NCLAT stays insolvency proceedings against Reliance Infrastructure
Reliance Infrastructure in its latest regulatory filing said that the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has stayed an NCLT order over an appeal filed by it.
The Mumbai bench of the the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on May 30 this year directed initiation the
corporate insolvency resolution process
and appointment of an interim resolution professional against Reliance Infrastructure.
The NCLT order came after IDBI Trusteeship in April 2022 had filed a petition alleging a default of ₹88.68 crore plus interest as of August 28, 2018.
In a regulatory filing on June 2 this year, Reliance Infrastructure said the NCLT order has become infructuous "upon full payment having already been made".
On June 4, NCLAT had suspended the NCLT order while hearing the company's appeal which said it has made the full payment of ₹92.68 crore to Dhursar Solar Power Pvt Ltd (DSPPL).
"The company has made full payment of ₹92.68 crore to Dhursar Solar Power Private Limited, towards claim of tariff as per the Energy Purchase Agreement with the company," Reliance Infra had said in its June 2 statement.
IDBI Trusteeship in its petition had alleged payment defaults on 10 invoices raised between 2017 and 2018 by DSPPL for supplying solar energy to Reliance Infrastructure.
The payments were sought by IDBI Trusteeship, the security trustee of DSPPL. PTI
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Google's antitrust suit: SC admits cross appeals
The Supreme Court on Friday admitted a batch of cross-appeals by Google Inc., its related companies, the Competition Commission of India (CCI), and the Alliance Digital India Foundation against a National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) March order that partially upheld the antitrust regulator's findings that Google abused its dominant position in its Play Store policy.A bench comprising Justice PS Narasimha and Justice Atul S Chandurkar said it will hear the case in Inc and its related companies—Alphabet Inc, Google Ireland, Google India, Google India Digital Services—and others have challenged the March 28 judgment by the NCLAT, which largely affirmed the CCI's core findings that Google abused its dominant position in multiple markets in the Android mobile device ecosystem through its Play Store policies and engaged in unfair promotion of Google Pay, thereby violating Section 4(2)(e) of the Competition tech companies have also challenged the NCLAT's May 1 order that corrected its "inadvertent error" in its original judgment, reinstating CCI's two key data-related directives, which require the tech giant to disclose its data policies and refrain from leveraging billing data for competitive CCI's October 2020 order had penalised Google for allegedly exploiting its dominant position in markets such as online search and the Android app store. The competition watchdog had imposed a penalty of Rs 936 crore against the tech giant and its companies for engaging in anti-competitive behaviour by mandating the use of its Google Play Billing System for app purchases, while exempting its own applications like YouTube from similar commission structures. The antitrust body had also directed Google to cease these practices, including allowing third-party billing and ensuring data the appellate tribunal affirmed the CCI's s order that Google imposed unfair and discriminatory conditions on app developers through mandatory use of Google Play billing system for paid apps and in-app purchases, it set aside the competition watchdog's findings regarding denial of market access and restriction of innovation on the grounds that Google's billing services constituted less than 1% of total UPI transactions and that there was insufficient evidence of market foreclosure or hindrance to technical original penalty of Rs 936.44 crore was also reduced by the NCLAT to Rs 216.69 crore by limiting it to Play Store-specific revenues rather than Google's global turnover. The appellate tribunal also rejected some findings of the antitrust body's order, which the CCI has challenged now in the startups, including People Interactive India (operator of Shaadi. com), Mebigo Labs (owner of Kuku FM), the Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation, and the Indian Digital Media Industry Foundation, had moved the CCI seeking a probe into Google's functioning.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Google's antitrust suit: SC admits cross appeals
