logo
If 'conservation' is the goal, why emphasize public access to natural land?

If 'conservation' is the goal, why emphasize public access to natural land?

Yahoo18-05-2025

The word "conservation" has appeared regularly in Wisconsin news — whether it is continued funding of Knowles-Nelson "conservation" funding or WisCorps "conservation" activities or nature trail marathon running.
My concern is that the word "conservation" is misrepresented in all these conversations. If the purpose of Knowles-Nelson is to "conserve" what little of our natural land cover is left — then why is public access emphasized? Possible scientific areas have been, and should be, prioritized due to sensitivity of the land and for future generations. What will future generations see when native plants are damaged or destroyed by recreational activities? There is the notion that nature is for our "eye candy."
As "conservatives" also mislabel their opposition to land preservation, we should "conserve" what we have as "conservatives." These have long been bipartisan activities and should not become contests for who can grant the public the most access to our few and shrinking natural treasures.
Recreation, is not preservation.
Thomas Murn, Beloit
Opinion: Environmental reviews protect lakes and forests from political chainsaws
Opinion: Wake surfing done responsibly is fine. Don't restrict Wisconsin boaters like me.
Letters: I've seen firsthand how wake-enhanced boating makes small Wisconsin lakes unsafe
Here are some tips to get your views shared with your friends, family, neighbors and across our state:
Please include your name, street address and daytime phone.
Generally, we limit letters to 200 words.
Cite sources of where you found information or the article that prompted your letter.
Be civil and constructive, especially when criticizing.
Avoid ad hominem attacks, take issue with a position, not a person.
We cannot acknowledge receipt of submissions.
We don't publish poetry, anonymous or open letters.
Each writer is limited to one published letter every two months.
All letters are subject to editing.
Write: Letters to the editor, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 330 E. Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 500, Milwaukee, WI, 53202. Fax: (414)-223-5444. E-mail: jsedit@jrn.com or submit using the form that can be found on the on the bottom of this page.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Focus on preservation of natural land, not recreation | Letters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Golden Share' in U.S. Steel Gives Trump Extraordinary Control
‘Golden Share' in U.S. Steel Gives Trump Extraordinary Control

New York Times

time31 minutes ago

  • New York Times

‘Golden Share' in U.S. Steel Gives Trump Extraordinary Control

To save its takeover of U.S. Steel, Japan's Nippon Steel agreed to an unusual arrangement, granting the White House a 'golden share' that gives the government an extraordinary amount of influence over a U.S. company. New details of the agreement show that the structure would give President Trump and his successors a permanent stake in U.S. Steel, significant sway over its board and veto power over a wide array of company actions, an arrangement that could change the nature of foreign investment in the United States. The terms of the arrangement were hammered out in meetings that went late into the night on Wednesday and Thursday, according to two people familiar with the details. Representatives from Nippon Steel — which had been trying to acquire the struggling U.S. Steel since December 2023, but had been blocked by the Biden administration over national security concerns — came around to Mr. Trump's desire to take a stake that would give the U.S. government significant control over the company's actions. Nippon had argued that this influence should expire — perhaps after three or four years, the duration of the Trump administration. But in the meetings, which were held at the Commerce Department, Trump officials led by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick insisted that the golden share should last in perpetuity, the two people said. Under the terms of the national security pact, which the companies said they signed Friday, the U.S. government would retain a single share of preferred stock, called class G — as in gold. And U.S. Steel's charter will list nearly a dozen activities the company cannot undertake without the approval of the American president or someone he designates in his stead. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store