Prince Harry's Immigration Records Unsealed, but Are Heavily Redacted Over Harassment Fears
Per a judge's order, Prince Harry's immigration records were unsealed yesterday—but were heavily redacted due to fears of unwanted media attention for the Duke of Sussex.
The paperwork was made public around 4 p.m. EST on March 18, as Judge Carl Nichols ruled over the weekend that the records must be released by the end of the day on Tuesday. Judge Nichols ruled in favor of the Heritage Foundation's Freedom of Information (FOIA) request and ordered the Department of Homeland Security to release the documents, according to court filings released March 15.
This overturned a September 2024 decision by the same judge, who ruled at that time that there wasn't strong enough public interest to disclose Harry's immigration records. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington, D.C.-based group, was prompted by Harry's disclosure in his 2023 memoir Spare that he had taken drugs (including marijuana, cocaine, and psychedelic mushrooms) to question why he was allowed in the U.S. in 2020, when Harry and wife Meghan Markle moved to her home country from the U.K. with son Prince Archie (daughter Princess Lilibet was born in California in 2021).
Per The Telegraph, the 'heavily redacted files' outlined why there was not a strong enough public interest argument to disclose the records in full. 'To release his exact status could subject him to reasonably foreseeable harm in the form of harassment as well as unwanted contact by the media and others,' the documents read. 'There is the potential of harm in the form of harassment if his exact [REDACTED] is revealed. Thus, there is significant privacy interest involved in the records.'
The matter in question seems to center around whether Harry lied on his 2020 application about past drug use, which he later disclosed in the pages of Spare. Because of redactions, what Harry wrote in his application five years ago remains unclear, multiple outlets report. Application forms for U.S. visas specifically ask about current and past drug use, per the BBC, and 'admissions of drug use can lead to non-immigrant and immigrant visa applications being rejected, although immigration officers have discretion to make a final decision based on different factors.'
Harry's visa itself was not released on Tuesday, and instead the 82 pages of unsealed documents are supporting declarations and court transcripts that pertain to the Heritage Foundation's case, according to the BBC.
Sam Dewey from the Heritage Foundation told the network that he believed the Department of Homeland Security has not provided all of its papers, adding that he is 'frustrated' and that this is 'not the end of the road.' Among his complaints were that Harry was given preferential treatment, alleging that the Duke of Sussex has benefited from his 'wealth and status' by being allowed to live in the United States.
In a 2024 interview with Good Morning America, Harry said he has 'considered' becoming a U.S. citizen, but that doing so wasn't a 'high priority' for him. Speaking with Will Reeve, Harry said of living in California, 'It's amazing. I love every single day.' When Reeve pressed Harry and asked if he felt American, Harry laughed and responded, per People, 'Do I feel American? Um, no. I don't know how I feel.'