The Supreme Court on Friday admitted a batch of cross-appeals by Google Inc., its related companies, the Competition Commission of India (CCI), and the Alliance Digital India Foundation against a National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) March order that partially upheld the antitrust regulator's findings that Google abused its dominant position in its Play Store policy.A bench comprising Justice PS Narasimha and Justice Atul S Chandurkar said it will hear the case in November. Google Inc and its related companies—Alphabet Inc, Google Ireland, Google India, Google India Digital Services—and others have challenged the March 28 judgment by the NCLAT, which largely affirmed the CCI's core findings that Google abused its dominant position in multiple markets in the Android mobile device ecosystem through its Play Store policies and engaged in unfair promotion of Google Pay, thereby violating Section 4(2)(e) of the Competition Act. The tech companies have also challenged the NCLAT's May 1 order that corrected its "inadvertent error" in its original judgment, reinstating CCI's two key data-related directives, which require the tech giant to disclose its data policies and refrain from leveraging billing data for competitive advantage. The CCI's October 2020 order had penalised Google for allegedly exploiting its dominant position in markets such as online search and the Android app store. The competition watchdog had imposed a penalty of Rs 936 crore against the tech giant and its companies for engaging in anti-competitive behaviour by mandating the use of its Google Play Billing System for app purchases, while exempting its own applications like YouTube from similar commission structures. The antitrust body had also directed Google to cease these practices, including allowing third-party billing and ensuring data transparency. While the appellate tribunal affirmed the CCI's s order that Google imposed unfair and discriminatory conditions on app developers through mandatory use of Google Play billing system for paid apps and in-app purchases, it set aside the competition watchdog's findings regarding denial of market access and restriction of innovation on the grounds that Google's billing services constituted less than 1% of total UPI transactions and that there was insufficient evidence of market foreclosure or hindrance to technical original penalty of Rs 936.44 crore was also reduced by the NCLAT to Rs 216.69 crore by limiting it to Play Store-specific revenues rather than Google's global turnover. The appellate tribunal also rejected some findings of the antitrust body's order, which the CCI has challenged now in the startups, including People Interactive India (operator of Shaadi. com), Mebigo Labs (owner of Kuku FM), the Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation, and the Indian Digital Media Industry Foundation, had moved the CCI seeking a probe into Google's functioning.
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Good news for Anil Ambani's, can now recover Rs 284830000000 dues from…, Reliance Infrastructure gets nod by…
BSES Yamuna Power Ltd and BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd, subsidiaries of Reliance Infrastructure, are set to recover power dues totaling Rs 28,483 crore after a Supreme Court verdict. According to Reliance Infrastructure, as of July 31, 2025, the combined outstanding dues of the two discoms stand at Rs 28,483 crore. The two power distribution companies (discoms), in which Reliance Infrastructure (RInfra) holds 51 per cent, supply electricity to 5.3 million households in Delhi. The remaining 49 per cent stake is with the Delhi government. Reliance Infrastructure On Recovery Of Power Dues In a regulatory filing on Friday, Reliance Infrastructure (RInfra) said its subsidiaries will 'recover Rs 28,483 crore of regulatory assets over a period of 4 years starting retrospectively from April 1, 2024', following a Supreme Court order that has set guidelines for the recovery of regulatory assets. The Apex Court on Wednesday directed that the regulatory assets, including carrying costs to the tune of Rs 27,200.37 crore, to be paid within three years to Delhi's three private discoms. Regulatory assets, essentially deferred revenue gaps to be recovered in future tariffs, have risen sharply, reaching Rs 12,993.53 crore for BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd, Rs 8,419.14 crore for BSES Yamuna Power Ltd and Rs 5,787.70 crore for Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd as on March 31, 2024, totalling Rs 27,200.37 crore. Infra Petition Over Tariff RInfra further said its subsidiaries had filed a writ petition and civil appeals in 2014 before the Supreme Court, raising the issue of 'non-cost reflective tariff, unlawful creation of regulatory asset and non-liquidation of regulatory asset'. The writ petitions along with connected matters were heard at length by the Supreme Court, and after hearing all parties, including the state governments and state electricity regulatory commissions. As per the order, RInfra said, Electricity Regulatory Commissions (ERCs) must provide the roadmap for liquidation of existing regulatory assets, which will include provisions for dealing with carrying costs. ERCs must also undertake a strict and intensive audit of the circumstances in which the Discoms have continued without recovery of Regulatory Assets, it said. (With Inputs From PTI)
