
UK politics blunts antitrust action against Google
The Competition and Markets Authority spent years setting up a regime to intervene in the operations of tech giants such as Google, Apple and Amazon, saying it needed special expertise and powers to drive competition in the digital economy.
But just as it received new powers, Britain's Labour government said its need to grow the economy meant tough regulation was now out.
The CMA, chaired by a former Amazon executive, has touted a targeted approach as the way to meet its goal of reining in big tech without throttling investment from an industry that has spent tens of billions of pounds in Britain.
On Tuesday, it proposed designating Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab as having "strategic market status" in search, giving it the power to impose conditions on the U.S. tech firm such as changing the way it ranks search results or offering users more choice.
Competition experts said the designation was no surprise, coming long after similar moves in the United States and the European Union.
"Everyone has been at the search rodeo for years, there are EC (European Commission) decisions, U.S. judgements," Cristina Caffarra, a competition economist, said. "What the CMA is doing is purely performative."
Nonetheless, the CMA's first designation is being closely watched by tech groups, lawyers, and business owners to see how it operates in the new political climate.
In announcing its proposals, CMA Chief Executive Sarah Cardell was careful to stress its "targeted and proportionate actions" to regulate a sector innovating at breakneck speed via artificial intelligence, and mindful of the political pressure.
Lawyer Ronan Scanlan, a partner at Steptoe International and former deputy director at the CMA, said Britain's Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act gave the CMA broad powers, but in practice it didn't have the political capital to make grand interventions.
"The DMCC Act, which was billed as this revolutionary new tool that the CMA could wield, has arrived three years too late and is becoming a bit of an albatross around its neck," he said.
"It's up against huge players like Google, Apple, Amazon, with a lot of political connections, and now - in a new political reality - somehow has to try to extricate itself with the minimum amount of damage."
The CMA's delicate balancing act is made harder by U.S. President Donald Trump's muscular defence of U.S. business interests, and Scanlan said the regulator would want to see what would happen with Google there.
Some of the measures the CMA is proposing, such as choice screens for consumers to easily opt for alternative search engines, have been around for decades.
Others, such as changing the ranking of results to limit Google favouring its own services, could have more impact if they are confirmed in the CMA's final decision in October.
Tom Smith, a competition lawyer at Geradin Partners and a former CMA legal director, said there was a question mark over political support for some of the regulator's tougher proposals, but thought it was trying to stick to its guns.
"Given the new context, it's still implementing the regime properly," he said, adding that the U.S. Department of Justice had proposed measures that could lead to a breakup of Google, particularly in its search and advertising businesses.
"The idea that the CMA is going too far by putting in a choice screen, it's quite ludicrous."
Despite that, Alphabet-owned Google warned it may not bring new features and services to Britain if the regulator goes ahead with the proposals, and said "proportionate, evidence-based regulation" was needed if Britain was to grow its economy.
Google, which employs around 7,000 people in Britain, accounts for more than 90% of all general search queries in the country, with more than 200,000 businesses relying on its search advertising to reach their customers.
But according to submissions to the CMA from the likes of flights and hotel website Skyscanner and the recommendation platform Checkatrade, that dominance may have enabled it to favour its own services over their offerings, and they want regulatory intervention.
Silicon Valley has been wary of the CMA since 2023, when it blocked Microsoft's $69 billion acquisition of the "Call of Duty" maker Activision-Blizzard. Having sparked fury from the U.S. companies, it then tore up its own rule book to approve the case after Microsoft made some changes.
Its second investigation under its new powers is examining mobile operating systems, targeting Google and Apple.
