logo
Pop paedophile Gary Glitter to remain in jail after losing latest parole bid

Pop paedophile Gary Glitter to remain in jail after losing latest parole bid

Daily Mirror20 hours ago

The disgraced former glam rocker will remain behind bars after the Parole Board turned down his latest request to be released over his jail term for raping and abusing three schoolgirls
Pop paedophile Gary Glitter has lost his latest bid for freedom and will stay in jail for at least another two years, the Parole Board has revealed.
The disgraced 80-year-old was jailed in 2015 for the sexual abuse of three schoolgirls and was released automatically in 2023 after serving half of his 16-year sentence.

Glitter was recalled to HMP The Verne, a specialist sex offender prison in Dorset, within weeks after breaking his licensing conditions by allegedly downloading images of children online. And he's remained inside since March 2023, having been refused bail last year when it was ruled that he still posed a danger to children.

His latest application for release was refused today by the Parole Board, the MailOnline has reported. A spokesperson said: "We can confirm that a panel of the Parole Board refused the release of Paul Gadd following a paper review.
"Parole Board decisions are solely focused on what risk a prisoner could represent to the public if released and whether that risk is manageable in the community. A panel will carefully examine a huge range of evidence, including details of the original crime, and any evidence of behaviour change, as well as explore the harm done and impact the crime has had on the victims.
"Parole reviews are undertaken thoroughly and with extreme care. Protecting the public is our number one priority. Under current legislation he will be eligible for a further review in due course. The date of the next review will be set by the Ministry of Justice."
The Parole Board is set to publish a written summary in the coming weeks explaining why it decided to turn down the application. In March the former glam rocker was declared bankrupt after refusing to cough up £508,000 in damages awarded by the High Court last year to a woman he raped when she was 12.

Her lawyers at Slater and Gordon successfully launched an enforcement action. T he case appeared under Glitter's real name of Paul Gadd at Torquay and Newton Abbot county court in Devon. A trustee can now take over his assets, including his £2million penthouse in central London, and use them to pay the victim.
A High Court judge ruled last year the woman was entitled to compensation to cover the time she has been unable to work and for the suffering Glitter caused.
It is understood that at l east two more victims have since come forward to sue the singer. Documents filed at Companies House show a firm Glitter founded, now run by associates, has £137,873 in assets. It paid off the mortgage on his flat in Baker Street, central London. He is also understood to still be raking in royalties while in jail.

Glitter sold millions of records and is thought to get royalties as a songwriter. It would mean he is earning each time his tunes are played on radio, TV or at a sports event. By 2013, he had reportedly earned £1million from 1995 Oasis track Hello, which uses part of his song Hello, Hello, I'm Back Again.
He served two-and-a-half years in jail in Vietnam from 2006 for sexually abusing two girls, aged 10 and 11. Then at Southwark Crown Court in south London in the 2015 case, he was convicted of two indecent assaults and sex with a girl under 13 in relation to the woman who sued him.
Richard Scorer, at Slater and Gordon, said after the compensation ruling last year: "Gadd's refusal to engage with the process proves his utter lack of remorse, something we will remind the Parole Board about if he makes another application for early release."
The board last year found Glitter had not engaged in sex offender courses in jail and was not satisfied that his release "would be safe for the protection of the public".

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disgraced popstar Gary Glitter refused prison release
Disgraced popstar Gary Glitter refused prison release

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Disgraced popstar Gary Glitter refused prison release

Gary Glitter, the disgraced pop star convicted of multiple child sex offences, will remain in jail after his bid for release was rejected. The Parole Board announced its decision following a paper review of Glitter's case, whose real name is Paul Gadd. Glitter, 81, was sentenced to 16 years in 2015 for the sexual abuse of three schoolgirls between 1975 and 1980. Having served half of his sentence, he was automatically released from HMP The Verne on Portland, Dorset in February 2023. Less than six weeks after his release, Glitter was rearrested and imprisoned for breaching his licence conditions. Reports indicated that he had attempted to access the dark web and view downloaded images of children. In a statement, a spokesman for the Parole Board said: 'We can confirm that a panel of the Parole Board refused the release of Paul Gadd following a paper review. 'Parole Board decisions are solely focused on what risk a prisoner could represent to the public if released and whether that risk is manageable in the community. 'A panel will carefully examine a huge range of evidence, including details of the original crime, and any evidence of behaviour change, as well as explore the harm done and impact the crime has had on the victims.' Parole judges review the cases of criminals who are recalled to prison to decide whether they should be re-released or stay behind bars for the rest of their sentence. Glitter's last parole hearing happened in January 2024. If the Parole Board does not recommend him for release in future, he will walk free when his sentence expires in February 2031. 'Parole reviews are undertaken thoroughly and with extreme care. Protecting the public is our number one priority,' the Parole Board spokesman added. 'Under current legislation, he will be eligible for a further review in due course. The date of the next review will be set by the Ministry of Justice.' In April, Glitter was made bankrupt after failing to pay more than £500,000 in damages to one of his victims, her lawyers said. Richard Scorer, head of abuse law and public inquiries at Slater and Gordon – who represents one of Glitter's victims, said the decision is 'absolutely right' but warned of the 'nightmare' his client faces each time the 81-year-old is up for review. 'The decision made by the parole board is absolutely right,' Mr Scorer said. 'My client is relieved at this ruling but is understandably apprehensive about the continued nightmare of Gadd coming up for parole again, and the fear of him being let out on licence. 'This is unfair on victims and it would be better if our clients could be assured that he would serve the rest of his sentence.'