Read the original article on InStyle
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Missing Bride Arrested After Allegedly Murdering Husband on Honeymoon
Originally appeared on E! Online An Indian bride who went missing on her honeymoon has been arrested on suspicion of plotting to murder the groom. Newlywed Sonam Raghuvanshi was taken into custody by police after surrendering herself June 8, six days after the body of her new husband Raja Raghuvanshi, with whom she disappeared during their honeymoon in northeastern India, was discovered in a gorge with his throat slit. Authorities allege that the 25-year-old and her boyfriend Raj hired a group of men to kill Raja while the newly-married couple was vacationing, prompting the arrest of Sonam and four other individuals. 'The plan was to kill Raja in a distant place,' Indore deputy police commissioner Rajesh Dandotiya told reporters, per Hindustan Times, 'dump his body somewhere where it would not be found and then live happily.' However, Sonam's dad Devi Singh adamantly denies the allegations against his daughter and has accused the local government of 'lying from the beginning' of their investigation. More from E! Online Blake Lively Breaks Silence on Legal Victory Against Justin Baldoni Julie Chrisley Debuts New Blonde Hair After Prison Release Addison Rae Changes Her Name "My daughter is innocent,' he told reporters June 9, per the Indian news outlet The Tribune. 'I have trust in my daughter. She cannot do this. They got married with the consent of both families.' E! News has reached out to a lawyer for Sonam for comment and has not heard back. Sonam and Raja, 30, tied the knot in the Indian city of Indore on May 11, which Raja's brother Vipin Raghuvanshi said was a reflection of their positive arranged marriage. "Their marriage was arranged four months back and they were both happy,' he told reporters, per the BBC June 9. 'There had been no fights between the couple before or after marriage." Four days after the couple embarked on their honeymoon May 20, they went missing, prompting a search effort from police, disaster relief teams and local citizens. Following the discovery of Raja's body June 2 and no sign of Sonam, the pair's families criticized the authorities and petitioned the Prime Minister of India for help. After Sonam's arrest, Raja's brother Vipin initially said he would "not accept' his sister-in-law's 'involvement in the murder until she confessed." However, once he learned that one of the alleged accomplices was known to Sonam, he expressed his faith in authorities' investigation. "I now believe that Meghalaya government was not lying,' he said, per the BBC. 'They were telling the truth." For the latest breaking news updates, click here to download the E! News App
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Visual timeline shows how the Los Angeles protests unfolded
Clashes between federal agents and protesters in Los Angeles escalated Sunday as the demonstrations against immigration detention operations stretched into their third day and National Guard troops began arriving in the city under orders from President Trump. Here's a timeline of how the protests unfolded in multiple locations around L.A. Note: All times below are in Pacific time. Friday, June 6 Friday afternoonImmigration raids in Los Angeles on Friday sparked protests at several locations where federal agents were making arrests. In the Fashion District near downtown Los Angeles, video showed a crowd gathering outside a clothing warehouse targeted in the raids, and protesters clashing with law enforcement as they attempted to block a white law enforcement van. 3:23 Karen Bass posted on X after 3 p.m. condemning federal immigration enforcement actions in Los Angeles, saying, "we will not stand for this." Around 6 in downtown Los Angeles, demonstrators clashed with Department of Homeland Security officers at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and United States Courthouse. This was where officials allegedly took some migrants who were detained during the raids. Video from the scene shows protesters vandalizing the outside of the building and clashing with federal law enforcement at around 6:30 p.m. var pymParent = new "chart", " {} ); Around 6:30 Los Angeles Police Department said it responded to a request for assistance from federal authorities at around 6:30 p.m. and arrived at the scene within 55 minutes. The department said its response time was impacted by "significant traffic congestion, the presence of demonstrators, and, notably, by the fact that federal agents had deployed irritants into the crowd prior to LAPD's arrival." Later, the Department of Homeland Security claimed the LAPD took two hours to respond. A federal law enforcement official told CBS News that ICE requested assistance from LAPD multiple times over the course of Friday night and that it took more than two hours to honor that request. However, a senior city official in L.A. disputed that timeline, telling CBS News that it took LAPD 55 minutes to respond, not two hours. The LAPD posted on X at 7 p.m. that it had declared an "unlawful assembly," ordering protesters to leave the area and giving them five minutes to comply. By 8 p.m., video shows LAPD officers had blocked the crowd's path to the detention center. Police said some protesters had thrown large pieces of concrete. CBS News Los Angeles reporters witnessed officers firing non-lethal foam projectiles and bean bag rounds in response. Saturday, June 7 Saturday morningFootage posted to social media at around 9:45 a.m. showed federal law enforcement officers outside a Home Depot in Paramount, a city south of Los Angeles, fueling rumors of an imminent raid. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, said in a statement that there was no ICE "raid" on Saturday in Paramount, but instead the agents were staging at an office. Around 11 Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said it responded to a call about a large crowd blocking traffic in the area. Saturday afternoonTensions escalated on Saturday afternoon. At around 4 p.m., the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department declared the demonstration in Paramount an unlawful assembly, warning protesters to leave. The protests spread to the nearby city of Compton. 5:13 Gavin Newsom posted to X saying the "federal government is moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers. That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions." Around 6 Trump signed a memo ordering the deployment of at least 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles County. The majority of the soldiers would come from the California National Guard, a Defense Department official told CBS News. 7:06 of Defense Pete Hegseth posted on X that the National Guard was being mobilized immediately, and that if the violence continued, he would also mobilize active duty Marines from Camp Pendleton in San Diego County. He said the Marines were on "high alert." Saturday nightThe protests continued into Saturday night. The Los Angeles Police Department later posted on X that they had declared a protest at Alameda and Temple Streets an unlawful assembly, warning demonstrators they could be arrested if they remained in the area. Sunday, June 8 Sunday morningNational Guard troops arrived in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday, following President Trump's order. The U.S. military's Northern Command confirmed to CBS News that 300 National Guard troops were in the Los Angeles area on Sunday, specifically in Paramount, Compton and the downtown area. Photos posted just after 8 a.m. on Sunday by the U.S. Northern Command showed troops from the California National Guard's 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team in Los Angeles. Around 3 News Los Angeles reporters on the ground said demonstrations remained peaceful through Sunday morning and early afternoon. That changed around 3 p.m., when a large crowd marched from the steps of City Hall to the nearby federal building, where the Metropolitan Detention Center is located. Protesters confronted a line of federal agents stationed outside. The Los Angeles Police Department issued a citywide Tactical Alert. By 3:30 p.m., the LAPD's Central Division posted on X that a dispersal order was issued and arrests were being made. Around 3:30 Newsom officially asked the Trump administration to rescind the National Guard deployment order, posting on X, "This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed." Around 4 entered the 101 Freeway in downtown Los Angeles, blocking lanes and the Aliso Street off-ramp as others watched from a nearby overpass. The California Highway Patrol shut down the freeway and deployed dozens of officers, who cleared southbound lanes and pushed demonstrators back. Several people were detained, and officers deployed smoke canisters. The crowd was completely moved from the road by 5 p.m. and moved into the Civic Center. Around 6 officer hit Australian journalist Lauren Tomasi with a rubber bullet outside the Metropolitan Detention Center. In a statement, 9News said Tomasi and her camera operator were safe and would continue their coverage. Around 9 declared the demonstration in downtown Los Angeles an unlawful assembly and ordered protesters to leave. Protesters continued moving through downtown, setting off fireworks and throwing objects at passing police vehicles. They lit fires in dumpsters and trash bins and looted at least one store. Protesters also tagged dozens of buildings with graffiti, including LAPD headquarters, the U.S. Courthouse and the former Los Angeles Times building. Australian reporter covering Los Angeles protests shot with rubber bullet by police officer Kristi Noem says "we are not going to let a repeat of 2020 happen" amid L.A. crackdown Magic in the dark: The fantastical worlds of Lightwire Theater
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
People on £10,000 to £96,000 tell us what they want from the Spending Review