Previous CMA investigations had pointed to Amazon as the subject of the third strategic market status investigation that was due to be announced this summer. On Tuesday, however, the CMA pushed the third case back to next year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
26 minutes ago
- Sky News
House of Lords under fire for dropping rule that once caught out cricket legend and historian
Campaigners have criticised a change to the rules around declarations of interest in the House of Lords as a "retrograde step" which will lead to a "significant loss of transparency". Since 2000, peers have had to register a list of "non-financial interests" - which includes declaring unpaid but often important roles like being a director, trustee, or chair of a company, think tank or charity. But that requirement was dropped in April despite staff concerns. Tom Brake, director of Unlock Democracy, and a former Liberal Democrat MP, wants to see the decision reversed. "It's a retrograde step," he said. "I think we've got a significant loss of transparency and accountability and that is bad news for the public. "More than 25 years ago, the Committee on Standards in Public Life identified that there was a need for peers to register non-financial interests because that could influence their decisions. I'm confused as to what's happened in the last 25 years that now means this requirement can be scrapped. "This process seems to be all about making matters simpler for peers, rather than what the code of conduct is supposed to do, which is to boost the public's confidence." Westminster Accounts: Search for your MP Rules were too 'burdensome', say peers The change was part of an overhaul of the code of conduct which aimed to "shorten and clarify" the rules for peers. The House of Lords Conduct Committee argued that updating non-financial interests was "disproportionately burdensome" with "minor and inadvertent errors" causing "large numbers of complaints". As a result, the register of Lords interests shrunk in size from 432 pages to 275. MPs have a different code of conduct, which requires them to declare any formal unpaid positions or other non-financial interests which may be an influence. A source told Sky News there is real concern among some Lords' staff about the implications of the change. Non-financial interest declarations have previously highlighted cases where a peer's involvement in a think tank or lobbying group overlapped with a paid role. 4:23 Cricket legend among peers to breach code There are also examples where a peer's non-financial interest declaration has prompted an investigation - revealing a financial interest which should have been declared instead. In 2023, Lord Skidelsky was found to have breached the code after registering his role as chair of a charity's trustees as a non-financial interest. The Commissioner for Standards investigated after questions were raised about the charity, the Centre for Global Studies. He concluded that the charity - which was funded by two Russian businessmen - only existed to support Lord Skidelsky's work, and had paid his staff's salaries for over 12 years. In 2021, Lord Botham - the England cricket legend - was found to have breached the code after registering a non-financial interest as an unpaid company director. The company's accounts subsequently revealed he and his wife had benefitted from a director's loan of nearly £200,000. It was considered a minor breach and he apologised. 'Follow the money' Lord Eric Pickles, the former chair of the anti-corruption watchdog, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, believes focusing on financial interests makes the register more transparent. "My view is always to follow the money. Everything else on a register is camouflage," he said. "Restricting the register to financial reward will give peers little wriggle room. I know this is counterintuitive, but the less there is on the register, the more scrutiny there will be on the crucial things." 'I was shocked' The SNP want the House of Lords to be scrapped, and has no peers of its own. Deputy Westminster leader Pete Wishart MP is deeply concerned by the changes. "I was actually quite horrified and quite shocked," he said. "This is an institution that's got no democratic accountability, it's a job for life. If anything, members of the House of Lords should be regulated and judged by a higher standard than us in the House of Commons - and what's happened is exactly the opposite." Public confidence in the Lords is already at a low ebb after the PPE controversy surrounding Baroness Michelle Mone, who took a leave of absence in 2022. The government has pledged to reform the House of Lords and is currently trying to push through a bill abolishing the 92 remaining hereditary peers, which will return to the House of Commons in September. But just before recess the bill was amended in the Lords so that they can remain as members until retirement or death. It's a change which is unlikely to be supported by MPs. A spokesperson for the House of Lords said: "Maintaining public confidence in the House of Lords is a key objective of the code of conduct. To ensure that, the code includes rigorous rules requiring the registration and declaration of all relevant financial interests held by members of the House of Lords. "Public confidence relies, above all, on transparency over the financial interests that may influence members' conduct. This change helps ensure the rules regarding registration of interests are understandable, enforceable and focused on the key areas of public concern. "Members may still declare non-financial interests in debate, where they consider them directly relevant, to inform the House and wider public. "The Conduct Committee is appointed to review the code of conduct, and it will continue to keep all issues under review. During its review of the code of conduct, the committee considered written evidence from both Unlock Democracy and Transparency International UK, among others."