Gary Glitter denied jail release
Gary Glitter denied jail release

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Gary Glitter denied jail release

Gary Glitter, the convicted child sex offender, will remain in jail after the Parole Board rejected his bid for release following a paper review of his case. Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, was sentenced to 16 years in 2015 for the sexual abuse of three schoolgirls and was automatically released in February 2023 after serving half of his sentence. He was rearrested less than six weeks after his release for breaching his licence conditions, with reports indicating he attempted to access the dark web and view images of children. The Parole Board stated that its decisions are solely focused on the risk a prisoner could represent to the public if released and whether that risk is manageable in the community. Richard Scorer, representing one of Glitter's victims, said the decision was 'absolutely right' but warned of the 'nightmare' his client faces each time Glitter is up for review.

Man convicted of 1994 Orkney restaurant murder is innocent, claims top lawyer
Man convicted of 1994 Orkney restaurant murder is innocent, claims top lawyer

Daily Record

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Man convicted of 1994 Orkney restaurant murder is innocent, claims top lawyer

Leading criminal lawyer Aamer Anwar believes the case of a former soldier convicted of the murder 31 years ago of a restaurant waiter is a miscarriage of justice Sheku Bayoh lawyer Aamer Anwar has called for the man convicted of the racially motivated murder of an Asian restaurant waiter to be set free. The human rights campaigner believes that former Black Watch sergeant Michael Ross is the victim of a miscarriage of justice and wants his case referred back to the appeal courts and conviction and life sentence overturned. ‌ Anwar says there is no evidence to show that he carried out a racially motivated killing. Michael Ross was found guilty in 2008 of shooting Bangladeshi waiter Shamsuddin Mahmood in the Mumutaz Indian Restaurant in Kirkwall, Orkney, in 1994. At the time of the murder Ross was only 15. ‌ After a trial at the High Court in Glasgow Ross was told he must serve 25 years before he can be considered for parole. Suspicion first fell on the teenager after his policeman father, a firearms specialist, told senior officers that he possessed the same ammunition as was used in the killing. Ross, who was an army cadet at the time, was identified as a man seen wearing a balaclava in woods around two weeks before the murder. Twelve years later new evidence came from local man William Grant who told police he had seen Ross on the evening of the murder wearing a balaclava and handling a gun in toilets near the crime scene. Mr Grant also claimed he witnessed the youth shouting racial abuse outside the restaurant weeks before the murder. A campaign - Justice for Michael Ross - has been launched on Orkney which Anwar's Glasgow firm is backing. In an exclusive interview with Criminal Record - our new weekly podcast - the lawyer said: "We have represented Michael for a few years now and need new evidence to get the keys to open the cell door and for a miscarriage of justice application. "It strikes me as incredible that a 15 year old boy could walk into a restaurant with a balaclava on, walk directly up to an individual, shoot them at point blank range and then walk out and leave nothing of themselves." Anwar says there are also concerns that 15-year old Ross was interviewed in 1994 about the murder by police without a lawyer present. He also described the evidence of Mr Grant as "fanciful". The lawyer is appealing to anyone with information on the 31 year old murder to come forward. ‌ He added: "There must be people on the island who know much more than they knew at the time and with the passage of time will feel guilt or have a conscience and will one day give that information which means we have a miscarriage of justice application. "There were always questions over whether it was someone outside the island or a gangland execution." Anwar hopes to present any new evidence to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission who have the power to refer convictions back to the appeal courts. The lawyer added: "There was evidence of people having turned up at the restaurant in the days before shouting abuse at Shamsuddin. "There is nothing to show that Michael Ross carried out a racially motivated murder." Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. ‌ Following the murder of Shamsuddin Ross enlisted in the army and saw active combat in Iraq, becoming the sergeant of a sniper platoon. Aamer Anwar is one of the country's most prominent criminal lawyers and has represented Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi, the Libyan convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, Surjit Singh Chhokar, the Lanarkshire waiter who was murdered in a racially motivated attack, and Sheku Bayoh, from Kirkcaldy, who died after being restrained by police officers in 2015. He features in a new three part series of The Firm - about the workings of his legal practice - which began last night (Tuesday) on BBC Scotland. ‌ The first episode shows him with Margaret Caldwell, the mother of murdered Glasgow sex worker, Emma Caldwell, as they successfully secure a public inquiry into police handling of her daughter's murder. In 2024, Iain Packer was jailed for life with a minimum of 36 years for the murder of Emma in 2005. It emerged that Packer has been ignored as a suspect despite admitting to police that he was a client of Emma's and had previously taken her to the remote wooded spot where her body was found. Anwar originally represented one of four Turkish men charged with Emma's murder and realised at that time they were not guilty. He added: "We need to know what went horribly wrong with the Emma Caldwell investigation. "There are still lessons to be learned. " Margaret Caldwell hopes to get to the truth but also wants a real and lasting legacy." You can hear more from Aamer Anwar in our Criminal Record podcast where he talks about death threats, online abuse, and his most memorable campaigns and cases.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store