
'Massive' free speech concerns in anti-Semitism plan
Recommendations in a report from Australia's Special Envoy to Combat Anti-Semitism Jillian Segal are being considered by the federal government as it examines ways to combat a surge in discrimination against Jewish Australians.
While it suggests embedding Holocaust education into school curricula and strengthening legislation against hateful conduct, the report also recommends terminating or withholding funds from universities, broadcasters and cultural institutions that fail to address anti-Semitism.
It also suggests deporting and the cancelling visas of immigrants who have been involved in discrimination against Jewish people.
National Union of Students president Ashlyn Horton raised issues with the way widespread student encampment protests were portrayed.
"Conflating actual anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel is a massive, massive concern," she told AAP.
"Most student activists who have been part of the Palestine movement have never actually been anti-Semitic ... it is just students who are concerned about the genocide in Gaza and their universities' involvement in weapons manufacturing.
"Spinning it in this way of 'the encampments were anti-Semitic, we need to crack down on all freedom of speech now' is absolutely the wrong approach."
While there were some cases of anti-Semitic individuals, Ms Horton said student unions were often the first to crack down.
First Nations, Palestinian, Arab and Muslim communities would be disproportionately harmed by the plan, the Australia Palestine Advocacy Network warned.
Walkley-award winning journalist Jan Fran said Israel had killed nearly 200 people in Gaza since Tuesday, along with ordering Palestinians into what experts labelled an "internment camp".
"If the anti-Semitism envoy's plan stifles criticism of Israel for these actions, particularly at public broadcasters and in media organisations broadly, then we are headed down a very dark path," she told AAP.
The report also recommended universities and all levels of government adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's definition of anti-Semitism, even though it has been accused of conflating anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism.
Jewish Council of Australia executive officer Max Kaiser labelled the report a "blueprint for silencing dissent" and his organisation said the emphasis on surveillance, censorship and punitive control over funding were "straight out of Trump's authoritarian playbook".
But other Jewish groups including the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council called for the plan to be adopted in full.
Ms Segal's report found threats, vandalism and physical violence against Jewish Australians tripled between October 2023 and September 2024.
Universities Australia committed to considering the report's recommendations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
5 hours ago
- West Australian
Four-day work week proposal dismissed by PM and Treasurer as pair align ahead of next week's roundtable
A union-led call for Australia to adopt a four-day work week has been shot down by both the Prime Minister and Treasurer before it could even be discussed at next week's productivity roundtable. The Australian Council of Trade Unions claimed its push for shorter working hours would boost productivity and improve Australians' work-life balance but business groups have slammed the idea as 'populist' and 'anti-productivity.' Anthony Albanese laughed off the proposal when asked on Wednesday, joking he'd 'wouldn't mind a six-day-and-23-hour work week, myself, rather than 24/7' before adding 'certainly, the government has no plans'. The proposal faced further rejection from Jim Chalmers who echoed: 'We haven't been working up a policy for a four day week. That hasn't been our focus'. It comes after Dr Chalmers had previously said he didn't want to kill off floated ideas before the three-day talks even begin. Business Council of Australia boss Bran Black slammed the peak body for Australian unions for not taking the roundtable opportunity seriously and proposing ideas based on 'fundamentally-flawed evidence'. Australian Industry Group chief executive Innes Willox had fumed that attendees had been explicitly told industrial relations reforms wouldn't be discussed at all. It was frustration which was shared by Australian Chamber or Commerce and Industry boss Andrew McKellar who said they had also respected the rules but said IR should be on the agenda. The PM and Dr Chalmers' lock-step on the issue marked a notable shift on Wednesday after mixed messaging on Labor's ambition of their upcoming productivity-turned-economic reform roundtable next week. The PM bushed off questioning on Wednesday that he had spoken to his treasurer face-to-face on the need to 'be on the same page' regarding the roundtable, saying they meet every week. 'We meet every week. We met face to face. We meet every single week. We talk every week, almost every day. We talked yesterday. We talk every day, either in person or exchange messages,' the PM told ABC radio, in a morning media appearance blitz. It comes after the PM had previously hosed down the prospect of major tax reform emerging from the productivity round table. 'The only tax policy that we're implementing is the one that we took to the election,' he had said last week when seeking to adjust expectations. But on Wednesday, the PM changed his tune, declaring: 'I'm up for big reform and we are a big reforming Government '. Mr Albanese also flagged he would act immediately on 'low hanging fruit' which can be agreed on. 'I think there's a range of things that we can do immediately out of the roundtable,' he said. 'That's what I hope. There's agreement. There's some low-hanging fruit out there that we can get done.' Dr Chalmers later added he was also eyeing 'sufficient common ground in areas that aren't especially controversial' to move on immediately. 'It's hard to preempt the suggestions that people might make. There might be sufficient appetites, sufficient common ground in areas that aren't especially controversial to make some progress on tax reform,' he said. 'On tax reform more broadly, the PM and I have said the same thing. We've had a tax reform agenda and our focus is on rolling that out. 'We haven't changed our position on the tax policies that we have.' However, both said not all changes would necessarily be immediate, as measures could come in next year's budget or a future government term. 'There's other measures that will feed into next year's Budget. There's other things that could be for a future term of government,' the PM said. Shadow Finance Minister James Paterson said Coalition would back any proposals from next week's economic roundtable that boost productivity. 'If good ideas are brought forward at the round table, and if the government adopts them and chooses to move forward with them, then we'll offer bipartisan support for them to be legislated and enacted,' he told ABC. 'If there are ideas that reduce red tape and regulation, we're up for that. We're open minded. 'We have reservations if the government tries to do things it doesn't have a mandate for because it didn't earn it at the election, for example, increasing taxes. 'Labor didn't tell anyone before the election that they would raise taxes. 'A hand-picked roundtable of people in Canberra doesn't provide them the mandate.'

