Big business says it will transform productivity. Unions say it will destroy jobs. Labor's in the middle
Big business and unions are on a collision course over Labor's plans to curb the use of artificial intelligence – a policy with potential to create another flashpoint with the Trump administration.
The federal government has been mulling new laws or regulations to limit the potentially damaging effect of some automated tools, mirroring moves in Europe. The EU attracted the wrath of US Vice-President JD Vance, who said in February that 'excessive regulation of the AI sector could kill a transformative industry'.
Australia's most influential corporate lobby group, the Business Council of Australia, is calling on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to shun calls for heavier regulation stemming from the ethics debates surrounding advances such as OpenAI.
The argument to avoid curbs puts the business lobby on the side of Treasury secretary Steven Kennedy, who said last week that AI presented immense economic opportunities and existing regulations should be favoured instead of new rules. But unions are pushing for federal regulations to protect workers, setting up a fresh contest on industrial relations in Labor's second term.
BCA boss Bran Black wants schools to teach about AI in primary school and is arguing for large boosts to research in the sector to drive up Australia's sagging rate of productivity and material living standards.
Australia must avoid EU-style laws which are too broad, according to Black, a former adviser to ex-NSW premier Dominic Perrottet.
'We should always start from the premise that the application and use of AI is overwhelmingly positive and will increase our collective prosperity,' Black told this masthead.
The BCA is pointing to existing applications of AI to prove its potential as an economic boon, including Commonwealth Bank using machines to read documents, BHP using the technology to manage resources and save water, and Salesforce addressing 84 per cent of customer inquiries without human involvement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
8 minutes ago
- West Australian
Push to get 'damn fine' Australian products into Europe
Australia stands firm in free trade negotiations with the European Union in the new environment of Donald Trump's tariffs. Trade Minister Don Farrell walked away from the bloc's previous offer following rounds of negotiations because it failed to give Australian agricultural products greater market access, which remains the sticking point. Senator Farrell met face-to-face with the EU's trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic for the first time on Wednesday, on the sidelines of an OECD meeting in Paris. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said there was bipartisan support for free and fair trade. "We will seek a deal that is good enough for Australia," he told reporters on Thursday. "If it benefits us, we'll be in it. If it doesn't, we'll continue to not sign up to something that is not in our national interest." Mr Albanese said Australia's free trade agreement with the UK had led to an increase in meat exports, in addition to wine. "Why is that the case? Because our products are damn fine and they are in demand right around the world," he said. Talks for a deal with the EU began in 2018, and that involves consulting all 27 member states before an agreement can be sealed. There are more than 450 million consumers in Europe. Countries across the world seek to diversity trade in the face of the US president's tariffs, with levies on steel and aluminium since doubling to 50 per cent. Australian products are subject to a 10 per cent baseline tariff. The trade minister said an agreement with the bloc would build resilience in a rapidly changing global environment. "Both Australia and the EU recognise that now is the time to strengthen our economic partnership, and we're working through the remaining issues to try and finalise the deal," he said.
