logo
'Forecasts were there': Emergency response questioned in Texas floods

'Forecasts were there': Emergency response questioned in Texas floods

UPI10-07-2025
1 of 3 | Aerial view of the wreckage left in the wake of the flooding in Kerr County, Texas, on Sunday. USCG MH-65 helicopters have conducted multiple flights to the flooded area, rescuing 15 campers from Camp Mystic in Hunt and aiding in the evacuation of 230 people. Photo via U.S. Coast Guard/UPI | License Photo
July 10 (UPI) -- More than 100 people are dead and 150 known to be missing in Texas Thursday from flooding but questions remain about how the effects of the deadly disaster could have been mitigated.
Kerr County is where most of the deaths and missing persons originate from, but more counties have reported fatalities: Travis, Kendall, Burnet, Williamson and Tom Green County.
Hunt, Texas, the site of Camp Mystic for Girls, is located in Kerr County. Twenty-seven campers and counselors from the camp were confirmed dead while five campers and one counselor were listed as missing on Tuesday.
The search for blame has extended to Washington with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., demanding an investigation into whether staffing cuts by the Trump administration are in any way responsible for weakening disaster mitigation efforts in Texas.
President Donald Trump's administration, in its broad effort to reduce federal spending, has cut positions in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and proposed more cuts.
"According to The New York Times -- key forecasting and coordination positions at the [National Weather Service] offices responsible for this region -- were vacant at the time of the storm," Schumer wrote in a letter to acting inspector general Duane Townsend. "NYT further reports that the vacancy rate at many NWS offices nationwide has roughly doubled since President [Donald] Trump returned to office -- due in part to a wave of early retirements encouraged by the administration and a freeze on hiring. The roles left unfulfilled are not marginal, they're critical."
NOAA eliminated the positions of hundreds of probationary employees beginning in February.
NOAA's budget justification for fiscal year 2026 -- a detailed breakdown of how funding will be used -- outlines about a $2.2 billion reduction in research funding. This would include climate and weather research. The responsibilities of the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research would be terminated with some of its remaining responsibilities being moved to the National Weather Service and National Oceanic Service.
Staff was not an issue in Texas on July 3 and July 4, according to a press release shared with UPI by NOAA. Extra staff members were on duty at the National Weather Service's Weather Forecast Offices in Austin/San Antonio and San Angelo, Texas, on July 3 and into the daytime on Friday.
"All forecasts and warnings were issued in a timely manner," the press release reads. "Additionally, these offices were able to provide decision support services to local partners, including those in the emergency management community."
The timeline shared by NOAA begins before what was shared by Kerr County officials.
On the morning of July 3, the National Water Center Flood Hazard Outlook "indicated an expansion of flash flood potential" for Kerrville, Texas, in Kerr County and surrounding areas.
At 1:18 p.m. CDT on July 3, a flood watch was issued by the National Weather Service Austin/San Antonio office. It was to remain in effect through Friday morning.
As early as 6:10 p.m. on July 3, the Weather Prediction Center issued three forecasts focused on excessive rainfall "indicating the potential for flash flooding."
At 6:22 p.m. on July 3, the National Weather Center Area Hydrologic Discussion issued "locally considerable flood wording" -- messaging guidance -- for areas north and west of San Antonio including Kerrville.
At 11:41 p.m. on July 3, the first flash flood warning was issued for Bandera County.
"The point is the forecasts were there," Clifford Mass, professor of atmospheric and climate science at the University of Washington, told UPI. "The mechanisms to distribute the forecasts were there. This was a failure of local counties and municipalities and people running these camps."
Mass added that weather forecasting, including for dangerous weather, is better than it has ever been. However, local officials have not taken proper steps to maintain the safety of their populations in several instances, including ahead of the floods in Texas.
"This has happened time and time again. Some local groups, counties and cities are not taking advantage," he said. "Governmental structures are not acting properly. You can't expect everybody to be an expert on emergency management. It has to be done at a higher level."
The Texas legislature will convene a special session beginning on July 21. Its agenda includes items related to improving the state's disaster response and emergency management.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Kerr County officials refused to answer questions from reporters about who would have made decisions relating to evacuation orders during separate press conferences on Tuesday.
Abbott confirmed that the state government was aware of the possibility of serious flooding on July 2.
"We pre-positioned assets and resources and personnel," Abbot said during Tuesday's press conference. "Then when greater clarity was discerned on Thursday we moved them closer, added and made sure we had adequate supply going into Friday. So we were ready with resources on the ground to be able to quickly respond."
"That said, we didn't know the magnitude of the storm," he continued. "If you're in a flash flood warning, no one would know that would be a 30-foot high tsunami wall of water, I don't think."
According to Kerr County Sheriff Larry Leitha, the first flood emergency alert happened at 1:14 a.m. CDT on Friday. Dispatchers began receiving calls about the flood between 3 and 4 a.m. and he was first contacted by a sergeant between 4 and 5 a.m.
"We're in the process of trying to put a timeline. That's going to take a little bit of time," Leitha told reporters on Tuesday morning. "That is not my priority at this time. There's three priorities. That's locating the people out there, identifying and notifying the next of kin. That is what I'm taking as my job as sheriff here to do."
When asked whether the county's emergency manager was awake and able to issue an emergency alert during the early morning hours, Leitha said he could not say.
"Sir, it's not that easy to just push a button. There's a lot more to that," Leitha said. "I can't tell you at this time."
Lt. Col. Ben Baker, deputy director of law enforcement of the Texas Game Wardens, then declined to answer a follow-up question about who from emergency management was receiving weather briefings and would have made a decision to evacuate.
"We understand you have many questions. We understand that," Baker responded. "Right now, this team up here is focused on bringing people home. That's our focus. All those questions will be answered but the priority right now is bringing people home."
In his press conference Tuesday afternoon, Abbott became combative with a reporter who asked "who is to blame here?"
"Know this, that's the word choice of losers. Every football team makes mistakes," Abbott said. "The losing teams are the ones that try to point out who's to blame. The championship teams are the ones that say, 'Don't worry about it, man. We got this. We're going to make sure we go score again and we're going to win this game. What Texas is all about is solutions."
Anyone with information about people missing from the flood is encouraged to call 830-258-1111 or email kerrvillemissing@dps.texas.gov.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mixed results for 'Rage Against the Regime' day of action
Mixed results for 'Rage Against the Regime' day of action