ABC News
10 hours ago
- ABC News
Coalition accuses Labor of emboldening Hamas, after terror group praises move to recognise Palestinian state
The Coalition says Anthony Albanese has been "shamed" for his decision to recognise a state of Palestine, after the move received praise by terror group Hamas, whose October 7 attack on Israel triggered the conflict in Gaza. In comments reported by the Sydney Morning Herald, the terror group reportedly applauded the Albanese government's decision to recognise a Palestinian state and praised Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's "courage". Shadow Foreign Minister Michaelia Cash said the move has emboldened Hamas. "All Australians should be appalled at the massive propaganda victory Mr Albanese has handed Hamas on a platter," Senator Cash said in a statement. "When terrorists are cheering Australia's foreign policy it is clear proof it is wrong. "Mr Albanese should explain whether he'll still pursue recognition knowing it has the clear endorsement of terrorists." The Coalition has vowed to revoke recognition of Palestine if it wins power at the next election. On Tuesday, the prime minister claimed Hamas would oppose the move to recognise a Palestinian state, because they would have no role in its future governance. The government has rejected accusations by Israel that recognition of a Palestinian state at September's United Nations General Assembly would be a "reward" to Hamas. The split from a longstanding bipartisan position to recognise Palestine only after a two-state solution is negotiated has prompted fury from the Coalition, who say it will not further peace in the region. Mr Albanese reasserted today that Hamas would be excluded from the process of recognising Palestine, as the international community works with the Palestinian Authority to reintroduce democratic elections to the Occupied Palestinian Territories. "The Arab League, the countries around the region, as well as the international community have made it very clear Hamas has no role," he said. In comments reported by the Sydney Morning Herald, however, a senior Hamas official labelled the move an "important step" towards achieving its aims. "We welcome Australia's decision to recognise the state of Palestine, and consider it an important step towards achieving justice for our people and securing their legitimate rights," Sheikh Hassan Yousef said. "This position reflects political courage and a commitment to the values of justice and the right of peoples to self-determination." Hamas has vowed not to surrender in Gaza until Palestine is recognised. Speaking on ABC Afternoon Briefing, frontbencher Amanda Rishworth said it was not surprising Hamas would attempt to take advantage of Australia's announcement. "Hamas will use whatever they can to promote propaganda," Ms Rishworth said. "To be very, clear the work that has been agreed to is that Hamas will not have a role in the future [of] Palestine."

News.com.au
12 hours ago
- News.com.au
Kiwi MP booted from parliament over Palestine speech
New Zealand Greens co-leader Chloe Swarbrick has been booted out of parliament for a fiery speech in which she suggested the government was 'spineless' for refusing to sanction Israel. Anthony Albanese announced on Monday that Australia would recognise a Palestinian state but his Kiwi counterpart, Christopher Luxon, has been more hesitant on the issue. On Tuesday Mr Luxon, who recently hosted a visit from the Aussie PM, announced New Zealand would make a decision on whether to recognise Palestine as a state next month. That afternoon in an urgent debate, Ms Swarbrick, who is in opposition, urged government MPs to back her private member's bill allowing New Zealand to apply sanctions on Israel. 'My question for this place is what the hell is the point of our jobs?' she said. ' … I will reiterate my call for the government to pick up our unlawful occupation of Palestine sanctions bill and to sanction Israel for its war crimes. 'If we find six of 68 government MPs with a spine we can stand on the right side of history.' Speaker Gerry Brownlee took exception to that last comment, telling Ms Swarbrick it was 'completely unacceptable to make that statement – withdraw it and apologise'. 'No,' she replied. 'Then leave the house for the rest of the week,' Mr Brownlee said. 'Happily,' said Ms Swarbrick, who along with her Greens colleagues was wearing a Middle Eastern keffiyeh around her neck. Mr Brownlee later explained Ms Swarbrick would be allowed back into parliament on Wednesday if she agreed to withdraw her statement and apologise. Emotions ran high during Tuesday's debate and Ms Swarbrick was not the only MP to attract the ire of Mr Brownlee. The speaker also demanded that ACT MP Simon Curry – part of the coalition government – apologise after he accused Ms Swarbrick of 'hallucinating outrage'. No National MPs spoke during the debate but Mr Curry said in his speech that recognition of a Palestinian state must be conditional on all Israeli hostages being returned and Hamas being removed from power. Speaking to reporters outside parliament after she was ejected, Ms Swarbrick said the speaker had been heavy-handed. 'As far as the robust rebate goes in that place, I think that was pretty mild in the context of the war crimes that are currently unfolding,' she said. 'What the hell is the point of everything that we do if the people if the people in my place, in my job don't do their job? 'If we allow other human beings to be just mercilessly slaughtered, to be shot while waiting for food aid, what hope is there for humanity?' ACT leader and deputy prime minister, David Seymour, had earlier criticised Ms Swarbrick's decision to display a keffiyeh in parliament. 'I invite you to consider what this house might look like if everybody who had an interest in a global conflict started adorning their seats with symbols of one side or another of a conflict,' he said.