Totti on Messi's Ballon d'Ors: ‘What if he had spent 25 years at Roma?'
Francesco Totti argues that Paulo Dybala is among the best players in the world alongside Lamine Yamal but has no Ballon d'Or regrets: 'Do you think Leo Messi would have won so many if he had spent 25 years at Roma?'
The former Italian striker released a long interview with Viva El Futbol podcast, hosted by ex-Serie A players Cassano, Lele Adani and Nicola Ventola.
Totti argued with his ex-Roma teammate Cassano over José Mourinho and confirmed he was offered to come out of retirement and play in Serie A again this season.
As reported by TMW, Totti spoke about Roma star Dybala as well: 'He is the player who resembles me the most today; I struggle to find others like him in Serie A,' said the 2006 Italy World Cup winner.
'Paulo is a true talent, not just in Italy. In my time, there were many; today, there are only five or six like him in the world. One of them is Yamal. Dybala is in great shape now, he doesn't struggle and doesn't stop. In Serie A, he is the best, but there are too few players like him in Italy. Once upon a time, Brescia had players like Pep Guardiola and Roberto Baggio. Today, you don't even recognise the names.'
Totti does not regret spending his entire career at Roma even if he had a chance to join Real Madrid in 2004.
'I never thought about playing for another team. It wouldn't have made sense,' he said.
'Only Maldini and I played 25 years with the same club. But do you really think that if Messi had spent 25 years at Roma with Frau, Cesar Gomez, and Pivotto, he would have won all those Ballon d'Ors?'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Victor Perez Drains Hole-in-One at U.S. Open Then Steals the Show
Victor Perez made U.S. Open history on Friday, and he made it look fun. He just pulled off the kind of moment that keeps golf's legend alive, and he did it on one of the tournament's toughest stages. The Frenchman sank a hole-in-one on the par-3 sixth during the second round of the 125th U.S. Open at Oakmont Country Club, making history and energizing a landscape usually defined by grit and restraint. Advertisement In a sport often defined by polite applause and reserved nods, Perez broke the mold with an exuberant celebration that spread across social media like wildfire. He struck a 7-iron from 192 yards, the ball bouncing three times and then dropping directly in the cup. The golfer raised his arms, skated toward his caddie James Erkenbeck, and shared an exuberant chest bump—a celebration not often seen on major championship turf. "ACE ALERT," the U.S. Open's official X account posted alongside the clip, noting both the "great shot" and "even better celebration." Perez's ace adds his name to the short and prestigious list of players who have made holes-in-one on golf's biggest stage. It was only the second hole-in-one ever recorded in a U.S. Open at Oakmont—the last came back in 1983 when Scott Simpson aced the 16th hole. Advertisement Ranked 99th in the world and playing in his sixth U.S. Open, Perez's ace wasn't an echo. It was a declaration. It pulled him back into contention at 1-over-par for the tournament, after an earlier triple-bogey on the par-5 12th had threatened to derail his round. With a single swing and a celebration worthy of a World Cup goal, he delivered one of the most unforgettable moments of the tournament so far. Whether or not he contends for the title, Perez's hole-in-one will be one of the highlights fans remember long after the final putt drops. It will also be a career highlight for him. This ace wasn't just a statistical footnote—it was a matter of timing and tone. With only 54 total holes‑in‑one in U.S. Open history, it's an elite club, and Perez just secured his spot. Whether Perez goes on to contend seems secondary now. For a moment, he shattered Oakmont's 'Beastly' aura and reminded everyone why golf can still move us. Victor Perez Drains Hole-in-One at U.S. Open Then Steals the Show first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 13, 2025
Fox Sports
an hour ago
- Fox Sports
What If ... the U.S. Wasn't Robbed in the 2002 World Cup?
