GOP's Comer subpoenas Jill Biden aide in panel's probe of Joe Biden's mental health
June 26 (UPI) -- Republican House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman James Comer on Thursday issued a subpoena to a former Jill Biden aide in his panel's probe into Joe Biden's mental health.
The subpoena targeted Anthony Bernal, a former assistant to the president and senior adviser to the former first lady, calling for him to appear for a deposition on July 16 as part of Comer's probe into what his press announcement called "the cover-up of President Joe Biden's mental decline and potentially unauthorized executive actions."
Comer's announcement on the subpoena said Bernal was reportedly so close to the former first lady that he was referred to as her "work husband."
A day earlier, Bernal had notified Comer's panel that he would not take part in its requested interview. Comer on Thursday said that Bernal previously had confirmed that he would appear "for a voluntary transcribed interview" on Thursday. However, Comer said, the White House Counsel's office informed Bernal that it was waiving executive privilege for the committee's investigation. At that, Bernal refused to appear.
In a subpoena cover letter, Comer said, in part, to Bernal that "the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform requested that you -- because of your role as a senior aide to former President Joe Biden -- appear for a transcribed interview on June 11, 2025, broadly regarding 'the extent of your influence over the former President and your knowledge of whether the former President was personally discharging the duties of his office.'
"Given your close connection with both former President Biden and former First Lady Jill Biden, the Committee sought to understand if you contributed to an effort to hide former President Biden's fitness to serve from the American people," the letter continued. "You have refused the Committee's request. However, to advance the Committee's oversight and legislative responsibilities and interests, your testimony is critical. Accordingly, please see the attached subpoena for testimony at a deposition on July 16, 2025."
Bernal was one of the sources cited in Jake Tapper's book Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again. That book also has been referenced by Comer in his panel's investigation into Joe Biden's mental health.
In May, Comer announced his investigation, citing general concerns about Biden's age and mental capacity after the president's troubled performances and missteps on the campaign trail, which eventually resulted in Joe Biden withdrawing from his presidential run.
Comer's investigation also launched as renewed interest in Biden's health erupted after the former president announced he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Earlier this month, President Donald Trump ordered an investigation into Joe Biden's cognitive state, alleging that White House aides covered up his mental decline.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
Daily Briefing: Where will DC's homeless go?
Good morning!🙋🏼♀️ I'm Nicole Fallert. Can you really teach your dog to talk? Will National Guard on DC's streets address homelessness? Under President Donald Trump's orders, members of the Washington, D.C., National Guard have reported for duty across the nation's capital. A "physical presence" on D.C. streets: Trump's decision to deploy the military drew sharp condemnation from advocates and some residents, who disputed the president's justification that the city was plagued by crime and homelessness. Smithsonian review to remove 'divisive' materials The Trump administration launched a "comprehensive" review of the Smithsonian Institution, taking a microscope to the nation's premier museum system amid a culture war campaign that has targeted leading American institutions. In a letter sent to the institution on Tuesday, officials said the review would determine if materials conformed to the Trump administration's views on teaching history. Within 120 days, the Smithsonian is expected to begin making "content corrections where necessary" among other changes. More news to know now What's the weather today? Check your local forecast here. Will Tropical Storm Erin hit the US? Tropical Storm Erin, which is still thousands of miles from the U.S. East Coast in the central Atlantic Ocean, is traveling west and forecast to strengthen into the season's first hurricane by Thursday, the National Hurricane Center said. The stronger the Bermuda High - a semi-permanent ridge of high pressure that sits over the western Atlantic Ocean in the summer - the more of a threat Erin is to the United States. A weaker Bermuda High is better news. But all signs point to Erin reaching major hurricane status, the hurricane center said. The forecast is due to warm waters where the storm is expected to track, providing fuel for the system. America's farmers are aging. There's no one to replace them. With nearly 40% of all farmland across the country now owned by farmers over the age of 65, it's raising alarm bells. Industry leaders are voicing concerns about the future of American agriculture and the country's food supply. The current dilemma facing the farming industry ties back to the 1980s farm crisis, when thousands of families lost their farms due, in part, to plummeting land values and overproduction. The economic downturn altered the way young people thought about farming. Enrollment in agriculture-based college programs dropped, starting a trend of young people who grew up in farming families opting not to continue the business. Today's talkers The US suburbs where the grass really is greener New York's wealthiest suburb is Scarsdale, a name long linked to affluence. Wellesley, the most well-heeled Boston suburb, is known for academia. McLean, a high-earner enclave outside the nation's capital, houses diplomats and spies. USA TODAY dove into a new report that identifies the wealthiest suburbs of America's 50 largest metropolitan areas in 2025. Some of the names are familiar. But perhaps surprisingly, other affluent suburbs are larely unknown. Photo of the day: This Barbie gets equal pay Venus Williams selected her outfit from her 2007 Wimbledon win for her own Barbie. Why? It was the first year the women's and men's singles champions earned equal prize money at Wimbledon, a cause that Williams championed long before her win. In an exclusive interview with USA TODAY Sports, Williams said seeing her own Barbie marked a "full-circle moment." Nicole Fallert is a newsletter writer at USA TODAY, sign up for the email here. Want to send Nicole a note? Shoot her an email at NFallert@
San Francisco Chronicle
9 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The Trump administration wants to squash clean energy. How bad will it be for California?
