logo
Risky to entrust high caliber Ringling Museum to New College

Risky to entrust high caliber Ringling Museum to New College

Yahoo27-02-2025

I have read the news about Gov. Ron DeSantis commandeering a change in leadership of our wonderful Ringling Museum of Art to his appointed president at New College.
It is chilling to imagine that, considering what they did to New College, tearing it apart rather than repairing a longstanding institution.
Presently, under the leadership of Steven High and Florida State University, the Ringling Museum has hosted exhibits of the highest caliber within a range to interest anyone and everyone.
In addition to the art galleries, there are frequent lectures, music and other performances that stir the imagination and lift the audience to new and wonderful ideas and experiences.
As a conservator at the Museum of Natural History in the Smithsonian Institution, I have seen how museums function and the intricacies of and requirements necessary to exhibit works of art.
The Ringling Museum already does it all to the highest caliber.
Please don't entrust this intricate skill to someone steeped in toxic politics who has no museum experience and would surely degrade the quality of our museum.
Natalie Firnhaber, Sarasota
Some government agencies might warrant strategic cutbacks, but the IRS should actually have even more employees and a bigger budget – to help it find waste, fraud and abuse by wealthy people who do not pay their fair share of taxes but reap the benefits that taxes help finance.
More than 11 million Americans owe back taxes, but the IRS is primarily interested in high-wealth groups and corporations. Its mission is to improve compliance and ensure fairness.
After years of declining budgets, the IRS finally had the resources to improve collections. Last year it collected more than $1 billion in past-due taxes from millionaires.
And since 2022, audits of taxpayers making less than $400,000 a year have not increased.
Isn't that what we all want? That everyone pays their fair share? Our economy certainly could use that money, but it definitely shouldn't fund even more tax cuts for the wealthy.
Isn't it strange that those who clamor to hobble the IRS are the "1 percenters," who probably already cheat on their taxes?
Let your members of Congress know that you want a strong IRS that can improve compliance and fairness for all.
Virginia deHaven Hitchcock, Sarasota
Imagine being the richest man in the world.
You just spent a quarter of a billion dollars buying close proximity to a president, so you can inflict immense suffering on countless others, including the world's poorest, in order to become even richer. This sickness is obviously not imaginary.
What kind of a sociopath would fire:
nuclear safety workers.
Veterans Affairs workers.
medical and scientific researchers.
workers at our national parks.
immigration judges (already in short supply).
aviation safety workers.
an entire agency that protects Americans from financial scammers.
personnel who protect us from severe weather.
emergency response workers at FEMA.
researchers into Sept. 11-related diseases.
thousands of IRS workers (all of whom add money to the Treasury).
The list could obviously go on and on.
But the clincher is that all these cuts, all the misery and suffering of both the workers and those they served, are intended to just partially offset an enormous tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, including President Donald Trump and Elon Musk themselves.
That level of corruption is jaw-dropping.
Meanwhile, Trump played golf on 10 of his first 30 days as president, costing taxpayers $10.7 million.
Peter Burkard, Sarasota
Tamiami Trail: For nearly 100 years it has connected Tampa and Miami.
It's a practical, functional, useful name for the highway also known as U.S. 41.
But what the heck – let's toss away "Tamiami Trail" as a name and reach into the taxpayers' pockets to pay for all new signs along the highway.
And for all new maps.
Let's confuse tourists.
And most important, let's demonstrate fealty before the new self-proclaimed 'king' who is trying to distract us from the wholesale destruction of our government in order to increase the wealth of the billionaire class.
Kirk Winters, Sarasota
If an unknown entity hacked the U.S. information systems, everyone would be screaming for accountability.
Elon Musk and his minions (with no security clearance) have done just that, and our Republican representatives remain silent.
Since the mainstream media barely mentions it – and who knows what "Faux News" says? – many people may not even know about this attempted coup.
I, for one, do not want a 22-year-old 'tech bro' noodling around in my private data.
If President Donald Trump and his henchmen really want to streamline the government and cut waste, they don't need to break the systems to do it.
Makes you wonder what their goal really is.
Elon's cringeworthy press conference in the Oval Office says it all: He, not Trump, is in charge.
Linda Dirk, Lakewood Ranch
Write to us: How to send a letter to the editor
This article originally appeared on Sarasota Herald-Tribune: New College could degrade quality of Ringling Museum | Letters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Summer business travel is still on for many, but it might look different this year
Summer business travel is still on for many, but it might look different this year

Business Insider

time32 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Summer business travel is still on for many, but it might look different this year

