logo
Taliban Rule Hits 4 Years as Global Divide Deepens

Taliban Rule Hits 4 Years as Global Divide Deepens

The Diplomat2 days ago
Four years ago, just before the Taliban returned to power in Afghanistan, the group banned the sale of children's toys in Kandahar province. It was a sign of the group's draconian approach.
As the group marks its fourth year back in power, the Taliban have closed off society to Afghan women and have enforced brutal authority in a country where people have been relentlessly repressed by waves of conflict, corruption, poverty, and displacement for over four decades.
The myriad challenges in Afghanistan have compounded with the Taliban's rule. At the moment, more than half of the population requires lifesaving assistance, according to the United Nations. Afghanistan is facing a hunger crisis, with more than one-third of the population experiencing dangerous levels of food insecurity and severe poverty affecting 90 percent of the population. This poverty is so terrible that some parents have reportedly been forced to sell their children for survival, due to economic collapse and a healthcare crisis, among other grave humanitarian challenges.
Not only that but Afghanistan ranks globally as the sixth most vulnerable country to climate change. The country has been enduring recurring climate-related disasters and faces severe water scarcity, with reports by humanitarian organizations noting that the capital, Kabul, might become the first modern city to run out of water by 2030.
Amid these catastrophic humanitarian and climate crises, Afghanistan is also facing a severe rollback of basic human rights, particularly for women and girls. The Taliban's draconian restrictions have been contributing to increased suicide rates, especially among younger generations of Afghans. Not only have women and girls been erased from public life but they've also been dying as a result of the Taliban's decrees. The Taliban's edict requiring women to have a male chaperone to travel outside their homes has led to documented cases of women who urgently required medical attention, especially pregnant women, dying, unable to receive care in time because they weren't able to leave their homes to seek healthcare on their own. Even more troubling, at the end of last year, the Taliban banned medical training for women, which will further harm women's access to health care and increase maternal mortality rates across the country.
Despite the urgency of the crises in Afghanistan, the international community's response has been fragmented and divided. This international division was on display in a recent resolution on the situation in Afghanistan adopted by the U.N. General Assembly. According to the Associated Press, the resolution calls on the Taliban to reverse their oppression of women and girls, emphasizes 'the importance of creating opportunities for economic recovery, development and prosperity in Afghanistan,' and urges donors to address the country's dire humanitarian and economic crisis.'
Key U.N. member states cast different votes, exposing the divided international response to the urgent crises unfolding in Afghanistan. The United States voted against the resolution, while its major European allies voted in favor of it, and important regional actors including China, India, Russia, and Iran abstained from voting entirely. The contrasting votes by the different stakeholders reveal the evolving policies of these countries toward Afghanistan. At a time when global unity is crucial to address the devastating crises in Afghanistan, stakeholders have remained divided. This split has only allowed the Taliban to solidify its grip on power, with little accountability and pressure from the international community.
The U.N. resolution followed Russia's recognition of the Taliban, becoming the first country to do so. While the move highlights Russia's rift with the West and its desire to contain the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP), Russian recognition doesn't remedy the Taliban's isolation. Rather, it shows all the more why stakeholders need to come together to pursue one coherent strategy to address the critical challenges in Afghanistan, including the humanitarian and human rights crises, while ensuring they do not give legitimacy to the Taliban. At the same time, stakeholders should continue to push for justice and accountability through international means, including the International Criminal Court.
Four years into the Taliban regime, life for Afghans has become even more difficult, with basic aspects of daily life prohibited, while Afghanistan continues to sink deeper into crisis.
The challenges in Afghanistan are daunting, but the foremost step is for the international community to come together behind a unified strategy aimed at achieving an Afghanistan where women are free to live according to their will and where girls can play without fear of repression.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Afghan Taliban seek to end international isolation
Afghan Taliban seek to end international isolation

NHK

time20 hours ago

  • NHK

Afghan Taliban seek to end international isolation

The Taliban interim government in Afghanistan has signaled that the country wants to ends its international isolation following Russia's recent recognition of the Islamist group's rule. The Taliban regained power in August 2021. The interim government's economy minister Din Mohammad Hanif spoke with NHK in Kabul on Saturday. The interview came after Russia became the first state to recognize the Taliban government last month. Hanif said the recognition has good benefits politically and economically. He expressed hope that Russia will extend economic cooperation with investment and the development of the country's mineral resources. Hanif said they will request other countries to recognize their government as well. The minister denied that women's human rights are being violated in Afghanistan, and said the country's religious customs should be respected. Japan, the United States and European countries have been critical of the Taliban's strict restrictions on women's rights to education and employment.