Before President Donald Trump was elected for the second time, catastrophic wildfires sent electricity prices soaring and posed one of the biggest continuing threats to energy affordability in California. Today, there's another major factor. Since taking office, the Trump Administration has thrown up roadblocks for clean energy development at a time when electricity demand is rising. In nearly a dozen policy directives, the administration is ending subsidies and tax credits for wind and solar and adding regulatory hurdles that could slow new development. These actions, some renewable energy advocates say, could drive up electricity prices even more nationwide and especially in California, a state pushing new large-scale wind and solar projects in its race to ensure homes and businesses are powered solely by clean energy sources by 2045. 'It's going to hurt affordability for literally every person in this country," said Merrian Borgeson, California climate and energy policy director with the Natural Resources Defense Council. Trump has repeatedly complained that wind and solar farms are eyesores that take up too much space and are too reliant on government subsidies. His administration has quickly reversed policies promoting renewable energy, while clearing hurdles for gas- and coal-fired power sources. 'We will develop the liquid gold that is right under our feet, including American oil and natural gas,' Trump wrote on social media. 'And we will also embrace nuclear, clean coal, hydropower, which is fantastic, and every other form of affordable energy to get it done.' However, Trump's view of renewables overlooks how much less expensive experts say they are to develop compared to gas and coal. A June report from Lazard asset management firm found that 'utility-scale solar and onshore wind remain the most cost-effective forms of new-build energy generation,' even with no government subsidies, and that the cost of building new gas turbines had reached a 10-year high. 'It costs less to build a new clean energy power plant than to just operate an existing fossil fuel plant,' said Daniel Kammen, a professor of energy at UC Berkeley. The actual impacts of Trump's policies to utility bills, if any, aren't yet known because most have yet to be implemented. One of the most impactful changes may be the abrupt end of tax credits that can save clean energy developers at least 30% on costs. That tax credit was slated to begin phasing out in 2032, but the Trump administration has changed the deadline to Dec. 31, 2025. The American Clean Power-California is urging state agencies to speed up approvals of projects currently under review so that they qualify for the federal tax credits before they sunset. Without the tax credits, developers could be paying between $400 million to $650 million more per gigawatt of large-scale solar or wind resources currently in the pipeline, according to an association memo submitted to the CPUC. That could boost costs by as much as 60% over the lifetime of a project, according to the association. These aren't direct costs to ratepayers but could eventually filter into utility bills. Utilities pass the costs of buying energy directly to customers. For example, roughly 38% of Pacific Gas and Electric Co. residential bills go toward power the company generates and power it buys from power producers. PG&E spokesperson Lynsey Paulo said that the company is currently not aware of any impacts to new power projects related to changes in federal policies. The company 'met our residential and small business customers' electricity use with 98% greenhouse-gas free electricity in 2024,' she said. PG&E will continue adding greenhouse gas-free sources of electricity 'to reduce emissions across our energy system and make progress toward our goal of net-zero emissions by 2040 at the lowest possible cost,' she said. Alex Jackson, executive director of the power association said there is now a race among developers to qualify for the subsidies and tax breaks before they expire. But he said the state has a lot of tools to push projects forward despite federal policies. 'California is a big state. It has a lot of influence,' Jackson said. 'It's not helpless in this fight.' State regulators this summer fast-tracked a massive new solar project in Fresno County slated to include more than 3 million solar panels and the largest solar energy battery storage system in the world. Called the Darden Clean Energy Project, it was the first project approved in a new process designed to reduce regulatory hurdles. The project developer, a subsidiary of San Francisco-based Intersect Power, didn't respond to a request for comment from the Chronicle. But Borgeson said that the project is unlikely to face federal pushback because it is on private land and primarily required state approval. A California Public Utilities Commission spokesperson said there are 'hundreds' of clean energy projects currently in the pipeline. 'We are actively assessing how recent changes in federal tax, tariff, and land use policy may impact the long-term prospect for projects planning to come online to serve California – but so far 2025 has continued to see robust development of new resources,' said Terrie Prosper, CPUC spokesperson. But it's not just heavily Democratic California that relies on clean energy sources. Wind is an important power source in states like Texas and Oklahoma, and solar power is critical in sunny states like Arizona and Nevada. In an Aug. 4 letter to Department of the Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo warned that new federal policies toward clean energy had already stalled important solar energy projects for the state and would harm his state's 'business-friendly environment.' 'Solar energy development on federal land fuels Nevada's economy,' he wrote. Many energy experts are hopeful that California will continue using its economic clout to continue fueling the clean energy boom despite federal headwinds. Gov. Gavin Newsom recently reported that the state brought a record amount of clean energy online in 2024 – about 7,000 megawatts – boasting in a news release that the state 'has never added so much capacity to our grid in such a short amount of time.' The state must triple the amount of clean energy to meet its 2045 goal – and solar is a significant part of that. Bernadette Del Chiaro, senior vice president for California at the Environmental Working Group, criticized California for slashing incentives for rooftop solar at a time when energy demand is rising and the federal government is hostile. 'We can't place all the blame on Trump. Newsom has unwisely engaged in a zero sum game of pitting one form of renewable energy against another (rooftop vs utility scale),' Del Chiaro said. With the many hurdles it is creating for large-scale projects, the federal government 'has a great deal of power to slow and delay clean energy projects, which results in higher costs,' Kammen said. Even so, Kammen said he doesn't expect it to impact utility bills in part because electricity prices are influenced by many other factors including natural gas markets. Plus, momentum for new clean energy projects is strong because 'it costs less to build a new clean energy power plant than to just operate an existing fossil fuel plant,' he said. 'The clean energy transition has left the station,' Kammen said.
Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The UK Shows How Not To Do Online Age Verification
The first week of implementation for the U.K.'s Online Safety Act (OSA) has been anything but smooth. Upon going into effect on July 25, popular online services ranging from X to Discord and even Spotify, requiring users to show ID before engaging with content on their platforms. Users turned in droves to downloading virtual private network (VPN) apps to avoid the requirements of the law and browse with their privacy intact. It's a very American response to the imposition of the British government's age verification rules, and it led the U.K.'s Secretary for Science and Technology Peter Kyle to suggest on live TV that every time an adult uses a VPN, it leads to the harm of a child online. U.S. advocates of similar digital regulations should take notice of how badly this is going. The aim of protecting children online is a worthy goal, but it is impossible to ignore the OSA's nature, which is a thinly veiled effort to normalize censorship in the U.K. and expand surveillance of British citizens and guests within their borders. A boy participates in an online lesson for his kindergarten class while schools remain closed to help slow the spread of COVID-19, in Chicago, Ill., on April 3, 2020. A boy participates in an online lesson for his kindergarten class while schools remain closed to help slow the spread of COVID-19, in Chicago, Ill., on April 3, of the primary problems with the Online Safety Act lies in its overly broad language regarding the types of content it polices. The text requires sites that host pornography and other content deemed "harmful," whatever that means, to verify that users are over the age of 18. With penalties as steep as 10 percent of global revenue and potential jail time for repeat offenses by firms, platforms are understandably overcorrecting and taking an overzealous approach to requiring ID checks in hopes of avoiding liability. For example, in order to access your Spotify account, users will need to submit their ID so that they can listen to music again on the platform, or risk their account being scrubbed. The distinction here is worth highlighting, because while some music can be profane, you can see how the law flattens graphic video content and audio content, or, put more simply, words. It's no shock that users are soundly rejecting this approach by the U.K. government by turning to VPNs. These services, such as ExpressVPN or Surfshark, have quietly empowered individuals to take control of their digital privacy, whether to protect themselves on public Wi-Fi, avoid algorithmic price discrimination, or download large peer-to-peer files online. And yes, people use VPNs to access explicit content or simply new music that is geoblocked. When a new album by your favorite band drops, Australians are usually jamming to it 12 hours before most Americans. Originally designed in the 1990s to help businesses secure remote connections, VPNs are a critical and mainstream tool for everyday internet users seeking to protect themselves in an increasingly surveilled online world. By encrypting data and masking IP addresses, VPNs shield users from hackers, corporate trackers, and even government surveillance. In an era where data is currency and digital freedom is under threat, VPNs are not a fringe convenience or an indication of nefarious activity by the user. It may only be a matter of time before the United Kingdom considers restricting VPNs altogether. They make total control infeasible. That's why Secretary Kyle had to appeal to Brits with a scare tactic about harming children with VPNs. The government passed a law that standard digital tech makes a mockery of, and that most online users under 50 know how to bypass. VPNs aren't the only way users are skirting age verification requirements. Video gamers playing Death Stranding have tapped into more creative solutions for getting past such regulations by leveraging the in-game photo modes to fool age verification software. When U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer recently told President Donald Trump, "We've had free speech for a long time, so, er, we are very proud of that," one had to wonder—what exactly is he proud of? Is he referring to the 30 people a day his government arrests for posting "offensive" things online? Or perhaps he is proud of the fact that his government was threatening Americans with criminal charges for not complying with his government's Online Safety Act? And while the OSA was done under the guise of protecting kids online, the government is also inexplicably engaged in a Streisand effect moment, with its agency announcing it was investigating four companies operating 34 pornographic websites. Essentially, by calling it out, the regulator told minors where they can go to access pornographic content without the need to utilize age verification. The Online Safety Act is a masterclass in unintended consequences and symbolic rulemaking. Britons are pushing back with a petition to repeal the law, which has already gathered over 450,000 signatures. American lawmakers would be wise to pay attention and avoid making the same mistakes in Congress. We can protect children without sacrificing the foundational principles of a free and open internet. James Czerniawski is the head of emerging technology policy at The Consumer Choice Center. His work has been featured in the New York Post, Newsmax, U.S. News and World Report, and more. Follow him on X/Twitter @JamesCz19. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