The United States men's national team could have made the 2002 FIFA World Cup final — in fact, they should have. And yet, they didn't. Why? An obvious handball that wasn't called in the quarterfinal against Germany. The rest is history. But WHAT IF we could rewrite history? After being eliminated in the Round of 16 in 1994 and not making it out of the group stage in 1998, the U.S. was primed for a run in 2002. They were able to finish as runners-up in their group, most notably defeating Portugal 3-2 and drawing with group winner South Korea. In the Round of 16, they faced Mexico for the first time at a World Cup — and recorded a 2-0 victory behind goals from Brian McBride and Landon Donovan. Next, it was on to the quarterfinal against powerhouse Germany. Michael Ballack got the Germans out to an early 1-0 lead in the 39th minute, but the Americans responded with several attacking plays to start the second half. But in the 50th minute, everything changed. _____ Off a U.S. corner kick by Donovan, a German player attempted to head the ball away from goal— only to have it find a wide-open Gregg Berhalter, who took a shot at goal from just a few yards out. German keeper Oliver Kahn was able to barely save the shot, but the ball would bounce off the arm of midfielder Torsten Frings who was defending the post. Immediately, U.S. players began clamoring for a handball, and when the replay was shown — it was clear as day. However, referee Hugh Dallas didn't call it. And with VAR not yet in existence, the call was irreversible. Had it been called, the U.S. would have been awarded a penalty kick, and Frings would have been given a red card. As mentioned, the U.S. were dominating the first 10 minutes of the half, and surely would have taken advantage of the 10-man German side. But WHAT IF the handball was called? Would the U.S. have lifted its first-ever World Cup trophy? Would soccer in the United States be viewed in a different light today? Let's dive in. _____ If the handball had been called, the best-case scenario would have resulted in Claudio Reyna scoring the game-tying penalty— and Germany would have had to fend off a momentum-driven American attack with just 10 men. So many of the legendary Americans could have subsequently scored the game-winning goal— with Donovan, McBride, Reyna, Cobi Jones, Eddie Pope, and several others headlining the squad. Had they advanced, they would have faced South Korea in the semifinal, whom they had drawn with in the group stage. A win against the co-hosts would pit the U.S. against Brazil, and the U.S. would have made its first men's World Cup final ever. While the Brazilian squad was filled with superstars like Ronaldo, Ronaldinho and Rivaldo— the exposure from such a massive stage could have changed the landscape of American soccer for the next two decades— regardless of the result. _____ Few can forget the dominant fashion in which the USWNT won the World Cup in 1991 and 1999. This sort of success undoubtedly influenced young American girls watching the tournament, leading to the likes of Carli Lloyd, Alex Morgan, Abby Wambach— and current stars like Sophia Wilson, Trinity Rodman, and Naomi Girma. Such an emphasis on women's soccer in the United States has led to them winning four of the nine World Cups ever held. So what would a win over Germany in 2002 have resulted in for the men? Just imagine all the young boys who would have participated in soccer during the early 2000s instead of the usual suspects— Pop Warner football, little league baseball, and AAU (Amateur Athletic Union) basketball. For perspective, in a study done by the National Federation of State High Schools in 2022, there were 374,773 participants in girls soccer for that school year— the third-highest of all sports. On the boy's side? Soccer participants ranked fifth, behind football, track & field, basketball, and baseball. _____ No U.S. coach has coached or won more matches in the team's history than Bruce Arena, with 148 and 81 respectively. He was inducted into the National Soccer Hall of Fame in 2010, but what would his career have looked like if he had taken down Germany in that 2002 World Cup quarterfinal? Arena had already won two MLS titles with D.C. United in 1996 and 1997 before spearheading the 2002 national team past the Round of 16 for the first time ever. Considering that two Arena's successors – Bob Bradley and Gregg Berhalter – were able to coach abroad, it's not unreasonable to think he could have done so as well. Had he taken a potential offer in Europe, that could have also changed the team's fortunes at the 2006 World Cup. The U.S. did not make it out of the group stage in 2006, finishing last in their group and ultimately leading to Arena's exit three weeks after the tournament. He'd go on to win three more MLS titles with the Galaxy in 2011, 2012 and 2014 and was again hired by the national team in 2016. In his second stint, the U.S. failed to qualify for the 2018 World Cup— the first time that had happened since 1986. One can't help but wonder how all of this would have changed if the handball was called in 2002. _____ It's incredible to think about how a win over Germany would have changed the landscape of the MLS and American youth academies. Such an upset could have sparked massive national interest in soccer, leading to unprecedented investment in the U.S. youth soccer system. With never-before-seen pressure from both public and corporate entities, we could have seen high-level sponsorship in the MLS and a complete overhaul of youth academies— which has often been faulted for its pay-to-play model. The next five to ten years could have allowed for a network of talent aggregation modeled after the European youth system, emphasizing technical development and scouting in underserved communities. In turn, it's possible that an entire generation of world-class players would have emerged— with players like Christian Pulisic appearing in much greater numbers. Just imagine what the 2014, 2018, and 2022 World Cup results would have looked like for the U.S. had this occurred after 2002. It's totally in