Times
27 minutes ago
- Times
Meet the British teenager who's taking on the porn industry
When porn is an industry worth tens of billions of dollars, the anti-porn business can also be pretty lucrative. That becomes clear when Alex Slater turns his camera around to show me where he is living. The 19-year-old from southwest London is the co-founder of an app designed to help young men wean themselves off their porn-watching habit. The app has quickly become popular enough that he and his team have moved into a rented home in south Miami. During our video call, a quick scan with the camera from the terrace where he is sitting with Connor McLaren, his American business partner, reveals a pool, lush lawn and a substantial, gleaming white mansion. 'It's a $10 million house,' says Slater, an astonishingly self-possessed teenager who is confident that he will become a billionaire and describes himself as 'Future Prime Minister' on Twitter and LinkedIn. His inventiveness, he suggests, derives from his mother, an artist, and his father, a DJ, producer and musician who had a hit in the 1990s with a track entitled Passion. 'I used all of that creativity from both sides of my family to design and build apps. I always had a lot of drive because I notice many things about society and the world that I want to improve upon and don't want to sit around waiting for other people to solve it for me.' He went to a state school in Epsom before college and has a younger brother and sister. Slater designed the app, Quittr, which promises to help Gen Z men 'regain control' and stop watching porn. He claims the app, which costs £44.99 a year, has been so successful that they have had a million downloads and are making $500,000 a month. Slater grew up in Worcester Park, near Wimbledon, but felt 'very confined in classrooms'. He dropped out of Kingston College, a sixth-form college where he was studying business, to start building apps after having taught himself to code. 'British culture is very closed-minded. I took a visit to the States when I was 17 on my own and my mind got opened so much, I was like, OK, I'm dropping out of school, I'm going to do this full time.' • The startling truth about Spotify — it's got a porn problem He fell down the 'rabbit hole called self-improvement'. Here he listened to messages that have convinced many young men to hit the gym, go on diets and engage in abstinence of different kinds. 'Things that are so normalised are actually really, really bad for us. Like overconsumption of social media, sugar, food, porn. What I found in my journey in self-improvement is porn is the hardest to fight because it's so accessible. It's free, everyone has a phone. Instinctively we want to go out there and find a girlfriend because that's what humans are built to do but, because we have phones in our hands, we just access porn instead because it's easier.' Did he have a problem with porn? 'I definitely did use it. Just like everyone else did. People use porn to fill a void in their life, but actually it's porn that creates the void.' Our media and social media have become 'oversexualised', he says. 'That's what gets the clicks, that's what gets the likes, and that's what feeds the algorithm. That's why Bonnie Blue is so successful.' Ah yes, Tia Billinger, aka Bonnie Blue, the woman who arranged to be filmed having sex with, she claims, more than 1,000 men in 12 hours and was the subject of a controversial recent Channel 4 documentary. These two Gen Z men look distinctly unimpressed. McLaren is disgusted by all those involved. 'It's sad, to be completely honest with you. It's sad the amount of men that lined up and it's sad that she was willing to do that.' I report that Tia/Bonnie recently told Janice Turner in an interview in The Times: 'Each day I wake up so excited. I can't believe this is my life.' McLaren shakes his head emphatically: 'She has to be lying.' McLaren had the idea of helping men to stop using porn because his peers told him how they were feeling. 'We saw a shift with Gen Z expressing the fact that porn's bad, it's not good for you, you should quit watching porn. It wasn't really cool to watch porn any more, it was kind of just like: you're a loser if you watch porn,' he says. 'Once you put it into perspective, it's like, 'Really? That's disgusting!'' McLaren mentions some of the 'big guys' of the manosphere, including Jordan Peterson, the psychologist, Andrew Huberman, the neuroscientist and podcaster, and Joe Rogan, the king of the podcast bros. Slater says that while he was down his rabbit hole he watched some of Andrew Tate's videos. 'While I didn't agree with everything, some of his messaging around discipline, masculinity and quitting porn aligned with the changes I was trying to make in my own life. The stuff around women I don't stand behind.' Tate, a self-professed misogynist, is facing charges in the UK that include rape, which he denies. His message about porn is, to say the least, very confusing. He has called pornography 'a plague' but profited from a webcam sex business. 