
Billy O'Riley compares Malaysia's household income with the US
JOHOR BARU: American conservative commentator Bill O'Reilly has once again taken a jab at Malaysia, this time by comparing household per capita income between the country and the United States.
Sinar Harian reported that O'Reilly claimed that Malaysia's household per capita income stands at US$5,731 (RM25,061) per year, while the United States records US$42,220 (RM184,628).
'That's an eightfold difference,' he said in a TikTok video.
'Malaysia is angry at me—this is a ridiculous story,' he added.
Previously, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim slammed O'Reilly's remarks, which claimed Southeast Asia 'has no money,' calling them arrogant and ignorant.
Anwar, who is also the Finance Minister, said the comment not only reflected O'Reilly's ignorance of the current realities in Southeast Asia but also revealed a narrow-minded worldview influenced by racial sentiment and colonial ideology.
O'Reilly also admitted that he views himself as a coloniser.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
21 minutes ago
- The Star
Australia confident US will proceed with Biden-era submarine pact after review
SYDNEY/WASHINGTON: Australia's Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Thursday (June 12) he was confident the AUKUS submarine pact with the US and Britain would proceed, and his government would work closely with the US while the Trump administration conducted a formal review. In an Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio interview, Marles said AUKUS was in the strategic interests of all three countries and the new review of the deal signed in 2021 when Joe Biden was the US president was not a surprise. "I am very confident this is going to happen," he said of AUKUS, which would give Australia nuclear-powered submarines. "This is a multi-decade plan. There will be governments that come and go and I think whenever we see a new government, a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken," Marles told the ABC. Australia in 2023 committed to spend A$368 billion (US$239.3 billion) over three decades on AUKUS, Australia's biggest ever defence project with the United States and Britain, to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet US President Donald Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada, where the security allies will discuss tariffs and a request from the United States for Australia to increase defence spending from two to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product. Albanese had previously said defence spending would rise to 2.3 per cent and has declined to commit to the US target, saying Australia would focus on capability needs. Under AUKUS, Australia was scheduled to make a US$2 billion payment in 2025 to the US to help boost its submarine shipyards and speed up lagging production rates of Virginia-class submarines to allow the sale of up to three US submarines to Australia from 2032. The first US$500 million payment was made when Marles met with his US counterpart Pete Hegseth in February. The Pentagon's top policy advisor Elbridge Colby, who has previously expressed concern the US would lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for military deterrence against China, will be a key figure in the review, examining the production rate of Virginia-class submarines, Marles said. "It is important that those production and sustainment rates are improved," he added. AUKUS would grow the US and Australian defence industries and generate thousands of manufacturing jobs, Marles said in a statement. John Lee, an Australian Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was "primarily an audit of American capability" and whether it can afford to sell up to five nuclear powered submarines when it was not meeting its own production targets. "Relatedly, the low Australian defence spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor," Lee said. Charles Edel, Australia chair at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said AUKUS was significant for "enhancing deterrence by putting more players in the field", and it would be important for Albanese to seek reassurance from Trump when they meet. "A necessary part of the conversation will be discussing how both Australia and the US are working to boost their own defence capabilities, enhancing allied integration, and delivering deterrent effects with a sense of urgency," he said. Under the multi-stage AUKUS timeline, Britain and Australia will jointly build a new AUKUS-class submarine expected to come into service from 2040. Marles said Britain's recently completed review of AUKUS was positive. Britain announced plans this month to increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet. - Reuters

The Star
21 minutes ago
- The Star
Jetstar Asia's exit shrinks options for consumers, but unlikely to dent Changi's hub status
