New map reveals the most financially distressed states in the US — see which was dubbed most ‘desperate'
The US has been plagued by economic uncertainty of late, but some regions were definitely hit harder than others. Personal finance company WalletHub recently unveiled a map showing the states with the most people suffering from financial distress — finding that Texas topped the list in this regard.
That's right, despite being the largest economy in the world — with a GDP bigger than most countries — the Lone Star State has been in dire straits financially due to its citizens' low credit scores, deferred payments and bankruptcy filings, per the survey.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, New York came in at an unimpressive 19th place, proving that Empire Staters are floundering financially despite the Big Apple boasting the most billionaires on Earth.
4 'Measuring the share of residents in financial distress is a good way to take the pulse of a state and see whether people are generally thriving or having trouble making ends meet,' said WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo. 'When you combine data about people delaying payments with other metrics like bankruptcy filings and credit score changes, it paints a good picture of the overall economic trends of a state.'
Yakobchuk Olena – stock.adobe.com
WalletHub defined financial distress as having a credit account that is in forbearance, meaning 'the account holder is temporarily allowed to not make payments due to financial difficulty,' per the site.
Advertisement
This trend has unfortunately been on the rise as the country faces skyrocketing inflation — the effects of which have been exacerbated by tariffs and other government expenditures — fluctuating unemployment, natural disasters and other factors that have made it harder for Americans to pay their bills.
To determine which regions were the most impacted, WalletHub compared the 50 states across key metrics, including average credit score, the change in the number of bankruptcy filings over the last year, and the percentage of people with accounts in distress.
4 Big Bend National Park in Texas, whose citizens were the most financial distressed, per the survey.
Zack Frank – stock.adobe.com
They also factored in the frequency of searches involving the terms while creating the map, which was based on data from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, credit reporting firm TransUnion, Google Trends, and its own database.
Advertisement
WalletHub then calculated the 'weighted average across all metrics to calculate an overall score for each state and used the resulting scores to rank-order the states.'
'Measuring the share of residents in financial distress is a good way to take the pulse of a state and see whether people are generally thriving or having trouble making ends meet,' said WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo. 'When you combine data about people delaying payments with other metrics like bankruptcy filings and credit score changes, it paints a good picture of the overall economic trends of a state.'
4 Waikiki Beach and Diamond Head on Oahu, Hawaii, whose residents boasted the lowest levels of financial distress.
tomas del amo – stock.adobe.com
Texas placed first in the economic hardship Olympiad.
Advertisement
The Southwestern hub's struggles were evident in the fact that its citizens boasted the ninth-lowest average credit score in first quarter of 2025, the third highest number of accounts with deferred payments and the seventh highest share of people with distressed accounts — at 7.1%.
Texans also Google the terms 'debt' and 'loans' at an alarming clip, illustrating many people are 'desperate to borrow, despite already owing money,' per the site.
4 New York placed 19th when it came to the number of citizens with financial distress.
Nicholas J. Klein – stock.adobe.com
Clocking in second was Florida with the 'Panhandler' state boasting the second-highest increase in the percentage of people with distressed accounts from March 2024 to March 2024 — at nearly 23%.
It also had sixth-highest overall share of people with accounts in distress, at 7.3%, redefining the term 'tropical depression.'
Meanwhile, rounding out the top three were Louisiana, Nevada and South Carolina.
Here are the ten states with the most people in financial distress
Texas Florida Louisiana Nevada South Carolina Oklahoma North Carolina Mississippi Kentucky Alabama
Thankfully, not all of the country was embroiled in as much economic turmoil.
Advertisement
The states with the lowest levels of financial distress were Hawaii, Vermont, and Alaska while New Jersey placed an admirable 7th place in this regard.
