&w=3840&q=100)
Why India will hold census after 15 years, beginning in 2026
India will carry out its overdue population census, along with caste enumeration, in two phases, starting from snowy states and UTs of Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand in October 2026. For the rest of the country, the exercise will begin from March 2027. Supposed to be held in 2021, the process was deferred. Here's why read more
India will carry out its population census in two phases. The first phase will begin in October 2026 in the snowy states and Union Territories of Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand.
The enumeration exercise, which will also entail a caste census, will be conducted for the rest of the country with the reference date of March 1, 2027. 'The notification for the intent of conducting the Population Census with these reference dates will be published in the official gazette tentatively on 16.06.2025, as per provision of section 3 of Census Act 1948", the Ministry of Home Affairs said in a statement on Wednesday (June 4).
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The decennial census was last held in 2011. The next enumeration was to be done in 2021, but the Centre postponed it due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Let's take a closer look.
India's census history
A census is a statistical pool of information about a country's population and its socio-economic status.
From religion, age and gender to literacy levels, housing and migration, the census contains a wide range of data about people.
The British Raj started the census exercise in 1872. Between 1881 and 1931, the Indian census listed all castes. The caste enumeration was also done in 1941 – during World War II, but the data was not released.
Caste was last enumerated in 1931 in the then undivided India. The data revealed the country had 4,147 castes besides depressed classes or Dalits.
A caste census tabulates the castes of all Indians, particularly the Other Backward Classes or OBCs.
The first census in independent India was conducted in 1951. Since then, the exercise has not included the enumeration of castes, except for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).
This will change as India holds its long-overdue census soon. In April, the Centre announced it would carry out caste enumeration as part of the forthcoming regular census in a 'transparent' manner. The population census 2027 will include the caste census as well.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Population Census-2027 to be conducted in two phases along with enumeration of castes
Read here: https://t.co/5Nt4QOPqda@HMOIndia @PIB_India pic.twitter.com/avUqB878d2 — Spokesperson, Ministry of Home Affairs (@PIBHomeAffairs) June 4, 2025
How census is conducted
It is a two-step process, beginning with house-listing and numbering exercise. After this, the counting of population is done.
For house-listing, the details of all buildings – permanent or temporary – are gathered, along with their type, assets and amenities. After a list of all houses is prepared, the actual population enumeration is done.
As Indian Express noted, this house-listing step is generally done in the middle of the year before the census year. The counting of people traditionally takes place in February of the census year.
When this timeline is followed, the numbers reveal India's population as on midnight on March 1 in the census year.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A security guard (unseen) manually changes a number to update the population clock board displayed outside the International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) in Mumbai on June 2, 2023. File Photo/AFP
Why delaying census is bad
It has been 14 years since India last held its census. The 2011 population enumeration revealed the country had 121 crore people and the sex ratio was 940 females per 1,000 males.
After the 2021 census was deferred due to Covid-19, it was the first time in India's 150-year history of population enumeration that the exercise did not happen on time.
The Constitution mandates population enumeration, but the Census of India Act of 1948 does not specify its timing or periodicity.
Even after normalcy resumed, India did not hold its decennial census. The Centre and state governments have to rely on outdated data to formulate policies for the citizens.
The census provides accurate data that guides planning, administrative and economic decisions of the government. It is the basis for every social, economic and other indicator.
Emphasising the importance of data in a democracy, Amy Kapcynski, professor of Law at Yale School, says, 'Data are not something merely wielded by democratic governments, but also something that constitutes them. Data are not simply used by democracies but play a formative role in shaping and creating the demos, the 'we the people' who are supposed to rule.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Only the census captures granular village-level data. According to Scroll, a census delay will affect many government policies and hurt India's planning for its outreach programmes.
The biggest hit will be felt by India's Public Distribution System, under which it gives subsidised food. Scroll noted that crores of people are not receiving the scheme's benefits due to the government depending on more than a decade-old data.