SINGAPORE: Jetstar Asia's impending exit after more than two decades in Singapore is a blow to budget-conscious travellers, even if the low-cost airline's modest three per cent share of Changi Airport's traffic might suggest otherwise. Although Changi remains well-served by other budget carriers on busy routes such as Bali and Jakarta, Jetstar Asia's departure will sever non-stop links to four emerging holiday spots. The Singapore offshoot of Australia's Jetstar – which began operations in December 2004 – is the only airline that serves Okinawa in Japan, Wuxi in China, Labuan Bajo in Indonesia and Broome in Australia from Changi. While Changi Airport Group (CAG) has said it would work with other airlines to restore connectivity, the prospect of losing non-stop connections to these cities comes at a time when Singapore is looking to aggressively expand the number of destinations linked to Changi. The airport is connected to about 170 cities worldwide, and the target is to surpass 200 cities by the mid-2030s, when Terminal 5 opens. Maintaining as many air links as possible is good for airlines and consumers, especially when low fares are in the mix. This also strengthens Changi's competitiveness as a transit hub. Jetstar Asia, which is 49 per cent owned by Australia's Qantas and 51 per cent by Singapore company Westbrook Investments, cited higher airport fees and aviation charges, as well as intensifying competition, as reasons it had become unsustainable to continue operations at Changi. Linus Benjamin Bauer, founder and managing director of aviation consultancy BAA & Partners, said rising costs are squeezing low-cost carriers. 'Many airlines still operate under pre-pandemic pricing models, but face a vastly more expensive cost base,' he said, adding that more exits or mergers, especially among smaller budget airlines, can be expected. The writing had been on the wall for some time for Jetstar Asia. It was the slowest of the three Singapore-based carriers – the others being Singapore Airlines (SIA) and its budget arm Scoot – to rebound from the Covid-19 pandemic. Its fleet of 13 Airbus A320 aircraft is down from 18 before the pandemic. Its move from Changi's Terminal 1 to Terminal 4 in March 2023 – which the airline protested publicly – also lengthened connecting times for passengers transferring to Qantas or its partner airlines. T4 is a distance from T1, where Qantas operates, for instance. When Singapore announced its latest round of airport fee hikes in November 2024 to fund improvements to Changi Airport and defray rising costs, Jetstar Asia had warned the increases would have an impact on its ability to offer low fares. It also noted that most of CAG's planned upgrades do not apply to T4, where it operates. Under the new fee structure, landing, parking and aerobridge charges for narrow-body jets such as the A320 will rise yearly, climbing from about $1,200 (US$935) per landing before April 2025 to $1,725 in April 2030. Passenger fees will also go up in stages until the end of the decade. Passenger fees at Changi are already steeper than those in regional hubs such as Bangkok. While such costs are seen as necessary to help airports fund infrastructural improvements to meet future demand, the increases have made it increasingly difficult for low-cost carriers such as Jetstar Asia to keep air fares low – their key selling point – without passing the extra costs on to customers. 'Singapore has become a high-cost environment for a low-cost carrier, and Qantas Group and Jetstar feel they can get better returns on their assets in other markets,' said Mayur Patel, Asia head at consultancy OAG Aviation. It does not help that in some cases, full-service carriers such as SIA can also offer low fares if tickets are booked early. This is because they have the flexibility of deploying wide-body or narrow-body aircraft, depending on demand. After its closure, Jetstar Asia's 13 planes will be redeployed progressively across the Qantas Group to support fleet renewal and growth in Australia and New Zealand in line with demand. The low-cost airline's closure comes as global demand for air travel remains strong. Airlines are expected to fly a record 4.99 billion passengers in 2025 – a four per cent increase from 2024 – according to the latest forecast from the International Air Transport Association. The Asia-Pacific region is driving this growth. So why has Jetstar Asia struggled to take advantage of this? This has partly to do with the intensity of competition on seven of the 16 routes that it serves, which are operated by at least three other airlines, data compiled by Mr Patel showed. Singapore-Bali is served by nine airlines including Jetstar Asia, Singapore-Jakarta by eight, and Singapore-Kuala Lumpur by seven. Even fellow low-cost carrier AirAsia has scaled back on some routes of late, likely due in part to higher operating costs. It dropped its Singapore-Ipoh and Singapore-Phuket services, and cut back