the realm of possibilities that the U.S. would be a consistent soccer powerhouse had this foundation been set. _____ Possibly the biggest question of all that arises from this hypothetical exercise, is just how much bigger soccer would be in this country had the U.S. taken down Germany with the correct call. It's hard to imagine that Landon Donovan wouldn't have become even more of an icon than he already is, and that he would have inspired several people to become fans of the sport. While it's hard to say that this single result would have propelled soccer as the top sport among Americans, there's little doubt that the millions of potential viewers a final or semifinal match would have generated would have changed the trajectory of the sport. For perspective, 26.7 million people watched the USWNT take down Japan in the 2015 World Cup final. The 2022 men's final between France and Argentina had over 25 million viewers. Just imagine a world in which the four-and five-star high school basketball and football recruits that colleges fight over grew up playing soccer instead. We'll never know. More Sports History "WHAT IFs?": What if ... Patriots QB Drew Bledsoe never got injured in 2001? What if ... the 49ers drafted Aaron Rodgers instead of Alex Smith in the 2005 NFL Draft? Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! recommended Get more from United States Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more in this topic
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Welcome to the Gallagher Prem: English rugby's top flight rebrands and targets US
Premiership Rugby has rebranded England's top division as the Gallagher Prem as part of a wide-ranging reboot that includes plans to take a fixture to the United States in the coming years and kicking off next season on a Thursday night. Unperturbed by the existential threat posed by the R360 breakaway league, PRL on Saturday relaunches the Premiership on the day that Bath face Leicester in the final at Twickenham. Advertisement The change comes after widespread consultation with players including the England and Northampton full-back George Furbank and the Bath prop Beno Obano, with PRL executives stating it reflects 'how fans talk' and seeks to 'unashamedly celebrate intensity, physicality, grit and extreme athleticism'. Related: Owen Farrell agrees return to Saracens as player-coach on five-year deal The rebrand – the first time the league has changed name since 1997 – is also designed to underline PRL's intentions to start a new chapter after recent years have been plagued by financial turmoil with Worcester, Wasps and London Irish all going bust. Executives point to how the number of sellouts has risen from 18 to 30 this season while a new broadcast deal with TNT has been signed and, as exclusively revealed by the Guardian, Red Bull has agreed a deal to buy Newcastle Falcons. Plans for a franchise league also continue apace amid consultation with Deloitte and Raine Group over further investment. Advertisement Emboldened as a result, a return to the US is likely. In 2016, Saracens and London Irish locked horns in New York and a year later Newcastle and Saracens squared off in Philadelphia. Neither fixture moved the dial – only 6,000 attended the latter – but, with the US hosting the Rugby World Cup in 2031, there is a collective attempt among powerbrokers to capitalise. England are playing a Test against the USA in Washington in July while the All Blacks will meet Ireland in Chicago at Solider Field in the autumn in a rematch of their historic meeting in 2016. It is understood that the British & Irish Lions turned down the chance to play their warm-up match against Argentina next week in Las Vegas but a well-placed source has told the Guardian that playing a fixture in the US on the way to New Zealand in 2029 is likely. PRL's title sponsor, Gallagher, is based in Chicago and celebrates its 100th anniversary in 2027. Harlequins (Twickenham), Saracens (Tottenham Hotspur Stadium) and Bristol (Principality Stadium) have all staged matches away from their regular homes this season to great success. Asked about taking fixtures abroad, and if a return to the States was a prospect, the Premiership Rugby chief executive, Simon Massie-Taylor, said: 'Yeah, but you need to do it strategically. The obvious point is the US and we've had US games before and they've been flash in the pans, at the wrong time of the season, in the wrong area, in the wrong stadiums with the wrong teams. But there is an opportunity in the buildup to the 2031 World Cup, we've also got a US partner who are coming up to their 100th anniversary. 'It needs to lead to something. It's about maxing out what we've got domestically first, which is why sell-outs are so important. That needs to continue for these big games to exist, and then you start moving beyond your shores.' Advertisement Of the rebrand, Premiership Rugby's chief growth officer, Rob Calder, said: 'This is not formal, corporate or traditional. It's got grit, just like our competition. It's a physical contest that showcases power, pace and incredible skill under pressure, so we are unashamedly going to talk about physicality, intensity, extreme athleticism and the grit of top-flight rugby. 'This is about big hits, it's intense, it's full contact and it's unflinching. We know this works as we've spoken to the players, and the things they've said in the process are 'promote the players. Show the game, the aggression, the gladiatorial nature of the game, and give the brand the intensity to match'.' PRL chiefs have also confirmed that next season is set to start on a Thursday, two days before the women's World Cup final, in an effort to avoid a clash with the Twickenham showpiece. It is likely to be a one-off in the short-term but, with next year's Six Nations also starting on a Thursday at the request of broadcasters, midweek matches could become a more regular feature further down the line. Officials have also revealed that they intend to trial away sections at more matches next season after doing so at Saracens and Leicester in April.
