
Trump's trade war victory is already under siege
None of that happened – at least, not yet.
President Donald Trump has pulled off what few outside the White House predicted: A trade war victory of sorts that sets America's taxes on imported goods higher than the infamous Smoot-Hawley era, without any of the damaging fallout so far. Customs revenue has increased sharply while inflation remains reasonably low. And America's trading partners, for the most part, have been willing to accept the higher tariffs without significant retaliation.
Multiple framework agreements between the United States and other trading partners have jacked up tariffs on foreign goods imported to America while setting levies on US exports at or near zero. Overseas trading partners have agreed to open previously closed markets to some US goods, pledged increased investments in the United States and dropped some of what the Trump administration has lambasted as non-trade barriers, like taxes on digital services.
But Trump's early trade victory may be short-lived. In fact, it is already showing signs that it may not last.
The European Union, fresh off its 11th-hour compromise to get a trade agreement done before Trump's self-imposed August 1 deadline, is already in revolt.
French Prime Minister François Bayrou called Sunday a 'dark day.' Hungarian Prime Minister and Trump ally Viktor Orban said Trump steamrolled the EU. Belgium's Prime Minister Bart De Wever lambasted the Trump administration's 'delusion of protectionism.' And Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's trade committee, said the deal is 'not satisfactory.'
The 27-member bloc has to hammer out key aspects of its framework, and the fragile trade truce between two of the world's largest economies could quickly break apart if sentiment turns against the arrangement.
The Trump administration's trade talks with its northern neighbor and one of its largest trading partners have been effectively shut down. Despite Canada relenting on its digital services tax that the president has lambasted, Trump continued to threaten higher tariffs on some Canadian goods, including lumber.
Although many goods imported from Canada continue to be tariff-free because of the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement, the USMCA only covers just about half of Canadian goods. So higher tariffs on Canada could raise some costs for American consumers down the road.
And the fact that America is even embroiled in a trade spat with Canada in the first place is a sign that the recent cooling off in the trade war may not last: Trump negotiated and signed the United States' current trade agreement with Canada during his first term. At any time, even after an agreement is inked, Trump could turn around and decide to raise tariffs again.
A third round of talks between China and the United States' trade negotiators is expected to result in a continued pause of their historically high tariffs on one another. But it's unclear what else might come from the discussions, and the Trump administration has grown frustrated by what it has described as China's slow-walking of its previous agreements.
Both sides have aimed to reduce more regulatory barriers on shipments of key technologies. China has sought more access to critical semiconductors, and the United States wants the flow of rare earth magnets to increase further.
But the Trump administration has tried repeatedly to speed up China's slow progress, claiming the country has failed to live up to its agreement to approve the critical materials for crucial electronics. Trump has also said he wants China to open up its market to more US goods – a desire that Chinese Premier Xi Jinping is unlikely to give in to significantly.
Trump's rhetoric against China has cooled in recent months, but the truce appears to be on a knife's edge.
A crucial appeals court hearing Thursday could determine whether most of Trump's tariffs are legal at all.
For most of his tariffs, Trump has cited powers listed in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. But a federal court in May ruled that Trump overstepped his authority to levy tariffs on that basis.
An appeals court paused that ruling from taking effect and will hear oral arguments Thursday. It's not clear when the court will rule, and the White House would likely appeal to the Supreme Court if it loses.
If Trump ultimately loses his ability to levy tariffs using emergency powers, he has plenty of other options – but legal experts have said those alternatives could limit his ability to set tariffs without Congress. For example, Trump may be able to impose some tariffs as high as just 15% but only for 150 days, potentially taking some of the bite out of his tariff regime.
Although the US economy remains strong, with rebounding retail sales, a still-robust labor market and rising consumer confidence, there is some evidence that inflation in key areas is starting to creep higher – slowly – because of tariffs. That's a potential warning sign as the tariffs take full effect.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index earlier this month showed that some tariff-affected goods have started to gain in price. Clothing, appliances, computers, sporting goods, toys, video equipment, hardware and tools prices have been on the rise. And it's starting to become a trend – in many of those categories, the rise has been happening for a few months.
Many major retailers, including Walmart, have said they will raise prices because of tariffs. And GM, Volkswagen and Stellantis all reported tariff charges of $1 billion or more over the past quarter.
