Jay Leno Supports Lifting Smog Checks For Classic Cars
Read the full story on The Auto Wire
Former Tonight Show host and comedian Jay Leno is backing a new bill in California which would wave the smog check requirement for certain classic cars. In fact, Senate Bill 172 is being called 'Leno's Law' already.If the bill passes, it would do away with the current requirement in California of a biennial smog check for any car that's 35 model years or older. The catch is the vehicle has to be insured as a collector car.
For those who don't know, collector car insurance is extended based on more limited use of a vehicle. Most policies put a hard cap on how many miles can be logged in a year, insuring that you're not using the car to commute or do other daily tasks.
The bill, which is sponsored by State Senator Shannon Grove, is supposed to keep the Golden State friendly to car enthusiasts. We personally know some who have either heavily considered or actually taken the plunge and moved because they feel the hobby is no longer respected or tolerated there.
'These rolling pieces of history are more than just vehicles—they have strong cultural ties in our communities and supply thousands of jobs in the aftermarket parts industry,' Grove said in a statement.
Considering the history California has when it comes to automotive culture, and the industry which has sprouted up around it, we can understand why Grove and Leno would be working to preserve what's left of it.
One big question is will this bill pass and become law? We're sure some will have a problem with it considering how aggressively some have pursued the goal of downright outlawing internal combustion engines. But classic cars contribute little to air pollution since they're driven irregularly.
'Our classic cars are only driven for special occasions, weekend drives and car shows. I am excited to work with Senator Grove on SB 712 to make it simpler for us to preserve these pieces of history,' Leno said.
Source: Fox 5 San Diego
Image via Jay Leno's Garage/YouTube
Join our Newsletter, subscribe to our YouTube page, and follow us on Facebook.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Not A Serious Analysis': Reeves' 'Baffling' Spending Plan Slammed By Leading Economists
Rachel Reeves' spending review has been slammed by leading economists who said it was not a 'serious department analysis'. The chancellor unveiled her plans to spend an extra £300 billion over the next three years on Wednesday, divvying out huge sums of cash to the NHS, net zero and defence – while also squeezing other Whitehall budgets. The government has said this is all an investment in Britain's renewal, and insisted that these decisions are fully-financed after Labour hiked taxes in last year's Budget. However, the director of think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) Paul Johnson tore into her announcement on Thursday. 'If you were baffled by the chancellor's speech yesterday, so were we,' he said during the IFS's analysis livestream on YouTube. 'It did not appear to be a serious effort to provide useful information to anybody.' He also seemed to criticise the premise that the economy is now in better place than it was a year ago, hence Labour's decision to spend again – and reverse some cuts. 'Despite some of the rather odd recent claims, neither the economic forecasts nor the public finances have improved relative to the genuinely difficult situation we knew about a year ago,' Johnson said. 'Rather the reverse. Hence some difficult choices.' Large council tax hikes have been included in the government expectations for the review, which also 'assumes that council tax bills will rise by 5% a year', according to the IFS chief. That means bills will rise at their fastest rate 'over any parliament since 2001-05.' Johnson laid into the cuts Reeves is imposing on other Whitehall departments in order to boost the NHS, defence and net zero, too. He said: 'Every department is facing the same administrative costs, 10% for all of them over the three years, and then another 5% in 2029-30. 'All of that is irrespective of how much they've grown, irrespective of planned spending increases, irrespective of anything at all. 'That is not the result of a serious department analysis. 'I hesitate to accuse the Treasury of making numbers up but…' He noted that total departmental spending is set to grow at 2.3% a year above economy-wide inflation. That's lower growth than was recorded over the 2019-2024 parliament, when it increased at 3.6% per year. 'This is a long period during which spending will be growing faster than the economy,' he said. Johnson even questioned the suggestion that the NHS had fared particularly well, noting: 'Health spending nearly always gets topped up. Growth of 3% a year is below the historic average.' Mounting pressures on spending, including the U-turn on winter fuel allowance for pensioners and the backlash against disability benefit cuts, means Reeves is expected to either introduce more cuts or hike taxes in the autumn Budget to pay for it all. Johnson noted: 'Nobody should be in any doubt that the chancellor has had some incredibly tough decisions to take. 'With spending plans set, and 'ironclad' fiscal rules being met by gnat's whisker, any move in the wrong direction will almost certainly spark more tax rises.' Nick Ferrari Calls Rachel Reeves 'The Klarna Chancellor' After She Splashed The Cash In Spending Review Blow For Rachel Reeves As UK Economy Shrank By 0.3% After Trump Tariffs Rachel Reeves Takes Axe To Whitehall Departments To Pay For Health And Defence Cash Splurge