'Yes, it's extremely contradictory. That's why I try to separate the message from the messenger. The truth about porn being harmful stands, regardless of who says it,' Slater says. • After I lost my job, porn and gaming kept me sane Slater and McLaren had connected online when exploring another project and discovered they had both had the same idea for an app that would become Quittr. Similar apps were aimed at older men. 'There was a massive underserved community of young guys who were just struggling, had no one to talk to because it was embarrassing, and were fighting this on their own,' Slater says. Those planning to subscribe to the app are asked about how they consume pornography, and how often, as well as whether it has an impact on their mood, concentration and motivation. They are told porn is a drug and it reduces hunger for real relationships. Subscribers are asked to pledge not to watch porn again and recommit to this every day. They choose goals such as stronger relationships, more energy, improved self-control, focus, clarity and a better sex life. The app offers a 'panic button' that users press when they think they are about to relapse. Your phone will vibrate and the camera will come on so that you see yourself, as if to say, Slater explains: 'Look at you. Why are you doing this? You have goals you need to fight for. You have your family to feed. What is jerking off going to do for you? Nothing.' The app can also block access to porn sites. It offers an AI chatbot and exercises that claim to be able to rewire your brain and rebuild dopamine receptors. A forum enables discussion with other subscribers about a subject they may not have felt comfortable exploring in real life. 'It's very taboo. You don't want to speak about it with your friends. It's awkward. This is a community of people all struggling with the same thing because they never got to speak about it,' Slater says. The pair launched the app with $3,000 of McLaren's savings and made $30,000 in the first month. And now? 'Half a million dollars a month,' Slater says. They promote the app through influencers and social media, including a viral post claiming they planned to buy OnlyFans, the subscription site known for its adult content, and close it down. Perhaps because of where the duo are marketing themselves, very few subscribers are over 40. But, they say, 50 per cent of those downloading the app are under 18. 'You're still very fresh to the earth when you're under 18. So the fact it's already a problem in people's lives, to the point where they download a whole app for it and even pay for it — that's insane,' Slater says. Many people appear to be downloading VPNs (virtual private networks) to circumvent the new age verification requirements for accessing porn sites in the UK. Slater and McLaren (a grand old man of 23) plan to build more apps in the men's health sphere. A few months ago Slater said he envisaged selling Quittr for $50 million or more, but for now they are reinvesting most of their earnings in the business, while paying themselves enough to drive flash cars and rent their fancy pad. Even that, Slater insists, is part of selling their brand: 'The point is to get more views on YouTube. It feels great, because not only do we have a successful business, but we're also helping thousands and thousands of people.' There is no doubt Slater is very focused on making money. In one YouTube video he boasts that he will be a billionaire in ten years or so. 'I think it will come naturally as a result of everything I do,' he says matter-of-factly when I bring this up. He certainly has the supreme confidence of youth. On Twitter he has said: 'End goal is my last name being ubiquitous and associated with greatness.' And when he has that fame and fortune, the crusade against porn will just be part of a CV for a political career. 'New people bring fresh ideas and we need a lot of fresh ideas in the UK right now,' he says. 'I think my stint in the US and building businesses and building a social brand for myself will be great in politics and I can bring this energy back to the UK and transform it to its former glory.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Hospital acquisitions of private practices are increasing patient costs, study says
A new study by the National Bureau of Economic Research indicates that hospitals acquiring private physician practices leads to reduced competition and increased costs for patients. Between 2008 and 2016, hospital ownership of physician practices rose by nearly 72%, resulting in significant price increases without a corresponding improvement in the quality of care. Experts suggest that reduced competition due to these mergers can not only drive up prices, but also potentially diminish the standard of care. The study found a scarcity of federal investigations into these consolidations, despite their impact on healthcare markets. While hospitals are major consolidators, private equity firms are also increasingly acquiring practices, leading to similar concerns about rising costs and declining quality, though some argue hospital integration can offer benefits like improved access to resources and specialized procedures.