flights to Bangkok's Don Mueang Airport earlier in 2025. Jetstar Asia's exit leaves SIA and Scoot as the only Singapore-based carriers. While consumers will have one less option, choices still abound, with one-fifth of the 100 airlines at Changi being low-cost carriers. Overall, they serve more than half of the 170 cities that the airport is connected to. Patel said any connectivity gaps left by Jetstar Asia's exit can be filled only in the short to medium term by other carriers. This is due to delays in the delivery of new aircraft and the time needed for capacity changes. Ultimately, Jetstar Asia's withdrawal from Singapore will shrink the choices available to consumers, particularly those eyeing the non-stop links it served exclusively. But its limited market share means that the impact on Changi's standing as a hub will likely be minimal. - The Straits Times/ANN


New Straits Times
28 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
'Terrifying': Migrants fret over LA raids, but still look for work
WHEN immigration officers leapt out of unmarked vans and ran towards undocumented men waiting by a Home Depot in Los Angeles, the day labourers scattered, terrified at the prospect of arrest and deportation. "People were hiding under wood, in the trash, wherever they could find a little hole," said Oscar Mendia, a Guatemalan who estimated 25 people were arrested. "It was like something out of a movie." The raid was part of an anti-immigration crackdown ordered by President Donald Trump that has seen factories and work sites targeted since Friday, sparking days of angry protests in America's second biggest city. "It all started here," Mendia said, pointing to the parking lot where around 20 workers had gathered on Wednesday. Mendia, who has lived undocumented in the United States for 26 years, had never been involved in a raid before, not even during Trump's first term. "It's one thing to see it on television," he said, "But it's another to experience it firsthand." Stories of migrants being held in crowded cells, unable to speak to family or lawyers before being rapidly deported are frightening, said another man, aged 40, who did not provide a name. But they are not enough to keep these workers away from the parking lot, where they gather in the hope of snagging off-the-books work in construction, farming or manual labour. "It's difficult, but we have to work, we have families to support," said the man, who sends most of his money to Honduras to provide for his six children. Mendia, who also used remittances to educate and raise his three children in Guatemala, says men like him have less to fear in this anti-immigration climate. But for the new generation, the situation "is terrifying," he said. "They come with hope, they come dreaming of a future." Beside him, a 21-year-old nods nervously. The young man was saved from Friday's raid because he had already been picked up for a construction project by the time the armed federal agents arrived. On Monday, he almost didn't come back, but ultimately realised he had no choice. "We need to do it," he told AFP. The men's stories are echoed in parking lots, car washes and on construction sites all over Los Angeles and throughout the United States. They fled countries devastated by economic and political crises, or by violence, in search of work to support their families. After difficult and dangerous journeys, they work for low salaries, doing the kind of back-breaking jobs many Americans have long since abandoned – and often pay taxes. Undocumented migrants contributed nearly US$90 billion to the public purse in 2023, according to an analysis by the American Immigration Council. Trump returned to power this year after campaigning on a pledge to conduct the biggest deportation operation in US history. The ramped-up raids this week appear to be part of a push to make do on that promise, and come after White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller reportedly ordered ICE (Immigration Customs and Enforcement) bosses to make at least 3,000 arrests every day. In Los Angeles, a city with large foreign-born and Latino populations, the idea of these masked men swooping has horrified people, many of whom personally know undocumented people. "Why is Donald Trump doing this?" asked a Mexican man who arrived in the United States nearly three decades ago. The man, who asked not to be identified, said it was unfair to go after hard-working people who are just trying to make a living. "Why is he attacking Los Angeles? Because we are a power, because we are the ones who make the economy," he said, "This country will fall without Latinos." The migrants of the 21st century might be largely Latinos, but America's rich history is one of waves of different people coming to these shores. "This is a country of immigrants," said Mendia, recalling Trump's own German roots. "Everyone from the president to the person who sweeps the streets."