Just because some Americans are scaling back on their summer travel, it doesn't mean their employers are. Business travel demand has remained steady going into the summer season, several travel companies have said. Navan, which works with companies like Lyft, Shopify, and Box, found that summer business travel in 2025 is up by double digits compared to 2024, a representative for the company told Business Insider in May. Navan compared corporate travel bookings for the same group of companies over the same time period in 2024 and 2025 and found flight bookings were up 10% year-over-year, while hotel bookings were up 25%. The group included a mix of professional services, financial services, technology, and manufacturing firms, and ranged in size from small- and medium-sized businesses to public companies. TravelPerk, another travel-management company, found work trip bookings this summer were up 3% compared to last year. The company compared bookings for June, July, and August made by the same group of long-term TravelPerk customers in 2024 and 2025. "The month of June is the busiest month in the first half of the year, a key time for growth, industry events, and meaningful connections," Eugen Triebelhorn, a country manager at TravelPerk, said in an email. "Especially for sales teams, June is a strategic halftime for the year ahead of the quiet vacation period in July and August." Ariel Katen, consumer advocate and director of product at Engine, another corporate travel management platform, to BI last month that the company has found work travelers expect some changes to their trips this year. The company conducted a survey in April that found 71% of businesses expected to be affected in some way by shaky economic conditions, with 29% expecting increased scrutiny of travel expenses. That could mean cutting back on premium flight upgrades or booking more affordable hotels, she said. Engine has also found that a new batch of more affordable cities is becoming popular for corporate travel, including Charlotte, North Carolina, and Nashville, Tennessee. "If you had to get the entire team down somewhere, where are you going to find more affordable hotel rooms? Is that New York City or is that Tampa?" Katen said. Business travel had shown some signs of slowing earlier this year. Airlines Reporting Corp., which tracks agency bookings, reported a 6% decline in April for agencies focused on corporate or government travel. But several travel companies have recently reported an increase or a stabilization of corporate travel demand. Alaska Air Group, which includes Alaska Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines, said in late April that business travel demand had "stabilized" after a slowdown in February and March. "Total forward bookings are up low single digits, improved from where they seem to have bottomed out in March," Andrew Harrison, Alaska's chief commercial officer, said of corporate bookings during the first-quarter earnings call on April 24. Southwest Airlines said on its quarterly earnings call, also on April 24, that corporate travel demand had been "softer, but stable." American Express Global Business Travel, a travel management company, reported an increased demand for business travel on its quarterly earnings call in May, as did Choice Hotels, which includes brands like Radisson and Comfort Inn. The trends in business travel come as leisure travel demand has softened, fueled by economic uncertainty. Several airlines withdrew their outlook for the year, with United, Delta, and Southwest cutting back on routes or capacity, citing weaker demand.

Ron DeSantis Says Floridians Have Right to Hit Protesters With Cars
Ron DeSantis Says Floridians Have Right to Hit Protesters With Cars

Newsweek

time34 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Ron DeSantis Says Floridians Have Right to Hit Protesters With Cars

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has said Floridians have a right to hit protesters with their car if they need to "flee for your safety." Ron DeSantis speaks during a news conference in Miami, Tuesday, May 9, 2023. Ron DeSantis speaks during a news conference in Miami, Tuesday, May 9, 2023. Rebecca Blackwell, File/AP Photo DeSantis was speaking on The Rubin Report on Wednesday, when he said: "We also have a policy that if you're driving on one of those streets and a mob comes and surrounds your vehicle, and threatens you, you have a right to flee for your safety. "And so if you drive off and you hit one of these people, that's their fault for impinging on you. You don't have to just sit there and be a sitting duck and let the mob grab you out of your car and drag you through the streets." Gov. Ron DeSantis says that Floridians are ALLOWED to drive over protesters in the street, if they feel like their life is in danger.. LOVE this! 👏👏 — American AF 🇺🇸 (@iAnonPatriot) June 12, 2025 Civil rights activist Heather Heyer was killed after James Alex Fields Jr., drove his car into counter protesters at the Unite the Right Rally in 2017. Fields argued self-defense but was found guilty of first degree murder. DeSantis' comments come ahead of the 'No Kings' protests which are planned for June 14. Protest organizers have said the demonstrations are non-violent, and are providing de-escalation training to people taking part. This is a developing story and will be updated.

Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill

Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives his thoughts on Elon Musk amid clash on bill President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of his "big, beautiful bill" with disappointment as Musk responded on X. A centerpiece of Donald Trump's tax bill would make millions of Medicaid recipients work, volunteer or study to maintain their publicly-financed health insurance. Republicans say the work requirement is vital to protect taxpayers while motivating nondisabled Medicaid recipients to take charge of their physical and fiscal health. Dr. Mehmet Oz challenged this population to "prove that you matter." But health advocacy groups and analysts say most recipients already work in jobs that don't provide affordable health insurance or pay enough for people to afford their own insurance. They say mandating a Medicaid work requirement − combined with more frequent eligibility checks − would create an administrative nightmare that drops coverage for many who qualify for the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled residents. What is Medicaid churn? Medicaid rolls vary from month to month as people lose eligibility due to a new job, a raise or other income source that disqualifies them for coverage. A job loss or change in life circumstances could make someone newly eligible. The constant change of Medicaid rolls is what health policy experts call churn. A person who temporarily loses coverage due to a paperwork issue or mistake then must again sign up. "Churn is what happens when these eligibility systems become difficult to navigate," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured for KFF, a health policy nonprofit. The federal government requires state Medicaid programs to check enrollees eligibility once a year. The Trump tax cut legislation would mandate states double eligibility checks to twice a year. And states would have the added duty of verifying a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation, which passed the House and awaits Senate approval, mandates Medicaid recipients who are "able-bodied" adults without children work 80 hours per month or qualify for an exemption such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The bill defines able-bodied as people who are not medically certified as physically or unfit for employment. The legislation also would strip coverage from undocumented immigrants who get Medicaid through state-funded programs. Health policy experts say more frequent eligibility checks and red tape will add administrative costs and cut off people who qualify but fall through the cracks due to administrative miscues. "People are going to have to document work status or exemption status multiple times a year, and at each point there's a risk that someone who is eligible could lose coverage," Tolbert said. Thousands lost coverage under Arkansas work requirement During the first Trump administration, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services gave states the option of implementing a work requirement for nondisabled adults on Medicaid. Arkansas' work requirement cut more than 18,000 residents from Medicaid within the first seven months of the program. People were removed often because people were unaware of paperwork requirements to keep their coverage, research shows and analysts said. In April, a study by researchers from the Urban Institute and Loyola University Chicago found the Arkansas uninsured rate jumped 7.4 percentage points among low-income adults age 30 to 49 after the state's work requirement began. The policy's impact on employment among that age group was "negative, small and statistically insignificant," the study said. Arkansas adults who didn't have access to the internet at home were disproportionately harmed by the policy, a sign adults might've had trouble accessing the state's online portal to report work histories or exemptions, the Urban Institute said. If the work requirement for Medicaid recipients is adopted nationwide, health experts say millions of working poor Americans will inevitably lose coverage. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated 10.9 million Americans would lose health insurance coverage through 2034 under the legislation. Most would lose coverage due to the Medicaid work requirement and the twice-a-year eligibility checks, but about 3.1 million would become uninsured from tweaks to Affordable Care Act enrollment, according to a KFF analysis. The ranks of the uninsured could grow larger if Congress doesn't extend the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made ACA plans more affordable for consumers. If the tax credits expire and Congress passes the current version of the Trump tax bill, as many as 16 million Americans would lose coverage , according to CBO. "Coverage loss from work requirements should actually be very small," said Kathy Hempstead, a senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. "But we anticipate it will be very large, because people will not be able to comply with the requirements and will lose their coverage." Dr. Oz: Medicaid spending is 'crippling the system' The Trump administration's top Medicaid official has defended the House legislation as a necessary step to slow spending for the federal health program that covers nearly 80 million low-income and disabled Americans. In a June 4 interview with Fox Business, Dr. Oz challenged Medicaid recipients who would face work requirements should "prove that you matter." Oz, the Trump-appointed administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the work requirement asks "able-bodied individuals who are able to go back to work at least try to get a job or volunteer or take care of a loved one who needs help or go back into school. Do something to show you have agency over your future." In a Fox News interview posted on the social media site X, Oz said Medicaid spending has surged 50% since 2019, a pace that is "crippling the system." However, some Republicans have pushed back on the proposed cuts. In a May opinion piece in the New York Times, Sen. Josh Hawley, R- Missouri, said "slashing health insurance for the working poor" is "morally wrong and politically suicidal." Survey: Americans worried about Medicaid cuts The public is paying attention to the proposed Medicaid cuts. Slightly more than half of adults said they're worried significant cuts in Medicaid spending would negatively affect their family's ability to obtain and afford health care, according to a KFF health tracking poll released June 6. The survey this survey of 2,539 U.S. adults was conducted online and by telephone over three weeks in May. The survey said nearly 6 in 10 adults said the Trump administration's policies would weaken Medicaid, but there is a stark divide based on party affiliation. Nine in 10 Democrats but just 2 in 10 Republicans expect the administration's policies would weaken Medicaid. Republicans also were far more likely than Democrats to say that the Trump's policies would strengthen Medicaid. Still, while the survey suggests people are tracking the news, many likely wouldn't know whether their coverage has changed until they try to get medical care. "People don't often know that they've lost coverage until they try and fill a prescription or see a doctor," Tolbert said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store