UPI

time22 minutes ago

  • UPI

Mixed results for 'Rage Against the Regime' day of action

Aug. 2 (UPI) -- The same organization behind prior protests against the Trump administration reported mixed results for Saturday's "Rage Against the Regime" protests across the country. The protests are part of the ninth "national day of action" event coordinated so far this year by the 50501 Movement, which opposes President Donald Trump and his administration's policies. Organizers accuse the Trump administration of "heralding ... American neo-fascism," building "concentration camps" and funding "genocide." They also accuse Trump of "weaponization of ICE against our communities, construction of concentration camps, covering up the Epstein files, attacks on transgender rights and ... dismantling of Medicaid, SNAP, USAID, the Department of Education, NOAA and the National Weather Service." The protests are intended to be peaceful, but at least one local organizer changed the name to "Rise Against the Regime" to emphasize its peaceful intent for the protest in San Angelo, Texas. Several posts on the 50501 Movements' Facebook page expressed disappointment over low turnout at many of the protests, while others said hundreds showed up. The organization says "50501" refers to 50 protests in 50 states in one day and calls the Trump administration a "threat" to democracy and human rights, The Hill reported. About 350 Rage Against the Regime protests were scheduled in communities across the nation. The name of Saturday's collective protests references the Los Angeles rock band Rage Against the Machine. Other nationwide protests organized by the 50501 Movement include the "No Kings Day" protest held on June 14 and the "Good Trouble Lives On" protest held on the anniversary of former Rep. John Lewis' death on July 17.