Here are the 10 states with the lowest levels of financial distress
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
38 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
21 Of The Biggest "Silent Scams" Society Just Accepts
Recently, I came upon a post from Reddit user Sweet_Programmer_592 on the popular Ask Reddit page that looked kind of interesting. In it, they asked, "What's a silent scam in society that everybody just accepts?" and whew, were the answers varied. Here are some of the best: "Subscription-based EVERYTHING nowadays." "Health insurance. It's all made-up numbers. 30,000% mark-ups. But hey, you save with insurance! All you have to do is pay $250 a month plus the entire $6,000 deductible for it to even kick in..." "Health insurance and the fact that dental is separate." "Paying tax on a used car (or used anything, really)." "Taxpayer-funded research that is patented and privatized as soon as it yields results, and then is sold back to the same taxpayers that funded its development." "Shrinkflation: Companies quietly reduce product sizes but keep prices the same, so we pay more per unit without realizing it. It's accepted as normal inflation, but it's really a sneaky price hike." "Almost literally everything now. Everything that used to work, flawed or otherwise, is now a grift. Nothing functions correctly, companies don't sell or make things people want, nothing that used to work and last can work and last now because in order for the company to make more money this year than last year, they need to sell you another one." "Megachurches being tax-exempt. They're allowed to meddle in politics, help sway elections, and all kinds of other BS, but get to reap billions of dollars tax-free." "Timeshares." "Ticketing fees. When you buy tickets online, extra fees get added for things like 'processing' or a 'service fee.' Everyone just accepts them, but it's basically paying more for an automated service." "Taxpayers subsidizing ballparks and stadiums." "The cost of funeral services." "Pop-up ads. You use my bandwidth to tell me blatant lies about things I don't need." "Tipping. It's the employer's role to pay their employees fairly." "Paying to park at a place for which you also pay admission." "I'm shocked no one has said credit scores yet; the three credit monitors/clearinghouses are publicly traded, for-profit companies." "Taxes. The IRS knows what 99% of Americans owe, and annual reconciliation is a 100% scam that H&R Block lobbyists bribe Congress to maintain. Both Obama and Trump publicly wanted it reformed, but both were rejected by well-bribed Congress." "I hate that every few months or years it seems I need to call my phone provider, garbage company, cable, car insurance, and threaten to leave to get them to lower my bill, or switch to a new company to get 'new member pricing.' It's beyond annoying." "YouTube reviews and demos." "Rounding up at checkouts so that corporations can use our donations to cover the overhead of the charitable organization associated with their business, while also using those 'donations' to get themselves massive tax breaks." "Cars. Can't really be a member of modern society without one in most places, and they are extremely expensive, extremely dangerous, extremely loud, and one of the worst sources of air and water pollution." Got any "silent scam" observations of your own to share? Tell me all about it down in the comments. I want to hear it all!
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump is right to shrink our government. Even if I worry about how he'll do it.
The U.S. government has reached a level of bloat that needs to be dealt with. Trump is right to take that challenge head-on. The Trump administration received a huge win from the Supreme Court on July 14, allowing the government to proceed with its plan to fire more than 1,300 employees of the Department of Education. These staffing cuts come in addition to the State Department's recent layoffs of a similar size. I have been a critic of many of the government efficiency measures proposed by the Trump administration, not because I oppose shrinking government, but rather because they have been unlikely to succeed in achieving that goal. Many opponents of the Republican plan to downsize government don't come from my perspective. Many oppose the slashing of current government programs because the result is seen as unfair to government employees. But it is not immoral for the government to cut jobs for the sake of efficiency. Pursuing efficiency at the expense of existing jobs is a proper goal, even if how President Donald Trump is chasing that efficiency needs to be examined. Layoffs are hard, but that's no reason for government to stay bloated Fired State Department workers made a show out of their job loss this week, staging a sort of ceremony in the lobby as people packed up their desks. Teary federal employees made for great publicity for Democrats opposed to Trump's plans. Many believe that the human toll of these layoffs is a sufficient reason not to implement them at all. That view is significantly mistaken, and one of the reasons government bloat has reached its current level. Layoffs are difficult, but good companies do them all the time. While the common maxim that 'government should be run like a business' is often a ridiculous one, the