Economists widely expect inflation to pick up in the late summer and throughout the rest of the year as retailers work through the inventories of goods they had stockpiled before tariffs went into effect. No one expects anything close to the inflation crisis of a few years ago. But with consumers still dealing with price-hike PTSD, that won't be a welcome change from the return to healthy inflation levels over the past year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Saving $100 a Month? You'll Be $1.1M Short of a Comfortable Retirement — 5 Things You Can Do
Saving $100 a month might feel like a comfortable way to build a nest egg, but is it enough for retirement? With rising costs, longer retirements and stagnant savings yields, that $100 won't necessarily stretch far when it matters most. Trending Now: For You: Why $100 a Month Isn't Enough A study from looked at how wide the gap really is. Someone with $8,000 in savings (the median U.S. bank balance according to according to the latest Survey of Consumer Finances data) who adds $100 each month will end up with just $57,629.53 after 20 years, assuming a 4.4% annual return. That's against a retirement target of $1.25 million, the amount needed to cover 25 years of expenses at $50,000 a year. The shortfall? A massive $1,192,370.47. Even bumping contributions to $500 per month still leaves the final balance at just $211,122.92, a long way from financial freedom. Here are six strategies that can make a meaningful difference over time. See Next: Look for Easy Expenses To Cut Some expenses, like unused subscriptions or overpriced delivery habits, are an obvious place to start when it comes to adding to monthly savings. Being able to redirect even $50 to $100 a month into savings can be an immediate win and doesn't have to be too painful. Increase Contributions Early and Often Waiting for a raise or a milestone to start saving more is a luxury most can't afford. Even a $25 increase now beats a $100 increase five years from now. Whether boosting automatic payroll deductions or increasing personal retirement account contributions, it's important to revisit savings annually and raise the amount steadily. Use the Right Type of Accounts Tax-advantaged accounts like 401(k)s, Roth IRAs and traditional IRAs offer valuable benefits in the run-up to retirement. Pre-tax growth, compound interest and employer matching can help retirement savings grow faster, with the average 401(k) match in 2025 between 4% and 6% of compensation, according to Vanguard. Invest With a Long-Term Lens Holding everything in cash may feel safe, but it often falls short of keeping up with inflation. Compound growth requires time and some risk tolerance. Building a diversified portfolio focused on long-term growth is one of the most effective ways to help savings grow enough to meet real retirement goals. Push Back Retirement by a Few Years While it might not be a popular choice, delaying retirement even by a few years can make a meaningful difference. It gives investments more time to grow, adds more contributions and shortens the number of years savings need to last. More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on Saving $100 a Month? You'll Be $1.1M Short of a Comfortable Retirement — 5 Things You Can Do
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats use obscure law to seek release of Epstein files
Democrats moved Wednesday to force Donald Trump to release files from the investigation into notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, invoking an obscure law to keep up the pressure on an issue that has roiled the US president's administration. The White House has been facing increasingly intense demands to be more transparent about the disgraced financier, who died in federal prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. The president raised further questions about his past relationship with Epstein on Tuesday when he told reporters he fell out with his former friend after the disgraced financier "stole" employees from the spa at his Mar-a-Lago resort. The Justice Department angered Trump supporters earlier this month when it said Epstein had died by suicide and had no "client list" -- rebuffing conspiracy theories about the supposed complicity of high-profile Democrats that leading figures in Trump's MAGA movement had been pushing for years. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and the Democrats on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee wrote to the Justice Department asking for the materials under a section of federal law known as the "rule of five." The measure -- introduced a century ago but rarely used -- requires government departments to provide relevant information if any five members of the Senate's chief watchdog panel request it. It is not clear if it could be enforced in court but even if the effort fails it keeps the spotlight on an issue that has upended Trump's summer, dividing Republicans and leading to the early closure of the House of Representatives. Trump has urged his supporters to drop demands for the Epstein files, but Democrats in Congress -- with limited Republican support -- have been seeking a floor vote to force their release. House Oversight Committee Democrats, backed by some Republicans, approved a subpoena last week for the Justice Department to hand over the documents, although the demand has yet to be sent. Lawmakers have also been seeking testimony from Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving 20 years in prison for her role in his crimes. Maxwell's lawyer has said she would speak to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee if granted immunity for her testimony. "The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony," a spokesman for the panel said. Democrats have also sought to attach votes on the Epstein files to unrelated bills multiple times, prompting Speaker Mike Johnson to send lawmakers home for the summer a day early last week rather than risk them succeeding. "Donald Trump promised he would release the Epstein files while he was on the campaign trail. He made that promise, and he has yet to do it," Schumer said in a speech Tuesday on the Senate floor. ft/dw
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Bank of Canada officials speak after central bank holds policy rate steady
TORONTO (Reuters) -Below are some key quotes from a news conference by Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem and Senior Deputy Governor Carolyn Rogers on Wednesday after the central bank held its key policy rate steady at 2.75%. MACKLEM ON CORE MEASURES "One of the reasons why we held the policy rate unchanged is because, yes, we have seen some additional pressures in underlying inflation. Core measures, the trim mean, trim median, have been running around 3. If you look at a broader range of core measures, they've all moved up. ... So, yes, that has got our attention. And, going forward, we are going to be watching closely what happens with those pressures and underlying inflation. MACKLEM ON CORE INFLATION UNWINDING "Some of the factors that may be causing that increase should unwind. The Canadian dollar appreciated after depreciating. That should pull in part. ... Wage growth has decelerated, and the economy is in excess supply. We think the economy contracted in the second quarter. So those things are all going to put downward pressure." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data