revenues tumble by 21.9% last year due to a restructuring. Last year, the group closed 18 restaurants as part of its turnaround efforts. Shares in the company shot 81% higher to 1p following the update on Monday. This gives the company a market capitalisation worth just under £2 million.
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New data reveals millions of Brits are holding money in cash savings
Britain has a problem. Millions of people are holding money in cash savings, and as a result are losing out on the potential long-term returns from investing. More than half of adults, 58 per cent, and equivalent to some 31.4million people are unwilling to face short-term losses on investments because they have low 'emotional' capacity for risk, new data from Interactive Investor reveals. Of course, watching your hard-earned cash fall in value when invested is tough to take, and for many this money is needed in case of emergencies, or simply to pay for day-to-day expenses. However, a third of those who said they didn't have the emotional capacity to take investment risk, as many as nine million people, do have the financial resilience to do so. Interactive Investor said this leads to these people 'under-investing', with 71 per cent of the 3,000 people surveyed owning no investments outside of their pension. Richard Wilson, chief executive of Interactive Investor , said: 'Our research has unearthed a safety-first instinct among savers that presents a serious challenge for the UK. 'Millions of people have the financial capacity to invest, but don't believe it's worth the risk - over a lifetime that's likely to have a serious impact on their financial resilience. 'The dangers of not taking any risk are fast climbing up the political and regulatory agenda, and analysis shows that Britain has the lowest levels of equity ownership outside of pensions of any G7 country, with a disproportionate amount in cash and property.' In fact, as few as 12 per cent of people have a high emotional capacity for risk. A slightly higher proportion, 19 per cent, had a high risk tolerance. That phrase refers to how willing people are to accept the possibility of losses in favour of higher returns in the long term. Still, around 57 per cent of people still scored low for risk tolerance, meaning that they aren't willing to take risks for rewards in the long term, even when financially stable. Greg Davies, head of behavioural finance at Oxford Risk, said: 'Most people invest too little and take less risk than they could safely afford. This isn't about logic - it's about emotion. Emotional discomfort with short-term market ups and downs leads even financially resilient investors to underinvest. 'For those with high financial capacity, the emotional gap is often greatest: they could afford to aim higher, but their feelings hold them back.' Data from the Bank of England reveals that in May an eye-watering £280billion worth of cash was sitting in UK bank accounts earning no interest. The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has launched a campaign to promote retail investing among ordinary people, promoting investing over holding large sums of money in cash. Meanwhile, 'targeted support' reforms will come into play next year, offering tailored recommendations based on what people in similar financial circumstances are doing with their money. Along with this came fears that the Chancellor would scrap the cash Isa in a bid to push more towards investing. On the news that this wouldn't be the case - for now at least - savers breathed an audible sigh of relief. At the same time though, many resigned themselves to continuing to miss out on much higher returns. Interestingly, just three per cent said they would have a higher tolerance for investing if cash Isa tax benefits were slashed. Meanwhile, 41 per cent said they would invest if they had more money, while 16 per cent said they would do so if they understood investments better. While it Is recommended that savers only invest cash that they can afford to lose, as well as making sure that they build up an emergency pot and cash savings before doing so, many are sitting on cash pots earning no interest.