Trump rails against Democrats as Senate takes up his nominees
Trump rails against Democrats as Senate takes up his nominees

The Hill

time23 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump rails against Democrats as Senate takes up his nominees

President Trump blasted Democrats again for delaying the process of getting his nominees confirmed by the upper chamber and praised Senate Republicans for staying in Washington and working on getting the president's picks approved. 'Very proud of our great Republican Senators for fighting, over the Weekend and far beyond, if necessary, in order to get my great Appointments approved, and on their way to helping us MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN,' Trump wrote in a Saturday post on Truth Social. The president then hammered Senate Democrats, arguing they are doing 'everything possible to DELAY these wonderful and talented people from being' confirmed. 'If George Washington or Abraham Lincoln were up for approval, the Dems would delay, as long as possible, then vote them out. The Democrats want our Country to fail, because they have failed,' the president said, thanking Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and 'our Republican Warriors in the Senate. Fight and WIN. I am with you all the way!!!' Thune told reporters on Thursday that recess appointments, to help tackle the backlog of over 160 nominees, mostly for lower-level positions, are 'on the table.' 'I think everything is on the table,' Thune said, adding that changes to rules would 'make more sense.' 'Fixing the rules, not just for now, but for the long term, would be a better solution for it. But at this point right now, I wouldn't say we're taking any options off the table,' the South Dakota Republican said. GOP senators have expressed openness to forging an agreement with Democrats to help confirm a tranche of Trump's nominees, but they are open to pivoting to other options if the deal does not go through. 'If we can't then we will have to resort to other options and we've got a lot of support for doing that,' Thune said in a Saturday interview with Politico. Republicans would need virtually all of their conference to vote for changing the rules. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has backed the party's approach to the president's nominees, saying Saturday that 'historically bad nominees deserve historic levels of scrutiny.' 'We have never seen nominees as flawed, as compromised, as unqualified as Trump's,' Schumer said in a post on social media platform X. 'And they know that.' Thune and Schumer's offices have been in contact this week and the New York senator had sent a counterproposal on Friday, according to Politico.

Senate GOP eyes recess appointments as stalemate drags on
Senate GOP eyes recess appointments as stalemate drags on

Axios

time23 minutes ago

  • Axios

Senate GOP eyes recess appointments as stalemate drags on

Fed-up Senate Republicans are starting to whisper about recess appointments again as Democrats stonewall them on nominees, cutting into the start of August recess. Why it matters: Senate leaders and the White House are still negotiating on a deal to end the standoff. But skipping town and letting President Trump speed-run his nomination list is an increasingly attractive option, some GOP senators told Axios. "The Senate should immediately adjourn and let President Trump use recess appointments to enact the agenda 77M Americans voted for," Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas) posted on Saturday. Recess appointments, as well as using the nuclear option to change chamber rules with a simple majority to expedite the confirmation process, are becoming real possibilities as talks drag into the evening. The Senate is in session on an August weekend voting on nominations, as Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and the White House struggle to find a compromise. How it works: Recess appointments would give Trump leeway to jam through numerous nominees without having to go through the usual Senate confirmation process. The Senate would have to agree to adjourn with a majority vote, and the House also would have to come back into town and agree to adjourn and cancel scheduled pro-forma days. Those nominees would only be able to serve through the end of 2026 — and without payment. Zoom in: Schumer wants the White House to release withheld federal funding in exchange for passing a small batch of uncontroversial nominees, per a source familiar. Democrats are also willing to commit to another batch later in the year — but only if it is formally written into an agreement that the deal is off if the White House so much as sends over another rescissions package. Republicans continue to point out that Democratic stonewalling is unprecedented. Typically, even the minority party ultimately allows some level of deference to the party in power and allows lower-level nominations to move more quickly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store