logo
Was '28 Years Later' worth the wait? Beauty in the frightening madness of zombie movie

Was '28 Years Later' worth the wait? Beauty in the frightening madness of zombie movie

Yahoo3 hours ago

It's been 23 years since Danny Boyle and Alex Garland collaborated on 28 Days Later, and with such a large gap in films, a big question for 28 Years Later has been whether it can reinvigorate the excitement of the first. Starring Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Ralph Fiennes, Jack O'Connell and Alfie Williams, the new movie feels electric.
It's becoming increasingly more difficult to really feel surprised by a movie, with so many clinging to familiar and beloved plot points and storytelling elements. But 28 Years Later is able to fully shock and surprise.
28 Years Later release date: June 20Director: Danny BoyleWriter: Alex GarlandCast: Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Alfie Williams, Ralph Fiennes, Jack O'ConnellRuntime: 115 minutes
It's been, as the title states, almost three decades since the rage virus escaped a biological weapons laboratory and decimated the U.K., prompting a strict quarantine.
A small group of survivors live on an island, connected to the mainland by a causeway, which can only be crossed during a low tide.
The film is focused on 12-year-old Spike (Alfie Williams), who we meet on his first day of an excursion to the mainland with his father Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson). It's a rite of passage for Spike to take the intimidating journey for his "first kill," as he says goodbye to his sick mother Isla (Jodie Comer), who suffers from a condition that's impacted her both physically and cognitively.
While on the hunt Spike finds out about Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) and hopes that he could help his ailing mother. Jamie is adamant that won't be the case, but Spike doesn't listen and travels back with his mother to reach Dr. Kelson on the mainland.
Garland and Boyle certainly aren't giving us the expected with 28 Years Later. The film is firmly planted in the horror genre, while including rich commentary on modern society, without sacrificing any off the gruesome elements.
The first portion of the movie is largely focused on intense chase scenes and terrifying zombie surprises with the introduction of the Alphas. The naked creatures are some of the most terrifying zombies we've gotten in a long time, while the film also suggests that the zombies may not be as mindless as many believe.
Boyle's direction takes a brisk pace through the film. It feels sharp and impactful with a really satisfying execution of something thrillingly chaotic. Using elements like stock footage of British soldiers and clips of other films, it adds to the startling nature of the movie.
Notably, the movie was filmed on iPhones, an evolution from the digital cameras used in the first film, as Boyle provides terrifying frenzied shots, in addition to breathtaking images of the landscape.
As we get deeper into the story, there's more time spent on the film's examination od humanity, including our relationship with death and questions about the ecosystem, while adding a sprinkling of dark comedy. But that's what Garland does well, he adds a compelling richness to films while making room for visual impact, and creating a foundation to elevate both elements.
While some may think 28 Years Later is too wacky for them, while the story could have more cohesion overall, there's no denying the spectacle of the film as we lean into the feeling of dread throughout the story.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pulp are in a different class at euphoric Manchester Co-op Live gig
Pulp are in a different class at euphoric Manchester Co-op Live gig

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pulp are in a different class at euphoric Manchester Co-op Live gig