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Not A Serious Analysis': Reeves' 'Baffling' Spending Plan Slammed By Leading Economists
Rachel Reeves' spending review has been slammed by leading economists who said it was not a 'serious department analysis'. The chancellor unveiled her plans to spend an extra £300 billion over the next three years on Wednesday, divvying out huge sums of cash to the NHS, net zero and defence – while also squeezing other Whitehall budgets. The government has said this is all an investment in Britain's renewal, and insisted that these decisions are fully-financed after Labour hiked taxes in last year's Budget. However, the director of think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) Paul Johnson tore into her announcement on Thursday. 'If you were baffled by the chancellor's speech yesterday, so were we,' he said during the IFS's analysis livestream on YouTube. 'It did not appear to be a serious effort to provide useful information to anybody.' He also seemed to criticise the premise that the economy is now in better place than it was a year ago, hence Labour's decision to spend again – and reverse some cuts. 'Despite some of the rather odd recent claims, neither the economic forecasts nor the public finances have improved relative to the genuinely difficult situation we knew about a year ago,' Johnson said. 'Rather the reverse. Hence some difficult choices.' Large council tax hikes have been included in the government expectations for the review, which also 'assumes that council tax bills will rise by 5% a year', according to the IFS chief. That means bills will rise at their fastest rate 'over any parliament since 2001-05.' Johnson laid into the cuts Reeves is imposing on other Whitehall departments in order to boost the NHS, defence and net zero, too. He said: 'Every department is facing the same administrative costs, 10% for all of them over the three years, and then another 5% in 2029-30. 'All of that is irrespective of how much they've grown, irrespective of planned spending increases, irrespective of anything at all. 'That is not the result of a serious department analysis. 'I hesitate to accuse the Treasury of making numbers up but…' He noted that total departmental spending is set to grow at 2.3% a year above economy-wide inflation. That's lower growth than was recorded over the 2019-2024 parliament, when it increased at 3.6% per year. 'This is a long period during which spending will be growing faster than the economy,' he said. Johnson even questioned the suggestion that the NHS had fared particularly well, noting: 'Health spending nearly always gets topped up. Growth of 3% a year is below the historic average.' Mounting pressures on spending, including the U-turn on winter fuel allowance for pensioners and the backlash against disability benefit cuts, means Reeves is expected to either introduce more cuts or hike taxes in the autumn Budget to pay for it all. Johnson noted: 'Nobody should be in any doubt that the chancellor has had some incredibly tough decisions to take. 'With spending plans set, and 'ironclad' fiscal rules being met by gnat's whisker, any move in the wrong direction will almost certainly spark more tax rises.' Nick Ferrari Calls Rachel Reeves 'The Klarna Chancellor' After She Splashed The Cash In Spending Review Blow For Rachel Reeves As UK Economy Shrank By 0.3% After Trump Tariffs Rachel Reeves Takes Axe To Whitehall Departments To Pay For Health And Defence Cash Splurge
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
YouTube says its ecosystem created 490K jobs and added $55B to the US GDP in 2024
YouTube released a report on Tuesday that shows just how influential the creator economy has become. YouTube says that its creative ecosystem contributed over $55 billion to the U.S. GDP and supported more than 490,000 full-time jobs, according to research by Oxford Economics. When YouTube talks about its creative ecosystem, it's not just talking about creators. This includes anyone who works with YouTube creators (video editors, assistants, publicists), as well as people who work for creator-oriented companies (Patreon, Spotter, Linktree, etc.). But these figures continue to grow, even in a time when venture capitalists are no longer pouring money into the industry like they were about four years ago. In 2022, YouTube and Oxford Economics reported that its creative ecosystem created about 390,000 jobs and contributed over $35 billion to the U.S. GDP, meaning that these 2024 figures jumped by 100,000 jobs and $20 billion. These numbers are so large because YouTube provides the most consistent and lucrative opportunities for creators. Those who qualify for YouTube's Partner Program can earn 55% of revenue earned from ads; even for mid-range creators (not the MrBeasts of the world), that can amount to several thousand dollars a month. While TikTok and YouTube Shorts have tried to monetize their platforms, the industry hasn't figured out a way to reliably distribute ad revenue among short-form creators. As both a fast-growing and often misunderstood sector, creators have been advocating for American institutions, from banks to the government, to better serve their industry. Some creators struggle to qualify for business credit cards or get certain business loans, regardless of their demonstrable financial solvency. These issues have become common enough to draw attention. Just last week, U.S. Representatives Yvette Clark (D-NY) and Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) announced their bipartisan Congressional Creators Caucus to support and recognize the potential of the creator economy. Sign in to access your portfolio