This week the government will set out how much it is going to spend over the next four years on the public services that millions of people use every day. That includes the NHS, schools and public transport as well as welfare benefits, armed forces, energy projects and a whole range of other government spending. We asked a handful of readers, who had contacted the BBC via Your Voice, Your BBC News, what they would like to see in Wednesday's announcement. Lewis Eager, 26, works two shifts a week in the on-demand delivery service for a supermarket in Southend-on-Sea, earning £850 a month. He lives with his parents who he pays £120 a month. He would like the Spending Review to include a plan to help young people like him find well-paid, full-time jobs. Lewis completed a business administration apprenticeship and an Open University degree, but says he cannot find full-time work. He estimates he has applied for more than 4,000 jobs without success. "Getting knocked down all the time is horrible." Even entry-level jobs seem to require experience, he says. He sees a "looming crisis" among young people unable to get on the jobs ladder, and would like to see more money go into adult education. "I live with my parents which I have nothing against, but I thought I would have achieved more by now," he says. Resheka Senior, 39, is a nursery nurse and her husband Marcus, 49, a school caretaker. Between them they take home more than £50,000 a year. But the couple say they are still struggling, particularly while Resheka is on maternity leave. When she goes back to work, Resheka says she won't be much better off because she will have to pay for childcare before and after school for her five-year-old and all day for the younger children, aged two and nine-months. They have debts that they are shuffling between credit cards and no prospect of moving out of their two-bedroom council flat in Woolwich, London. "I don't want to stay at home. I've been working since I was 15 years old," says Resheka. But she would like to see more support for couples who are "making an honest living". She wants the government to pay for free breakfast and afterschool clubs or more free childcare on top of the 30 hours a week currently provided. "It's not as if I'm saying I want benefits," she says. "We're putting back into the economy. We just need some help." Ollie Vass works for a nutritional supplement company, where he earns £31,000. His girlfriend Grace Sangster also 19 is on an apprenticeship scheme earning £40,000. They each started saving from the age of 13, earning money mowing lawns and working in restaurants. In April, with the help of a small inheritance and their Lifetime ISAs, the couple completed on a £360,000 two-bedroomed terraced house near Slough. Ollie and Grace would like to see more support for young people starting out, especially first-time buyers, and more apprenticeships. They also think the tax-free allowance, which has been frozen since 2021 should rise so that people on low wages can keep more of their earnings. Ollie also wants to see cheaper rail fares: "At the moment it's too expensive to use." Leah Daniel, 23, and her partner are entitled to £800 a month in Universal Credit and the council pays £900 a month rent for the flat in Birmingham they share with their two-year old daughter. But currently around £100 a month is being deducted from their Universal Credit to pay for advances they took while homeless for a short time. Leah says they run out of money every month and have to borrow from friends and family, sometimes having to skip meals to make sure their daughter is fed. If the government decides to cut the welfare budget in the Spending Review, that would be "absolutely heartless", she says. "It's one thing to make sure the country's growing and we aren't wasting money and people aren't taking advantage of the system. "It's another thing if you aren't giving more support to help people out of poverty and help them look for work," she says. Above all she and her partner want stable jobs so they can "build up their lives". "So many times we haven't eaten and we're worried about tomorrow," she says. "I just want this situation to change." As a GP and practice partner earning £96,000 a year, Dr Kirsty Rogerson says she is aware she is well-off. She and her husband, a hospital consultant, own their own house, and are putting some money aside to support their sons through university. But she sees plenty of people in her surgery in Sheffield who aren't so fortunate and face what she thinks are impossible choices. If she could choose one thing for the government to take action on it would be to subsidise fresh fruit and vegetables and make processed food more expensive. "What [the government] shouldn't be doing is just tackling it at the other end with weight loss drugs," she says. "That's going to bankrupt the NHS." She would also like to see more money spent on public services. "As a mother, I'd rather pay more tax and know my children were being well educated and there's a good healthcare system," says Dr Kirsty Rogerson. The same goes for the police. "I'd rather go to bed each night knowing those things were there," she says. Sylvia Cook, 72, used to sell accounting software, then published books about Greece, before she retired. Living on a pension of £20,000 means being careful with her outgoings, so she welcomes the government's u-turn on winter fuel payments as "a good decision, if a little late". The extra £200 "obviously eases things", she says. But in general she thinks that rather than increasing spending, the government should look at where it can save money. "You can spend a lot of money and achieve nothing," she says. Instead she suggests changes to the tax system, efficiency savings across government and cutting perks for MPs and civil servants. "There are so many inefficient things they haven't got the common sense to sort out." The health service is a case in point she says. "Throwing more money at the NHS doesn't necessarily help if they don't sort that out," she says.