Red velvet curtains are swept across the Co-op Live Arena stage, as a sold out crowd feverishly await the arrival of alt rockers Pulp in the uncharacteristically tropical heat of Manchester on Saturday night. A sultry voice booms out: "This show is an encore… An encore happens because the audience wants more." It couldn't be a more fitting introduction to a band that are back, not on some mere nostalgia trip, but with a number one album to celebrate. READ MORE: 'I put my USB stick in and then they just told me they were shutting it down' READ MORE: Oasis reunion tour merchandise price list revealed including bucket hats and T-shirts - full list That album - More - has also conveniently produced some of the finest music of the band's extensive career so far. It makes for some standout moments, like the upbeat singalong of Got To Have Love, alongside the belting Pulp anthems fans are lusting for in this euphoric dazzler of a show. Emerging with cardboard cutouts of the band from their 90s prime, it serves to spotlight frontman Jarvis Cocker as the unchanging, gangly-limbed talisman at the band's heart - the elbows and hips jutting at will beneath his velvet flared suit. His chat between songs (and often in songs) is the illuminating narration to a night that feels like an epic celebration of everything the Sheffield band have achieved since their earliest incarnation in the early 1980s. Naturally Jarvis can "remember the first time" he performed here - at The Pavillion at Salford University in 1982, before adding: "in actual Manchester it was later that year at The Boardwalk does that still exist?" He asks the crowd to a resounding chorus of "no." "But do you know what tonight is the very first time we've played here," he says, looking around at the vast cavern of Co-op Live - packed to the rafters with delirious fans. The last time they played here in Manchester, two years ago at Castlefield Bowl, was to around 7,000 fans, and now here we are with 23,000. It feels like the momentum continues to build around the reunited band that hit its first high in the Britpop era of the 1990s. They remain in a different class though (if you'll pardon the album pun) - indeed this performance is a sheer masterclass in how to elate a crowd, romping as it does through hits and fan favourites to an inevitable, soaring, dancing, pulsating high of Mis-shapes and then Common People. It's all played out across a visually-arresting stage set with lit staircase and a large video backdrop. For The Fear we get perhaps the most impressive deployment you're ever likely to see of those air dancer men, usually seen on garage forecourts, who manage to give Jarvis a run for his money in the body twisting stakes. We have a full-on rave for Sorted for Es and Whizz, indie disco vibes for Disco 2000, and Jarvis becomes like a James Bond villain for the epic, throbbing pounds of This is Hardcore. He is spotlit on a leather chair, before creeping out to stalk the stage and rasp out the dark, delicious lyrics of the 1998 slow-burner in one of the highlights of this show for me. He is ever the playful and often hilarious showman, chucking out grapes and chocolates to the audience at one point, before a crowd walk-through later in the show where more goodies are fed to the yearning arms on the arena floor. "That was tea bags I was handing out," he explains back on stage. "Not condoms". The show plays in two parts, which is unusual for live gigs these days, but it allows for the satisfying endnotes of Sunrise in the first half, celebrating the summer solstice, and Sunset as the encore. And in returning to the stage after the interval, we get the lovely vignette of Jarvis alongside Nick Banks, Mark Webber and Candida Doyle to perform an acoustic Something Changed, after Jarvis explains how this latest band incarnation reunited after a get together in 2022. The band's songs retain an intoxicating power, speaking as they so often do of missed chances, mundane moments, heartbreak and of growing up that make us who we are today. They also have an abilitiy to speak to the masses in an extraordinary way - probably because we all feel a bit like those misshapes, mistakes and misfits. Looking out at the sea of bodies across the Co-op Live Arena, jumping as one to Babies and Common People, ensured this was a night no-one here will forget. Just as the voiceover at the start of this show promised it would be. Part one Spike Island Grown Ups Slow Jam Sorted for Es and Whizz Disco 2000 F.E.E.L.I.N.G. C.A.L.L.E.D. L.O.V.E. Help the Aged Tina Farmers Market This is Hardcore Sunrise Part two Something Changed The Fear OU Pink Glove (fans' choice) Acrylic Afternoons Do You Remember the First Time? Mis-Shapes Got to Have Love Babies Common People Encore Sunset

Woman Drops Out of Family Wedding and Instead Considers Giving $600, but Many Argue the Sum Is Too Much: 'That's Nuts'
Woman Drops Out of Family Wedding and Instead Considers Giving $600, but Many Argue the Sum Is Too Much: 'That's Nuts'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Woman Drops Out of Family Wedding and Instead Considers Giving $600, but Many Argue the Sum Is Too Much: 'That's Nuts'

A Mumsnet user has to back out of her relative's upcoming wedding because her child has a doctor's appointment She and her husband are considering paying the couple over $600 as a wedding gift Users felt the amount was far too much and suggested lower pricesA woman wants to give her relative a financial gift for a wedding she's no longer attending, but people fear that she is being overly generous. In a post on the popular U.K. forum Mumsnet, the woman detailed how a relative of hers is getting married 200 miles away on a weekday in a couple of weeks. She and her family planned to attend, but those plans have now changed. is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! 'We had taken annual leave to be there and booked a hotel for the night before. Unfortunately we can no longer make it,' she explained, adding that her 2-year-old child now has a doctor's appointment on that date. The woman learned from her mother that the plates for the wedding cost $169 per person; now she's concerned that she needs to pay for her child's absence as well. She and her husband discussed giving over $600 and wanted feedback on whether this amount would be 'reasonable and would cover the cost of our absence and a good amount surplus as a gift?' 'We are not especially close to the relative and might see them once a year at a family event and I will usually send a a new year's/birthday message (and the relative will reply but never initiate),' the poster added. 'However we are very closely related (not parents or siblings but aunt/uncle/first cousin degree relations).' Users on the forum felt the generosity of the gift was far too much. 'That is an insanely large amount,' a commentator said. 'Wedding gifts are not based on how much the couple are paying for their wedding. That's an incredibly crass and unpleasant way to decide how much you are giving as a gift. You don't have to change how much your gift is because you are no longer going.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Some offered that a gift of $60 or more would be more appropriate. 'That's nuts,' one person said. 'They've probably got someone else who can fill your place.' Read the original article on People

NEWS OF THE WEEK: Court rejects Ed Sheeran Thinking Out Loud copyright case
NEWS OF THE WEEK: Court rejects Ed Sheeran Thinking Out Loud copyright case

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

NEWS OF THE WEEK: Court rejects Ed Sheeran Thinking Out Loud copyright case

A minority owner of a Marvin Gaye song has tried tirelessly to sue Sheeran over the alleged similarities between Sheeran's hit and Let's Get It On, but the High Court has refused to accept the lawsuit. "No reasonable jury could find that the two songs, taken as a whole, are substantially similar in light of their dissimilar melodies and lyrics," the judge declared, as reported by USA Today. Back in November, the High Court found that Sheeran did not infringe on Gaye's copyright, citing that the songs share only the "fundamental musical building blocks".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store