However, it would not be wise to rush the process. For an error-free census, the exercise depends on the accuracy of the questionnaire. Only then can the government devise policies that favour the people.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
India's Extreme Poverty Fell Sharply To 5.3% In 2022-23 From 27.1% In 2011-12: World Bank
Last Updated: Only 75.24 million people were living in extreme poverty in India during 2022-23, a drastic reduction from 344.47 million in 2011-12, according to the data India has made significant strides in reducing its extreme poverty rate, which fell to 5.3% in 2022–23 from 27.1% in 2011–12, according to updated World Bank data. This remarkable decline signals a transformative shift in the country's economic landscape over the past decade. The figures are noteworthy: only 75.24 million people were living in extreme poverty in India during 2022–23, a drastic reduction from 344.47 million in 2011–12. This indicates that 269 million individuals were lifted out of extreme poverty over approximately 11 years. Such progress highlights the effectiveness of government initiatives, economic reforms, and improved access to essential services, say analysts. The World Bank's assessment, based on the $3.00 per day international poverty line (using 2021 prices), shows a broad-based reduction across both rural and urban areas. While the overall extreme poverty rate fell to 5.3%, if measured by the earlier $2.15 poverty rate (based on 2017 prices), only 2.3% of the Indian population lived in extreme poverty in 2022–23, down from 16.2% in 2011–12. This effectively lifted 171 million people above that specific poverty line. This sharp decline was uniformly observed, with rural extreme poverty falling from 18.4% to 2.8% and urban extreme poverty reducing from 10.7% to 1.1% between 2011–12 and 2022–23. The narrowing gap between rural and urban poverty indicates that the benefits of economic growth have reached various segments of the population. (With agency inputs) First Published: June 07, 2025, 00:04 IST
New Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Road to justice for the Bengaluru XI
To blame any of the victims would be perverse beyond belief, dealing the unkindest of cuts to the families of those who lost their lives. Yet, it is with deepest sadness that it must be recorded that what happened was not the city's 'defect' or a sporting negligence—it was an Indian tragedy. Repeatedly, when crowds gather, for one cause or another, tragedy unfolds; yet, as a collective, we learn nothing. There is no doubt that the events of Wednesday afternoon have shaken Indian society's consciousness, but not so much that it will act as a deterrent. Not so much that there will be any changes of consequence when it comes to developing infrastructure that can safely handle large crowds, spontaneous surges of people or exuberant gatherings. Not thoroughly enough to force people in power to pause and get to the bottom of why something that should never have happened occurred. A probe has been ordered, arrests may be made, officials suspended and monetary compensation promised. This is a templated response. You can transpose the name of the team or sport, the venue, or the occasion with a religious gathering, a clamour to board a train—and the story would remain depressingly the same. They dare not say it aloud, but there will be a few who will look at the episode and think that only 11 people died. In India, it's not a number of fatalities that triggers righteous outrage. In 2005, at least 258 died in Satara, Maharashtra during a pilgrimage. In 2013, more than 115 were killed in a bridge collapse in over the Godavari in Andhra Pradesh. In 2024, the official count in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh was 121; the trigger was a tent collapse. In sports, globally, the numbers are equally terrifying: 300 in Peru at a football game in 1964, 93 in Nepal in 1988, and 126 in Ghana in 2001. In terms of numbers, the Hillsborough tragedy of 1989 where 97 people lost their lives at the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest in Sheffield is probably the most high-profile, not least because the victims' families banded together to mount a protracted campaign for justice. It took 27 years for the UK courts to charge those responsible In India, with the judicial system so overburdened that even the simplest of disputes can take decades to resolve, who knows when, if ever, those responsible for the events of Bengaluru 2025 will be brought to book.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Vijay Mallya relates how he told Arun Jaitley he was flying to the UK before he left India
TOI correspondent from London: Fugitive liquor tycoon Vijay Mallya has told a podcast, in a rare interview, that he told the late former finance minister Arun Jaitley that he was about to fly out of India to London before he left for the airport in March 2016. At the time there was supposed to be a CBI lookout circular (LOC) issued against him. Mallya told 'Figuring Out with Raj Shamani' he was not aware of any LOC against him, nor that it had been downgraded by the CBI from detaining him to informing immigration of authorities of his travel plans. He told Shamani that certain TV anchors and the Indian govt want to see him in 'jail clothes, eating jail food' in Tihar and spending the rest of his life behind bars. 'If that is what is inevitable, what options do I have? It might be inevitable, I'm not an astrologer. I will fight my way in court.' He said: 'I told FM Arun Jaitley before leaving for the airport and then I flew from Delhi to London on the way to Geneva for a meeting which was fixed months ago. I told the then finance minister because I went from Parliament to Delhi airport. When this news hit the media, once again, it created a storm. People went running to Mr Jaitley. He denied meeting me. A Congress MP saw us and then said to the media 'No, I saw them together'. Mr Jaitley had to retract his statement and say 'Yes, yes I met him but only while walking — it was a fleeting meeting'.' 'I never said I went to Mr Jaitley's office, sat in front of him, had tea with him. All I said is I told the finance minister while leaving, I'm going to London and going to Geneva for a meeting, please tell the banks to sit across the table and settle with me. How long does this once sentencetake? You see the way he denied it, and then when a Congress MP pointed out his mistake that he saw us, he quickly changed.' He also said he had always planned to go back to India but his Indian passport was revoked. In the four-hour podcast Mallya also said he would be prepared to return to India. 'If I have the assurance of a fair trial and assurance of dignified existence in India, I will think about returning to India seriously. ' He then reminded Shamani of the judgment in the Sanjay Bhandari case which found 'Indian detention conditions a violation of Article 3 of the ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights)', which may mean he could not be extradited now. When asked why he had not gone already as he had lost his extradition battle in the courts, the 69-year-old said: 'My stay in England is fully legitimate. There is more than the particular case you are referring to. There are ongoing proceedings in this country. It's one of the legal battles I am fighting,' he said. This suggests he may have applied for asylum.