U.N. Chief Guterres to Visit Japan to Attend TICAD 9

timea day ago

U.N. Chief Guterres to Visit Japan to Attend TICAD 9

News from Japan World Aug 16, 2025 13:00 (JST) New York, Aug. 15 (Jiji Press)--U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will visit Japan to attend the upcoming Ninth Tokyo International Conference on African Development, or TICAD 9, the United Nations said Friday. Guterres will underscore the importance of TICAD, according to Stephane Dujarric, a spokesperson for the U.N. leader. In his address at the opening ceremony for TICAD 9, to be held in Yokohama, south of Tokyo, for three days from Wednesday, Guterres will say that TICAD is a forum to highlight Africa's potential, such as having the youngest population in the world and abundant natural resources, Dujarric said. After attending the conference, Guterres is slated to visit the ongoing World Exposition in the western Japan city of Osaka. END [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press

No end in sight to plastic pollution crisis as treaty negotiations in Geneva fail
No end in sight to plastic pollution crisis as treaty negotiations in Geneva fail

The Mainichi

time2 days ago

  • The Mainichi

No end in sight to plastic pollution crisis as treaty negotiations in Geneva fail

GENEVA (AP) -- Negotiations to reach a major treaty to end growing plastic pollution around the world fell apart on Friday, with delegates in Switzerland adjourning with no immediate plans to resume. The consequence of the failed talks is devastating, as it leaves no clear path for nations to collectively address the mountains of plastic that are filling landfills, clogging oceans and showing up in chunks on beaches and other public places. "Consensus is dead," Bjorn Beeler, international coordinator for the International Pollutants Elimination Network, upon adjournment. Every year, the world makes more than 400 million tons of new plastic, and that could grow by about 70% by 2040 without policy changes. About 100 countries want to limit production. Many have said it's also essential to address toxic chemicals used to make plastics. The final decision, or lack there of, underscored the influence of the United States and other oil-producing countries such as Saudi Arabia, which opposed any limit on the productions of plastics, made mostly from fuels like oil and gas. Nations had worked for 11 days at the United Nations office in Geneva. But they were deadlocked over whether the treaty should reduce exponential growth of plastic production and put global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics. Environmentalists, waste pickers and Indigenous leaders and many business executives traveled to the talks to make their voices heard. Indigenous leaders sought a treaty that recognizes their rights and knowledge. The Youth Plastic Action Network was the only organization that spoke at the closing meeting Friday. Comments from observers were cut off at the request of the U.S. and Kuwait after 24 hours of meetings and negotiating. After the adjournment, some delegates tried to put a good face on the negotiations and expressed hope for future talks. Delegates did agree they would meet again at some point in the future. Inger Andersen, executive director of the United Nations Environment Programme, said despite challenges, despite the disappointment, "we have to accept that significant progress was made." This process won't stop, she said, but it's too soon to say how long it will take to get a treaty now. A repeat of last year's failure The negotiations were supposed to be the last round and produce the first legally binding treaty on plastic pollution, including in the oceans. But just like at the meeting in South Korea last year, the talks ended with no agreement. Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, wrote and presented two drafts of treaty text in Geneva based on the views expressed by the nations. The representatives from 184 countries did not agree to use either one as the basis for their negotiations. Valdivieso said Friday morning as the delegates reconvened in the assembly hall that no further action was being proposed at this stage on the latest draft. After a three-hour meeting, he banged a gavel made of recycled plastic bottle tops from a Nairobi landfill, one of many symbols of the plastic problem that were visible during the talks. A 'deeply disappointing' outcome European Commissioner Jessika Roswall said the European Union and its member states had higher expectations for this meeting and while the draft falls short on their demands, it's a good basis for another negotiating session. "The Earth is not ours only. We are stewards for those who come after us. Let us fulfill that duty," she said. Representatives of Norway, Australia, Tuvalu and others nations said they were "deeply disappointed" to be leaving Geneva without a treaty. Madagascar's representative said the world is "expecting action, not reports from us." China's delegation said the fight against plastic pollution is a long marathon and that this temporary setback is a new starting point to forge consensus. For their part, representatives from plastics industry, heavily criticized in recent years, called for nations to compromise more to get a deal. The Global Partners for Plastics Circularity said governments must move past entrenched positions. For any proposal to make it into the treaty, every nation must agree. India, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait, Vietnam and others have said that consensus is vital to an effective treaty. Some countries want to change the process so decisions may be made by a vote if necessary. Graham Forbes, head of the Greenpeace delegation in Geneva, urged delegates in that direction. "We are going in circles. We cannot continue to do the same thing and expect a different result," he said as Friday's meeting ended. Red lines that were not surmountable The biggest issue of the talks has been whether the treaty should impose caps on producing new plastic or focus instead on things like better design, recycling and reuse. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the U.S. opposed cutting plastic production or banning chemical additives in the treaty. The U.S. supported provisions to improve waste collection and management, improve product design and drive recycling, reuse and other efforts to cut the plastic dumped into the environment. Saudi Arabia said both drafts lacked balance, and Saudi and Kuwaiti negotiators said the latest proposal gave more weight to the views of other nations. That draft, released early Friday, did not include a limit on plastic production, but recognized that current levels of production and consumption are "unsustainable" and global action is needed. New language had been added to say these levels exceeded current waste management capacities and are projected to increase further, "thereby necessitating a coordinated global response to halt and reverse such trends." The objective of the treaty was revamped to state that the accord would be based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full lifecycle of plastics. It talked about reducing plastic products containing "a chemical or chemicals of concern to human health or the environment," as well as reducing of single-use or short-lived plastic products. It was a much better, more ambitious text, though not perfect. Each country came to Geneva with a lot of "red lines," said Magnus Heunicke, the Danish environment minister. Denmark holds the rotating presidency of the Council of Europe. "To be very clear, a compromise means that we have to bend our red lines," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store