Sky News AU
9 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Sky News host and NSW Treasurer exchange fiery barbs over changes to workers compensation as contentious bill causes standoff
Sky News host Laura Jayes has scolded NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey in a heated on-air exchange, as contentious reforms to workers' psychological compensation hits a major snag amid ballooning costs for small business. The NSW government's sweeping reforms to workers compensation laws have suffered a setback, with the opposition and crossbench stifling Premier Chris Minns' plans to clamp down on the surging cost of psychological injury claims. NSW Premier Chris Minns is seeking to overhaul the existing workers compensation system by considerably limiting the state's 4.5 million workers' ability to claim for psychological injury at work because of trauma and other factors. The government wants to raise the whole-person impairment (WPI) threshold from 20 to 30 per cent, of which is a medical scale used to measure the severity of injury sustained at a workplace. The proposed changes have incensed the Greens, crossbench, and opposition in addition to unions and the legal and medical professions, with experts outlining that an impairment as low as 15 per cent would mean an individual was unable to function independently in almost all domains of life. NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey urged the upper house to pass the legislation on Thursday in the strictest possible terms and reiterated that if the laws were not enacted businesses would face a 36 per cent increase in workers compensation premiums due to the sizeable number of claims. 'The reason why these reforms are urgent is because the system is failing injured workers right now. It's failing the 340,000 small businesses that are paying in it,' Mr Mookhey said. Yet he admitted that even if the changes to the WPI were made the move would not result in any immediate budget savings. "These changes, whether they go through this week or they go through in the budget week, won't impact the budget result,' Mr Mookhey said, conceding that the system was 'broken' and needed to be made more 'sustainable'. However, Jayes rebuffed the Treasurer's assertion that the changes would ensure the system would be made fairer for workers, stating 'you are trying to fix it by denying people with psychological injuries that they sustained at work from getting full and ongoing compensation'. Mookhey confessed that 'this is a controversial change here in New South Wales', with Jayes once again pressing the Treasurer if he accepted the bill would 'lock people out of the compensation that they deserve?' Mookhey responded with a blunt, 'no' and argued there are '88,000 people who use the workers' compensation system each year, of them 12,000 are psychological injury and within the 12,000, the number of workers that would be impacted came out to be roughly 900 if it was applied last year'. 'We've turned up with a reform package that's accepted that this is a broken system and in response to that we've seen both the Liberal Party choose to play politics with the Greens Party knowing full well that the consequence of that is to trap injured workers,' Mookhey said. Jayes blasted the Treasurer for playing 'politics', reiterating 'the Parliament works in the way that the opposition and the Greens can move amendments, they are not talking about abolishing this completely, they are only moving amendments'. The Coalition party room met on Tuesday and agreed to insist on a half-dozen amendments including removing the section raising the whole person impairment threshold, which is the underpinning element of the legislation. Mr Mookhey lashed his opposition counterparts for advocating higher costs for small businesses and delaying the bill ahead of the fast-approaching state budget. 'It's failing the 340,000 small businesses that are paying in it, those 340 thousand small businesses should know that the party that purports to defend their interests, are right now playing political games with the Greens Party at their expense''. The Coalition has indicated that if its amendments are not agreed to then it will send the bill to a further inquiry, whilst the Greens and crossbench have expressed serious reservations about the reforms. The Icare nominal insurer's workers' compensation scheme recorded a net loss of $1.88bn last financial year.
The Age
9 minutes ago
- The Age
Could Anthony Albanese be caught up in Trump's new US visa ban?
It's no secret President Donald Trump's reach extends beyond the United States, but a key element of his second presidency could have unprecedented consequences on the rest of the world for years to come – and we're not talking about his tariffs. Speaking with Samantha Selinger-Morris on The Morning Edition podcast, our international and political editor Peter Hartcher delves into the transcontinental influence of Trump's 'Make America Great Again' mindset, and the hidden announcement sparking a new level of global interference not seen from the US since the end of the Cold War. Click the player or watch the video below to listen to the full episode, or read on for an edited extract of the conversation. Selinger-Morris: You've written about a monumental announcement … that Donald Trump said on Thursday, about how he plans to export his MAGA revolution to the world. So what did he say? Hartcher: Until now ... a lot of this stuff has been; you could interpret it as just Trump mouthing off, rather than structured into government policy. But on Thursday, US time, last week, the administration notified the Congress that they were going to create a new office within the State Department. Loading They gutted, they cut, by something like 80 per cent the existing Bureau Of Human Rights ... and they have created something called the Office of Natural Rights, which is a new thing, new phenomenon. And it seems that this is the vehicle by which [they] will spread their values abroad through the State Department and its machinations. The Office of Natural rights is going to be opposed to digital censorship, as they call it, mass migration, restrictions on religious freedom, and numerous other assaults on democratic self-governance. The one that Marco Rubio has most emphasised in the last couple of weeks in an interview in the US was the right of countries to … come up with their own definitions of free speech.