attitude toward laying off workers in bloated departments ought to be the same among Americans as among managers at a Fortune 500 company. Opinion: Do you think the Supreme Court is partisan? Well you're wrong. When it comes to publicly traded companies, nobody disputes the right of a company to fire its employees for the sake of efficiency. In fact, it is their obligation. Even the charge that corporate layoffs are driven by greed tends to favor the layoffs when it comes to the government. Where a corporation may lay off workers in pursuit of maximizing profits, the government doing the same thing serves to decrease expenditures compared to revenue, which means lower budget deficits. I understand why the robotic calculation of reducing people's employment to a cost-benefit analysis is off-putting to some, but it's the sort of thing that is necessary when our federal workforce is far larger than it was ever intended to be. Cutting excessive positions is a sign of good governance. Again, I understand that being out of work sucks and that layoffs produce hard times for these employees and their families. I have plenty of sympathy for individuals going through tough times because of all this. The administration should take care not to callously celebrate shoving people out of their jobs, a caveat they are horribly failing at. Critics should focus on the 'how' of Trump's layoffs All of this is good in theory, but as with most things, the Trump administration has done little to earn the benefit of the doubt on the matter. Their approach looks more like pulling wires out of a machine on a whim than it does a butcher trimming fat precisely. The administration has already had to walk back many of the firings that took place under Elon Musk's DOGE initiative, signaling that they had gone too far in some instances. Your Turn: Musk caused US long-term damage. A citizen should never have this much power. | Opinion Forum There is plenty of opposition that can be raised regarding the "how" of the push to slash government bloat. However, this is not the sentiment that is sometimes being shared. Many are arguing that it is a mistake, or even immoral, for the Trump administration to perform layoffs, even if they do genuinely lead to cutting government waste. If the government is genuinely slashing necessary employees, then by all means, that position ought to be refilled. Layoffs go too far all the time, and those companies rehire for positions as needed. However, it is all the more likely that the federal government can do without many of these jobs, and if not, then the administration has already shown an indication that it will refill vital roles. Government is not a jobs program; it is meant to do a select number of things with the smallest intrusion into our lives possible. Those who oppose Trump's actions with regard to federal layoffs should focus on critiquing how he is going about these cuts, rather than arguing against the cuts themselves. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Trump Truth Social: ‘Big Beautiful Coal' Helping Trump to Transform America
The President was full of energy today – the traditional fossil fuel variety rather the green stuff – today but it didn't do much to boost oil stocks. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. In his latest Truth Social posting, the President's Trumpy nature was in full flow. Dashboard Delivers Okay, it wasn't quite the President's own words, more a reposting of someone else's fulsome quotes but they certainly seemed to have made the President fluff up his oil slick free feathers. Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright: 'President Trump has TRANSFORMED the American energy landscape. You're going to see a lot more of big, beautiful, clean coal!' U.S oil stocks didn't fare too well with Exxon Mobil (XOM) stock down 0.4% in early trading, with Chevron (CVX) also off 0.4%. More British focused stocks such as BP (BP) did better with it and Shell (SHEL) getting an around 0.35% lift. One of Trump's main mantras since his first day in charge, and before that in campaign speeches up and down the country, has been 'Drill, baby, drill' offering succour to oil and gas firms but switching the lights off for renewable energy firms. He has paused new permits for offshore wind farms and rowed back on green energy incentives. He has also ordered government agencies to identify ways to increase already record high U.S. oil and gas production, arguing past administrations had unnecessarily curtailed drilling. Feeling Green Indeed, in another Trumpy tweet today he praised another blow to the green energy lobby. 'To the many Great Americans enjoying their Summer Vacations in Atlantic City, Wildwood, and Cape May, in the wonderful State of New Jersey, overlooking the Atlantic Ocean: Remember that your Republican Congressman, and my GREAT friend, Jeff Van Drew, is fighting hard, and WINNING, to keep your Beaches BEAUTIFUL, with NO WINDMILLS. In fact, we just beat one of the biggest Windmill projects anywhere in the World. It would have been a disaster, but they gave up because of the onslaught of 'TRUMP'/Van Drew. Great job, Jeff!' Green stocks, such as Danish developer Orsted (DOGEF), have indeed suffered in comparison with oil. We have rounded up the best energy stocks to buy using our TipRanks comparison tool.
